Poll

Who would win?

North America
7 (13.5%)
North America with crippiling losses
8 (15.4%)
Europe
10 (19.2%)
Europe with crippling losses
16 (30.8%)
'murica will always prevail, why is Europe even on there
11 (21.2%)

Total Members Voted: 51

Voting closed: June 01, 2014, 03:08:03 pm

Author Topic: The Scenario Wars | "What if" Wars : Japan vs China  (Read 17531 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Riddlez

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4845
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Riddlez
  • Side: Neutral
Re: The Scenario Wars | "What if" Wars : Japan vs China
« Reply #135 on: August 08, 2014, 12:34:05 pm »
Thats a bit of a shit system :D

Yes. It's the same as the pre-NATO system. I forgot what is was called (Duuring, remind us, please), but it was basically NATO with Veto rights (I think for everyone) and a council. It was horrible. Nothing was ever done because not everyone would agree with everyone.
Probably one of the very few old-timers here who hasn't been a regimental leader.

Offline Toffee

  • King in the North
  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 5365
  • Ex 77y Pfc, 93rd Private and 18e Grenadier
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: The Scenario Wars | "What if" Wars : Japan vs China
« Reply #136 on: August 08, 2014, 04:47:11 pm »
How do you think the system should work?

Offline Riddlez

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4845
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Riddlez
  • Side: Neutral
Re: The Scenario Wars | "What if" Wars : Japan vs China
« Reply #137 on: August 08, 2014, 11:19:01 pm »
How do you think the system should work?

NATO is a good organization, truly. But I think countries ought to have more say to which countries they ally. I think NATO should only be a geographical alliance, not an idealistic one, as it appears to be now. A single country should be able to consider going to CAR and decide to help the population there. It shouldn't be something decided by the UN or NATO.
Probably one of the very few old-timers here who hasn't been a regimental leader.