China wouldn't let North Korea do that.
America would save the day
What is this? Red Dawn?
. Honestly, I don't know why China doesn't just take North Korea over and turn it into a much larger DMZ. It would calm the world down, given that the nukes are gotten rid of. Without detonation. Preferably.
What is this? Red Dawn?Essentially a discussion thread for if that were to happen. As in, what could happen from it and how the war would go, who would win, etc.
Don't the North Koreans have one of the largest militaries in the world?Maybe in the top 20, but they don't have the resources to make an offensive, the country is slowly starving to death.
North Korean Army is the equivalent of a yari ashigaru spam but IRL. Sad, but true.
North Korean Army is the equivalent of a yari ashigaru spam but IRL. Sad, but true.
They could be a lot more, it's just that they don't have very good equipment or vehicles.
They're not communists, they're some weird human deity worshipping cult-nation.They could be a lot more, it's just that they don't have very good equipment or vehicles.
Because they don't have any money, because they are communists = Auto win for western countries.
They're not communists, they're some weird human deity worshipping cult-nation.They could be a lot more, it's just that they don't have very good equipment or vehicles.
Because they don't have any money, because they are communists = Auto win for western countries.
No but it's a system of government, like communism which people use the word too indirectly and freely.They're not communists, they're some weird human deity worshipping cult-nation.They could be a lot more, it's just that they don't have very good equipment or vehicles.
Because they don't have any money, because they are communists = Auto win for western countries.
That isn't an economic system...
Are you going to remove my freedom of speech now?Wow, you sound like one of those political correctness fags.
COMMIE ALERT
Yorkshire starts the fight for it's independace, also known as the War Of Southern Agression. ;DThe vast armies of Yorkshire would destroy the rest of Britain and win it's independence! And after the world... :P
Confederate States of Yorkshire 8)Yorkshire starts the fight for it's independace, also known as the War Of Southern Agression. ;DThe vast armies of Yorkshire would destroy the rest of Britain and win it's independence! And after the world... :P
India has a better military, but Pakistan could draw on Islamic extremists from around the Middle East (Iran and others). Then you have to throw in Kashmir, which is an incredibly important area for both countries.Guerilla warfare is usefull mostly only on county's own land, i expect, that sabotage actions on enemy land wont be succesfull, if they wouldnt have the support of local people majority. I would say, that in land conflict India's army will beat Pakistan's one. But, also, foreign support will have the high value, not decisive, but quite high.
India has a better military, but Pakistan could draw on Islamic extremists from around the Middle East (Iran and others). Then you have to throw in Kashmir, which is an incredibly important area for both countries.
Pakistan exists because of its army. Most of its GDP goes to strengthening its army, although the Indians could muster many million men in a war, the Pakistanis would be spending much money in the war effort, and I recall reading an article about the superiority of Pakistani troops to the simple Indian soldier.India has a better military, but Pakistan could draw on Islamic extremists from around the Middle East (Iran and others). Then you have to throw in Kashmir, which is an incredibly important area for both countries.
Why would Pakistan get extremists which have been terrorizing the nation for the past decade?
Pakistan exists because of its army. Most of its GDP goes to strengthening its army, although the Indians could muster many million men in a war, the Pakistanis would be spending much money in the war effort, and I recall reading an article about the superiority of Pakistani troops to the simple Indian soldier.India has a better military, but Pakistan could draw on Islamic extremists from around the Middle East (Iran and others). Then you have to throw in Kashmir, which is an incredibly important area for both countries.
Why would Pakistan get extremists which have been terrorizing the nation for the past decade?
I suppose I was vague, in that I should have specified that people from Pakistan don't like India, thus, more people would want to join in on the war, whether it be out of nationalism or a hatred of Hindus. I probably should not have said extremists, my bad there.
The Hindu's have a special weapon though: they don't fear death. After all, they reincarnate.
What they believe, like any religion in any part of the world, that if you do what your church leaders say is right, you go to heaven.
I'm 100% confident that if some great mufti declared that killing 250 cats in your life-time gets you into heaven, the same people who kill 'the enemy' for a spot in heaven, would be doing that.
Who would benefit from that sort of war?Evil Empires of China and Russia.
And the machiavelic Swiss bankersWho would benefit from that sort of war?Evil Empires of China and Russia.
Europe has 3 times the populace of the US, we would rek the shit outta them.
Wouldn't work, espescially if the catholic church tries to make a bid for more supporters in non catholic countries.Europe has 3 times the populace of the US, we would rek the shit outta them.
United Europe would be fucking wrecking everybody. Second largest population, by far the largest economy etc.
How sweet it would be :(
A man can dream.
What about a northern european union of protestant nations :D?Nah, our economies are in the shitter at the moment.
All the best economies in europe together, GG?
What about a northern european union of protestant nations :D?Nah, our economies are in the shitter at the moment.
All the best economies in europe together, GG?
Wouldn't work, espescially if the catholic church tries to make a bid for more supporters in non catholic countries.Hi. Should I introduce you to the year 2014?
#Free North europe.
I think this guy's a plotter, he's trying to blow up parliment!Wouldn't work, espescially if the catholic church tries to make a bid for more supporters in non catholic countries.Hi. Should I introduce you to the year 2014?
#Free North europe.
Nah really, the Thirty Years War is over since a long time heh.
Who would benefit from that sort of war?It's a what if thread. It's just opinions and how people interpret it.
Wouldn't Canada side with the UK though, lol? They share a head of state, after all.
Wouldn't Canada side with the UK though, lol? They share a head of state, after all.
By that logic Ireland would have never rebelled.
Wouldn't Canada side with the UK though, lol? They share a head of state, after all.
That's America against Canada, not Europe against North America.I think that the idea is that Europe then rushes to Canada's aid?
Wouldn't Canada side with the UK though, lol? They share a head of state, after all.
Could we maybe say Canada got invaded by America? Could be a good reason for EU to go to war.
But the Canadians brought it on themselves in that case, why would Europe bother to get involved?Because fuck 'Merica? I dunno, if the Canadians wanted to take out Obama he was probably doing some bad shit that Europe wouldn't like either. I dunno, maybe they just like Canada more?
yeahThat's America against Canada, not Europe against North America.I think that the idea is that Europe then rushes to Canada's aid?
Then I'd change my vote to a US loss, we don't have the numbers or the tech to handle ALL of Europe and Canada at once.And if the US were the aggressors they would also lose the moment of surprise which would make Europe able to mobilize it's armies...
How about Argentina & Brazil vs. The UK in a war that started over the Falklands (Is that how you spell it?) but escalated when Argentina persuaded Brazil to join the war?There wouldn't be a war started by Argentina in the first place, as they piss themselves whenever they hear someone speak English.
If "behind every blade of grass there would be a rifle"... gg no re.Considering that Americans rank 2nd in the world for 'average body mass' (weight), I don't really believe that your quote is valid...
Lol China? They won't want to do anything at all, their economy is most dependent on the American one and vice versa. They will keep quietAs far as i know, they hold major part of US abroad debt, yea, dependant, sure.
Lol China? They won't want to do anything at all, their economy is most dependent on the American one and vice versa. They will keep quietAs far as i know, they hold major part of US abroad debt, yea, dependant, sure.
Lol China? They won't want to do anything at all, their economy is most dependent on the American one and vice versa. They will keep quietAs far as i know, they hold major part of US abroad debt, yea, dependant, sure.
Considering that Americans rank 2nd in the world for 'average body mass' (weight), I don't really believe that your quote is valid...
Lol China? They won't want to do anything at all, their economy is most dependent on the American one and vice versa. They will keep quiet
Lol China? They won't want to do anything at all, their economy is most dependent on the American one and vice versa. They will keep quiet
Watch the news lad.
They just backed Russia in all of this, and it's quite obvious who'd they side with in a major conflict.
Lol China? They won't want to do anything at all, their economy is most dependent on the American one and vice versa. They will keep quiet
Watch the news lad.
They just backed Russia in all of this, and it's quite obvious who'd they side with in a major conflict.
I do watch the news, not the propaganda news, but the actual news. And again, in a major conflict, they would not side with anyone. Unless they want their entire economy to fall apart, therefore not being able to upkeep their entire military infrastructure.
Where does it say they would back Russia if a major conflict erupted? lol
Morale in the Russian Ground Forces is actually really high. Fascist propaganda does wonders.Fascists. Lol.
Russia's army is 2gud4 Ukraine.My god, as a former superpower and the largest nation in the world, I would hope so.
There's no such thing as the 'UN Forces'.I think he may have mistaken the UN with the NATO.
Wanna talk about autism? UN Peacekeepers are a great starting pointThere's no such thing as the 'UN Forces'.I think he may have mistaken the UN with the NATO.
The only military branch of the UN are the peacekeepers.
China would spam their troops and Japan would spam their robots, with the repodruction rate of the chinese and the production rate of the Japanese robots, the war will never end.
Which can only be used in UN missions that are passed trough the Peace-council, in which Russia has a veto.I'm not very knowledgeable on the subject as you see :D but if Russia was breaking some international law would the other members of the UN not be allowed to vote to send in the peacekeepers without Russia having a say?
Thats a bit of a shit system :D
How do you think the system should work?