Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - DE14HANNES

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13
31
The Mess Hall / Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
« on: October 29, 2020, 06:54:10 am »
Justice strikes again

32
The Mess Hall / Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
« on: October 27, 2020, 10:00:42 pm »
Nr6

achieved what

 

Ok Ok, maybe we didnt win the CCL or CNWL but m8 i think winning matches or making some good placements is not nothing in all these years

33
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: October 25, 2020, 09:54:09 pm »

34
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: October 24, 2020, 04:32:10 pm »
Againg talking about unidentified "heavies" and generalizing. "Heavies" are the new "jews" and "freemasons". Who are they exactly, nobody knows.

Kindly acknowledge that there are different players, teams and regiments within that group and many of them never did anything to deserve reputation for delaying and being passive, unlike some players who play exclusively hussars. Nobody had to complain about 3-4h matches in last CNC, when Poland was participating as cuirassiers, just like they are supposed to do now (check out the recordings if you can't take my word for it). Some of the worst aspects of heavy playstyle were exaggerated recently by the confused amateurs from CB, true, but stop acting like that's all there ever was to it. This twisted way of thinking leads you to lash out on a team that doesn't even exist yet, if that is not ridiculous then I don't know what is. Once the team is out there, feel free to hate and criticise it for whatever reason you might find, but address it on it's own merit and not as a part of the punching bag that the vague word "heavies" has been turned into.
This.
Neither hussars, nor heavies have to be entirely passive while playing against each other. They are just forced to if no alternative is given.

+1

35
The Mess Hall / Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
« on: October 23, 2020, 07:00:30 am »
I think no one should rate themself, i felt like it would be arrogant to do this. I mean if you rate yourself tier 1 or 2, for me its like if anyone standing there and screaming: Hey guys i am better then you. But i dont have a problem if someone done it.

37
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: October 17, 2020, 11:54:27 pm »

38
The Mess Hall / Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CCL
« on: October 05, 2020, 09:47:31 pm »
uhh its coming back boys


39
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: October 05, 2020, 04:26:51 pm »

40
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: October 05, 2020, 12:43:41 am »
The match was a waste of time and the price way too high to win this in my opinion

41
Cavalry League / Re: Media
« on: October 04, 2020, 07:06:30 pm »
Rly nice, the match, the video and the text.

42
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 30, 2020, 05:25:42 pm »

43
Cavalry League / Re: Discussion
« on: September 22, 2020, 07:43:05 pm »

44



I wasn't there for the first couple of rounds so the recording will be missing a few. Shame there was no GG's from Animals after our comeback :(

GG


:o Rly, i thought i wrote gg, or not ? mhhh or i dont care at all what the score or how the match was maybe because its a gf

45
god im so happy that the most german cav regs disbanded after the update, so that they dont have to handle this much longer. 



RIP Nr6, Nr4
[close]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13