[RGL3] Main Thread

[Munj]

Even if no would, you wouldnt find out about everytime when one of your guys is doubleregging in any Regiment, thats really hard to controll.

There are 12 regiments currently in the RGL. The 94th is disbanding (from what I understand, don't take my word on it, just what I've heard from some of their members) and several regiments, as part of their regimental guidelines, don't even allow double regging. This makes the option of having a player double regging for another regiment in the RGL, narrowed down to only a few regiments which they could double reg for.  Therefore it would amaze me if the regiment leaders (from the two regiments involved) could not pinpoint which of their members are playing for another regiment in the RGL, either they are incompetent, or they are allowing it to happen. The chance of a regiment leader not knowing is extremely low and if such a leader feels that they would find it difficult to know who was double regging, then they should alter their regimental guidelines so as to prohibit double regging (at least for members which they use for competitive matches).

[Mr_Etherton]

True dis, its obviously hard to control members movements, if people leave and join another that can cause issues sometimes or if people are classed as 'reserves' which lets be honest is just a way  of  most regiments to basically use invites. I mean a 'reserve' should be a player who cannot attend often anymore due to irl issues/technicaly issues/other issues etc. Its quite noticeable that alot of regiments have 'reserves' as players who basically just dont play the game other than comps, now surely thats an invite :p i mean you should really be attending what like 50% of your regiments events to be considered an active member, if you a reserve and are always available but DONT attend simply because its not NWL/RGL then really a reg is just giving that player a free entry card to any comp they play without that player ever having to actually come.

I aint saying every reg does it but its a good amount that have this type of 'reserve' would be nice to see this sorted tho as it does cause complications if you go into a server and see players who you know forewell dont even play for that reg yet can play as they are a 'reserve' of said regiment 

[Carolus.]

Even if no would, you wouldnt find out about everytime when one of your guys is doubleregging in any Regiment, thats really hard to controll.

There are 12 regiments currently in the RGL. The 94th is disbanding (from what I understand, don't take my word on it, just what I've heard from some of their members) and several regiments, as part of their regimental guidelines, don't even allow double regging. This makes the option of having a player double regging for another regiment in the RGL, narrowed down to only a few regiments which they could double reg for.  Therefore it would amaze me if the regiment leaders (from the two regiments involved) could not pinpoint which of their members are playing for another regiment in the RGL, either they are incompetent, or they are allowing it to happen. The chance of a regiment leader not knowing is extremely low and if such a leader feels that they would find it difficult to know who was double regging, then they should alter their regimental guidelines so as to prohibit double regging (at least for members which they use for competitive matches).

bottomline the regs that wants a loophole and intend to cheat with inv/double regers will always claim its an "effort" to keep track of members.

[Moussolini]

I don't think double-regging will be a major problem, seeing as the 94th is maybe disbanding in the near future and the fact that 17e is no longer in existence. 

[Louisss]

15TH USES INVITESSSSSSSSSSSSSS !!!!

[Carolus.]

I don't think double-regging will be a major problem, seeing as the 94th is maybe disbanding in the near future and the fact that 17e is no longer in existence. 

Oh snap son

[Lone]

I dont think Reservists are a Problem... As Long as they don't Play for 2 Regiments participating At RGL and aren't Invites it Is no Problem because at all they Are more or less retired Players (as I define Reservists) or players Who don't attend very often, but I don't See a Problem if they only Play for one Regiment in the RGL.

As this seems to be an issue the captains are complaining about, I had an Idea I've already told Rommel about, making some Lists for every Regiment participating. Where they give the names of the Players that Will probably Play the Whole Season (This System Is running for example at NWGFL, there even with the ID's). Changes (Leaving People new People etc) would be told to the organisers or Whoever Is in Charge of this. Would make it kinna easier for all, especially the referees, to avoid Invites. The Number of Players on this List could be limited to 25 or 30. Just an Idea. Wouldnt be that intense to Manage.

[PrideofNi]

I dont think Reservists are a Problem... As Long as they don't Play for 2 Regiments participating At RGL and aren't Invites it Is no Problem because at all they Are more or less retired Players (as I define Reservists) or players Who don't attend very often, but I don't See a Problem if they only Play for one Regiment in the RGL.

As this seems to be an issue the captains are complaining about, I had an Idea I've already told Rommel about, making some Lists for every Regiment participating. Where they give the names of the Players that Will probably Play the Whole Season (This System Is running for example at NWGFL, there even with the ID's). Changes (Leaving People new People etc) would be told to the organisers or Whoever Is in Charge of this. Would make it kinna easier for all, especially the referees, to avoid Invites. The Number of Players on this List could be limited to 25 or 30. Just an Idea. Wouldnt be that intense to Manage.

12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.

[Salakien]

12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.

You want to do some kind of white list for RGL or list of player and monitoring them ? You dont know how to spend your time or what

[PrideofNi]

12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.

You want to do some kind of white list for RGL or list of player and monitoring them ? You dont know how to spend your time or what

It would have to be the latter for it to work as Lone described - which is work intense AKA not worth it.

[Carolus.]

I dont think Reservists are a Problem... As Long as they don't Play for 2 Regiments participating At RGL and aren't Invites it Is no Problem because at all they Are more or less retired Players (as I define Reservists) or players Who don't attend very often, but I don't See a Problem if they only Play for one Regiment in the RGL.

As this seems to be an issue the captains are complaining about, I had an Idea I've already told Rommel about, making some Lists for every Regiment participating. Where they give the names of the Players that Will probably Play the Whole Season (This System Is running for example at NWGFL, there even with the ID's). Changes (Leaving People new People etc) would be told to the organisers or Whoever Is in Charge of this. Would make it kinna easier for all, especially the referees, to avoid Invites. The Number of Players on this List could be limited to 25 or 30. Just an Idea. Wouldnt be that intense to Manage.

12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.

Don't worry. If you save your breath I think a man of your stature can pull it off

[PrideofNi]

I dont think Reservists are a Problem... As Long as they don't Play for 2 Regiments participating At RGL and aren't Invites it Is no Problem because at all they Are more or less retired Players (as I define Reservists) or players Who don't attend very often, but I don't See a Problem if they only Play for one Regiment in the RGL.

As this seems to be an issue the captains are complaining about, I had an Idea I've already told Rommel about, making some Lists for every Regiment participating. Where they give the names of the Players that Will probably Play the Whole Season (This System Is running for example at NWGFL, there even with the ID's). Changes (Leaving People new People etc) would be told to the organisers or Whoever Is in Charge of this. Would make it kinna easier for all, especially the referees, to avoid Invites. The Number of Players on this List could be limited to 25 or 30. Just an Idea. Wouldnt be that intense to Manage.

12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.

Don't worry. If you save your breath I think a man of your stature can pull it off

That probably sounded so cool in Swedish 

[Carolus.]

I dont think Reservists are a Problem... As Long as they don't Play for 2 Regiments participating At RGL and aren't Invites it Is no Problem because at all they Are more or less retired Players (as I define Reservists) or players Who don't attend very often, but I don't See a Problem if they only Play for one Regiment in the RGL.

As this seems to be an issue the captains are complaining about, I had an Idea I've already told Rommel about, making some Lists for every Regiment participating. Where they give the names of the Players that Will probably Play the Whole Season (This System Is running for example at NWGFL, there even with the ID's). Changes (Leaving People new People etc) would be told to the organisers or Whoever Is in Charge of this. Would make it kinna easier for all, especially the referees, to avoid Invites. The Number of Players on this List could be limited to 25 or 30. Just an Idea. Wouldnt be that intense to Manage.

12 x 25 = 300 people to manage. Then compare who played with the respective list, then managing the 12 lists. It seems quite intense to me.

Don't worry. If you save your breath I think a man of your stature can pull it off

That probably sounded so cool in Swedish 

More like bork börk bork

[John Price]

Just got back home an hour ago, I hope you didnt use up all them spicy memes without me

[Moussolini]

15thYR 15-5 72nd