Author Topic: Epic last stands  (Read 16687 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ililsa

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 458
  • This knife of Sheffield steel
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Retired_Ililsa
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #15 on: January 29, 2013, 07:09:04 pm »
Aha, now I have an excuse to talk about the glorious last stand of the 10th Regiment of Foot.

Northern Spain, 1813.

The situation leading to this was a dire one, and would lead towards the most brutal and paid for conquest of the war. As Wellington's forces pushed across the Pyrenees into France to take a foothold in Toulouse, William Beresford's ragged and beaten forces were left to co-operate with a guerilla army in eradicating the last of the French forces in the Peninsular.

The army was crippled, before it even reached Vittoria, by a French backed assassin who murdered Beresford and left his forces to advance leaderless, with only a handful of guns and some units beaten down to around 30 or 40 men.

One of these units was the 10th Regiment of Foot, a furious band of men who had been fighting their way through Spain for the past two years.

In the disastrous opening battle in Vittoria-Gasteiz, the remainder of Beresford's army found itself caught between two French generals and their fresh, well supplied armies which included units of Napoleon's elite Imperial Guard. Its ragged forces set up with cannons firing on one army, and a desperate band of infantry guarding them.

As it became apparent that the army couldn't hold both sides for long, the British light cavalry gave their lives in a desperate attempt to slow the French army advancing to their rear, it was by that point a futile act of defiance; French victory in the battle was a certainty.

But even as the masses of French soldiers came to either side of them, the British Infantry held fast. None more than the 10th.

One of the French Generals, eager for glory saw this ragged group of infantry watching the rear of the British Army and saw it as weak, he and his staff officers charged in, expecting their heavy horses and sabres to tear through the regiment like hot knives through butter.

Spoiler
[close]

Their charge lacked enough power to break the men of the 10th, however, and they soon fled as officers were killed by the stinging thrusts of the British bayonets, this was when the 10th raised their muskets and fired at the fleeing general, cutting him down with a musket ball in his back.

Meanwhile, behind them, the second French General on the field was cut down by a cannonball, the British army was determined to make the French bleed in its final moments.

Seeing this, the French infantry began their charge, a swarm of blue and white coats overrunning the cannons and leaving the British infantry no choice but to hold their ground and keep shooting with steady determination.
Spoiler
[close]

Unchecked by this, the French were eager to get into hand to hand combat, where they would surely overrun the feeble British lines. The 10th still held their line, their determination to survive showing through in their brutal brawling with the French; Line or Guard, they killed them all the same.
Spoiler

[close]

As more of the British infantry broke, the 10th held their line, hundreds of men around them, fighting tooth and nail.
Spoiler
[close]

By the time they broke off from the French, the 10th had inflicted over 100 casualties, and lost less than 20 men. The rest were, I like to think, captured.
Crawling back to you,
Ever thought of calling when you've had a few? 'cause I always do.
FUCKING MEDIEVAL HIPSTERS

Offline psmith

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 114
  • Validus quod Verus
    • View Profile
  • Nick: FiDO / PSmith
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #16 on: January 29, 2013, 08:49:17 pm »
Bravo Ililsa! 

And here's another that "actually" happened..

« Last Edit: January 29, 2013, 08:51:02 pm by psmith »

Offline Agovich

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 144
  • Left forum, contact: http://tinyurl.com/myhauf9
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #17 on: January 31, 2013, 01:39:36 pm »
The Battle of Neretva, most certainly!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_White


Had enough, left the forum

Contact: Clicky-Steam
[close]

Offline Duuring

  • Duuring
  • ***
  • Posts: 12357
  • Free at last
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #18 on: January 31, 2013, 04:46:36 pm »
The Battle of Neretva, most certainly!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_White




Good god, the cheesiness of those battle scenes  ;D

Offline Tali

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 747
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #19 on: January 31, 2013, 04:54:06 pm »
It would be nice if we could discuss military history, just once, without Agovic showing up to promote his "great" country.

"Guys, We won a battle once, why won't you just understand we are best at everything"

To add to the debate, the Norse viking that single-handedly killed 40 saxons in the battle of Stamford bridge ought to be mentioned.

"But there was one of the Norwegians who withstood the English folk, so that they could not pass over the bridge, nor complete the victory."
- The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle
« Last Edit: January 31, 2013, 04:58:18 pm by Tali »

Offline KillerMongoose

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1432
  • "And I believe I have cut your throat"- Fiore
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Wryngwyrm
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #20 on: January 31, 2013, 07:38:04 pm »
It's okay to be proud of your country's history, also I have heard of that, the Viking at Stamford Bridge, awesome story, especially the way it was described on Badassoftheweek.com

Offline Tali

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 747
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #21 on: January 31, 2013, 09:17:02 pm »
It's okay to be proud of your country's history, also I have heard of that, the Viking at Stamford Bridge, awesome story, especially the way it was described on Badassoftheweek.com

It is one thing to be proud of ones country, but this doesn't mean one have to defile every single historical discussion with the bias that one has.

Offline Agovich

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 144
  • Left forum, contact: http://tinyurl.com/myhauf9
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #22 on: February 01, 2013, 02:39:39 pm »
Excuse me, but since when are Serbia, Bosnia and Croatia my countries?  ;D Montenegrins may have been as commanders of these units, but mainly no Montenegrin partizans took part in the Battle of Neretva, it was mainly people from Serbia and Bosnia, and Croats alongside them....
Had enough, left the forum

Contact: Clicky-Steam
[close]

Offline Duuring

  • Duuring
  • ***
  • Posts: 12357
  • Free at last
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #23 on: February 01, 2013, 02:45:15 pm »
Ah, there you have it. So, basicly no Montenegroins at that battle, except the commanders?

Yeah, that sounds totally reasonable.

Offline Dordak_the_Lost

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 214
  • Faugh a Ballagh!
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #24 on: February 01, 2013, 09:05:02 pm »
Remember the Alamo!

Spoiler
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txcRQedoEyY[/youtube]
[close]

Offline RyanBoss

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 178
    • View Profile
  • Nick: BigBoss
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #25 on: February 04, 2013, 07:07:38 pm »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_for_Height_776

Russians have to do everything a bit more epic.

Offline Skipper

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1069
  • The real Skipper of NW
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Skipper
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #26 on: February 07, 2013, 07:58:35 pm »
This is obviously not a last stand in the sense you are speaking of however the people fought to defend it with their lives. I'm talking about the battle for Stalingrad in WW2. This started when Hitler invaded Russia, he wanted Stalingrad because it had "Stalin" is the name, that's the same reason Stalin was so desperate to defend it and the Russian's and Germans both had a hard time trying to defend and attack it. Stalingrad consisted of lots of close quarters combat, lines being muddled, and civilian casualties. This was the turning point in the war in the east. The Russian soldiers were forced to fight, they would advance in two lines, the first to fight and the second to shoot any who turned to flee.




[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ3bzg-Tvt4[/youtube]
Pirate_Battle_1 Community Rep||||[Former]Groupfighting admin, Jail Break server admin||||88th, 126th, 33rd, 24th, 57th, 2ndCSG, 54th, 4th, 65th, 5Brg, 67th, 57e, 28th

Offline Nipplestockings

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 8609
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #27 on: February 07, 2013, 08:15:23 pm »
Ah, there you have it. So, basicly no Montenegroins at that battle, except the commanders?

Yeah, that sounds totally reasonable.
I'm not saying he's right or you're wrong, but maybe you should give him the benefit of the doubt instead of automatically assuming he's a deluded nationalist.

Offline Duuring

  • Duuring
  • ***
  • Posts: 12357
  • Free at last
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #28 on: February 07, 2013, 08:17:42 pm »
Ah, there you have it. So, basicly no Montenegroins at that battle, except the commanders?

Yeah, that sounds totally reasonable.
I'm not saying he's right or you're wrong, but maybe you should give him the benefit of the doubt instead of automatically assuming he's a deluded nationalist.

But he is a deluded nationalist, automatically making anything he says highly questionable.

He supported that claim by saying wikipedia had a lot of Montenegrins under the marker 'leaders' on the Partisans page.

Offline Tali

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 747
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Epic last stands
« Reply #29 on: February 07, 2013, 09:19:16 pm »
I'm not saying he's right or you're wrong, but maybe you should give him the benefit of the doubt instead of automatically assuming he's a deluded nationalist.

Agovic is a biased nationalist, spewing forth his montenegrin propaganda in every thread, defiling it.