Flying Squirrel Entertainment

The Lounge => Off Topic => The Mess Hall => Topic started by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 12:55:26 am

Title: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 12:55:26 am
Hussars Rated EU

There have been a lot of infrantry lists, and very little cavalry (hussar) lists in the past few years. In my experience it has always been a competitive boost, and a little fun, to add ratings to players. I have ran a project much like this one before, but rated mostly on my own and in an inefficient way. In order to avoid any personal bias, and make the ratings as accurate as possible; I have invited some of the scene's oldest, most knowledgable and best players to all give their input. I have taken all these ratings and calculated the average.

A massive thanks to: Remao, Dokletian, Erik, Stannis, DeLaBedoyere, Cage, MajorMark, Thyrell, Treiz, Soartex, DarkHawk and Carlok  for their valuable input on these ratings.

This time around I have decided to divide players into tiers instead of giving them points, this gives a wider representation of what a particular player is capable of. Tiers may change throughout the tournament depending on performances, but only if there are major differences.

If there are any inaccuracies in regiments, nationalities and/or spelling, let me know.


 



Hussar Ranking - Europe

Tier 1

1.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Remao [6e]
1.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Dokletian [4e]
1.35 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Soartex [1er]
1.37 (https://i.imgur.com/KqCeH5p.png) Stannis [8th]
1.65 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Ciiges [1er]
1.88 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) DeLaBedoyere [1er]
1.95 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) MajorMark [1er]

Tier 2

2.05 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Aless [8th]
2.10 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Naz [1er]
2.10 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Thyrell [1er]

2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Thorvic [1er]
2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tommy [8th]
2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Empo [45thN]
2.50 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Skittles [4e]
2.55 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Leensab [6e]
2.75 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Law [6e]
2.75 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Treiz [6e]
2.80 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) FreyrDS [8th]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Jelly [4e]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Shadey [8th]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaSalle [6e]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ouranos [45e]
2.90 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tomas [8th]
2.95 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Andros [8th]
2.95 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Octanidas [8th]


Tier 3

3.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Parigonicalus [1er]
3.00 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Gabriel [10ph]
3.00 (https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/in.gif) Krishna [8th]

3.03 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) MaxenceIV [4e]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Enderby [4e]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Carlos [1er]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Felix [8th]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Goodest [2Lr]
3.07 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Jesu04 [8th]
3.07 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Adelon [2Lr]
3.08 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Carlok [2Lr]
3.10 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) SteFan [8th]
3.10 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harbringer [8th]
3.15 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Cage [8th]
3.15 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gauner [8th]
3.17 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles [2Lr]
3.20 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Giorno [4e]
3.20 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Yuki [1er]
3.24 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Bocom [4e]
3.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Magnum [2Lr]
3.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Strunk [1er]
3.30 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Darklight [4e]
3.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Erik [4e]
3.38 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Destroy [Nr10]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Quack [8th]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Draco [6e]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles [Nr4]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Thales [Nr10]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Domi [1er]
3.42 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/az.gif) Caucasian [4e]
3.43 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Husarion [Nr4]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ace [6e]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaPierre [6e]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) CokeTail [1er]

Tier 4

3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Squall [6e]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Termito [8th]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) SwaP [6e]
3.50 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Kazi [-]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Sharkie [-]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Killa [4e]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kreativer [8th]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Angel [1er]
3.52 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Lindblom [1er]
3.55 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tulkas [Nr10]
3.57 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Nightwing [2Lr]
3.58 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ironfist [Nr10]
3.58 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gorg [4e]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ducopie [6e]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Pyr0z [8th]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Rastignac [8th]
3.65 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Cooper [2Lr]
3.67 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sebi [8th]
3.67 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Foxii [Nr4]
3.70 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Apfelkuchen [4e]
3.70 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) FeezY [10ph]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Lightning [8th]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Zorius [10ph]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Tigrane [6e]
3.78 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) SirLegion [4e]
3.80 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Swissy [32nd]
3.80 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Louis [1er]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Posh [8th]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tengou [1er]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Thorny [4e]
3.95 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Shagon [4e]
3.95 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) EpicPizza [1er]
3.96 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Nelson [8th]
3.97 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tardet [4e]

4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) StephanGH [-]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Rorscharch [1er]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Ilypa [1er]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Iniskill [Nr4]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/MiEoPym.png) Mech [4e]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Stockfisch [Nr4]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Smurf [2Lr]
4.09 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Semon  [4e]
4.10 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kutte [Nr10]
4.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Unforgive [Nr4]
4.29 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Saphyro [1er]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Gibby [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Chuckster [1er]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Skarface [6e]]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Caius [6e]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Norwegian [Nr10]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ezio [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Raphael [8th]
4.30 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/us.gif) Virus [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Raven [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harford [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Huggu [6e]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Rune [1er]
4.35 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ozikan [6e]
4.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Chsuk [1er]
4.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Higen [1er]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Miyu [1er]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/isMBRHK.png) Uganda888 [33rd]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Icephenix [6e]
4.45 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Rapez [Nr4]

Tier 5

4.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ossi [1er]
4.55 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Mozart [-]
4.55 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sky [Nr4]
4.60 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Artigo [Nr4]
4.60 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Coco_Ayala [1er]
4.63 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Gothtrad [6e]
4.63 (https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Johnson [33rd]
4.77 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ichdie [2Lr]
4.80 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) targeknight [-]
4.82 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Belgian_Fury [6e]
4.82 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MarkusVonSTR [Nr4]
4.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Joe_Cobra [6e]
4.90 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/hr.gif) Waxo [8th]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Darracq [6e]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kaiser [4e]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Eisenmann [Nr10]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MiniiDNS [2Lr]
4.91 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Claudius [Nr10]
4.91 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Titus [2Lr]

5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Arthur [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Duke [33rd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Mclaren [8th]
5.00 (https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/il.gif) Chris [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sirox [2Lr]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) The_Joker [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Russel [Nr10]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/isMBRHK.png) Mark [33rd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/3h6BMNB.png) Floop [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) JoJo [Nr4]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Knaddle [Nr4]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Yuwan [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Ar0ch3r [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Clamydia [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Karl [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/C3NhXA5.gif) Aureliano [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Pouwelicious [2e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Papa/WRX3 [32nd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Smylie [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) KosS [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Niemand [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Twinkie [8th]
5.00 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/us.gif) James Baxter [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Basilikum [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/fMBmHUY.png) Dogukan [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) J-M [6e]





Complete votes
(https://i.gyazo.com/1be3db5916b8af8ff8f2a5a1f341e0ac.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/94445dd02230774e7459c4fad1ef1ee1.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/eeed5b7e4bf5bc8f777dc017fec19570.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/3b73596d22702b5f14c8db4f5dd16d14.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/75ca860b06f66cc3fb7f86c430314ac4.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/60d6cba5d7d68e2e7629279a7287e8f8.png)
[close]




 



Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 12:58:56 am
 
Regimental section


(https://i.ibb.co/qpQ7T44/1.png) 8th Hussars
Tier 1 and 2

(https://i.imgur.com/KqCeH5p.png) Stannis
(https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Aless
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tommy
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tomas
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Shadey
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harbringer
(https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) FreyrDS
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Felix

     Tier 3

(https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/in.gif) Krishna
(https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Andros
(https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Jesu04
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Cage
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Octanidas
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Quack
(https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) SteFan
(https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Pyr0z
(https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Rastignac

     Tier 4 and 5

(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kreativer
(https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Termito
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sebi
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Lightning
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Posh
(https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Nelson
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Gibby
(https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Smylie
(https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Mclaren
(https://i.imgur.com/3h6BMNB.png) Floop
(https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/hr.gif) Waxo


(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm6.static.flickr.com%2F5104%2F5621140148_36b6ed98d2_o.png&hash=3266b17727003f797981d0df0f57585b080bc10d)
(https://i.ibb.co/dPRqhnw/2.png) 4e Hussars
Tier 1 and 2

(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Dokletian
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Hannes
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Skittles
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Jelly


     Tier 3

(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) MaxenceIV
(https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Killa
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Erik
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Enderby
(https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/az.gif) Caucasian
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Bocom


     Tier 4 and 5

(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gorg
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Quinn
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Apfelkuchen
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Wib
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Giorno
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Thorny
(https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) SirLegion
(https://i.imgur.com/MiEoPym.png) Mech
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Apollo
(https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Shagon
(https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Semon 
(https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Darklight
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tardet
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kaiser


(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm6.static.flickr.com%2F5104%2F5621140148_36b6ed98d2_o.png&hash=3266b17727003f797981d0df0f57585b080bc10d)
(https://i.ibb.co/9nSMvrv/3.png) 1er Hussars
Tier 1 and 2

(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Soartex
(https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Ciiges
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) DeLaBedoyere
(https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) MajorMark
(https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Naz
(https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Thyrell
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Thorvic
     Tier 3

(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Yuki
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Carlos
(https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Parigonicalus
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Strunk
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) CokeTail
(https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Lindblom


     Tier 4 and 5

(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Angel
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Domi
(https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) EpicPizza
(https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Louis
(https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Rune
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tengou
(https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Rorscharch
(https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Ilypa
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Saphyro
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Chuckster
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Chsuk
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Miyu
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Higen
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Coco_Ayala
(https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/il.gif) Chris
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Clamydia
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Karl
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ossi
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Niemand
(https://i.imgur.com/fMBmHUY.png) Dogukan


(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm6.static.flickr.com%2F5104%2F5621140148_36b6ed98d2_o.png&hash=3266b17727003f797981d0df0f57585b080bc10d)

(https://i.ibb.co/dpQn6BW/4.png) 6e Hussars
Tier 1 and 2

(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Remao
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaSalle
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Treiz
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Leensab
(https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Law

     Tier 3

(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Draco
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaPierre

     Tier 4 and 5

(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ace
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) SwaP
(https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Tigrane
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Skarface
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Squall
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ducopie
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Icephenix
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Gothtrad
(https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Belgian_Fury
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Darracq
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ozikan
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Arthur
(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Joe_Cobra


(https://i.ibb.co/1vcPvH7/5.png) 2Lr Hussars
Tier 2

(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Darkhawk
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Goodest
     Tier 3

(https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Carlok
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Adelon
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Magnum


     Tier 4 and 5

(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Nightwing
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Cooper
(https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Smurf
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ichdie
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MiniiDNS
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Titus
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sirox


(https://i.ibb.co/ssLp6ky/6.png) Nr10
Tier 3

(https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tulkas
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Destroy


     Tier 4

(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ironfist
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) VonFux
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Thales
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kutte
(https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Norwegian
     Tier 5

(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Eisenmann
(https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Claudius
(https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Russel

(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm6.static.flickr.com%2F5104%2F5621140148_36b6ed98d2_o.png&hash=3266b17727003f797981d0df0f57585b080bc10d)(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm6.static.flickr.com%2F5104%2F5621140148_36b6ed98d2_o.png&hash=3266b17727003f797981d0df0f57585b080bc10d)(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm6.static.flickr.com%2F5104%2F5621140148_36b6ed98d2_o.png&hash=3266b17727003f797981d0df0f57585b080bc10d)
(https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm6.static.flickr.com%2F5104%2F5621140148_36b6ed98d2_o.png&hash=3266b17727003f797981d0df0f57585b080bc10d)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Soartex on October 07, 2020, 01:04:18 am
I am playing for 1er, not for 6e :v
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 01:04:51 am
I am playing for 1er, not for 6e :v
Fixed
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: KaneMaB on October 07, 2020, 01:09:15 am
I couldn't find myself in Tier 1 or 2??
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Vegi. on October 07, 2020, 01:18:51 am
Better change 4e to 92nd, because you lads are with us not.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Yvrul on October 07, 2020, 04:19:36 am
Strange. I didn't make the list... don't make me 7-0 you again Ser Ciiges
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Aless on October 07, 2020, 08:45:19 am
Yes
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Shadey on October 07, 2020, 08:50:46 am
(https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png)

yw
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Thyrell on October 07, 2020, 08:56:54 am
Mozart is dutch
Tigrane is belgian
Husarion will whine about how he is Scottish and not Polish
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 07, 2020, 09:20:44 am
You have put two Achilles on the list. Who is from which regiment?

+ Imagine MiniDNS is french xD
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Shadey on October 07, 2020, 09:53:32 am
Giorno is English/Italian  ;D
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 07, 2020, 09:54:55 am
German domination in the list hahaha
Unfortunately not in reality of NW
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: 33rdKincaid on October 07, 2020, 10:06:38 am
Giorno is English/Italian  ;D
beat me to it :D
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Twinkiee on October 07, 2020, 11:16:11 am
You have put two Achilles on the list. Who is from which regiment?

+ Imagine MiniDNS is french xD
LeMiniiDNS
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 11:18:01 am
There's a post above the list explaining I might have made some mistakes with the nationalities. Thanks for the ones providing it.
So instead of mocking, why don't you tell me where miniDNS is actually from.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 07, 2020, 11:23:14 am
Tier 5 - Cucopie
his name is Ducopie

Mini is german I believe? 2Lr?

Tigrane is Belgian - He is in the BNL Squad ciiges dfuck
Mozart is Dutch - same as the above, Dfuck?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Tardet on October 07, 2020, 12:27:51 pm
Good work! I like the fact you decided to go for tiers instead of adding an individual rating to every player which, let's be honest, wouldn't have meant much without proper stats to back it up.

One small suggestion though: In order to add disparity within the tiers, you could add a (+) or a (-) for certain people depending on whether they are closer to the tier below or above them.

Gonna take my example so nobody gets butthurt: You put me in Tier 4 with other players such as Swap, Grozni, Termito, Rastignac, Quinn, Wib, Bocom, Tengou, Husarion and probably many others who are all way better and more impactful than me in matches. Whether they are actually themselves closer to Tier3 is another discussion worth having but it's indisputable I am closer to Tier 5. And it's probably the cases for other players too so I think it would be nice to have it represented in the rankings.

I would make a case for Bocom and Quinn to be worthy of T3 for instance and I believe Erik has been finding a bit of his old level since the CL started. His impact (leading put aside) during the heavy matches was tremendous and he has generally been playing well in the other encounters we had. Obviously, it's easier to formulate an opinion on your own teammates. 

Cheers for the effort! 
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 07, 2020, 12:50:19 pm
I like the idea with the + and the -
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Thyrell on October 07, 2020, 12:51:36 pm
Good work! I like the fact you decided to go for tiers instead of adding an individual rating to every player which, let's be honest, wouldn't have meant much without proper stats to back it up.

One small suggestion though: In order to add disparity within the tiers, you could add a (+) or a (-) for certain people depending on whether they are closer to the tier below or above them.

Gonna take my example so nobody gets butthurt: You put me in Tier 4 with other players such as Swap, Grozni, Termito, Rastignac, Quinn, Wib, Bocom, Tengou, Husarion and probably many others who are all way better and more impactful than me in matches. Whether they are actually themselves closer to Tier3 is another discussion worth having but it's indisputable I am closer to Tier 5. And it's probably the cases for other players too so I think it would be nice to have it represented in the rankings.

I would make a case for Bocom and Quinn to be worthy of T3 for instance and I believe Erik has been finding a bit of his old level since the CL started. His impact (leading put aside) during the heavy matches was tremendous and he has generally been playing well in the other encounters we had. Obviously, it's easier to formulate an opinion on your own teammates. 

Cheers for the effort!

+1
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 01:15:50 pm
Based on the total of 10 ratings I got (from each of the players that helped) I added them all together and devided them by the number of players who rated them.

Example: Player 1 (1+1+3+2+2+1+2) rated by 7 players in what tier they think this player should be in.
The total number of these tiers (12) will be divided by the total raters (7). 12:7= 1,71. The player in this case belongs in tier 2.

The tiers work as follows: Tier 1 (1 to 1,49) Tier 2 (1,50 to 2,49) Tier 3 (2,50 to 3,49) Tier 4 (3,50 to 4,49) Tier 5 (4,50+).
If a particular player (for example Aless) has a rating close to the top tier (Aless 1,56) he will be given a green + next to their names, indicating that this particular player is quite close to the tier above them.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Tardet on October 07, 2020, 01:23:45 pm
Good stuff! Looks even better now.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 07, 2020, 01:30:44 pm
That's a great way to do it like that!

Btw Mozart is in Nr4
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: darracq on October 07, 2020, 01:44:54 pm
Please delete me from that ugly list, I'm not a vulgar pawn we can easily classify without knowing me. Thank you dear millenials. Your faithfully
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: GothTrad on October 07, 2020, 01:53:14 pm
Please delete me from that ugly list, I'm not a vulgar pawn we can easily classify without knowing me. Thank you dear millenials. Your faithfully
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 01:55:12 pm
The fact of the matter is that I personally do not really know you, but others like DeLaBedoyere, Remao, Treiz, Dokletian do. Therefor I didn't rate you and only they did.

The rating you received is an average of the players that know you rating you. You're literally getting mad at your regimental leaders.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Remao on October 07, 2020, 02:05:35 pm
(https://i.gyazo.com/c9c22e5ff90c82536990a17c9cb885d3.png)

Imagine create an fse account to said that they are Tier 4 and not Tier 5

ps : Go perf les gars, Tier 4 dans mon coeur
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 07, 2020, 02:06:25 pm
(https://i.gyazo.com/c9c22e5ff90c82536990a17c9cb885d3.png)

Imagine create an fse account to said that they are Tier 4 and not Tier 5

ps : Go perf les gars, Tier 4 dans mon coeur

U don't have to disagree with ur rating to ask to be removed.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 07, 2020, 02:19:22 pm
who is coco_ayola?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 07, 2020, 02:19:59 pm
Swissy - 32nd
Grozni - 10th
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 07, 2020, 02:20:56 pm
Chusk = Chsuk [1er]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Aless on October 07, 2020, 02:22:52 pm
Sharkie isn't in the 8th, he's only a reservist here. Also, he's playing for the 1er so I would say he's with them for now.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: darracq on October 07, 2020, 02:23:40 pm
Yes I'm a mad hater, now remove me, my name is a trade mark you can't use without my permission.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 02:26:41 pm
I'm gonne keep you on there just to annoy you a bit more, learn some respect.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 07, 2020, 02:31:15 pm
I'm gonne keep you on there just to annoy you a bit more, learn some respect.

pretty sure you have to remove them when requested.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Tardet on October 07, 2020, 02:34:35 pm
I'm gonne keep you on there just to annoy you a bit more, learn some respect.

pretty sure you have to remove them when requested.
Pretty sure he doesn't. ;)

I tried to remove a couple of people from an inf list a while back and got told that the FSE policy was to no longer remove people as per request nor force list owners to do so. I would prefer that Ciiges actually remove people if they asked it but there is nothing forcing him to do so.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 07, 2020, 02:36:28 pm
I'm gonne keep you on there just to annoy you a bit more, learn some respect.

pretty sure you have to remove them when requested.
Pretty sure he doesn't. ;)

I tried to remove a couple of people from an inf list a while back and got told that the FSE policy was to no longer remove people as per request nor force list owners to do so. I would prefer that Ciiges actually remove people if they asked it but there is nothing forcing him to do so.

Was how it worked during my list. 4e bias?
Mod told me to remove name, I said why. Its just a list. Mod then proceeded to remove it himself. And told me if I put it back he would delete the thread or some shit.
Happened with 2 different people on that list. Lol?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Coco. on October 07, 2020, 02:39:19 pm
who is coco_ayola?
AYALA :p
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 07, 2020, 02:39:32 pm
The rule has been set like an year ago when alot of infantry list emerged. The decision to encourage owners of said list but not forcing is the best and easiest solution for that. If I remember your list was before that happened (and before Tardet was promoted to Global Mod again)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 07, 2020, 02:41:36 pm
The rule has been set like an year ago when alot of infantry list emerged. The decision to encourage owners of said list but not forcing is the best and easiest solution for that. If I remember your list was before that happened (and before Tardet was promoted to Global Mod again)

Even in cases where the owner admits to just doing it to spite ppl rofl? Should be against rules ngl
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 02:44:39 pm
The rule has been set like an year ago when alot of infantry list emerged. The decision to encourage owners of said list but not forcing is the best and easiest solution for that. If I remember your list was before that happened (and before Tardet was promoted to Global Mod again)

Even in cases where the owner admits to just doing it to spite ppl rofl? Should be against rules ngl
Yes because those two were very respectful! It's not me being spiteful, it's me teaching people a little lesson.
They could have just politely asked to be removed like you did over steam, it's not rocketscience.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 07, 2020, 02:46:26 pm
The rule has been set like an year ago when alot of infantry list emerged. The decision to encourage owners of said list but not forcing is the best and easiest solution for that. If I remember your list was before that happened (and before Tardet was promoted to Global Mod again)

Even in cases where the owner admits to just doing it to spite ppl rofl? Should be against rules ngl
Yes because those two were very respectful! It's not me being spiteful, it's me teaching people a little lesson.
They could have just politely asked to be removed like you did over steam, it's not rocketscience.

Targeting violence with violence is usually not a great option.
Just show ur the bigger man and remove them? What's being a dick back gonna accomplish.
Either way I still think that should be against the rules. gets awfully close to targeted harrassment
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Tardet on October 07, 2020, 02:47:09 pm
I'm gonne keep you on there just to annoy you a bit more, learn some respect.

pretty sure you have to remove them when requested.
Pretty sure he doesn't. ;)

I tried to remove a couple of people from an inf list a while back and got told that the FSE policy was to no longer remove people as per request nor force list owners to do so. I would prefer that Ciiges actually remove people if they asked it but there is nothing forcing him to do so.

Was how it worked during my list. 4e bias?
Mod told me to remove name, I said why. Its just a list. Mod then proceeded to remove it himself. And told me if I put it back he would delete the thread or some shit.
Happened with 2 different people on that list. Lol?
I will have you know posting such nonsense as  '4e bias' when I literally explained you in the post above that it wasn't my decision to proceed that way makes it hard to attempt at having a mature and coherent discussion with you. I am gonna try nonetheless.

For a while (before I got asked to become global mod), moderators used to meddle in list business (probably what happened with your list) and force threads owner to remove people who had requested it. However, for a while now, the current policy seems to be that we don't do it anymore. If you don't believe me, you can ask Herishey, he is the one who told me we don't remove people anymore when I tried to intervene after being requested to by Drake for one of the inf lists. I had the same discussion with Quinn (a 4e!) when he asked his name to be removed from a list on FSE no so long. What applies for one, is meant to apply for everyone else.

Edit: Lightning literally explained it better than I did in one sentence.

So much for bias, eh?   
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Tylerus on October 07, 2020, 02:48:14 pm
Mark from 33rd is Danish & Johnson from 33rd is Irish
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: darracq on October 07, 2020, 02:48:22 pm
I don't need a permission to be removed from a list I didn't asked to be on, and that only gives importance to fews ones jerkin on their own performances to kill dismounted ones.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: GothTrad on October 07, 2020, 02:50:58 pm
it's me teaching people a little lesson.
yeah good luck with that
at first I was taking it in the humorous way and I thought you'd do the same, but now if you want to be a dick with me you'll better be prepared for a long day ahead cause I've plenty of time to be one this week
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 03:17:37 pm
I don't need a permission to be removed from a list I didn't asked to be on, and that only gives importance to fews ones jerkin on their own performances to kill dismounted ones.
Again, you're insulting some of the oldes, most respected and best players of the hussar community.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: GothTrad on October 07, 2020, 03:35:32 pm
I don't need a permission to be removed from a list I didn't asked to be on, and that only gives importance to fews ones jerkin on their own performances to kill dismounted ones.
Again, you're insulting some of the oldes, most respected and best players of the hussar community.

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/_aXZnGf2Tl9jwywYalgOerYX13fmKT75t8REq7wuJds5sUtTBQ4heN7wfcTRXkEwFid5iIAitfyRyWbchAV1SHM3iN4ob1Zm6cBa0nLhX1HcneCYwKV_lRBgUQW3BW5jPy5RBIyH59-CDP_Z7VGlMeE2gGBtvw_kFMU)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Erik le Rouge on October 07, 2020, 04:42:52 pm
4e bias?

Always has been
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Charles la Valette on October 07, 2020, 04:44:18 pm
hi whats poppin homedogs
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Termito on October 07, 2020, 06:00:19 pm
Every time i check this list im lower than before.


 :'(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 06:04:32 pm
It's been 1.5 years since this list was last up. Now it's unbiased though.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Aless on October 07, 2020, 06:07:45 pm
One thing that I would like to know is how you classified the 8th members without asking any officer.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 07, 2020, 06:08:55 pm
One thing that I would like to know is how you classified the 8th members without asking any officer.

I'll have you know im highly accurate in my 8th ratings.
No bias I promise
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 06:10:06 pm
I didn't ask all the regimental officers for their opinions, just the 9 people (and myself) listed on the first page. I took the rating average of those. But if you have any contributions, I'd love to receive them over FSE or steam.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Termito on October 07, 2020, 06:26:31 pm
I didn't ask all the regimental officers for their opinions, just the 9 people (and myself) listed on the first page. I took the rating average of those. But if you have any contributions, I'd love to receive them over FSE or steam.
Rastignac need to be Tier 1 cause he is the chosen one.

btw Aless is from Mexico.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Jesu04 on October 07, 2020, 06:28:56 pm
I didn't ask all the regimental officers for their opinions, just the 9 people (and myself) listed on the first page. I took the rating average of those. But if you have any contributions, I'd love to receive them over FSE or steam.
Rastignac need to be Tier 1 cause he is the chosen one.

btw Aless is from Mexico.
Termito is right, who else would know who is from mexico if he is from the mexican squad
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Aless on October 07, 2020, 06:30:17 pm
I'll have you know im highly accurate in my 8th ratings.
No bias I promise

Perhaps, but no offence, any regular player from the 8th can rate better than you. After all, they are the ones playing in the regiment.


I didn't ask all the regimental officers for their opinions, just the 9 people (and myself) listed on the first page. I took the rating average of those. But if you have any contributions, I'd love to receive them over FSE or steam.

Me or any 8th old officer would be glad to. As it would mean a better classification of our members.
Captain Stannis (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198083874650/)
Lieutenant Aless (https://steamcommunity.com/id/lordaldiva/)
Cornet Andros (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Andros8th)
Adjutant Cage (https://steamcommunity.com/id/8thcage/)
Staff Corporal Tomas (https://steamcommunity.com/id/DCHEIB/)
Corporal Jesu (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198387539734/)

Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 07, 2020, 06:31:10 pm
I'll have you know im highly accurate in my 8th ratings.
No bias I promise

Perhaps, but no offence, any regular player from the 8th can rate better than you. After all, they are the ones playing in the regiment.


I didn't ask all the regimental officers for their opinions, just the 9 people (and myself) listed on the first page. I took the rating average of those. But if you have any contributions, I'd love to receive them over FSE or steam.

Me or any 8th old officer would be glad to. As it would mean a better classification of our members.
Captain Stannis (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198083874650/)
Lieutenant Aless (https://steamcommunity.com/id/lordaldiva/)
Cornet Andros (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Andros8th)
Adjutant Cage (https://steamcommunity.com/id/8thcage/)
Staff Corporal Tomas (https://steamcommunity.com/id/DCHEIB/)
Corporal Jesu (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198387539734/)

All tier 5.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 07, 2020, 06:31:49 pm
I'll have you know im highly accurate in my 8th ratings.
No bias I promise

Perhaps, but no offence, any regular player from the 8th can rate better than you. After all, they are the ones playing in the regiment.


I didn't ask all the regimental officers for their opinions, just the 9 people (and myself) listed on the first page. I took the rating average of those. But if you have any contributions, I'd love to receive them over FSE or steam.

Me or any 8th old officer would be glad to. As it would mean a better classification of our members.
Captain Stannis (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198083874650/)
Lieutenant Aless (https://steamcommunity.com/id/lordaldiva/)
Cornet Andros (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Andros8th)
Adjutant Cage (https://steamcommunity.com/id/8thcage/)
Staff Corporal Tomas (https://steamcommunity.com/id/DCHEIB/)
Corporal Jesu (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198387539734/)

All tier 5.
Deal
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 06:47:17 pm
I'll have you know im highly accurate in my 8th ratings.
No bias I promise

Perhaps, but no offence, any regular player from the 8th can rate better than you. After all, they are the ones playing in the regiment.


I didn't ask all the regimental officers for their opinions, just the 9 people (and myself) listed on the first page. I took the rating average of those. But if you have any contributions, I'd love to receive them over FSE or steam.

Me or any 8th old officer would be glad to. As it would mean a better classification of our members.
Captain Stannis (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198083874650/)
Lieutenant Aless (https://steamcommunity.com/id/lordaldiva/)
Cornet Andros (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Andros8th)
Adjutant Cage (https://steamcommunity.com/id/8thcage/)
Staff Corporal Tomas (https://steamcommunity.com/id/DCHEIB/)
Corporal Jesu (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198387539734/)

All tier 5.
Agreed
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Cage on October 07, 2020, 06:53:28 pm
i must also tell you that stannis wants the UK flag to be used instead. he is a strong patriot and would be incredibly offended if he saw the scottish flag by his name
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Law on October 07, 2020, 07:08:12 pm
I'm playing for the 6e now  ;)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Charles la Valette on October 07, 2020, 07:25:26 pm
wheres JoeCobra?????

@ciiges
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: higened243ed on October 07, 2020, 07:26:47 pm
this tardet guy is insane quoi de la fuck
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 07, 2020, 07:30:54 pm
wheres JoeCobra?????

@ciiges
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 07:59:49 pm
wheres JoeCobra?????

@ciiges
I had to hide him in secret tier 0 for he is greater than any hussar to has ever crossed my blade
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 07, 2020, 08:01:25 pm
He didnt want 6e to dominate Tier 5
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 08:02:00 pm
He didnt want 6e to dominate Tier 5
How dare you speak such words about the mighty demi-god Joe the MESSIAH Cobra
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 07, 2020, 08:14:08 pm
where is Higen?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Termito on October 07, 2020, 09:42:59 pm
Why im tier 4, i want to be tier 5 (best tier).
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Shadey on October 07, 2020, 10:23:34 pm
What's this based on exactly, just the opinions of the players listed or actual tournament results?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Jesu04 on October 07, 2020, 10:30:11 pm
What's this based on exactly, just the opinions of the players listed or actual tournament results?
Opinion
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 10:44:55 pm
There have been some slight changes due to 2 more players comming in to help with ratings. I have asked Stannis and Cage from the 8th for their opinion to even out the regimental imballance in the ratings. Very slight changes, nothing major.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: higened243ed on October 07, 2020, 10:51:41 pm
where is Higen?
I’m inf no cav wola
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 10:55:57 pm
What's this based on exactly, just the opinions of the players listed or actual tournament results?
I guess you could say opinions, but it's the experience of 12 players seeing you play, playing with you, and playing against you.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Shadey on October 07, 2020, 10:59:54 pm
Interesting.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: King Stannis Baratheon on October 07, 2020, 11:07:59 pm
There have been some slight changes due to 2 more players comming in to help with ratings. I have asked Stannis and Cage from the 8th for their opinion to even out the regimental imballance in the ratings. Very slight changes, nothing major.

I am completely and utterly offended and without a doubt believe that this is the biggest insult I have ever recieved. You would do well to remove this insult of calling me English and return my flag to Scotland as it should be. Otherwise let it be known that Ciiges is tier 2 confirmed and this biased list does not have my approval. I denounce Ciiges and his actions so he should apologise to me. If this apology is recieved and my flag changed immediately I retract my statement and believe this is the single most well thought out list ever made and the attention to detail is quite extraordinary. Until then however I wish you a below average day.

Edit: With an update to my flag this forum post is null and void I wish everyone a great day and thank you for your time.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 07, 2020, 11:26:52 pm
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 07, 2020, 11:29:14 pm
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 07, 2020, 11:30:02 pm
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating
I guess thats what you get for beeing a heavy in disguise
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Tardet on October 07, 2020, 11:48:07 pm
Edit: With an update to my flag this forum post is null and void I wish everyone a great day and thank you for your time.
Thanks god I can now sleep in peace  :-[
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Cage on October 08, 2020, 12:04:53 am
I wish you a below average day.
*cries in irnbru*
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Charles la Valette on October 08, 2020, 01:38:27 am

I am completely and utterly offended and without a doubt believe that this is the biggest insult I have ever recieved....

aren't you spanish?????
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: tomascadarn on October 08, 2020, 02:09:50 am
Can we have a separate rating for ciiges showing how well he plays while he is eating?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Shadey on October 08, 2020, 06:14:54 am
Can we have a separate rating for ciiges showing how well he plays while he is eating?
(https://i.imgur.com/RhGMseH.jpg)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 08, 2020, 08:20:55 am
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating

Nah, Nr4 got the worst. Most of the members who played very well against 8th in the latest Matches have a worse rating now  :o

Spoiler
Why u so mean to us  :'(
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 08, 2020, 08:38:10 am
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating

Nah, Nr4 got the worst. Most of the members who played very well against 8th in the latest Matches have a worse rating now  :o

Spoiler
Why u so mean to us  :'(
[close]

LOL!
It's a list stop crying pls. Who even cares about a list its just for the ego
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Shadey on October 08, 2020, 08:44:08 am
list will die in a week like every other one does dw.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 08, 2020, 08:45:01 am
list will die in a week like every other one does dw.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 08, 2020, 09:12:22 am
Incredibly negative shadey
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Shadey on October 08, 2020, 09:22:40 am
Spoiler
(https://i.imgur.com/OSVWEEG.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Rikkert on October 08, 2020, 09:31:12 am
Why wasn't I asked for my expert opinion???!!!111!!1one!11!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Tardet on October 08, 2020, 09:34:21 am
Why wasn't I asked for my expert opinion???!!!111!!1one!11!
Cause your bias towards Harford is evident. You are not worthy Rikkert!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Rikkert on October 08, 2020, 09:36:39 am
Why wasn't I asked for my expert opinion???!!!111!!1one!11!
Cause your bias towards Harford is evident. You are not worthy Rikkert!
this list is in violation of harford style
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: TxM on October 08, 2020, 12:48:14 pm
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating

Nah, Nr4 got the worst. Most of the members who played very well against 8th in the latest Matches have a worse rating now  :o

Spoiler
Why u so mean to us  :'(
[close]

Bringing up friendly match’s? But did those players do the same against the 4e? The 6e and 1er in the league?....No so there’s your answer.

Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 08, 2020, 12:58:39 pm
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating

Nah, Nr4 got the worst. Most of the members who played very well against 8th in the latest Matches have a worse rating now  :o

Spoiler
Why u so mean to us  :'(
[close]

Bringing up friendly match’s? But did those players do the same against the 4e? The 6e and 1er in the league?....No so there’s your answer.

There are plenty in there that outperformed others (even in the same regiment) in the league that are listed lower than the one they outperformed anyways
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 08, 2020, 01:35:17 pm
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating

Nah, Nr4 got the worst. Most of the members who played very well against 8th in the latest Matches have a worse rating now  :o

Spoiler
Why u so mean to us  :'(
[close]

Bringing up friendly match’s? But did those players do the same against the 4e? The 6e and 1er in the league?....No so there’s your answer.

Ehm, yes? Watch vs 6e for example? Btw i just wondered why there was more impact on non-8th members than on 8th members after the involvement of Stannis' and Cages opinions which were requested by Aless for a better classification of 8th members if i'm not mistaken. Of course i noticed the lowering of Nr4 members and the upcoming of some new 8th members in the list at first.

Maybe this is a good example to ask a question. How does this regimental balance work which you talked of, Ciiges? So the opinions used for the list are from members of different Regiments, i got that. But how is the balance supposed to work? I don't know all the guys right now, might have to edit this Post, but atm there are opinions of many 4e members, three 8th members and some 6e members, right?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 08, 2020, 01:36:36 pm
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating

Nah, Nr4 got the worst. Most of the members who played very well against 8th in the latest Matches have a worse rating now  :o

Spoiler
Why u so mean to us  :'(
[close]

Bringing up friendly match’s? But did those players do the same against the 4e? The 6e and 1er in the league?....No so there’s your answer.

Well from an objective perspective. I was at the top of the scoreboard against 4e and played decent vs 1er and 6e even carried one decisive round vs 6e. Still almost Tier 4 xD
Just saying
Same for other people which play in the Nr4.
For example Niklas carried the first rounds of the 1vs1 vs 1er.4e Huss and he is not even listed. (He left after the 5th round because he had to do stuff for the school)
For more accurate ratings of the Nr4 people with evidences we would be glad if you would add one of our staff members :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 08, 2020, 01:57:16 pm
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating

Nah, Nr4 got the worst. Most of the members who played very well against 8th in the latest Matches have a worse rating now  :o

Spoiler
Why u so mean to us  :'(
[close]

Bringing up friendly match’s? But did those players do the same against the 4e? The 6e and 1er in the league?....No so there’s your answer.

Well from an objective perspective. I was at the top of the scoreboard against 4e and played decent vs 1er and 6e even carried one decisive round vs 6e. Still almost Tier 4 xD
Just saying
Same for other people which play in the Nr4.
For example Niklas carried the first rounds of the 1vs1 vs 1er.4e Huss and he is not even listed. (He left after the 5th round because he had to do stuff for the school)
For more accurate ratings of the Nr4 people with evidences we would be glad if you would add one of our staff members :)
There is no such thing as "almost tier 4" unless there's a - next to your name (which there isn't). You are rated tier 3, and for comparison sake on the same level as Krishna, or Thyrell; who are also tier 3 rated.

To Octanidas, there were 3 active 4e members who rated, 3 active 8th members, 1 6e member, 1 Nr4 member and 1 1er member. The numbers may seem off of you take it out of context. The fact is that most of the players who gave their opinion are community-pillars. They are respected, knowledgable and skilled players.
I did already approach 1 member from the 2Lr for the next update, for balance sake. But that will be the last of it.

From that point on I will look at performances from players, and re-ask the 13 people every tournament wether or not their opinion has changed, the keep the list as close to factual and up2date.

I must stress one point a bit more: If you are unhappy with your rating, and think you deserve higher, SHOW US  ;)
One of the main points of the list was to add competition and drive to players, and it always works.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 08, 2020, 02:11:55 pm
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating

Nah, Nr4 got the worst. Most of the members who played very well against 8th in the latest Matches have a worse rating now  :o

Spoiler
Why u so mean to us  :'(
[close]

Bringing up friendly match’s? But did those players do the same against the 4e? The 6e and 1er in the league?....No so there’s your answer.

Well from an objective perspective. I was at the top of the scoreboard against 4e and played decent vs 1er and 6e even carried one decisive round vs 6e. Still almost Tier 4 xD
Just saying
Same for other people which play in the Nr4.
For example Niklas carried the first rounds of the 1vs1 vs 1er.4e Huss and he is not even listed. (He left after the 5th round because he had to do stuff for the school)
For more accurate ratings of the Nr4 people with evidences we would be glad if you would add one of our staff members :)
There is no such thing as "almost tier 4" unless there's a - next to your name (which there isn't). You are rated tier 3, and for comparison sake on the same level as Krishna, or Thyrell; who are also tier 3 rated.

To Octanidas, there were 3 active 4e members who rated, 3 active 8th members, 1 6e member, 1 Nr4 member and 1 1er member. The numbers may seem off of you take it out of context. The fact is that most of the players who gave their opinion are community-pillars. They are respected, knowledgable and skilled players.
I did already approach 1 member from the 2Lr for the next update, for balance sake. But that will be the last of it.

From that point on I will look at performances from players, and re-ask the 13 people every tournament wether or not their opinion has changed, the keep the list as close to factual and up2date.

I must stress one point a bit more: If you are unhappy with your rating, and think you deserve higher, SHOW US  ;)
One of the main points of the list was to add competition and drive to players, and it always works.

Oh okay thanks for the information anyways :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 08, 2020, 02:20:21 pm
Yeah Ciiges, thank you. That was an explanation which (at least) i needed for a better understanding of the list  :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Twinkiee on October 08, 2020, 02:36:48 pm
There have been some slight changes due to 2 more players comming in to help with ratings. I have asked Stannis and Cage from the 8th for their opinion to even out the regimental imballance in the ratings. Very slight changes, nothing major.

I am completely and utterly offended and without a doubt believe that this is the biggest insult I have ever recieved. You would do well to remove this insult of calling me English and return my flag to Scotland as it should be. Otherwise let it be known that Ciiges is tier 2 confirmed and this biased list does not have my approval. I denounce Ciiges and his actions so he should apologise to me. If this apology is recieved and my flag changed immediately I retract my statement and believe this is the single most well thought out list ever made and the attention to detail is quite extraordinary. Until then however I wish you a below average day.

Edit: With an update to my flag this forum post is null and void I wish everyone a great day and thank you for your time.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Aless on October 08, 2020, 02:40:27 pm
There have been some slight changes due to 2 more players comming in to help with ratings. I have asked Stannis and Cage from the 8th for their opinion to even out the regimental imballance in the ratings. Very slight changes, nothing major.

I am completely and utterly offended and without a doubt believe that this is the biggest insult I have ever recieved. You would do well to remove this insult of calling me English and return my flag to Scotland as it should be. Otherwise let it be known that Ciiges is tier 2 confirmed and this biased list does not have my approval. I denounce Ciiges and his actions so he should apologise to me. If this apology is recieved and my flag changed immediately I retract my statement and believe this is the single most well thought out list ever made and the attention to detail is quite extraordinary. Until then however I wish you a below average day.

Edit: With an update to my flag this forum post is null and void I wish everyone a great day and thank you for your time.

I just noticed you aren't in the list. I guess you're not considered "active" ?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Thyrell on October 08, 2020, 02:45:09 pm
Ah I see, 8th people putting poor Aless down. Now that he finally achieved something...
Aless got the worst of it, lowered by 0.25 rating

Nah, Nr4 got the worst. Most of the members who played very well against 8th in the latest Matches have a worse rating now  :o

Spoiler
Why u so mean to us  :'(
[close]

Bringing up friendly match’s? But did those players do the same against the 4e? The 6e and 1er in the league?....No so there’s your answer.

Well from an objective perspective. I was at the top of the scoreboard against 4e and played decent vs 1er and 6e even carried one decisive round vs 6e. Still almost Tier 4 xD
Just saying
Same for other people which play in the Nr4.
For example Niklas carried the first rounds of the 1vs1 vs 1er.4e Huss and he is not even listed. (He left after the 5th round because he had to do stuff for the school)
For more accurate ratings of the Nr4 people with evidences we would be glad if you would add one of our staff members :)
There is no such thing as "almost tier 4" unless there's a - next to your name (which there isn't). You are rated tier 3, and for comparison sake on the same level as Krishna, or Thyrell; who are also tier 3 rated.
"there were 3 active 4e members who rated"
Surprisingly yeah haha, messed up but why give a fuck about the list anyway.
Also not 3 4e members but 5.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 08, 2020, 03:13:09 pm
If people like Niklas from Nr.4 are missing and deserve a spot on the list there is no reason to not ask for the addition, there are tons of people who were just "forgotten" :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Twinkiee on October 08, 2020, 03:51:37 pm
There have been some slight changes due to 2 more players comming in to help with ratings. I have asked Stannis and Cage from the 8th for their opinion to even out the regimental imballance in the ratings. Very slight changes, nothing major.

I am completely and utterly offended and without a doubt believe that this is the biggest insult I have ever recieved. You would do well to remove this insult of calling me English and return my flag to Scotland as it should be. Otherwise let it be known that Ciiges is tier 2 confirmed and this biased list does not have my approval. I denounce Ciiges and his actions so he should apologise to me. If this apology is recieved and my flag changed immediately I retract my statement and believe this is the single most well thought out list ever made and the attention to detail is quite extraordinary. Until then however I wish you a below average day.

Edit: With an update to my flag this forum post is null and void I wish everyone a great day and thank you for your time.

I just noticed you aren't in the list. I guess you're not considered "active" ?
;( i actually am active
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Termito on October 08, 2020, 05:03:06 pm
Can i be add to tier 6?

I need to be lowest.

Thank you for understanding.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Jesu04 on October 08, 2020, 06:15:34 pm
Can i be add to tier 6?

I need to be lowest.

Thank you for understanding.
Termito keeps posting but he doesn't realize that we ignore him everytime
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 08, 2020, 06:27:05 pm
Its a sign of love
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: OuRaNos on October 08, 2020, 09:43:39 pm
I'm in cavalry list ? I'm playing for 45e !
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 08, 2020, 09:57:25 pm
I'm in cavalry list ? I'm playing for 45e !

70 points, not more not less
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on October 08, 2020, 10:07:04 pm
hello u guys remember me?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Wursti on October 08, 2020, 10:10:44 pm
hello u guys remember me?

everyone remembers u cutie
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on October 08, 2020, 10:17:42 pm

A massive thanks to: Remao, Dokletian, Hannes, Stannis, DeLaBedoyere, TxM, Cage, Erik, Quinn, Treiz and StephanGH for their valuable input on these ratings.


hello u guys remember me?

everyone remembers u cutie
Nah those ppl do not :(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Wursti on October 08, 2020, 10:21:31 pm
Im pretty sure I saw you on this list in the beginning ngl

could be wrong tho

"Swissy [33rd]" thought its u
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 08, 2020, 10:27:10 pm
32nd Swissy oder schon 33rd?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Treiz35 on October 08, 2020, 10:45:29 pm
Btw would be nice to add a small note when you change something on the list so we can clearly see what change, instead of searching for details  :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 08, 2020, 11:54:22 pm
Btw would be nice to add a small note when you change something on the list so we can clearly see what change, instead of searching for details  :)
When it's any important changes I'll write notes or comment on it. Right now it's just regimental errors and spelling
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on October 08, 2020, 11:55:15 pm
32nd Swissy oder schon 33rd?
ja 32nd ^^
Dieser Swissy vom 33rd muss aber auch nicht schlecht sein :p
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 09, 2020, 12:00:48 am
psst, its still Coco_Ayala and not Ayola and Chris (Tier 5) is still from israel :P
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 09, 2020, 12:15:19 am
psst, its still Coco_Ayala and not Ayola and Chris (Tier 5) is still from israel :P
Find me an israeli flag please :[
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Wursti on October 09, 2020, 01:27:25 am
psst, its still Coco_Ayala and not Ayola and Chris (Tier 5) is still from israel :P
Find me an israeli flag please :[

(https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/il.gif)

its the steam flag atleast and thought that the other ones are too
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Twinkiee on October 09, 2020, 12:38:29 pm
Btw Cuprum is Cooper (founder of the 2Lhr) and he is from Germany
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Grozni on October 09, 2020, 06:53:46 pm
Remove my entry from this.

I do not play competitive cav leagues, was banned from cavalry-gropfight by its degenerate owner a while back, and I don't see how you can accurately rate me into a tier. Thanks.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 09, 2020, 07:20:49 pm
Do people even read what the mods say about this?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Grozni on October 09, 2020, 07:39:57 pm
Read what? How I was rated by 10 pillars of community, of whom in past months I never got to meet more than 3 on servers that I play on?

Remove me from the list please, I am not part of your community.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 09, 2020, 07:43:22 pm
Read what? How I was rated by 10 pillars of community, of whom in past months I never got to meet more than 3 on servers that I play on?

Remove me from the list please, I am not part of your community.

Lightning said the Moderators cant take it off, but it was a message of Grozni directly to Ciiges to remove him from the list I suppose
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Thyrell on October 09, 2020, 07:58:18 pm
Do people even read what the mods say about this?
He never asked a moderator to delete his name from the list.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 09, 2020, 08:02:47 pm
My bad my bad ignore my post
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Cooper on October 09, 2020, 10:32:03 pm
Btw Cuprum is Cooper (founder of the 2Lhr) and he is from Germany
That is certainly one way to blow my cover.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 09, 2020, 10:43:43 pm
please add a "dad-tier" for Bocom
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Charles la Valette on October 10, 2020, 08:51:29 pm
please add a "dad-tier" for Bocom

boomer tier man
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: higened243ed on October 10, 2020, 11:44:58 pm
saphyro legend
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Fietta on October 11, 2020, 03:45:44 pm
ngl i am pretty sick at hussars bro

Kind regards
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 11, 2020, 03:50:09 pm
piss off fietta
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Fietta on October 11, 2020, 03:50:37 pm
piss off fietta

Haha love u bro
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 13, 2020, 09:14:18 am
MarkusVonSTR is member of Nr4 ;)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Michnicki 1 on October 13, 2020, 09:11:17 pm
1.I don't identify myself as a hussar so you can remove me from your list
2.You can make duel tournament or something if you really need this list + I will give everyone 20 euro if Saphyro wins the duel with Artigo, Uganda or Mozart. 
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 13, 2020, 09:34:39 pm
1.I don't identify myself as a hussar so you can remove me from your list
2.You can make duel tournament or something if you really need this list + I will give everyone 20 euro if Saphyro wins the duel with Artigo, Uganda or Mozart.

dont pull me into your retardism pls
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Tardet on October 13, 2020, 10:03:52 pm
1.I don't identify myself as a hussar so you can remove me from your list
2.You can make duel tournament or something if you really need this list + I will give everyone 20 euro if Saphyro wins the duel with Artigo, Uganda or Mozart.
this
is
not
a
duel
list
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Michnicki 1 on October 13, 2020, 10:44:04 pm
1.I don't identify myself as a hussar so you can remove me from your list
2.You can make duel tournament or something if you really need this list + I will give everyone 20 euro if Saphyro wins the duel with Artigo, Uganda or Mozart.
this
is
not
a
duel
list


It's skill rating list, based on....nothing? That's why I suggest to make duels, It would make list more reliable.
 (Saphyro was just example, which show us how hilarious and meaningless is this list + I feel really bad for people rated worse than him)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Cooper on October 13, 2020, 10:55:41 pm
1.I don't identify myself as a hussar so you can remove me from your list
2.You can make duel tournament or something if you really need this list + I will give everyone 20 euro if Saphyro wins the duel with Artigo, Uganda or Mozart.
this
is
not
a
duel
list

It's skill rating list, based on....nothing? That's why I suggest to make duels, It would make list more reliable.
 (Saphyro was just example, which show us how hilarious and meaningless is this list + I feel really bad for people rated worse than him)

It is a list based on opinion of a non random sample of the Cavalry community. Duels, while making the list somewhat less subjective, would make it less generalizable (as duel skill does not translate to team work) and maybe even less reliable, as duel win or loss count may fluctuate quite wildly from day to day (i.e. a higher variance).

I do not think such lists have to be reliable, it is just an interesting indication of where people think one stands.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Michnicki 1 on October 13, 2020, 11:13:41 pm
1.I don't identify myself as a hussar so you can remove me from your list
2.You can make duel tournament or something if you really need this list + I will give everyone 20 euro if Saphyro wins the duel with Artigo, Uganda or Mozart.
this
is
not
a
duel
list

It's skill rating list, based on....nothing? That's why I suggest to make duels, It would make list more reliable.
 (Saphyro was just example, which show us how hilarious and meaningless is this list + I feel really bad for people rated worse than him)

It is a list based on opinion of a non random sample of the Cavalry community. Duels, while making the list somewhat less subjective, would make it less generalizable (as duel skill does not translate to team work) and maybe even less reliable, as duel win or loss count may fluctuate quite wildly from day to day (i.e. a higher variance).

I do not think such lists have to be reliable, it is just an interesting indication of where people think one stands.

Probably you are right. Anyway current list is disgusting. (just my opinion)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 14, 2020, 12:24:54 am
hahaha you are a meme Michnicki, not more not less xD
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 14, 2020, 07:00:13 am
If only we all had the opinion of the great and all-knowing michniki. I'll remove you when I'm back on my pc, whenever that may be.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Cooper on October 14, 2020, 09:17:09 am
Probably you are right. Anyway current list is disgousting. (just my opinion)
Fair enough.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Michnicki 1 on October 14, 2020, 11:48:35 am
If only we all had the opinion of the great and all-knowing michniki. I'll remove you when I'm back on my pc, whenever that may be.

Thank you
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 14, 2020, 12:20:54 pm
I will give everyone 20 euro if Saphyro wins the duel with Artigo, Uganda or Mozart.

Spoiler
(https://techworm.page/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/download-1-20.jpg)
20 Euro for everyone if the nail wins!
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: higened243ed on October 14, 2020, 02:27:38 pm
saphyro to strong
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: TxM on October 14, 2020, 10:11:48 pm
hahaha you are a meme Michnicki, not more not less xD

Takes one to know one.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 14, 2020, 11:08:12 pm
hahaha you are a meme Michnicki, not more not less xD

Takes one to know one.

zoinks play nice boys
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: MajorMark on October 14, 2020, 11:15:30 pm
I will give everyone 20 euro if Saphyro wins the duel with Artigo, Uganda or Mozart.

Spoiler
(https://techworm.page/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/download-1-20.jpg)
20 Euro for everyone if the nail wins!
[close]
hahaha you are a meme Michnicki, not more not less xD

Takes one to know one.

To the hater-posters:

(https://i.imgur.com/MZv61nZ.jpg)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 19, 2020, 05:52:10 pm
UPDATE

I've been approached by quite a few sad men that feel the list was a tad biased!

In order to remove most bias claims I have decided to completely rewrite the list with only 2 people from the top 6 regiments giving their input. I will again take the average of these ratings, and provide the same list format.

I hope this sorts out the bias claims, and satisfies the young warriors eager to prove themselves.

Messages have been sent out to almost all raters, but the forum only allows 10 personal messages to be sent each hour, so in an hour time I will fullfill this task.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Shadey on October 19, 2020, 07:07:57 pm
DarkHawk should be Tier 1 tbh
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 19, 2020, 07:13:30 pm
DarkHawk should be Tier 1 tbh
Let's see what all 12 raters have to say about that, although I'd agree.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Elias on October 19, 2020, 07:42:36 pm
tbh tardet should be above coco in every list  ;) ;)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Tardet on October 20, 2020, 01:31:10 am
tbh tardet should be above coco in every list  ;) ;)
shades were thrown
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Harford on October 20, 2020, 02:03:32 am
UPDATE

I've been approached by quite a few sad men that feel the list was a tad biased!

In order to remove most bias claims I have decided to completely rewrite the list with only 2 people from the top 6 regiments giving their input. I will again take the average of these ratings, and provide the same list format.

I hope this sorts out the bias claims, and satisfies the young warriors eager to prove themselves.

Messages have been sent out to almost all raters, but the forum only allows 10 personal messages to be sent each hour, so in an hour time I will fullfill this task.

still waiting your pm
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: QuinnML on October 20, 2020, 02:09:32 am
Irrelevant opinions not required
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 20, 2020, 02:19:41 am
still waiting your pm
I‘ll let you choose in my stead even though I know it‘s gonna hurt ;-;
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Termito on October 20, 2020, 10:21:54 am
People care too much over a number on a website / game just to boost their ego.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 20, 2020, 10:52:35 am
People care too much over a number on a website / game just to boost their ego.

For example numbers like 4h 10min
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 20, 2020, 12:04:19 pm
People care too much over a number on a website / game just to boost their ego.

For example numbers like 4h 10min
Lmao
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Rastignac on October 20, 2020, 12:24:25 pm
UPDATE

I've been approached by quite a few sad men that feel the list was a tad biased!

In order to remove most bias claims blaa bla bla

I don't see a point in trying to "remove the bias", the list was surely biased but any other list that follows it will be biased as well, in a different way, but biased nevertheless. Which is simply natural and inevitable rather than bad or wrong, since no matter who you ask to vote, they will project their personal likes and dislikes onto their rating. If I were asked to vote, I would totally give excessively good ratings to my best friends in the game like Erik or Quack and maliciously underrate people I hate.

Only Remao has achieved true nirvana and complete detachment from human passions, thus being able to vote objectively from his hermit hut in the middle of a french bamboo forest where he lives surrounded by biches and hannetons.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 20, 2020, 02:10:10 pm
UPDATE

I've been approached by quite a few sad men that feel the list was a tad biased!

In order to remove most bias claims blaa bla bla

I don't see a point in trying to "remove the bias", the list was surely biased but any other list that follows it will be biased as well, in a different way, but biased nevertheless. Which is simply natural and inevitable rather than bad or wrong, since no matter who you ask to vote, they will project their personal likes and dislikes onto their rating. If I were asked to vote, I would totally give excessively good ratings to my best friends in the game like Erik or Quack and maliciously underrate people I hate.

Only Remao has achieved true nirvana and complete detachment from human passions, thus being able to vote objectively from his hermit hut in the middle of a french bamboo forest where he lives surrounded by biches and hannetons.
Well yes, but having 5 players from the 4e, 3 from the 8th and way less from other regiments will surely result in some bias towards those regimental players. Now there might be biased towards own regiment, but it will be mostly cancelled out by the fact that there's an even amount of players rating from each regiment.

ALSO

The new update should be pushed through late today or early tomorrow hopefully, just waiting for a few more raters to send in their parts.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Remao on October 20, 2020, 04:31:17 pm
Only Remao has achieved true nirvana and complete detachment from human passions, thus being able to vote objectively from his hermit hut in the middle of a french bamboo forest where he lives surrounded by biches and hannetons.


Spoiler
https://youtu.be/wLItgSOZNnk
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Erik le Rouge on October 21, 2020, 01:16:19 am
If I were asked to vote, I would totally give excessively good ratings to my best friends in the game like Erik or Quack and maliciously underrate people I hate.

if you dont mention me in all of your fse posts you die
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Rastignac on October 21, 2020, 02:52:28 pm
yes, as a matter of fact I'll just put "Erik" into my signature to have this obligatory feature of my posts added to them automatically instead of typing it into each message manually.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Erik le Rouge on October 21, 2020, 03:46:33 pm
yes, as a matter of fact I'll just put "Erik" into my signature to have this obligatory feature of my posts added to them automatically instead of typing it into each message manually.
(https://i.ibb.co/VMw1RVd/erik-i-sleep.png)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 21, 2020, 11:45:39 pm
LIST COMPLETELY UPDATED WITH THE NEW RATINGS.

If you notice any mistakes, please inform me through PM.

A massive thanks to: Remao, Dokletian, Hannes, Stannis, DeLaBedoyere, Cage, MajorMark, Thyrell, Treiz, Soartex, DarkHawk and Carlok  for their valuable input on these ratings.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Treiz35 on October 22, 2020, 01:38:01 am
The_Joker is not in the 6e
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on October 22, 2020, 01:54:12 am
interesting that ciiges is 1.0 in the ratings in detail, implying every judge rated him tier 1, unlikely given that the 8th at least have no illusions about how shit you are <3 ;p
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: StockholmDE on October 22, 2020, 02:19:06 am
Okay cav boys. I am not Austrian. But more important, I am everything but a cav player. Apart from my motivational speeches and having patience cause no life I should be Tier 21 so please just delete me. Also I basically attend a cav match every 2 weeks and only played 1,5 CL Matches so no clue who had the idea to put me on it even.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 22, 2020, 02:21:36 am
interesting that ciiges is 1.0 in the ratings in detail, implying every judge rated him tier 1, unlikely given that the 8th at least have no illusions about how shit you are <3 ;p
Mhh
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Harford on October 22, 2020, 08:14:08 am
Okay cav boys. I am not Austrian. But more important, I am everything but a cav player. Apart from my motivational speeches and having patience cause no life I should be Tier 21 so please just delete me. Also I basically attend a cav match every 2 weeks and only played 1,5 CL Matches so no clue who had the idea to put me on it even.

no u fully deserve ur place as a tier5 player men!!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 22, 2020, 08:58:28 am
Sky and knaddle are german
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Rastignac on October 22, 2020, 10:54:06 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuGpXkaxYj8
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 22, 2020, 10:58:44 am
Very proud to be in one tier with the best polish player to ever grace this game
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Vegi. on October 22, 2020, 11:00:13 am
Okay cav boys. I am not Austrian. But more important, I am everything but a cav player. Apart from my motivational speeches and having patience cause no life I should be Tier 21 so please just delete me. Also I basically attend a cav match every 2 weeks and only played 1,5 CL Matches so no clue who had the idea to put me on it even.
imagine being dogshit at both inf and cav
shame on you stocky
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 22, 2020, 11:22:58 am
Very proud to be in one tier with the best polish player to ever grace this game
Semon?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 22, 2020, 11:27:41 am
Very proud to be in one tier with the best polish player to ever grace this game
Semon?
Sorry not interested
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 22, 2020, 11:36:33 am
 :-X

edit: Titus is still german and Ar0ch3r is polish
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: King Stannis Baratheon on October 22, 2020, 12:56:28 pm
Hussars Rated EU -  is list of active, competitive hussar players of Napoleonic Wars, based on their skill.

This is the only information that gives a description on how players are rated so it can be assumed that the list is based on players skill and nothing else such as teamwork or even their ability to fight heavy cav/lancers for instance. Things such as 15v15 hussar regiment fights all the way down to a single man on man 1v1 should count because of this. So me and Cage measured the ratings based on this while also looking back at lots of previous matches over the years up to today to make the best assumption we could. So I make a call out to fellow inputters what is your thought process behind this cause I'm seeing so many players that I know to be very skilled in both large matches down to 1 on 1's that don't make sense for the tier they are in. With so much match evidence on fse to look through and at the very least this 1v1 tourney from 2 years back: https://challonge.com/CavTourney i find it difficult to believe so many players aren't rated as accurately as they could be.

Another point that I think should be considered is having tier 2 not be so restricted. I know Ciiges only wanted a max numbers of players in tier 1 and 2 but personally I find there are a lot more players in tier 3 who deserve to be in tier 2 but just aren't as well as for tier 4 to 3 and tier 2 to 1. There might be some compromise here where instead of having 5 tiers, creating 6 tiers would help to more evenly spread players out so the differences can be seen without the vast majority of people being blobbed into 2 groups in the middle. It would make it a lot easier to define the gaps in the middle so those people who are more skilled but just not enough to be in the higher tiers can be shown as that instead of just being thrown into the cluster with everyone else. Just my 2 cents
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 22, 2020, 01:18:20 pm
This is current list and not an 'all-time' one, that is why results from 2-3 years ago do not help here as much.

edit: except for rating a player's continuity, of course
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 22, 2020, 01:44:39 pm
Hussars Rated EU -  is list of active, competitive hussar players of Napoleonic Wars, based on their skill.

This is the only information that gives a description on how players are rated so it can be assumed that the list is based on players skill and nothing else such as teamwork or even their ability to fight heavy cav/lancers for instance. Things such as 15v15 hussar regiment fights all the way down to a single man on man 1v1 should count because of this. So me and Cage measured the ratings based on this while also looking back at lots of previous matches over the years up to today to make the best assumption we could. So I make a call out to fellow inputters what is your thought process behind this cause I'm seeing so many players that I know to be very skilled in both large matches down to 1 on 1's that don't make sense for the tier they are in. With so much match evidence on fse to look through and at the very least this 1v1 tourney from 2 years back: https://challonge.com/CavTourney i find it difficult to believe so many players aren't rated as accurately as they could be.

Another point that I think should be considered is having tier 2 not be so restricted. I know Ciiges only wanted a max numbers of players in tier 1 and 2 but personally I find there are a lot more players in tier 3 who deserve to be in tier 2 but just aren't as well as for tier 4 to 3 and tier 2 to 1. There might be some compromise here where instead of having 5 tiers, creating 6 tiers would help to more evenly spread players out so the differences can be seen without the vast majority of people being blobbed into 2 groups in the middle. It would make it a lot easier to define the gaps in the middle so those people who are more skilled but just not enough to be in the higher tiers can be shown as that instead of just being thrown into the cluster with everyone else. Just my 2 cents
Valid input.

For the next update (somewhere halfway throughout CNC probably) I will add certain criterium E.G. Mounted 1v1, Mounted groupfighting, Dismounted fighting vs Mounted, Dismounted fighting vs Dismounted, Survivability, Awareness, Consistency, Raw skill, Teamwork, Clutch situations, Raw killing ability, Positioning, Patience, etc. This is a list of huge factors, but I will tighten it down to 10 major factors (after discussing with the 12 of you) and rate each category out of 10, to create a better visual representation for each player.

Again, this will take a lot of work, and so will be done in quite a bit (CNC) so we've got some time to relax, and for players eager to "prove themselves" work on these certain factors.
Would this help in the more accurately rating of players?

edit: We did this in native, and it worked swimingly.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Aless on October 22, 2020, 01:48:34 pm
The only way of settling this is having another 1v1 tournament for tiers [1-2], [1-3] and [2-3].

Spoiler
(https://i.imgur.com/Riz6cBP.png)
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Rastignac on October 22, 2020, 02:18:55 pm
Another fun idea might be a BATTLE OF TIERS. A small gf between Tiers 1 & 2, full scale 1v1 between the most numerous middle Tiers, 3 & 4. Though this would require too many players to accept the tier they were put in and come to play without sulking. Not sure if this could happen. If it would, however, it would verify both the players AND the ratings/list itself.


Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Erik le Rouge on October 22, 2020, 02:41:28 pm
Hussars Rated EU -  is list of active, competitive hussar players of Napoleonic Wars, based on their skill.

This is the only information that gives a description on how players are rated so it can be assumed that the list is based on players skill and nothing else such as teamwork or even their ability to fight heavy cav/lancers for instance. Things such as 15v15 hussar regiment fights all the way down to a single man on man 1v1 should count because of this. So me and Cage measured the ratings based on this while also looking back at lots of previous matches over the years up to today to make the best assumption we could. So I make a call out to fellow inputters what is your thought process behind this cause I'm seeing so many players that I know to be very skilled in both large matches down to 1 on 1's that don't make sense for the tier they are in. With so much match evidence on fse to look through and at the very least this 1v1 tourney from 2 years back: https://challonge.com/CavTourney i find it difficult to believe so many players aren't rated as accurately as they could be.

Another point that I think should be considered is having tier 2 not be so restricted. I know Ciiges only wanted a max numbers of players in tier 1 and 2 but personally I find there are a lot more players in tier 3 who deserve to be in tier 2 but just aren't as well as for tier 4 to 3 and tier 2 to 1. There might be some compromise here where instead of having 5 tiers, creating 6 tiers would help to more evenly spread players out so the differences can be seen without the vast majority of people being blobbed into 2 groups in the middle. It would make it a lot easier to define the gaps in the middle so those people who are more skilled but just not enough to be in the higher tiers can be shown as that instead of just being thrown into the cluster with everyone else. Just my 2 cents

I read the whole thing in a scottish accent.............
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Naz on October 22, 2020, 02:57:10 pm
Hussars Rated EU -  is list of active, competitive hussar players of Napoleonic Wars, based on their skill.

This is the only information that gives a description on how players are rated so it can be assumed that the list is based on players skill and nothing else such as teamwork or even their ability to fight heavy cav/lancers for instance. Things such as 15v15 hussar regiment fights all the way down to a single man on man 1v1 should count because of this. So me and Cage measured the ratings based on this while also looking back at lots of previous matches over the years up to today to make the best assumption we could. So I make a call out to fellow inputters what is your thought process behind this cause I'm seeing so many players that I know to be very skilled in both large matches down to 1 on 1's that don't make sense for the tier they are in. With so much match evidence on fse to look through and at the very least this 1v1 tourney from 2 years back: https://challonge.com/CavTourney i find it difficult to believe so many players aren't rated as accurately as they could be.

Another point that I think should be considered is having tier 2 not be so restricted. I know Ciiges only wanted a max numbers of players in tier 1 and 2 but personally I find there are a lot more players in tier 3 who deserve to be in tier 2 but just aren't as well as for tier 4 to 3 and tier 2 to 1. There might be some compromise here where instead of having 5 tiers, creating 6 tiers would help to more evenly spread players out so the differences can be seen without the vast majority of people being blobbed into 2 groups in the middle. It would make it a lot easier to define the gaps in the middle so those people who are more skilled but just not enough to be in the higher tiers can be shown as that instead of just being thrown into the cluster with everyone else. Just my 2 cents
Valid input.

For the next update (somewhere halfway throughout CNC probably) I will add certain criterium E.G. Mounted 1v1, Mounted groupfighting, Dismounted fighting vs Mounted, Dismounted fighting vs Dismounted, Survivability, Awareness, Consistency, Raw skill, Teamwork, Clutch situations, Raw killing ability, Positioning, Patience, etc. This is a list of huge factors, but I will tighten it down to 10 major factors (after discussing with the 12 of you) and rate each category out of 10, to create a better visual representation for each player.

Again, this will take a lot of work, and so will be done in quite a bit (CNC) so we've got some time to relax, and for players eager to "prove themselves" work on these certain factors.
Would this help in the more accurately rating of players?

edit: We did this in native, and it worked swimingly.

Add the criteria 'Stofzuigen' so I can get a 10 on my name.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 22, 2020, 03:48:07 pm
Another fun idea might be a BATTLE OF TIERS. A small gf between Tiers 1 & 2, full scale 1v1 between the most numerous middle Tiers, 3 & 4. Though this would require too many players to accept the tier they were put in and come to play without sulking. Not sure if this could happen. If it would, however, it would verify both the players AND the ratings/list itself.
Though it'd be fun, I don't think it will prove nor reflect anything. A singular battle where the factors are way off from a normal reg 1v1, is not what the list is based on.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Rastignac on October 22, 2020, 04:21:49 pm
Another fun idea might be a BATTLE OF TIERS. A small gf between Tiers 1 & 2, full scale 1v1 between the most numerous middle Tiers, 3 & 4. Though this would require too many players to accept the tier they were put in and come to play without sulking. Not sure if this could happen. If it would, however, it would verify both the players AND the ratings/list itself.
Though it'd be fun, I don't think it will prove nor reflect anything. A singular battle where the factors are way off from a normal reg 1v1, is not what the list is based on.

On the contrary, it would prove something essential. We know that the ratings are not absolute, perfect, flawless and so on, but even if they are just vaguely right, in a "more or less" kind of way, there should still be a huge skill gap amassed between neighbouring tiers. So even if the ratings have just a general tendence to be right rather than flawless accuracy in being so, it should still be reflected clearly in score of such match by a decisive win of the upper tier. In short, it would prove whether the list has a solid substance to it or if it's pure BS.

Besides, it would be entertaining to see how some people would enter their ultimate try-hard modes in such an event to prove that they stand out from their tier.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 22, 2020, 04:42:03 pm
Another fun idea might be a BATTLE OF TIERS. A small gf between Tiers 1 & 2, full scale 1v1 between the most numerous middle Tiers, 3 & 4. Though this would require too many players to accept the tier they were put in and come to play without sulking. Not sure if this could happen. If it would, however, it would verify both the players AND the ratings/list itself.
Though it'd be fun, I don't think it will prove nor reflect anything. A singular battle where the factors are way off from a normal reg 1v1, is not what the list is based on.

On the contrary, it would prove something essential. We know that the ratings are not absolute, perfect, flawless and so on, but even if they are just vaguely right, in a "more or less" kind of way, there should still be a huge skill gap amassed between neighbouring tiers. So even if the ratings have just a general tendence to be right rather than flawless accuracy in being so, it should still be reflected clearly in score of such match by a decisive win of the upper tier. In short, it would prove whether the list has a solid substance to it or if it's pure BS.

Besides, it would be entertaining to see how some people would enter their ultimate try-hard modes in such an event to prove that they stand out from their tier.

I think the SNC will show the "ultimate try-hard mode" as you call it, representing your nation and being one of the chosen 24 (I believe 24?!) also means you have to fight inside the team to be allowed to PLAY in the cup, I hope we have some big and great battles with all people showing the best they can
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: MajorMark on October 22, 2020, 04:43:03 pm
Add the criteria 'Stofzuigen' so I can get a 10 on my name.

Stofzuigen  (stɔf-zœy̯-ɣən)  Verb  •  Back-formed from ‘stofzuiger’. Equivalent to stof (“dust”) +‎ zuigen (“to suck”) •  Mount and Blade: The action or process of stealing every possible dismounted kill during an official match.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Yvrul on October 22, 2020, 05:06:19 pm
 ??? Odd, still don’t see my name.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 22, 2020, 05:06:50 pm
I like Rasti's idea.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 22, 2020, 05:32:57 pm
I like Rasti's idea.
It's a fun idea to do nevertheless, but I just wonder what the results would prove? It's just another fight like we have each sunday. The result wouldn't change anything, because it's a singular match and people will play like they always do in a 1v1.

Please elaborate on how exactly it'll be different, and what the outcome would prove? Since one of the most important things is consistency, and a singular battle wouldn't do much to credit that.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 22, 2020, 05:44:50 pm
Some players require good environments to perform whereas other players of arguably similar strengths will be more consistent in their skill display regardless of who they play with, so they are arguably better. Playing with players of your tier, against other players of your tier, means you can no longer hide behind top players, or use weaker players to make your own performance look good, like you could in a CL environment.

I would take myself as an example of a player who is dependant on good teamplay/good communication to play at his regular level but since I am already bottom of my tier, it doesn't prove much. But I genuinely would be interested to see an internal T3 or T4 fight to bring perspective to the ratings although I know practically speaking it would be really hard to set-up. I don't think it would be as interesting for T1 or T2 but T3 and T4 have the wildest range of players both in numbers and skill so these are the tiers where Rasti's suggestion would make the most sense imo.

Could also work for T5 although T5 feels like a tier where new/bad/unknown/not-active enough players are mixed-up altogether.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Jesu04 on October 22, 2020, 05:54:08 pm
Ratings based on different "skills" are a good idea not everything is being the best in 1v1's if you are going to suicide because you have 0 awareness or having a excellent skill on killing dismounteds but you need a team that dismount everyone or the opposite people who aims very well to the enemy horse and prefeer to let the kills to the teammate who is behind him. There is also a huge difference on how many players are there fighting, some do really well doing the first pick ups and taking advantage of the chaos of a 18v18, some uses the teamwork on a 8v8 and others just perform better focusing on a few like in a 3v3,2v2...
Btw I think this was the last tournament https://challonge.com/es/j7b0gbg2 and as it is a 3v3 from 2 months ago, it kinda prove the skill of the players better than in a regimental 1v1 (as the last individual 1v1 tournament is from a long time ago)
You can see the teams here: https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=44496.0
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Law on October 22, 2020, 06:19:20 pm
Maybe put the list of votes on the players made by the 12 people would be a good thing.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Remao on October 22, 2020, 06:27:34 pm
Maybe put the list of votes on the players made by the 12 people would be a good thing.

+1

I try my best to be impartial on my personal list and to be 100% objective
But there are so many underrated players just because people hate him or don't know what he is doing during his game ...
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on October 22, 2020, 07:06:43 pm
Playing with players of your tier, against other players of your tier, means you can no longer hide behind top players, or use weaker players to make your own performance look good, like you could in a CL environment.

ciiges is only tier 1 because he has the 4e to carry him change my mind
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 22, 2020, 07:15:26 pm
Maybe put the list of votes on the players made by the 12 people would be a good thing.
Could do this if nobody opposes.
Playing with players of your tier, against other players of your tier, means you can no longer hide behind top players, or use weaker players to make your own performance look good, like you could in a CL environment.

ciiges is only tier 1 because he has the 4e to carry him change my mind
What the fuck are you on about? I've been playing NW for 3 years, even when 4e has way weaker players and I've always had a fuckton of impact. If you truely believe 4e carries me, you are incredibly naive.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 22, 2020, 07:27:17 pm
Here is the complete list of all the votes, if there are any question, ask ahead.

Spoiler
Remao: Tier 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1,00
Dokletian: Tier 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1,00
Ciiges: Tier 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1,00
DeLaBedoyere: Tier 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 = 1,16
Hannes: Tier 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 = 1,18
T2
DarkHawk: Tier 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 =1,50
Stannis: Tier 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 = 1,58
Soartex: Tier 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 = 1,67
Thorvic: Tier 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 = 1,92
Aless: Tier 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 = 2,08   
MajorMark: Tier 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 = 2,16
TxM: Tier 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 = 2,33
Skittles: Tier 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 = 2,33
Shadey: Tier 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 = 2,33
Naz: Tier 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 = 2,36

T3
Thyrell: Tier 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 = 2,50
Goodest: Tier 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 = 2,75
Leensab: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 = 2,75
Ouranos: Tier 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 =2,75
Octanidas: Tier 3 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 4 3 3 = 2,83
Harbringer: Tier 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 =2,83
SteFan: Tier 3 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 = 2,90
LaSalle: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 = 2,91
Tomas: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 = 2,92
St0m: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 = 3,00
Krishna: Tier 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 = 3,00
Sharkie: Tier 3 3 2 3 3 3 4 4 3 2 = 3,00
Cage: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 = 3,00
Kazi: Tier 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 = 3,00
Tulkas: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 =3,00
Treiz: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 =3,00   
Andros: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 = 3,00
Felix: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 = 3,00   
MaxenceIV: Tier 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 = 3,08
Law: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 =3,08
Carlok: Tier 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 =3,08
Achilles(Nr4): Tier 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 = 3,09
Draco: Tier 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 = 3,18
Achilles (2lr): Tier 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 = 3,18
Adelon: Tier 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 = 3,18
Blader: Tier 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 = 3,18
Killa: Tier 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 =3,18
Jesu04: Tier 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 =3,18
FreyrDS: Tier 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 = 3,20
Yuki: Tier 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 =3,25
Lindblom: Tier 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 2 = 3,25
Magnum: Tier 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 = 3,25
Jellyking21: Tier 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 2 3 3 3 = 3,33
Destroy: Tier 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 = 3,38
Skarface: Tier 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 = 3,40
Enderby: Tier 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 =3,42
Caucasian: Tier 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 =3,42
Gauner: Tier 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 =3,42

T4
Husarion: Tier 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 = 3,50
Ace: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 = 3,55
Ironfist: Tier 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 = 3,58
VonFux: Tier 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 = 3,58
Thales: Tier 3 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 = 3,58
Rastignac: Tier 5 5 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 = 3,60
Quinn: Tier 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 = 3,64
Termito: Tier 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 = 3,66
StephanGH: Tier 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 = 3,67
Parigonicalus Tier 4 4 3 =3,67
Nightwing Tier 3 3 5 =3,67
Sebi: Tier 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 =3,73
Foxii: Tier 3 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 = 3,73
Bocom: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 =3,75
Strunk: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3,75
Erik: Tier 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 = 3,75
Domi: Tier 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 =3,80
Angel: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 3 = 3,80
Swissy: Tier 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 = 3,80
Lightning: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 =3,82
FeezY: Tier 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 3 = 3,83
Wib: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 =3,92
Posh: Tier 3 4 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 = 3,92
Tengou: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 4 4 3 4 = 3,92
Quack: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 = 3,92
Thorny: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 = 3,92
LaPierre: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 = 3,92
Squall: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 =4,00
Rorscharch: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 = 4,00
Kutte: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 =4,00
Ilypa: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 =4,00
Tigrane: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 =4,00
Iniskill: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 4 =4,00
SirLegion: Tier 4 4 =4,00
Stockfisch: Tier 4 4 4 =4,00
Rapez: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 = 4,00
Olof: Tier 4 4 4 4 =4,00
Smurf: Tier 4 4 4 =4,00
Giorno: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 3 4,08
Semon: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 = 4,09
Nelson: Tier 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 = 4,11
Kreativer: Tier 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 = 4,25
Unforgive: Tier 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 = 4,25
Gibby: Tier 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 = 4,30
Chuckster: Tier 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 = 4,30
Norwegian: Tier 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 = 4,30
Zorius: Tier 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 = 4,33
Chsuk: Tier 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 = 4,40
Saphyro: Tier 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 = 4,42
Miyu: Tier 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 =4,44
Uganda888: Tier 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 = 4,44
Tardet: Tier 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 = 4,44

T5
Icephenix: Tier 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 =4,50
Cuprum: Tier 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 = 4,50
Coco_Ayala: Tier 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 = 4,50
Mozart: Tier 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 = 4,55
SwaP: Tier 4 4 5 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 = 4,58
Gothtrad: Tier 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 = 4,64
Johnson: Tier 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 = 4,66   
Artigo: Tier 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 =4,73
Belgian_Fury: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 =4,82
Ichdie: Tier 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 = 4,82
Ducopie: Tier 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 = 4,82
MarkusvonSTR: Tier 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 = 4,82   
Shagon: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 = 4,83
Darracq: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 = 4,90
Kaiser: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 = 4,92
Eisenmann: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 = 4,92
MiniiDNS: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 = 4,92
Claudius: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 = 4,92
Titus: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 = 4,92
Floop: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 =5,00
Arthur: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 =5,00
Joe-Cobra: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 =5,00
Duke: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 =5,00
Mclaren: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 =5,00
Chris: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 =5,00
Sirox: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 =5,00
The_Joker: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 =5,00
Russel: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 =5,00
Mark: Tier 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 =5,00
Sky: Tier 5 5 =5,00
JoJo: Tier 5 5 =5,00
Knaddle: Tier 5 5 5 =5,00
Stockholm: Tier 5 5 5 =5,00

[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on October 22, 2020, 07:33:47 pm
What the fuck are you on about? I've been playing NW for 3 years, even when 4e has way weaker players and I've always had a fuckton of impact. If you truely believe 4e carries me, you are incredibly naive.

Ciiges is coming, lock up your dismounts!!!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Shadey on October 22, 2020, 07:35:30 pm
What the fuck are you on about? I've been playing NW for 3 years, even when 4e has way weaker players and I've always had a fuckton of impact. If you truely believe 4e carries me, you are incredibly naive.

Ciiges is coming, lock up your dismounts!!!
Spoiler
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b8/ad/ee/b8adeea750f181e71a5d0a4828f3239f.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 22, 2020, 07:53:52 pm
It seems quite a few ratings are 'off' due to miscalculations. I will try and do a comprehensive check for every rating to make sure they accurately reflect the votes.

For instance based on the votes for Swap, is current rating should be 3,75, not 4,58. So please till everything is checked, hold on your comments cause it could literally change your tier.

Evidence for Swap's Tier: 4 4 5 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 = 45 (Sum of all votes) divided by 12 (Number of voters) = 3,75.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Grozni on October 22, 2020, 09:45:59 pm
It seems quite a few ratings are 'off' due to miscalculations. I will try and do a comprehensive check for every rating to make sure they accurately reflect the votes.

For instance based on the votes for Swap, is current rating should be 3,75, not 4,58. So please till everything is checked, hold on your comments cause it could literally change your tier.

Evidence for Swap: Tier 4 4 5 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 = 45 (Sum of all votes) divided by 12 (Number of voters) = 3,75.

Hold your comments while Tardet figures out that the tier's number is not part of the equation.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 22, 2020, 09:55:59 pm
Yeah, I meant for people to just wait for their rating to be updated before eventually complaining about them, not to stop the comments altogether.  :-X
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Grozni on October 22, 2020, 10:00:59 pm
Yeah, I meant for people to just wait for their rating to be updated before eventually complaining about them, not to stop the comments altogether.  :-X

I don't think you understand.. You have included the tier's number (4) as a rating. There are 11 per player.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Jesu04 on October 22, 2020, 11:11:37 pm
Yeah, I meant for people to just wait for their rating to be updated before eventually complaining about them, not to stop the comments altogether.  :-X

I don't think you understand.. You have included the tier's number (4) as a rating. There are 11 per player.
No, you can see how some tier 3 players have a 4 as the first number or tier 4 players having a 3 so there is no way that the first number means that
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 22, 2020, 11:16:52 pm
@Grozni Yeah sorry I misunderstood your earlier comment but as Jesu pointed it out, having the first number of each line being the 'tier' doesn't make sense.

Plus there are 12 people officially named as contributors in the OP so that would make sense as for why most players have 12 different ratings (and not 11 like you suggested).
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Grozni on October 22, 2020, 11:29:46 pm
True. The list has errors and I used the one of Hannes as a sample. Which had an error.

Hannes: Tier 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 = 1,18
Should be 1,08, the numbers were divided by 11 instead of 12.

Which makes me wonder, from the very start this list had some players one or even two tiers above where they should be. I thought it was just a case of them sucking up to raters, but maybe the list's author messing up the math could have something to do with it as well.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 23, 2020, 12:27:07 am
In Hannes' case it's a bit weird, he is the only one in T1 who doesn't have 12 ratings (he got 11). It could be explained by Hannes not being willing to rate himself but that effectively means you should divide his overall rating sum (13) by 11 (number of voters) which gives an average of 1,18. So Hannes' rating should be correct. 

Edit: Actually, Ciiges and Dokletian also have 11 votes but Remao and Bedoyere got 12. I'm a bit confused so I will probably wait for Ciiges to clarify whether or not it's normal; before delving further into the checking.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 23, 2020, 12:34:48 am
In Hannes' case it's a bit weird, he is the only one in T1 who doesn't have 12 ratings (he got 11). It could be explained by Hannes not being willing to rate himself but that effectively means you should divide his overall rating sum (13) by 11 (number of voters) which gives an average of 1,18. So Hannes' rating should be correct. 

Edit: Actually, Ciiges and Dokletian also have 11 votes but Remao and Bedoyere got 12. I'm a bit confused so I will probably wait for Ciiges to clarify whether or not it's normal; before delving further into the checking.
Probably them not rating themselves (Hannes already told me he didnt see a reason to do that unlike others).
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 23, 2020, 12:53:57 am
I obviously did not rate myself - same with Hannes.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: DE14HANNES on October 23, 2020, 07:00:30 am
I think no one should rate themself, i felt like it would be arrogant to do this. I mean if you rate yourself tier 1 or 2, for me its like if anyone standing there and screaming: Hey guys i am better then you. But i dont have a problem if someone done it.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 23, 2020, 01:08:56 pm
It was a long day when I did the maths so couldve screwed up at various people, my apologies. I think Tardet is redoing all the maths like a chad, and I will edit everything accordingly.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 23, 2020, 01:36:11 pm
It was a long day when I did the maths so couldve screwed up at various people, my apologies. I think Tardet is redoing all the maths like a chad, and I will edit everything accordingly.

(https://imgur.com/f1M5IAl.png)

ciiges be like
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 23, 2020, 01:44:26 pm
T1 & T2 are fully checked and correct:

(https://gyazo.com/1be3db5916b8af8ff8f2a5a1f341e0ac.png)

Delving into T3 this instant.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 23, 2020, 01:46:11 pm
T1 & T2 are fully checked and correct:

(https://gyazo.com/1be3db5916b8af8ff8f2a5a1f341e0ac.png)

Delving into T3 this instant.

Ofcourse the french ones voted for themselves in Tier 1....

I also like how one person decided DeLaBedoyere was tier 3... Boy
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 23, 2020, 01:49:20 pm
Please let us take a moment and praise Tardet
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 23, 2020, 01:51:26 pm
Please let us take a moment and praise Tardet
Rather praise the google sheet, it's doing all the works cause I don't trust my maths either
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 23, 2020, 01:54:54 pm
Please let us take a moment and praise Tardet
Rather praise the google sheet, it's doing all the works cause I don't trust my maths either
Just accept please :(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 23, 2020, 03:03:05 pm
Tardet's a fucking chad
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on October 23, 2020, 03:50:19 pm
Tardet is love, Tardet is life
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATES THROUGHOUT CL 2020
Post by: Tylerus on October 24, 2020, 08:05:03 pm
Mark from 33rd is Danish & Johnson from 33rd is Irish
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 25, 2020, 09:18:02 am
T3 fully checked. Red means your final position after checking has decreased, green means it has increased.

(https://i.gyazo.com/94445dd02230774e7459c4fad1ef1ee1.png)
(https://gyazo.com/eeed5b7e4bf5bc8f777dc017fec19570.png)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 25, 2020, 01:58:21 pm
my man Lindblom out here not being in deserved t2 smh
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 21-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 25, 2020, 02:00:13 pm
my man Lindblom out here not being in deserved t2 smh
I wonder who voted him tier 2
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Charles la Valette on October 25, 2020, 06:10:28 pm
@tardet pls don't do tier 4 because my position decreased and i don't want people to know
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Yvrul on October 26, 2020, 11:37:28 pm
Hello?

(https://i.imgur.com/0TI4mx1.jpg)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 26, 2020, 11:44:40 pm
Where's this "Ciiges" player typing GG and is apperantly spawned in? Can't seem to locate him on the scoreboard...
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: DarkTemplar on October 27, 2020, 12:38:08 am
wtf, three Austrians ranked :o

Furthermore I had no clue the cav community is dominated by German players. Now I see why Ger don't get that much NWWC achievements, all their players are cav keks
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Yvrul on October 27, 2020, 02:44:58 am
wtf, three Austrians ranked :o

Furthermore I had no clue the cav community is dominated by German players. Now I see why Ger don't get that much NWWC achievements, all their players are cav keks

You must not have met El Senor Lance.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 27, 2020, 10:37:56 am
wtf, three Austrians ranked :o

Furthermore I had no clue the cav community is dominated by German players. Now I see why Ger don't get that much NWWC achievements, all their players are cav keks

They dont get anything in cav either, they just lose to some spanish with sticks
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: QuinnML on October 27, 2020, 11:38:17 am
wtf, three Austrians ranked :o

Furthermore I had no clue the cav community is dominated by German players. Now I see why Ger don't get that much NWWC achievements, all their players are cav keks

German cav players get really overrated. I don't know how it happens, you look at each of the players in isolation and it's hard to criticise them, but you take any german regiment or team and they just fail to perform. Maybe it's problems with organisation or morale instead of personal skill, would be one explanation.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Termito on October 27, 2020, 11:48:03 am
wtf, three Austrians ranked :o

Furthermore I had no clue the cav community is dominated by German players. Now I see why Ger don't get that much NWWC achievements, all their players are cav keks
They dont get anything in cav either, they just lose to some spanish with sticks
sticks op
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Cooper on October 27, 2020, 12:04:23 pm

you take any german regiment or team and they just fail to perform
Shots fired.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 27, 2020, 01:37:42 pm
Nr6
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: QuinnML on October 27, 2020, 01:39:42 pm
Nr6

achieved what
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 27, 2020, 02:03:40 pm
(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/031/021/cover2.jpg)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Harford on October 27, 2020, 02:25:54 pm
leave him be he's just another retard who likes to believe he's superior to the rest but never managed himself to achieve anything  :o
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Rastignac on October 27, 2020, 02:36:02 pm
Quinn achieving great things in his backyard:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocUYh54iMoY

Btw, anything Nr. 6 might have achieved was thanks to Peradius so it doesn't count as German achievement anyway.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 27, 2020, 02:50:59 pm
Nr6

Just gonna say Team GER vs UK last cnc where we obv failed to perform
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Yvrul on October 27, 2020, 05:58:07 pm
The KGL was a very good cavalry regiment, they beat uh... well they attended line battles!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 27, 2020, 09:30:20 pm
T4 fully checked:

(https://i.gyazo.com/3b73596d22702b5f14c8db4f5dd16d14.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/75ca860b06f66cc3fb7f86c430314ac4.png)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 27, 2020, 09:37:33 pm
Why am I in your calculations when im not even on the list
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 27, 2020, 09:39:00 pm
Why am I in your calculations when im not even on the list

Took it from Ciige's post here, in which you are:

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=44894.msg1986746#msg1986746

(https://gyazo.com/0ae29d05460f162b946e3a3d7b905930.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/1dd460fd66b41d451d2d0e89cf21bb56.png)


Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Wursti on October 27, 2020, 09:40:04 pm
Why am I in your calculations when im not even on the list

wym u r on the list
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on October 27, 2020, 09:45:35 pm
Can someone place me in tier 6 pls
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 27, 2020, 09:46:44 pm
well I wasn't... Apparantly put back on.

rip.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: DE14HANNES on October 27, 2020, 10:00:42 pm
Nr6

achieved what

 (https://media.giphy.com/media/1X7lCRp8iE0yrdZvwd/giphy.gif)

Ok Ok, maybe we didnt win the CCL or CNWL but m8 i think winning matches or making some good placements is not nothing in all these years
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: MaxenceIV on October 27, 2020, 10:19:46 pm
I think Dokletian is a good guy.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 27, 2020, 10:48:36 pm
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Carl_Steffeck-Reille1884%2CRuhmeshalle-1.JPG/1280px-Carl_Steffeck-Reille1884%2CRuhmeshalle-1.JPG)



Quinn, approaching ze Germans:
"You guys are really overrated and you achieved nothing and you can't perform well and your morale is bad just like your organisation."


Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: QuinnML on October 27, 2020, 11:10:48 pm
*Snip*
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 27, 2020, 11:19:41 pm
(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/031/021/cover2.jpg)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on October 27, 2020, 11:47:47 pm
*Snip*

*Snip*
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: TxM on October 27, 2020, 11:53:14 pm
*Snip*
*Snip*

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/47381554d7dc1be489ca599465789c3d/tenor.gif?itemid=4928101)

Grandad strikes again
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Harford on October 28, 2020, 02:39:49 pm
(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/031/021/cover2.jpg)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: St0m_GER on October 28, 2020, 03:16:42 pm
(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/031/021/cover2.jpg)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Chainsor on October 28, 2020, 03:37:42 pm
The KGL was a very good cavalry regiment, they beat uh... well they attended line battles!

their infantry was badass
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Wursti on October 28, 2020, 03:38:37 pm
The KGL was a very good cavalry regiment, they beat uh... well they attended line battles!

their infantry was badass
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 28, 2020, 03:47:40 pm
they also had a legendary gf team
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 28, 2020, 05:01:15 pm
Very interesting NON-HUSSAR FACTS!!!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Cooper on October 28, 2020, 05:46:17 pm
Very interesting NON-HUSSAR FACTS!!!
Does calling out off-topic in an off-topic section of the forum actually apply?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 28, 2020, 05:48:22 pm
Well he can point it out as hes the thread owner.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Aless on October 28, 2020, 05:48:54 pm
They are also responsable for the laggiest cavgf server. And that's a big hit on the cavalry community.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Cooper on October 28, 2020, 05:50:29 pm
Well he can point it out as hes the thread owner.
Thanks for the clarification :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: DeLaBedoyère on October 28, 2020, 06:48:43 pm
They are also responsable for the laggiest cavgf server. And that's a big hit on the cavalry community.
In time, someone will save us and bring back a good server for every horsemen of the community. The old maps will eventually be restaured, and balance will be brought.
Pray for that day to come..
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 28, 2020, 07:09:36 pm
They are also responsable for the laggiest cavgf server. And that's a big hit on the cavalry community.
In time, someone will save us and bring back a good server for every horsemen of the community. The old maps will eventually be restaured, and balance will be brought.
Pray for that day to come..
I would be up to pay one but Idk which provider to choose. Got no maps aswell.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: DeLaBedoyère on October 28, 2020, 08:43:43 pm
They are also responsable for the laggiest cavgf server. And that's a big hit on the cavalry community.
In time, someone will save us and bring back a good server for every horsemen of the community. The old maps will eventually be restaured, and balance will be brought.
Pray for that day to come..
I would be up to pay one but Idk which provider to choose. Got no maps aswell.
That's very kind of you ! I believe Lindblom's servers (Ultrastack) are great. They are the ones being used for th CL, and everyone was happy with their quality so far. I also believe Wüstenkrieger conserved a good number of those old maps. I still have the Cavalry Battle server, which is from Ultrastack, it's maybe worth a try.

But I fear the biggest problem is that it would make in total 3 cav gf servers (4 if you consider Quinn's cav gf is still alive-I don't know). I bet most of the people did register the cav gfs in their favourite. So they would probably just not notice the new server, or they would prefer to stay on the cav gfs they played on for ages.
If we truly want the things to move, I believe the community should have ONE server, the quality being appropriate for all, well managed by active people.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Wursti on October 28, 2020, 08:45:03 pm
Lindbloms are nice yes

Else its also a good idea to set one up on a Cloud Server e.g.

if you have a good provider they should be insane
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Thyrell on October 28, 2020, 09:28:07 pm
They are also responsable for the laggiest cavgf server. And that's a big hit on the cavalry community.
In time, someone will save us and bring back a good server for every horsemen of the community. The old maps will eventually be restaured, and balance will be brought.
Pray for that day to come..
I would be up to pay one but Idk which provider to choose. Got no maps aswell.
That's very kind of you ! I believe Lindblom's servers (Ultrastack) are great. They are the ones being used for th CL, and everyone was happy with their quality so far. I also believe Wüstenkrieger conserved a good number of those old maps. I still have the Cavalry Battle server, which is from Ultrastack, it's maybe worth a try.

But I fear the biggest problem is that it would make in total 3 cav gf servers (4 if you consider Quinn's cav gf is still alive-I don't know). I bet most of the people did register the cav gfs in their favourite. So they would probably just not notice the new server, or they would prefer to stay on the cav gfs they played on for ages.
If we truly want the things to move, I believe the community should have ONE server, the quality being appropriate for all, well managed by active people.

Both Caulaincourt & KGL servers are not being reset making them laggy from time to time (especially KGL due to the scripts).
I think if you get a CavGF server with 2 head admins and keep the admin roster up to date for maximum efficiency, the server should be able to become the main server.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 28, 2020, 09:29:39 pm
I will release a thread about it this week and then update everyone.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: QuinnML on October 29, 2020, 01:31:46 am
So posting the same image of a clown 5 times is cool but I can't post one picture of a guy with a bucket. Cheers
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 29, 2020, 01:50:31 am
So posting the same image of a clown 5 times is cool but I can't post one picture of a guy with a bucket. Cheers
I didnt care about the bucket but the personal provocation below. As soon as you learn that I might let you of the leash.

https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=2713.0
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: QuinnML on October 29, 2020, 01:55:34 am
To be honest man you are confusing my response with the real provocation. I'm just stating a fairly common opinion and the response is these jokers spamming clown pictures. Clearly they are butthurt and have no valid counter point so they just spam provoking pics. But whatever man, I'm in the right anyways so no need for me to stoop on their level either way.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 29, 2020, 02:02:18 am
If you feel like someone else is directly and unecessary provocating you, insulting you or my takes are wrong you are free to report the post to the moderation.

Edit: You can also send me a pm or message me on steam if you want a detailed clarification.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Shadey on October 29, 2020, 02:36:38 am
I feel provoked by these CLOWN IMAGES. Snippety snip them at once!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: QuinnML on October 29, 2020, 02:52:18 am
See unlike whoever snipped my image I have a sense of humour, so nae bother. The double standards are amusing though
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: DE14HANNES on October 29, 2020, 06:54:10 am
Justice strikes again
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Chainsor on October 29, 2020, 08:38:38 am
they also had a legendary gf team

(https://img.redbull.com/images/c_fill,g_auto,w_860,h_860/q_auto,f_auto/redbullcom/2017/06/19/3965fbe6-3488-40f8-88bc-b82eb8d1a230/pogchamp-twitch.png)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: QuinnML on October 29, 2020, 10:02:38 am
I think if you get a CavGF server with 2 head admins and keep the admin roster up to date for maximum efficiency, the server should be able to become the main server.

You'd think, but I tried this some 2-3 months ago, got a new (german based) server with very good connection, invited many reliable players from different regiments to be admin, added old and new cav maps, but people just joined the same old servers still. At the end of the day people just joined whichever server happened to have people on, and 99% of the time that first person that populates a server populates one of the old ones for obvious reasons. As if to prove my point the server is literally still running, I don't have the time or motivation right now to go and promote it or such

Edit: www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=44070. Kanade even offered his cavgf maps and scripts for it.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: StephanGH on October 29, 2020, 10:25:22 am
I think if you get a CavGF server with 2 head admins and keep the admin roster up to date for maximum efficiency, the server should be able to become the main server.

You'd think, but I tried this some 2-3 months ago, got a new (german based) server with very good connection, invited many reliable players from different regiments to be admin, added old and new cav maps, but people just joined the same old servers still. At the end of the day people just joined whichever server happened to have people on, and 99% of the time that first person that populates a server populates one of the old ones for obvious reasons. As if to prove my point the server is literally still running, I don't have the time or motivation right now to go and promote it or such

Edit: www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=44070. Kanade even offered his cavgf maps and scripts for it.

Yes but u named it QRR Cav Gf and ur the head admin.
Id rather play on the bad one
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: QuinnML on October 29, 2020, 10:26:11 am
Trueeeeeeeeeee
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: St0m_GER on October 29, 2020, 12:07:40 pm
next cav gf owner or headadmin should be Bedo or soartex ngl
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 29, 2020, 12:12:30 pm
next cav gf owner or headadmin should be Bedo or soartex ngl
Both are heavily involved in the current creation and im pretty sure that Bedo would be fine with beeing an headadmin on it.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Termito on October 29, 2020, 01:29:27 pm
next cav gf owner or headadmin should be Bedo or soartex ngl
Both are heavily involved in the current creation and im pretty sure that Bedo would be fine with beeing an headadmin on it.
Lancer forever, best class in the game
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Harford on October 29, 2020, 02:53:06 pm
See unlike whoever snipped my image I have a sense of humour, so nae bother. The double standards are amusing though


(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/031/021/cover2.jpg)

quinn's a cunt
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 29, 2020, 03:02:08 pm
Honestly, if someone would make an actual 'Cavalry_Groupfighting' with proper maps, no shooting scripts etc. again and promote it effectively, I have no doubt that server would quickly become the best and the most joined option.

Also, someone could try to get in contact with Azhrei for some of the old cav gf‘s maps etc.; wouldn’t message Glenn or Narsus lol
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Dusbled on October 29, 2020, 03:18:46 pm
I think Soartex also got some maps and we got enough people here who are capable of creating maps... The problem with the QRR cavgf was that there was QRR at the start so people thought its their own regimental one :/
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: QuinnML on October 29, 2020, 03:19:13 pm
quinn's a cunt

@Mods I'm literally shaking, please SNIP this now. Someone has INSULTED me on the INTERNET. I've already shit and pissed in my pants, and am eagerly awaiting the support of the moderation team.

Cheers
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 29, 2020, 03:21:57 pm
Okay I think im pretty far with the server at the moment so If stuff goes right we might be able to go live within this week.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Shadey on October 29, 2020, 03:26:02 pm
Okay I think im pretty far with the server at the moment so If stuff goes right we might be able to go live within this week.
Requesting that you call it NotLaggy_CavGF just so i know which one to join. Ty sir
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on October 29, 2020, 03:27:01 pm
Okay I think im pretty far with the server at the moment so If stuff goes right we might be able to go live within this week.
Requesting that you call it NotLaggy_CavGF just so i know which one to join. Ty sir
Haha I will debate about the name and take it carefully into consideration
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on October 29, 2020, 05:32:02 pm
instead of storing a kda add an elo rating so we have something else to argue about

also set it up to track how many kills ciiges gets that aren't dismounts
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on October 29, 2020, 09:30:32 pm
T5 fully checked and that's a wrap. Only Swap was really off (he is top half of T4 and was misplaced in T5). Rest was a couple of things off but nothing too big. I updated the picture for T4 too in my earlier post, I reckon Ciiges will try to update it whenever he got some free time.

(https://i.gyazo.com/60d6cba5d7d68e2e7629279a7287e8f8.png)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: LaSalle on October 31, 2020, 12:37:10 pm
What's the number next to the tier votes? For me It's 32 but Idk what is it
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Octanidas on October 31, 2020, 12:57:25 pm
The sum of all the votes
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Lilja Mariasdóttir on October 31, 2020, 01:21:16 pm
Also, someone could try to get in contact with Azhrei for some of the old cav gf‘s maps etc.; wouldn’t message Glenn or Narsus lol
Most maps from this cavgf were public downloadable maps, no need to contact the people that downloaded them. I sent DeLaBedoyère the downloadpage. Also they can have the cavgf mod and my maps.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on October 31, 2020, 03:30:13 pm
Also, someone could try to get in contact with Azhrei for some of the old cav gf‘s maps etc.; wouldn’t message Glenn or Narsus lol
Most maps from this cavgf were public downloadable maps, no need to contact the people that downloaded them. I sent DeLaBedoyère the downloadpage. Also they can have the cavgf mod and my maps.
not sure about that because I know that Glenn and Narsus made a couple
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on October 31, 2020, 04:15:27 pm
What's the number next to the tier votes? For me It's 32 but Idk what is it
total sum of the votes i think, then divided by the people ranking you will give you the tier you‘re ranked
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Cooper on October 31, 2020, 08:35:50 pm
What's the number next to the tier votes? For me It's 32 but Idk what is it
total sum of the votes i think, then divided by the number of people ranking you will give you the tier you‘re ranked
I couldn't resist.

The results made me wonder about the apparently high inter-voter agreement. Was the vote done fully blind (i.e. did voters know about other voters perception at the time of their vote)? If yes, it is interesting to see that opinions about skill are actually not that divided in the voters - which would mean that the perception of skill as a relationship of different factors is perhaps actually not that of an intangiable subject (hence might even be defined).
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: LaSalle on October 31, 2020, 08:38:36 pm
OK thanks all
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on October 31, 2020, 08:53:20 pm
What's the number next to the tier votes? For me It's 32 but Idk what is it
total sum of the votes i think, then divided by the number of people ranking you will give you the tier you‘re ranked
I couldn't resist.

The results made me wonder about the apparently high inter-voter agreement. Was the vote done fully blind (i.e. did voters know about other voters perception at the time of their vote)? If yes, it is interesting to see that opinions about skill are actually not that divided in the voters - which would mean that the perception of skill as a relationship of different factors is perhaps actually not that of an intangiable subject (hence might even be defined).
Voting was done fully blind. Nobody knew what the others had voted.

Also: List updated, thanks a ton to Tardet who re-did all of the maths resulting in a little shuffeling here and there.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Cooper on October 31, 2020, 09:45:14 pm
The results made me wonder about the apparently high inter-voter agreement. Was the vote done fully blind (i.e. did voters know about other voters perception at the time of their vote)? If yes, it is interesting to see that opinions about skill are actually not that divided in the voters - which would mean that the perception of skill as a relationship of different factors is perhaps actually not that of an intangiable subject (hence might even be defined).
Voting was done fully blind. Nobody knew what the others had voted.
Truly interesting. I would have expected some more variance in the ratings tbh. Might be somewhat related to the constraint of only 5 categories as well though.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on November 01, 2020, 12:51:13 am
The results made me wonder about the apparently high inter-voter agreement. Was the vote done fully blind (i.e. did voters know about other voters perception at the time of their vote)? If yes, it is interesting to see that opinions about skill are actually not that divided in the voters - which would mean that the perception of skill as a relationship of different factors is perhaps actually not that of an intangiable subject (hence might even be defined).
Voting was done fully blind. Nobody knew what the others had voted.
Truly interesting. I would have expected some more variance in the ratings tbh. Might be somewhat related to the constraint of only 5 categories as well though.
That's probably it. Might want to get a tier 6 aswell.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Aless on November 01, 2020, 11:21:01 am
Spoiler
The results made me wonder about the apparently high inter-voter agreement. Was the vote done fully blind (i.e. did voters know about other voters perception at the time of their vote)? If yes, it is interesting to see that opinions about skill are actually not that divided in the voters - which would mean that the perception of skill as a relationship of different factors is perhaps actually not that of an intangiable subject (hence might even be defined).
Voting was done fully blind. Nobody knew what the others had voted.
Truly interesting. I would have expected some more variance in the ratings tbh. Might be somewhat related to the constraint of only 5 categories as well though.
That's probably it. Might want to get a tier 6 aswell.
[close]

Tier "newcomers"? I don't think there are that many recruits these days, but would be cool
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Erik le Rouge on November 01, 2020, 03:54:50 pm
Spoiler
The results made me wonder about the apparently high inter-voter agreement. Was the vote done fully blind (i.e. did voters know about other voters perception at the time of their vote)? If yes, it is interesting to see that opinions about skill are actually not that divided in the voters - which would mean that the perception of skill as a relationship of different factors is perhaps actually not that of an intangiable subject (hence might even be defined).
Voting was done fully blind. Nobody knew what the others had voted.
Truly interesting. I would have expected some more variance in the ratings tbh. Might be somewhat related to the constraint of only 5 categories as well though.
That's probably it. Might want to get a tier 6 aswell.
[close]

Tier "newcomers"? I don't think there are that many recruits these days, but would be cool

You're cool
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: QuinnML on November 01, 2020, 09:50:23 pm
For a Catalan
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: RedFeu on November 01, 2020, 10:06:32 pm
Where is thomaschampi372 ? Ppl told me he was like top 5
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 25-10-2020
Post by: Twinkiee on November 01, 2020, 11:34:26 pm
Spoiler
The results made me wonder about the apparently high inter-voter agreement. Was the vote done fully blind (i.e. did voters know about other voters perception at the time of their vote)? If yes, it is interesting to see that opinions about skill are actually not that divided in the voters - which would mean that the perception of skill as a relationship of different factors is perhaps actually not that of an intangiable subject (hence might even be defined).
Voting was done fully blind. Nobody knew what the others had voted.
Truly interesting. I would have expected some more variance in the ratings tbh. Might be somewhat related to the constraint of only 5 categories as well though.
That's probably it. Might want to get a tier 6 aswell.
[close]

Tier "newcomers"? I don't think there are that many recruits these days, but would be cool
place me there pls
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on November 02, 2020, 02:28:43 am
Added the tier 6 which will be used in future updates. Suggestions on players for tier 6 are always welcome.

Also added a small poll, might do one weekly for fun.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on November 02, 2020, 12:18:48 pm
put anyone caught using scripts in tier 6  >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

shoulda thought twice before you looked at my hp feezy
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Rastignac on November 02, 2020, 02:07:10 pm
put anyone caught using scripts in tier 6  >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

shoulda thought twice before you looked at my hp feezy

Some people will go down the history of NW and be remembered for winning competitions, others for creating and leading regiments. Some for being memelords, others for hosting and organizing stuff. Some for simply being good players and good mates.

And then, there's Feezy.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Shadey on November 02, 2020, 03:20:16 pm
put anyone caught using scripts in tier 6  >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

shoulda thought twice before you looked at my hp feezy

Tier 6 bout to be THIC with all those Q nerds  😳😳
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on November 02, 2020, 03:37:10 pm
put anyone caught using scripts in tier 6  >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

shoulda thought twice before you looked at my hp feezy

Tier 6 bout to be THIC with all those Q nerds  😳😳

Tier 6 DarkhawQ
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: DarkHawk on November 02, 2020, 04:47:27 pm
put anyone caught using scripts in tier 6  >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

shoulda thought twice before you looked at my hp feezy

Tier 6 bout to be THIC with all those Q nerds  😳😳

Tier 6 DarkhawQ

never used the mod ;)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Harford on November 02, 2020, 04:53:42 pm
imagine ever using elbas j

am i right gamers
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Cooper on November 02, 2020, 04:55:40 pm
Tier 6 DarkhawQ

never used the mod ;)
Technically it is an AutoHotkey script   ::)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Twinkiee on November 02, 2020, 05:06:31 pm
imagine ever using elbas j

am i right gamers

Imagine
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: DarkHawk on November 02, 2020, 06:17:25 pm
Tier 6 DarkhawQ

never used the mod AutoHotkey script ;)
Technically it is an AutoHotkey script   ::)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on November 02, 2020, 07:10:35 pm
imagine ever using elbas j

am i right gamers
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Shadey on November 02, 2020, 07:53:54 pm
put anyone caught using scripts in tier 6  >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

shoulda thought twice before you looked at my hp feezy

Tier 6 bout to be THIC with all those Q nerds  😳😳

Tier 6 DarkhawQ

Tier 6 uack
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on November 07, 2020, 03:13:42 pm
New poll added.

Poll results are shown underneath the main post.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Erik le Rouge on November 07, 2020, 03:57:10 pm
(https://i.gyazo.com/3ba1ede4e64585b3648ca41349714b7a.png)

Spoiler
(https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/705380/85749220.gif)
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on November 07, 2020, 03:59:47 pm
farted tbf
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: St0m_GER on November 07, 2020, 05:32:11 pm
Thanks for those who voted for me. I appreciate it :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Dokletian on November 07, 2020, 05:52:54 pm
(https://i.ibb.co/CBbVKSG/La-Salle-Lasalle-Obama.png) (https://ibb.co/VVgMYk4)

(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/030/329/cover1.jpg)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: MajorMark on November 07, 2020, 08:32:46 pm
(https://i.postimg.cc/mDQCBdgz/Naamloos.png)

(https://i.postimg.cc/T2LBqgHy/download.png)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Kazi on November 07, 2020, 08:44:51 pm
(https://i.postimg.cc/mDQCBdgz/Naamloos.png)

(https://i.postimg.cc/T2LBqgHy/download.png)

Spoiler
Note: They do not deserve your quality memes
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Aless on November 07, 2020, 08:53:45 pm
(https://i.postimg.cc/mDQCBdgz/Naamloos.png)

(https://i.postimg.cc/T2LBqgHy/download.png)

This the first meme I see from you and the quality it's so high blinding
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on November 07, 2020, 09:09:40 pm
MajorMark

49 posts

all of them gold
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: TxM on November 07, 2020, 09:26:00 pm
(https://i.postimg.cc/mDQCBdgz/Naamloos.png)

(https://i.postimg.cc/T2LBqgHy/download.png)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on November 07, 2020, 09:55:25 pm
I actually doubt Mark is verified.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on November 07, 2020, 09:57:58 pm
Rigged elections
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Law on November 07, 2020, 10:04:59 pm
Rigged elections

Ye where is Swissy on this poll
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: LaSalle on November 08, 2020, 08:50:50 am
(https://i.ibb.co/CBbVKSG/La-Salle-Lasalle-Obama.png) (https://ibb.co/VVgMYk4)

(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/030/329/cover1.jpg)

XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD YES DOK I WANT TO FIGHT WITH OTHER TIER 2 PLAYERS, ISN'T THAT NORMAL
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on November 08, 2020, 11:21:22 pm
List update

Due to the constant changing performances of players, I have approached my raters and asked them for any specific names who deserve to be rated higher, or lower on the list. The changes are as follows:
Spoiler
Ciiges 1.00>1.15
Hannes 1.18>1.16
Stannis 1.58>1.54
Soartex 1.67>1.56
Thorvic 1.92>1.97
DarkHawk 1.50>1.63
Aless 2.08>1.86
TxM 2.33>2.31
St0m 3.00>2.92
Cage 3.00>2.93
Skittles 2.33>2.13
Shadey 2.33>2.36
MajorMark 2.17>2.15
Naz 2.36>2.33
Goodest 2.75>2.77
Thyrell 2.50>2.46
Leensab 2.75>2.64
Carlos 3.00>2.95
Ouranos 2.75>2.72
Skarface 3.40>3.36
LaSalle 2.91>2.86
Octanidas 2.92>2.90
Andros 3.00>2.93
Rastignac 3.60>3.48
Tomas 2.83>2.87
Jesu04 3.17>3.12
FreyrDS 3.20>3.17
Jelly 3.33>3.15
Saphyro 4.42>4.29
Erik 3.75>3.60
Husarion 3.50>3.43
Quack 3.92>3.86
Coco_Ayala 4.50>4.60
Ducopie 4.80>4.63
Parigonicalus 3.67>3.60

[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Golden. on November 08, 2020, 11:26:07 pm
Nice list Ciiges  :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Lightning. on November 08, 2020, 11:32:30 pm
Soon Dokle will be the #1 player as it should be
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Ciiges on November 08, 2020, 11:51:01 pm
Nice list Ciiges  :)
Much appreciated mr infy boy
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: LaSalle on November 09, 2020, 11:34:38 am
Ciiges, will there be some kind of tournament between members of a tier ? ps : nice list baby
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: Tardet on November 09, 2020, 11:47:26 am
Ciiges, will there be some kind of tournament between members of a tier ? ps : nice list baby
Rastignac suggested the idea a while back on this very thread but even if Ciiges isn't fully up to organize it, there is absolutely nothing preventing anyone from the community to host a tiered tournament (teams).

The most obvious problem with this is that such a list is a mixture of different opinions on long-term performances, aka voters are supposed to rate players based on recent performances - but across several months of plays at the very least. On the other hand, the people who would perform very well in a one-night tournament per tiers / show match would expect to see their ratings improve, which although natural, wouldn't really make sense given the structure of the list (one-night performance < constant performance across several months).

A tournament per tiers across several weeks/months would eventually be the perfect way to observe the evolution of certain players but it would inevitably be hard to make players commit to it. In that regards, the Fantasy League some people are planning to host next year would be the perfect chance to see players evolve in a competitive environment but without their usual regimental / national teammates. Until then, better be patient.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 31-10-2020
Post by: StephanGH on November 09, 2020, 11:51:06 am
Ciiges, will there be some kind of tournament between members of a tier ? ps : nice list baby
Rastignac suggested the idea a while back on this very thread but even if Ciiges isn't fully up to organize it, there is absolutely nothing preventing anyone from the community to host a tiered tournament (teams).

The most obvious problem with this is that such a list is a mixture of different opinions on long-term performances, aka voters are supposed to rate players based on recent performances - but across several months of plays at the very least. On the other hand, the people who would perform very well in a one-night tournament per tiers / show match would expect to see their ratings improve, which although natural, wouldn't really make sense given the structure of the list (one-night performance < constant performance across several months).

A tournament per tiers across several weeks/months would eventually be the perfect way to observe the evolution of certain players but it would inevitably be hard to make players commit to it. In that regards, the Fantasy League some people are planning to host next year would be the perfect environment to see players evolve in a competitive environment but without their usual regimental / national teammates. Until then, better be patient.

I hope I go undrafted again just to win the tournament after playing every game again
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Ciiges on November 09, 2020, 03:52:15 pm
New poll up!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Tardet on November 09, 2020, 03:59:10 pm
Will only vote after the 8th vs 4e, don't see much sense in doing it beforehand given the importance of that match (but cool poll)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Aless on November 09, 2020, 04:30:38 pm
Will only vote after the 8th vs 4e, don't see much sense in doing it beforehand given the importance of that match (but cool poll)

Same, I think we should vote once the tournament ends.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Dokletian on November 09, 2020, 08:24:58 pm
huge difference between generally playing well and being the 'player of the tournament' btw.

For example, I didn't do anything exceptional this league that would justify voting for me. I'd rather go for outstanding performances like Skittles' 40 mins clutch with Semon, someone being constantly on the top with a large margin in his team, such as DarkHawk, or the ones who manage to give outstanding performances while being in charge of their team - where Remao would pop into my mind.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: stevve on November 09, 2020, 09:34:29 pm
Will only vote after the 8th vs 4e, don't see much sense in doing it beforehand given the importance of that match (but cool poll)

Same, I think we should vote once the tournament ends.
you should vote for Rasti  >:(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Tardet on November 09, 2020, 09:40:40 pm
huge difference between generally playing well and being the 'player of the tournament' btw.

For example, I didn't do anything exceptional this league that would justify voting for me. I'd rather go for outstanding performances like Skittles' 40 mins clutch with Semon, someone being constantly on the top with a large margin in his team, such as DarkHawk, or the ones who manage to give outstanding performances while being in charge of their team - where Remao would pop into my mind.

preach
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: LaSalle on November 10, 2020, 08:21:11 am
Same for me, this poll is very difficult because you haven't got that general opinion you have on the players. I voted darkhawk only because he was often top score but sadly Idk the performances of others
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Termito on November 10, 2020, 12:12:26 pm
best player of the tournament is sharkie for streaming 2 full CB matches without quitting.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Dusbled on November 10, 2020, 12:22:36 pm
mvp (most value person) of the tournament is sharkie for streaming 2 full CB matches without quitting.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Tardet on November 10, 2020, 12:38:07 pm
best player of the tournament is sharkie for streaming 2 full CB matches without quitting.
make it a double mvp for Termito, having referred several CB matches and plenty of other cav matches in the league (cause it's not like spectating hussar vs hussar on NW is particularly fun too)

the survivor they call him
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Ciiges on November 10, 2020, 01:49:45 pm
best player of the tournament is sharkie for streaming 2 full CB matches without quitting.
make it a double mvp for Termito, having referred several CB matches and plenty of other cav matches in the league (cause it's not like spectating hussar vs hussar on NW is particularly fun too)

the survivor they call him
Agreed
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on November 10, 2020, 04:39:44 pm
can you add joecobra to the poll?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: LaSalle on November 10, 2020, 05:05:55 pm
can you add joecobra to the poll?

He's right you know
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Lightning. on November 10, 2020, 06:18:03 pm
can you add joecobra to the poll?
No need to have a poll then
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Harford on November 10, 2020, 09:30:37 pm
huge difference between generally playing well and being the 'player of the tournament' btw.

For example, I didn't do anything exceptional this league that would justify voting for me. I'd rather go for outstanding performances like Skittles' 40 mins clutch with Semon, someone being constantly on the top with a large margin in his team, such as DarkHawk, or the ones who manage to give outstanding performances while being in charge of their team - where Remao would pop into my mind.

you're an exceptionnal human being, enough to vote for u
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Dokletian on November 11, 2020, 08:13:15 pm
you're an exceptionnal human being, enough to vote for u
Spoiler
(https://media.giphy.com/media/f9vvn2LXQo5TolglzC/giphy.gif)
[close]


(https://i.imgur.com/hxjERfn.jpg)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Ciiges on November 14, 2020, 02:46:00 pm
I will put the 10 top answers from the previous poll up in the new poll tomorrow after 8th vs 4e
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: corentin-murat on November 16, 2020, 11:19:03 am
Shadey for tier 1  :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Aless on November 16, 2020, 11:44:12 am
Shadey for tier 1  :)

Krishna for tier 1 :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: corentin-murat on November 16, 2020, 11:58:10 am
Shadey for tier 1  :)

Aless for tier 0 :D
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: LaSalle on November 17, 2020, 12:30:03 pm
Aless tier -2067407940674096749747497409747
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 02, 2020, 11:13:38 pm
nice update ciiges
all those lovely 1er tags there!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Dusbled on December 02, 2020, 11:24:44 pm
Krishna for tier 1 :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Cooper on December 03, 2020, 10:07:43 am
nice update ciiges
all those lovely 1er tags there!
Is this official?
How can the community believe this if it wasn't posted in a newspaper like the previous developments?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 03, 2020, 10:58:50 am
nice update ciiges
all those lovely 1er tags there!
Is this official?
How can the community believe this if it wasn't posted in a newspaper like the previous developments?

The Nexit became a bit stale and a lot of negotiations were going on. Don't worry bout it, media is just slow
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on December 03, 2020, 12:47:03 pm
nice update ciiges
all those lovely 1er tags there!
Spoiler
(https://i.imgflip.com/4oraas.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Aless on December 03, 2020, 01:13:58 pm
Spoiler
(https://i.imgflip.com/4oraas.jpg)
[close]

Lmao
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Termito on December 03, 2020, 04:51:29 pm
how i am not in tier 6?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: QuinnML on December 03, 2020, 11:40:43 pm
Road to Tier 3?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 04, 2020, 11:47:29 am
I'm Roading to tier 1   :o
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: QuinnML on December 04, 2020, 05:58:32 pm
I'm Roading to tier 1   :o

Get in the queue man
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 07, 2020, 11:31:15 am
I'm Roading to tier 1   :o

Get in the queue man

I let you the priority cause you're tier 3
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 08, 2020, 07:38:59 pm
Working on an update
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Twinkiee on December 09, 2020, 11:15:35 am
Working on an update

Titus joined the 2Lr in case you wanna update that :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: OuRaNos on December 10, 2020, 10:35:02 pm
Ah and I don't have any cavalry regiment anymore, I will just play competitions as an invite.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: RedFeu on December 10, 2020, 10:45:36 pm
Why am I not in this list ? I'm one of the best cav player ever
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 10, 2020, 11:36:03 pm
Why am I not in this list ? I'm one of the best cav player ever
Snip
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Michnicki 1 on December 12, 2020, 05:23:44 pm
Apfelkuchen should be in tier 1 (on 1st place ofc).I have never seen player greater than him. It's such an honor to play on CavGf with him. <3
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 15, 2020, 03:53:28 pm
List should be updated today, waiting for the last submission.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on December 15, 2020, 04:17:15 pm
can we have a "referee rated list" pls?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 08-11-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 15, 2020, 05:17:01 pm
can we have a "referee rated list" pls?

Red tier 5
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 15, 2020, 05:24:37 pm
List updated!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: FreyrDS on December 15, 2020, 05:39:58 pm
Yuwan in tier 5.
How can this list even claim to not be biased if the best player in the game isn't even tier 1. Rigged beyond comprehension.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 15, 2020, 06:03:37 pm
Statistics
4e has 22 players on the list: two tier 1s, two tier 2s, eight tier 3s, nine tier 4s, one tier 5.

8th has 24 players on the list: one tier 1, six tier 2s, seven tier 3s, seven tier 4s, two tier 5s.

1er has 33 players on the list: three tier 1s, four tier 2s, seven tier 3s, ten tier 4s, seven tier 5s.

Nr4 has 16 players on the list: zero tier 1s, one tier 2, three tier 3s, five tier 4s, seven tier 5s.

2Lr has 13 players on the list: zero tier 1s, one tier 2, three tier 3s, five tier 4s, seven tier 5s.

6e has 18 players on the list: one tier 1, four tier 2s, two tier 3s, six tier 4s, five tier 5s.
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cooper on December 15, 2020, 06:28:22 pm
Statistics
4e has 22 players on the list: two tier 1s, two tier 2s, eight tier 3s, nine tier 4s, one tier 5.

8th has 24 players on the list: one tier 1, six tier 2s, seven tier 3s, seven tier 4s, two tier 5s.

1er has 33 players on the list: three tier 1s, four tier 2s, seven tier 3s, ten tier 4s, seven tier 5s.

Nr4 has 16 players on the list: zero tier 1s, one tier 2, three tier 3s, five tier 4s, seven tier 5s.

2Lr has 13 players on the list: zero tier 1s, one tier 2, three tier 3s, five tier 4s, seven tier 5s.

6e has 18 players on the list: one tier 1, four tier 2s, two tier 3s, six tier 4s, five tier 5s.
[close]
the math doesnt check out yet.
8th = 1+6+7+7+2 = 23
1er = 3+4+7+10+7 = 31
2Lr = 1+3+5+7 = 16
( or maybe the numbers are wrong, I didnt cross check with the tier list)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 15, 2020, 06:31:15 pm
Ill check it later, enough maths for today
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Charles la Valette on December 15, 2020, 09:06:39 pm
@ciiges your list kinda sucks ngl
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ozikan on December 15, 2020, 10:21:02 pm
I’m not even in it xD
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: St0m_GER on December 15, 2020, 11:26:40 pm
remove me out of this tierlist, ty
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 16, 2020, 11:37:22 am
remove me out of this tierlist, ty

(https://www.streamscheme.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/kekw-emote.jpg.webp)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on December 16, 2020, 11:45:31 am
WRX3 is 32nd ;)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 16, 2020, 12:26:52 pm
remove me out of this tierlist, ty

Would you agree to be in it if you were tier 1 ?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 16, 2020, 01:30:05 pm
Funny you were ok being in the list when you were 2.9, but now you're 3.2 you want to be removed
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Grozni on December 16, 2020, 01:43:41 pm
You know what is even funnier? How some players who leave their regs and join 1er or 4e automagically gain a significant jump in their rank.

It is almost as if this list is a scam and a recruitment tool for selected few regiments.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 16, 2020, 02:06:34 pm
You know what is even funnier? How some players who leave their regs and join 1er or 4e automagically gain a significant jump in their rank.

It is almost as if this list is a scam and a recruitment tool for selected few regiments.
Just when I thought I had seen all stupid had to offer, he sends me you. smh

Bedo dropped 0.90 since the list was made, I dropped 0.60, thorvic dropped 0.50.
Skittles has dropped 0.30

Nice 1er and 4e bias and recruiting protocol!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: FreyrDS on December 16, 2020, 02:07:52 pm
You know what is even funnier? How some players who leave their regs and join 1er or 4e automagically gain a significant jump in their rank.

It is almost as if this list is a scam and a recruitment tool for selected few regiments.

Fully agreed. Unnaceptable. Simply disgusting.

Time to let only the 8th vote on this matter as they are the only unbiased regiment in this game.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dokletian on December 16, 2020, 02:40:03 pm
You know what is even funnier? How some players who leave their regs and join 1er or 4e automagically gain a significant jump in their rank.

It is almost as if this list is a scam and a recruitment tool for selected few regiments.
I'd rather explain it in a different way: players who are not in highly competitive regiments are often (unfortunately) not recognized as high tier players, simply because they do not get the opportunity to really shine, except maybe on Cavalry_Groupfighting. Due to this list being solely a summa of different opinions, it is only natural that - once these kind of players get their chance to stand out - they will be rated higher.

I have two examples for that: Giorno, a player originally from the 33rd, who recently joined the 4e and also was in the UK team, really stepped up because suddenly people in competitive regiments and the national teams finally watched him play unbound from a counterproductive team surrounding him (sorry 33rd, but I hope you get what I mean).
My second example would be Parigonicalus, who used to be in your regiment, a regiment that rarely played any 1v1's and did not paricipate in a league so far (which is totally fine of course), and really had a chance to shine in the BNL team and in addition to that more recently in the 1er and - as a result of this new acknowledgement -  improved on the list as well.

My point is, if you like it or not, the recognition of individuals will always be connected to the framework they play in. Changes in personal opinions due to players changing their regiment is systemic in this list and not necessarily bad; especially nothing as mysterious and manipulative as you potrayed it. Don't lose yourself in wild conspiracies, Grozni.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cooper on December 16, 2020, 02:58:18 pm
Funny you were ok being in the list when you were 2.9, but now you're 3.2 you want to be removed

I think in terms of St0m, he kinda announced to retire from competitive nw after the snc, so his request does make some sense to me.

----

Nice points Dokletian.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 16, 2020, 03:01:53 pm
Funny you were ok being in the list when you were 2.9, but now you're 3.2 you want to be removed

I think in terms of St0m, he kinda announced to retire from competitive nw after the snc, so his request does make some sense to me.

----

Nice points Dokletian.

He still shows up to 1v1s tho. If he really is "Retired" cringe btw he will surely get removed after his 1 month hiatus when ciiges does a next update?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cooper on December 16, 2020, 03:07:39 pm
Funny you were ok being in the list when you were 2.9, but now you're 3.2 you want to be removed

I think in terms of St0m, he kinda announced to retire from competitive nw after the snc, so his request does make some sense to me.

----

Nice points Dokletian.

He still shows up to 1v1s tho. If he really is "Retired" cringe btw he will surely get removed after his 1 month hiatus when ciiges does a next update?
The snc isnt over yet. Some people like to cut their ties themselves.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Thyrell on December 16, 2020, 03:18:35 pm
WR3X is 32nd
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on December 16, 2020, 03:28:29 pm
Funny you were ok being in the list when you were 2.9, but now you're 3.2 you want to be removed
I think in terms of St0m, he kinda announced to retire from competitive nw after the snc, so his request does make some sense to me.
tbh i'd want to be removed if i were st0m, how insulting to get his regiment wrong, he's not in the 4e anymore bro he's retired now, he actually moved in to my retirement home a few doors down from me last month
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 16, 2020, 05:28:14 pm
Edited the regs of st0m and wrx
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Shadey on December 16, 2020, 05:38:33 pm
This list

(https://cdn.betterttv.net/emote/5e9c6c187e090362f8b0b9e8/3x)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 16, 2020, 05:44:26 pm
This list

(https://cdn.betterttv.net/emote/5e9c6c187e090362f8b0b9e8/3x)
Constructive feedback
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Shadey on December 16, 2020, 05:47:08 pm
This list

(https://cdn.betterttv.net/emote/5e9c6c187e090362f8b0b9e8/3x)
Constructive feedback
(https://cdn.betterttv.net/emote/5d793f2e14011815db9377d2/2x)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dias10 on December 16, 2020, 05:58:53 pm
As a mostly casual Cavalry player and leader, I would like to say without being familiar a lot with the competitive scene of Cavalry in NW, that it is nice seeing a list of Cavalry players being formed. Even if based on personal opinion and acknowledging the fact that some people are mad over their ratings (Reminder I am not familiar with the Competitive Scene) I think that it is good seeing someone putting effort into the Cavalry community. Keep up the good work.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 16, 2020, 08:02:56 pm
Gosh sometimes I see the quote of dokletian "cav community is less toxic than the infantery one" and then I watch this thread
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Rikkert on December 16, 2020, 08:43:15 pm
Gosh sometimes I see the quote of dokletian "cav community is less toxic than the infantery one" and then I watch this thread
You've clearly not been on the infantry side of FSE a lot.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dokletian on December 16, 2020, 11:30:46 pm
Gosh sometimes I see the quote of dokletian "cav community is less toxic than the infantery one" and then I watch this thread
think it's still more or less accurate

no offense stick boys
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dusbled on December 17, 2020, 01:37:31 am
Gosh sometimes I see the quote of dokletian "cav community is less toxic than the infantery one" and then I watch this thread
You've clearly not been on the infantry side of FSE a lot.

in terms of toxicity: inf > cav
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 17, 2020, 09:02:54 am
Gosh sometimes I see the quote of dokletian "cav community is less toxic than the infantery one" and then I watch this thread
You've clearly not been on the infantry side of FSE a lot.

in terms of toxicity: inf > cav

Braincells is another matter though
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Tardet on December 17, 2020, 10:43:03 am
As a mostly casual Cavalry player and leader, I would like to say without being familiar a lot with the competitive scene of Cavalry in NW, that it is nice seeing a list of Cavalry players being formed. Even if based on personal opinion and acknowledging the fact that some people are mad over their ratings (Reminder I am not familiar with the Competitive Scene) I think that it is good seeing someone putting effort into the Cavalry community. Keep up the good work.
Trust me, these kind of feedbacks actually matter a lot for Ciiges so cheers for him mate.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Elias on December 17, 2020, 11:44:58 am
Gosh sometimes I see the quote of dokletian "cav community is less toxic than the infantery one" and then I watch this thread
You've clearly not been on the infantry side of FSE a lot.

in terms of toxicity: inf > cav

true actually
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: FreyrDS on December 17, 2020, 11:47:26 am
Gosh sometimes I see the quote of dokletian "cav community is less toxic than the infantery one" and then I watch this thread
What do you mean? This thread is the perfect example of how adults communicate to eachother with respect, dignity and maturity. No where else on this planet will you find such sophisticated and civilized discussions.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: DeLaBedoyère on December 17, 2020, 11:57:58 am
cc freyr
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 17, 2020, 12:33:18 pm
You know what is even funnier? How some players who leave their regs and join 1er or 4e automagically gain a significant jump in their rank.

It is almost as if this list is a scam and a recruitment tool for selected few regiments.

If Erik was part of the rating team I would agree! That rigging Frenchman.

Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 17, 2020, 12:38:30 pm
1er & 4e players go up!? 8th go down?!
(https://y.yarn.co/66631b45-9376-4fa5-8128-537799082021_text_hi.gif)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Naz on December 17, 2020, 02:59:51 pm
Mount and Blade players when dropping 0.01 in a list:
Spoiler
(https://i.imgflip.com/3pvbzp.png)
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Grozni on December 17, 2020, 03:03:50 pm
You know what is even funnier? How some players who leave their regs and join 1er or 4e automagically gain a significant jump in their rank.

It is almost as if this list is a scam and a recruitment tool for selected few regiments.
I'd rather explain it in a different way: players who are not in highly competitive regiments are often (unfortunately) not recognized as high tier players, simply because they do not get the opportunity to really shine, except maybe on Cavalry_Groupfighting. Due to this list being solely a summa of different opinions, it is only natural that - once these kind of players get their chance to stand out - they will be rated higher.

I have two examples for that: Giorno, a player originally from the 33rd, who recently joined the 4e and also was in the UK team, really stepped up because suddenly people in competitive regiments and the national teams finally watched him play unbound from a counterproductive team surrounding him (sorry 33rd, but I hope you get what I mean).
My second example would be Parigonicalus, who used to be in your regiment, a regiment that rarely played any 1v1's and did not paricipate in a league so far (which is totally fine of course), and really had a chance to shine in the BNL team and in addition to that more recently in the 1er and - as a result of this new acknowledgement -  improved on the list as well.

My point is, if you like it or not, the recognition of individuals will always be connected to the framework they play in. Changes in personal opinions due to players changing their regiment is systemic in this list and not necessarily bad; especially nothing as mysterious and manipulative as you potrayed it. Don't lose yourself in wild conspiracies, Grozni.

Ah, the "framework". I just know I am being bullshitted when someone uses such a word in a situation like this, it is a nice way to say "you will play by our rules".

Well thank you for confirming everything I said, and then calling it a wild conspiracy right after. So unless you are within a "framework" of being a member of one of about four big competitive regiments, your ranking will be kept low. Since not only are all the rating givers loyal members or captains of these regiments, but also they happen to only care about your performance in these big 1v1s.

The list is a recruitment scam, for this simple reason: it started by adding *all* the half-decent players they could think of, even members of non-competitive regiments. As if it is going to justly rate *all* the active hussar players in the game. Your appetites for recognition are weated.

But then, you feel like your ranking is too low? "Well", they say, "you have to shooow us". And then it turns out, you can't possibly show them, unless you are a member of one of four big competitive regiments. Not only are they exclusively interested in your performance in big 1v1s, but accidently all the other regiments are just not good enough for your performance to really shine. There is no epic feat that you can pull out against all odds that will go noticed. But hey no worries, as soon as you join one of these regiments, who's members and leaders also happen to be the ones who give out ratings, you can start hoping that your rank will go up and closer to, or at least what you imagine is closer to your true deserved rank.

There may be a tiny amount of deviation from this rule sprinkled here and there, which is only suitable as a mask to hide the true intentions of this list.

My point is, at least stop lying, rename this list into some sort of big league individual player rating table and make it clear which regiments are supposed to be in it. It will still have a toxic effect on the community in my opinion, but at least you won't be those black ops bastards who have to hide their deeds and panickingly insult people who ask to be removed from it. Maybe.

Quote
My second example would be Parigonicalus, who used to be in your regiment
Parigon is still in the 10thRH, the only reason it says 1er is because Ciiges labeled him this way by his own will, which proves many of my points.  This is the second time Parigon has been mislabeled, he already asked once in the past for the "nr10" label to be replaced with "10thRH". And now on the next update suddenly he is "1er", and still is, even though Parigon has asked him to set that label back to 10thRH, again, and the 10thRH is marked as his favorite group on his steam profile.

Ciiges has this time refused to make the update. This only goes to show in what tyrannical way he wields the power of being the editor of the list. This is the guy whom you let run the list that decides on your ranking, and you let him do it due to greed for recognition, ridiculous.

Ciiges is clever to pull this out, but is not smart enough to hide his bad personality completely. In the past pages of this thread there are plenty of examples of him being a raging kid whenever someone questioned his skill or asked to be removed from the list. For example he refuses to remove some players from the list for a few days "just to teach them a lesson", as if he has some divine right of authority to teach anyone a lesson.

Though some of these removal requests were not very much polite (not as if you have to be polite to someone who has put you on a corrupt list without your approval), what about the last example? St0m asked to be removed in a pretty polite and straightforward way, and Ciiges immediately reacted by trying to publicly ridicule him. The "oh you don't want to be in my list, you must be butthurt over the drop in your rank" attitude.

And there is no mystery as to why Ciiges would be enraged by removal requests, each person less on the list makes the list less valid, therefore less power to him, making him less useful to the handful of others who benefit from it. 

Any player of integrity should ask to be removed from the list. Even though you will be attacked and ridiculed for doing so, showing some spine will earn you self esteem which will be more useful to you than a number on a corrupt piece of paper.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Naz on December 17, 2020, 03:26:37 pm
You know what is even funnier? How some players who leave their regs and join 1er or 4e automagically gain a significant jump in their rank.

It is almost as if this list is a scam and a recruitment tool for selected few regiments.
I'd rather explain it in a different way: players who are not in highly competitive regiments are often (unfortunately) not recognized as high tier players, simply because they do not get the opportunity to really shine, except maybe on Cavalry_Groupfighting. Due to this list being solely a summa of different opinions, it is only natural that - once these kind of players get their chance to stand out - they will be rated higher.

I have two examples for that: Giorno, a player originally from the 33rd, who recently joined the 4e and also was in the UK team, really stepped up because suddenly people in competitive regiments and the national teams finally watched him play unbound from a counterproductive team surrounding him (sorry 33rd, but I hope you get what I mean).
My second example would be Parigonicalus, who used to be in your regiment, a regiment that rarely played any 1v1's and did not paricipate in a league so far (which is totally fine of course), and really had a chance to shine in the BNL team and in addition to that more recently in the 1er and - as a result of this new acknowledgement -  improved on the list as well.

My point is, if you like it or not, the recognition of individuals will always be connected to the framework they play in. Changes in personal opinions due to players changing their regiment is systemic in this list and not necessarily bad; especially nothing as mysterious and manipulative as you potrayed it. Don't lose yourself in wild conspiracies, Grozni.

Ah, the "framework". I just know I am being bullshitted when someone uses such a word in a situation like this, it is a nice way to say "you will play by our rules".

Well thank you for confirming everything I said, and then calling it a wild conspiracy right after. So unless you are within a "framework" of being a member of one of about four big competitive regiments, your ranking will be kept low. Since not only are all the rating givers loyal members or captains of these regiments, but also they happen to only care about your performance in these big 1v1s.

The list is a recruitment scam, for this simple reason: it started by adding *all* the half-decent players they could think of, even members of non-competitive regiments. As if it is going to justly rate *all* the active hussar players in the game. Your appetites for recognition are weated.

But then, you feel like your ranking is too low? "Well", they say, "you have to shooow us". And then it turns out, you can't possibly show them, unless you are a member of one of four big competitive regiments. Not only are they exclusively interested in your performance in big 1v1s, but accidently all the other regiments are just not good enough for your performance to really shine. There is no epic feat that you can pull out against all odds that will go noticed. But hey no worries, as soon as you join one of these regiments, who's members and leaders also happen to be the ones who give out ratings, you can start hoping that your rank will go up and closer to, or at least what you imagine is closer to your true deserved rank.

There may be a tiny amount of deviation from this rule sprinkled here and there, which is only suitable as a mask to hide the true intentions of this list.

My point is, at least stop lying, rename this list into some sort of big league individual player rating table and make it clear which regiments are supposed to be in it. It will still have a toxic effect on the community in my opinion, but at least you won't be those black ops bastards who have to hide their deeds and panickingly insult people who ask to be removed from it. Maybe.

Quote
My second example would be Parigonicalus, who used to be in your regiment
Parigon is still in the 10thRH, the only reason it says 1er is because Ciiges labeled him this way by his own will, which proves many of my points.  This is the second time Parigon has been mislabeled, he already asked once in the past for the "nr10" label to be replaced with "10thRH". And now on the next update suddenly he is "1er", and still is, even though Parigon has asked him to set that label back to 10thRH, again, and the 10thRH is marked as his favorite group on his steam profile.

Ciiges has this time refused to make the update. This only goes to show in what tyrannical way he wields the power of being the editor of the list. This is the guy whom you let run the list that decides on your ranking, and you let him do it due to greed for recognition, ridiculous.

Ciiges is clever to pull this out, but is not smart enough to hide his bad personality completely. In the past pages of this thread there are plenty of examples of him being a raging kid whenever someone questioned his skill or asked to be removed from the list. For example he refuses to remove some players from the list for a few days "just to teach them a lesson", as if he has some divine right of authority to teach anyone a lesson.

Though some of these removal requests were not very much polite (not as if you have to be polite to someone who has put you on a corrupt list without your approval), what about the last example? St0m asked to be removed in a pretty polite and straightforward way, and Ciiges immediately reacted by trying to publicly ridicule him. The "oh you don't want to be in my list, you must be butthurt over the drop in your rank" attitude.

And there is no mystery as to why Ciiges would be enraged by removal requests, each person less on the list makes the list less valid, therefore less power to him, making him less useful to the handful of others who benefit from it. 

Any player of integrity should ask to be removed from the list. Even though you will be attacked and ridiculed for doing so, showing some spine will earn you self esteem which will be more useful to you than a number on a corrupt piece of paper.

Wollah wat doe jij allemaal eh?! Je hebt al tien dagen die trainingspak aan hahaha.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Treiz35 on December 17, 2020, 03:29:50 pm
Wow
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 17, 2020, 03:38:41 pm
I'm fucking dying, how you can still find the keys on your keyboard with your head so far up your own ass is truly magnificent.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Rikkert on December 17, 2020, 03:44:14 pm
dit is waarom ik de cav forums lees, machtig prachtig
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Grozni on December 17, 2020, 03:45:52 pm
I'm fucking dying, how you can still find the keys on your keyboard with your head so far up your own ass is truly magnificent.

I have a miniature keyboard in my ass. And all my arguments are valid while you have none.

And it would be nice if some guys stop spamming Dutch on English speaking forum, you guys didn't fully take over NW quite yet.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cage on December 17, 2020, 04:15:24 pm
Its all one big conspiracy, I saw ciiges putting a microchip up freyrs ass (he's only 12 btw) and suddenly he is tier 2???? somethings not right and I'm going to find out  >:( >:(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Thyrell on December 17, 2020, 04:18:37 pm
I'm fucking dying, how you can still find the keys on your keyboard with your head so far up your own ass is truly magnificent.

I have a miniature keyboard in my ass. And all my arguments are valid while you have none.

And it would be nice if some guys stop spamming Dutch on English speaking forum, you guys didn't fully take over NW quite yet.

doubt, most of ur arguments are useless since you misinterpret everything Dokle said. You blame the creator & raters because you only get rated "properly" if you are in the top 4 regiments which is klinklare onzin. We can't do anything about it that smaller/worse regiments only fight other regiments at their level so we don't get a proper look at their skill level.

For example: Players from 33rd like Giorno, SirLegion, Uganda are rated worse than they would be in regiments which are more competitive, simply because their regiments don't allow them to show their skill by not organizing a training match vs a higher skilled regiment.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: FreyrDS on December 17, 2020, 04:28:06 pm
I'm fucking dying, how you can still find the keys on your keyboard with your head so far up your own ass is truly magnificent.

I have a miniature keyboard in my ass. And all my arguments are valid while you have none.

And it would be nice if some guys stop spamming Dutch on English speaking forum, you guys didn't fully take over NW quite yet.
Two sentences of Dutch isn't a spam.

Het zou veel erger zijn als er zowaar nog meer mensen in het Nederfrankisch begonnen te converseren. Dan zou u eventueel kunnen spreken van een 'spam' mijn eerwaarde Servische vriend. Maar een geluk dat dit niet staat te gebeuren aangezien wij vriendelijke mensen zijn die respect hebben voor het feit dat dit een Angelsaksiche thread is. Nog een prettig kerstfeest!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dokletian on December 17, 2020, 04:56:57 pm
Ah, the "framework". I just know I am being bullshitted when someone uses such a word in a situation like this, it is a nice way to say "you will play by our rules".

Well thank you for confirming everything I said, and then calling it a wild conspiracy right after. So unless you are within a "framework" of being a member of one of about four big competitive regiments, your ranking will be kept low. Since not only are all the rating givers loyal members or captains of these regiments, but also they happen to only care about your performance in these big 1v1s.

The list is a recruitment scam, for this simple reason: it started by adding *all* the half-decent players they could think of, even members of non-competitive regiments. As if it is going to justly rate *all* the active hussar players in the game. Your appetites for recognition are weated.

But then, you feel like your ranking is too low? "Well", they say, "you have to shooow us". And then it turns out, you can't possibly show them, unless you are a member of one of four big competitive regiments. Not only are they exclusively interested in your performance in big 1v1s, but accidently all the other regiments are just not good enough for your performance to really shine. There is no epic feat that you can pull out against all odds that will go noticed. But hey no worries, as soon as you join one of these regiments, who's members and leaders also happen to be the ones who give out ratings, you can start hoping that your rank will go up and closer to, or at least what you imagine is closer to your true deserved rank.

There may be a tiny amount of deviation from this rule sprinkled here and there, which is only suitable as a mask to hide the true intentions of this list.

My point is, at least stop lying, rename this list into some sort of big league individual player rating table and make it clear which regiments are supposed to be in it. It will still have a toxic effect on the community in my opinion, but at least you won't be those black ops bastards who have to hide their deeds and panickingly insult people who ask to be removed from it. Maybe.
Despite you thinking otherwise, my response was a genuine and I had no bad intentions whatsoever, especially because I think some of your observations are more than legitimate.
While writing a response to your post, I quickly realized that I'd just end up repeating what I have explained yesterday. You didn't really get the point I was trying to get across and I'd recommend to read what I have posted once again. Or you can continue picking out single words, that is also fine.

Also, guys, the list is only as relevant as you make it. You should not take it as the Ultima.

Regarding Ciiges himself, once again, I think you have reasonable points here: I do not know what happened with Pari and it sounds like a very individual case. I can understand that - just by looking at his FSE posting history and his in-game behavior - he might appear as a very immature guy, who should not be in charge of anything - especially not this list. But I think that would be an unfair, plain and very, very superficial statement. Ciiges takes this game very seriously (even though he sometimes wants people to think the opposite) and that results in him also taking this list, as his little project, seriously. In my experience, he very is cautious about trying to integrate as many opinions as possible from as many sides of our community as possible; he has learned from the last list and you can feel it. That's why he's a perfectly fine choice for moderating this list. Period.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cooper on December 17, 2020, 05:08:08 pm
Many discussions on validity mostly boil down to the inherent subjectivity and/or bias of a list based on ratings. Peoples opinion and reason for assigning a specific ranking to a person is a complex interaction of factors related to 1vs1 performance, probably caf gf performance (as some players in the list also do not really actively participate in 1vs1), and/or other personal experience (performance in trainings, or private play). It is true that people with less exposure or less "exposure friendly" regiments will be inherently disadvantaged here, but this is also why this list did not really claim to be objective, but only as objective as it can be (as such Dokletian's remark to a Framework is more the admittance of bias, not a cover-up).

In my opinion, the reason why Grozni seems to despise the idea of such a list is essentially why these lists are only tolerated in off-topic. They cannot be fair and are potentially easy to be misinterpreted and/or misused (ok probably also because they generate lots and lots of salt). For me, it certainly is just a fun off-topic thread  in a topic that I find interesting (plus I also like data, dont judge).

I do not think that the rankings here likely do influence people's decision making for recruitment. It is not difficult to find the strongest cav regs by looking into competition results and people who do not care about this will not be interested in this list either.

The argument against Ciiges as manger of such a list is controversial. Can you ridicule a product by misbehaviour of its creator? I personally also think Ciiges could be more diplomatic with critiques, but this thread is still Off-topic, so as long as the Moderation does not move in, I see no problem. (maybe to clarify here;  I feel like people overstate the importance of this list. Eventhough this is the only list of its kind, I see it as 'a' list, not 'the' list, which I think should be a good approach with any list or statistic in general)

I feel that this list never claimed to be just nor do I see a measureable benefit to its creator (apart from self-exposure I guess, but thats not necessarily a benefit), thus I do not see a need to be removed from it.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Bocom on December 17, 2020, 05:08:33 pm
Period.

What a chad
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Grozni on December 17, 2020, 05:27:10 pm
I'm fucking dying, how you can still find the keys on your keyboard with your head so far up your own ass is truly magnificent.

I have a miniature keyboard in my ass. And all my arguments are valid while you have none.

And it would be nice if some guys stop spamming Dutch on English speaking forum, you guys didn't fully take over NW quite yet.

doubt, most of ur arguments are useless since you misinterpret everything Dokle said. You blame the creator & raters because you only get rated "properly" if you are in the top 4 regiments which is klinklare onzin. We can't do anything about it that smaller/worse regiments only fight other regiments at their level so we don't get a proper look at their skill level.

For example: Players from 33rd like Giorno, SirLegion, Uganda are rated worse than they would be in regiments which are more competitive, simply because their regiments don't allow them to show their skill by not organizing a training match vs a higher skilled regiment.

You are correct. As you keep confirming my point, which is that this list's ranking concept allows players to rank up only if they fight in big 1v1s, thereby they have to be a member of one of the very few big competitive regiments.

Therefore, initially including so many players who are not members of these regiments, without even asking them, gave this list all the qualities of a recruitment scam, that hooks the players by showing them an initially low rank that will be fixed once they join one of few regiments.

If something has qualities of a scam it is a scam, and rather than defending it you should think about how to fix it further. I can't say for sure to what extent this was planned, or was it even on purpose, but some facts remain:

1) The list started with a claim that *all* active players who were forcibly added, no matter what regiment they are in, will be rated according to their skill. This is a naive claim and an impossible task, therefore the list has quickly deformed into what it is now.

2) To believe that members and captains of a tiny amount of regiments who are giving out ranking will have the accuracy of the list in their dearest concern is naive. Since this was "fixed" by involving an equal number of members of a few regiments, the list is still just a recruiting tool whose power is shared among a small number of regiments.

3) By its nature, the list will be autistically defended by those who were given high rank in it.

4) Not quite a fact yet but an important point, Ciiges is in my opinion not fit to run such a list, apart from being seen acting like an angry kid in some occasions, in my personal case I can say his refusal to fix Parigon's regiment label shows that he is not a servant to all that he is supposed to be, but rather forces his will on the list whenever he sees fit. Yes, he may have done the work of starting it, but if he is the only guy who can use excel sheets then this corrupt list should just stop.


One constructive solution I can offer is stop pretending this is an all encompassing ranking list of active hussars, and turn it into some sort of a major league player ranking that is clearly limited to only a certain number of regiments. Then it will stop being a scam, even though it started as one, and will evolve into a toxic but valid ranking list.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 17, 2020, 05:30:20 pm
....Lads...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2p6kwukmRL0
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Aless on December 17, 2020, 05:34:48 pm
Your statement of this list being planned entirely to lure members from smaller regs into bigger ones gives me the same feeling as the 5G mind control paranoists.

Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 17, 2020, 05:37:44 pm
I put too much time into making, coding, balancing, producing the list and gathering data, to write out huge paragraphs with whatever I think of anything on here. You literally have no arguments for saying I am unfit to run a fucking list besides "he wont change pari's regiment to the 10thRH" boo fucking hoo Groczni.

People also seem to forget that I literally have ZERO input in any of the ratings, whatever is on the front page is not my opinion. It's a shared opinion between (initially 12) of the most knowledgeble, respected and/or skilled hussar players. Ofcourse it's an opinion you buffoon, it always is. But atleast it's the average opinion of a wide portion of regiments, and interpretation on how skill should be represented.

The fact of the matter is that your shitty little reg doesn't play enough 1v1's and isn't active enough to be considered an active hussar regiment. Therefore I have decided to put Parilomeus' second reg (the 1er) in his active regiment; because they do play actively and not against shitty teams because they poop themselves at the thought of losing.


Your statement of this list being planned entirely to lure members from smaller regs into bigger ones gives me the same feeling as the 5G mind control paranoists.

Nothing to add really
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 17, 2020, 05:40:23 pm
I put too much time into making, coding, balancing, producing the list and gathering data, to write out huge paragraphs with whatever I think of anything on here. You literally have no arguments for saying I am unfit to run a fucking list besides "he wont change pari's regiment to the 10thRH" boo fucking hoo Groczni.

People also seem to forget that I literally have ZERO input in any of the ratings, whatever is on the front page is not my opinion. It's a shared opinion between (initially 12) of the most knowledgeble, respected and/or skilled hussar players. Ofcourse it's an opinion you buffoon, it always is. But atleast it's the average opinion of a wide portion of regiments, and interpretation on how skill should be represented.

The fact of the matter is that your shitty little reg doesn't play enough 1v1's and isn't active enough to be considered an active hussar regiment. Therefore I have decided to put Parilomeus' second reg (the 1er) in his active regiment; because they do play actively and not against shitty teams because they poop themselves at the thought of losing.


Your statement of this list being planned entirely to lure members from smaller regs into bigger ones gives me the same feeling as the 5G mind control paranoists.

Nothing to add really

Grozni... Personally I wouldn’t have that...
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Shadey on December 17, 2020, 05:52:21 pm
This thread is my new favourite source of cringeyness
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: FreyrDS on December 17, 2020, 06:09:27 pm
As someone who has been part of this community since the glory days of 2014, a true veteran if you will, I feel it is my sacred duty to enlighten the people of FSE with my great knowledge and opinion surrounding this grave matter.

I can simply not help but agree with every single point that Grozni makes. Such intelligence cannot be denied.
Of course Ciiges is RUINING this community by DESTROYING the regimental system by ACTIVELY luring good hard working people from the small regiments to the big corporate regiments. This is a blatant attack on the working class and WILL NOT be tolerated! I say it is time for for the workers of the NW community to unite and FIGHT BACK against the hordes of mindless corporate drones hellbent on extinguishing our pure way of life! DOWN WITH THE WEST

(https://i.imgur.com/URavyY0.png)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Termito on December 17, 2020, 06:11:26 pm
At the end of the day, you can join 4e and still lose.... like dokletian.

Such a loser.

 ;D
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dokletian on December 17, 2020, 06:13:01 pm
Spoiler
This thread is my new favourite source of cringeyness
(https://i.imgur.com/VxtExO4.png)
[close]

At the end of the day, you can join 4e and still lose.... like dokletian.

Such a loser.

 ;D
that's the Nr6 curse, my dude
all my homies hate trophies
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Thyrell on December 17, 2020, 06:17:20 pm
I'm fucking dying, how you can still find the keys on your keyboard with your head so far up your own ass is truly magnificent.

I have a miniature keyboard in my ass. And all my arguments are valid while you have none.

And it would be nice if some guys stop spamming Dutch on English speaking forum, you guys didn't fully take over NW quite yet.

doubt, most of ur arguments are useless since you misinterpret everything Dokle said. You blame the creator & raters because you only get rated "properly" if you are in the top 4 regiments which is klinklare onzin. We can't do anything about it that smaller/worse regiments only fight other regiments at their level so we don't get a proper look at their skill level.

For example: Players from 33rd like Giorno, SirLegion, Uganda are rated worse than they would be in regiments which are more competitive, simply because their regiments don't allow them to show their skill by not organizing a training match vs a higher skilled regiment.

You are correct. As you keep confirming my point, which is that this list's ranking concept allows players to rank up only if they fight in big 1v1s, thereby they have to be a member of one of the very few big competitive regiments.

Therefore, initially including so many players who are not members of these regiments, without even asking them, gave this list all the qualities of a recruitment scam, that hooks the players by showing them an initially low rank that will be fixed once they join one of few regiments.

If something has qualities of a scam it is a scam, and rather than defending it you should think about how to fix it further. I can't say for sure to what extent this was planned, or was it even on purpose, but some facts remain:

1) The list started with a claim that *all* active players who were forcibly added, no matter what regiment they are in, will be rated according to their skill. This is a naive claim and an impossible task, therefore the list has quickly deformed into what it is now.

2) To believe that members and captains of a tiny amount of regiments who are giving out ranking will have the accuracy of the list in their dearest concern is naive. Since this was "fixed" by involving an equal number of members of a few regiments, the list is still just a recruiting tool whose power is shared among a small number of regiments.

3) By its nature, the list will be autistically defended by those who were given high rank in it.

4) Not quite a fact yet but an important point, Ciiges is in my opinion not fit to run such a list, apart from being seen acting like an angry kid in some occasions, in my personal case I can say his refusal to fix Parigon's regiment label shows that he is not a servant to all that he is supposed to be, but rather forces his will on the list whenever he sees fit. Yes, he may have done the work of starting it, but if he is the only guy who can use excel sheets then this corrupt list should just stop.


One constructive solution I can offer is stop pretending this is an all encompassing ranking list of active hussars, and turn it into some sort of a major league player ranking that is clearly limited to only a certain number of regiments. Then it will stop being a scam, even though it started as one, and will evolve into a toxic but valid ranking list.
Not what I said but k.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Naz on December 17, 2020, 06:19:19 pm
As someone who has been part of this community since the glory days of 2014, a true veteran if you will, I feel it is my sacred duty to enlighten the people of FSE with my great knowledge and opinion surrounding this grave matter.

I can simply not help but agree with every single point that Grozni makes. Such intelligence cannot be denied.
Of course Ciiges is RUINING this community by DESTROYING the regimental system by ACTIVELY luring good hard working people from the small regiments to the big corporate regiments. This is a blatant attack on the working class and WILL NOT be tolerated! I say it is time for for the workers of the NW community to unite and FIGHT BACK against the hordes of mindless corporate drones hellbent on extinguishing our pure way of life! DOWN WITH THE WEST

(https://i.imgur.com/URavyY0.png)

I have to agree with my fellow countryman, despite him coming from the Southern part of The Netherlands. How can a person that only has 200 hours in this game even be allowed to make a list which is supposed to represent the skills of players that have ten times the amount of playtime he has, utterly disgusting. Admins, please fix.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cooper on December 17, 2020, 06:32:59 pm
Spoiler
I'm fucking dying, how you can still find the keys on your keyboard with your head so far up your own ass is truly magnificent.

I have a miniature keyboard in my ass. And all my arguments are valid while you have none.

And it would be nice if some guys stop spamming Dutch on English speaking forum, you guys didn't fully take over NW quite yet.

doubt, most of ur arguments are useless since you misinterpret everything Dokle said. You blame the creator & raters because you only get rated "properly" if you are in the top 4 regiments which is klinklare onzin. We can't do anything about it that smaller/worse regiments only fight other regiments at their level so we don't get a proper look at their skill level.

For example: Players from 33rd like Giorno, SirLegion, Uganda are rated worse than they would be in regiments which are more competitive, simply because their regiments don't allow them to show their skill by not organizing a training match vs a higher skilled regiment.

You are correct. As you keep confirming my point, which is that this list's ranking concept allows players to rank up only if they fight in big 1v1s, thereby they have to be a member of one of the very few big competitive regiments.

Therefore, initially including so many players who are not members of these regiments, without even asking them, gave this list all the qualities of a recruitment scam, that hooks the players by showing them an initially low rank that will be fixed once they join one of few regiments.

If something has qualities of a scam it is a scam, and rather than defending it you should think about how to fix it further. I can't say for sure to what extent this was planned, or was it even on purpose, but some facts remain:

1) The list started with a claim that *all* active players who were forcibly added, no matter what regiment they are in, will be rated according to their skill. This is a naive claim and an impossible task, therefore the list has quickly deformed into what it is now.

2) To believe that members and captains of a tiny amount of regiments who are giving out ranking will have the accuracy of the list in their dearest concern is naive. Since this was "fixed" by involving an equal number of members of a few regiments, the list is still just a recruiting tool whose power is shared among a small number of regiments.

3) By its nature, the list will be autistically defended by those who were given high rank in it.

4) Not quite a fact yet but an important point, Ciiges is in my opinion not fit to run such a list, apart from being seen acting like an angry kid in some occasions, in my personal case I can say his refusal to fix Parigon's regiment label shows that he is not a servant to all that he is supposed to be, but rather forces his will on the list whenever he sees fit. Yes, he may have done the work of starting it, but if he is the only guy who can use excel sheets then this corrupt list should just stop.


One constructive solution I can offer is stop pretending this is an all encompassing ranking list of active hussars, and turn it into some sort of a major league player ranking that is clearly limited to only a certain number of regiments. Then it will stop being a scam, even though it started as one, and will evolve into a toxic but valid ranking list.
[close]
The premise of your recuitment scam theory lies on the assumption that people are making it their main goal in their nw "career" to advance in this particular list, otherwise there would be no motivation to feel pressured to join a strong regiment. I strongly doubt this to be the case.
Trying to make the list more valid by just including only some regiments (while not being a bad idea) would not elivate your hypothesized recruitment issue, as then one would only get listed by being in said regiments to begin with. It would also not eliviate validity too much, as then one could point out, that regiments still differ in quality ( I guess scores could be normalized by regimental performance, but then we would need a regimental performance measure).
Lastly, I am defending this list even though I am listed in Tier 4... Is this ruled under implied exceptions in your argument?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on December 17, 2020, 06:49:36 pm
The real proof that this is all a scam is that ciiges hasn't added a rating for himself when he is eating, which would be T4 at best imo
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Grozni on December 17, 2020, 06:50:34 pm
I put too much time into making, coding, balancing, producing the list and gathering data, to write out huge paragraphs with whatever I think of anything on here. You literally have no arguments for saying I am unfit to run a fucking list besides "he wont change pari's regiment to the 10thRH" boo fucking hoo Groczni.

People also seem to forget that I literally have ZERO input in any of the ratings, whatever is on the front page is not my opinion. It's a shared opinion between (initially 12) of the most knowledgeble, respected and/or skilled hussar players. Ofcourse it's an opinion you buffoon, it always is. But atleast it's the average opinion of a wide portion of regiments, and interpretation on how skill should be represented.

The fact of the matter is that your shitty little reg doesn't play enough 1v1's and isn't active enough to be considered an active hussar regiment. Therefore I have decided to put Parilomeus' second reg (the 1er) in his active regiment; because they do play actively and not against shitty teams because they poop themselves at the thought of losing.


Whatever is on the front page is not your opinion? And then you change a player's main regiment, against his wishes, entirely based on your (wrong) opinion of that regiment's activity? What a way to eat your own words.

You literally cheated for the benefit of your regiment, since the result is yet another member of 1er on the list, according to your stats which you just admitted to have tampered with, entirely based on your "opinion".

If you did that, who knows what else you tampered with that we don't know about yet, and what you manage to get away with by continuously sucking up to those who give out ratings, seriously what a joke of a list if this guy is running it. And how someone like Dokletian who is an actual tier 1 can stand sharing the tier with this pavian is beyond me.

To the members of the 8th, alright we get it, you have won the championship, now you can be a gang of obnoxious apes spreading good humor everywhere, including massively trolling as admin on cavalry groupfighting, I am sure your parents are proud of you all.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Shadey on December 17, 2020, 06:52:10 pm
Spoiler
This thread is my new favourite source of cringeyness
(https://i.imgur.com/VxtExO4.png)
[close]
Felt cute might delete later
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cage on December 17, 2020, 06:56:17 pm
To the members of the 8th, alright we get it, you have won the championship, now you can be a gang of obnoxious apes spreading good humor everywhere, including massively trolling as admin on cavalry groupfighting, I am sure your parents are proud of you all.

bold of you to assume we didn't do that before
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on December 17, 2020, 06:58:05 pm
To the members of the 8th, alright we get it, you have won the championship, now you can be a gang of obnoxious apes spreading good humor everywhere, including massively trolling as admin on cavalry groupfighting, I am sure your parents are proud of you all.

weird of you to assume that we only started shit stirring AFTER we became CL champs
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dokletian on December 17, 2020, 07:02:12 pm
Grozni, you don’t seem to be interested in a proper conversation, since you‘re ignoring most valid points that clearly prove you wrong. This isn‘t about this list itself but you indirectly dealing with some shit that‘s going between you and few individuals, so deal with them directly.

No one cares as much about this list as you do; you really overestimate it drastically.





Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on December 17, 2020, 07:05:06 pm
Grozni, you don’t seem to be interested in a proper conversation, since you‘re ignoring most valid points that clearly prove you wrong. This isn‘t about this list itself but you indirectly dealing with some shit that‘s going between you and few individuals, so deal with them directly.

No one cares as much about this list as you do; you really overestimate it drastically.

Actually I care.
If he doesn't make me tier 1 soon i'll send lightning feet pics in payment to log ban him from cavgf
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: SirNelsonGOE on December 17, 2020, 07:06:21 pm
Ciiges:

Ask yourself what you do, a list, of those who are supposed to be your friends according to their "capacity", one of your friends tells you, "I don't want to be on the list", and you keep putting it ... honestly, you have lost my respect Ciiges. (Just as I find it wrong that those who have voted the list do not complain to ciiges for that treatment of St00m or Darraq)

I have to admit that I liked the list at first, but now it seems to me that your position is authoritarian and retrograde towards St00m or Darraq

Let me illustrate:

The classification of individuals according to lists of competition in any area, from intellectual models to video games, is called classism. And discrimination based on that classification is also called classism.

 Regardless of whether or not this list was made with the objectivity of a Jew threatened by thirty Nazis (are you seriously putting Darklight behind me?), It is totally retrograde and above all shows a conceit that should be motive of shame more than pride from your part.

Probably the most childish characteristic of your list is not to erase the names of those who have asked you, first, because you show an ecpathic character (contrary to empathy) and, second, because you believe that the position that you or anyone who has voted this list is not mere prejudice. When a list is not based on mathematical criteria or objective minimums (empiric stuff), has the same quality that a shopping list has, insubstantial and arbitrary. To give you an idea, FIFA to make its games, relies on more than 5 million specific data to make the rankings of the players and is still considered a subjective and false list.

Asking a minimum of good sense, erase the name of whoever asks you and stop believing that a video game is a reason to believe yourself superior or discriminate against someone.

PS: Someone will say: this is what you say because you are in tier 4, well anyone who knows me will know that I care little about merit, I have been a cadet of my own free will in the 8th for more than a year, and I would calmly say reasons why I could be on tier 5 on this list and still happy with that.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Shadey on December 17, 2020, 07:06:38 pm
To the members of the 8th, alright we get it, you have won the championship, now you can be a gang of obnoxious apes spreading good humor everywhere, including massively trolling as admin on cavalry groupfighting, I am sure your parents are proud of you all.
Yes, Stannis is King Kong and we are all his bitches
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 17, 2020, 07:06:52 pm
I put too much time into making, coding, balancing, producing the list and gathering data, to write out huge paragraphs with whatever I think of anything on here. You literally have no arguments for saying I am unfit to run a fucking list besides "he wont change pari's regiment to the 10thRH" boo fucking hoo Groczni.

People also seem to forget that I literally have ZERO input in any of the ratings, whatever is on the front page is not my opinion. It's a shared opinion between (initially 12) of the most knowledgeble, respected and/or skilled hussar players. Ofcourse it's an opinion you buffoon, it always is. But atleast it's the average opinion of a wide portion of regiments, and interpretation on how skill should be represented.

The fact of the matter is that your shitty little reg doesn't play enough 1v1's and isn't active enough to be considered an active hussar regiment. Therefore I have decided to put Parilomeus' second reg (the 1er) in his active regiment; because they do play actively and not against shitty teams because they poop themselves at the thought of losing.


Whatever is on the front page is not your opinion? And then you change a player's main regiment, against his wishes, entirely based on your (wrong) opinion of that regiment's activity? What a way to eat your own words.

You literally cheated for the benefit of your regiment, since the result is yet another member of 1er on the list, according to your stats which you just admitted to have tampered with, entirely based on your "opinion".

If you did that, who knows what else you tampered with that we don't know about yet, and what you manage to get away with by continuously sucking up to those who give out ratings, seriously what a joke of a list if this guy is running it. And how someone like Dokletian who is an actual tier 1 can stand sharing the tier with this pavian is beyond me.

To the members of the 8th, alright we get it, you have won the championship, now you can be a gang of obnoxious apes spreading good humor everywhere, including massively trolling as admin on cavalry groupfighting, I am sure your parents are proud of you all.

I usually laugh at monkeys at the zoo, but to laugh at one on the forums is new to me.


because you believe that the position that you or anyone who has voted this list is not mere prejudice. When a list is not based on mathematical criteria or objective minimums (empiric stuff), has the same quality that a shopping list has, insubstantial and arbitrary.

Which is why I said it's all opinionated, not by my personal opinion, but the average of the raters.

erase the name of whoever asks you and stop believing that a video game is a reason to believe yourself superior or discriminate against someone.

I think that is up to me to decide, supported by the forum rules. It is quite obvious the entire st0m thing is a big laugh and a joke, but thanks for playing the white knight in his defence.

PS: Someone will say: this is what you say because you are in tier 4

Don't put words into our mouths like Grozni is. You are free to give your opinion.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 17, 2020, 07:07:20 pm
@ The 8th
I put too much time into making, coding, balancing, producing the list and gathering data, to write out huge paragraphs with whatever I think of anything on here. You literally have no arguments for saying I am unfit to run a fucking list besides "he wont change pari's regiment to the 10thRH" boo fucking hoo Groczni.

People also seem to forget that I literally have ZERO input in any of the ratings, whatever is on the front page is not my opinion. It's a shared opinion between (initially 12) of the most knowledgeble, respected and/or skilled hussar players. Ofcourse it's an opinion you buffoon, it always is. But atleast it's the average opinion of a wide portion of regiments, and interpretation on how skill should be represented.

The fact of the matter is that your shitty little reg doesn't play enough 1v1's and isn't active enough to be considered an active hussar regiment. Therefore I have decided to put Parilomeus' second reg (the 1er) in his active regiment; because they do play actively and not against shitty teams because they poop themselves at the thought of losing.


Whatever is on the front page is not your opinion? And then you change a player's main regiment, against his wishes, entirely based on your (wrong) opinion of that regiment's activity? What a way to eat your own words.

You literally cheated for the benefit of your regiment, since the result is yet another member of 1er on the list, according to your stats which you just admitted to have tampered with, entirely based on your "opinion".

If you did that, who knows what else you tampered with that we don't know about yet, and what you manage to get away with by continuously sucking up to those who give out ratings, seriously what a joke of a list if this guy is running it. And how someone like Dokletian who is an actual tier 1 can stand sharing the tier with this pavian is beyond me.

To the members of the 8th, alright we get it, you have won the championship, now you can be a gang of obnoxious apes spreading good humor everywhere, including massively trolling as admin on cavalry groupfighting, I am sure your parents are proud of you all.
[close]
(https://i.imgur.com/EfrvnEc.png)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Rikkert on December 17, 2020, 07:25:08 pm
Regardless of whether or not this list was made with the objectivity of a Jew threatened by thirty Nazis
Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D-a_8RVU0AIQHCP.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: SirNelsonGOE on December 17, 2020, 07:26:47 pm

I think that is up to me to decide, supported by the forum rules. It is quite obvious the entire st0m thing is a big laugh and a joke, but thanks for playing the white knight in his defence.


Don't put words into our mouths like Grozni is. You are free to give your opinion.

If you think that the rules of a forum are an example of what is good, then you have no idea

well, since what you want is to be right: okay, putting on the list who does not want to be on it makes you a person with a big heart. You are objective, and you have not made the list to feel better at all.

It would be interesting to see the psychological reasons for making a ranking list of the people you play with, but I am lazy to do a psychological analysis of you.

Oh and this is my objective list of players with hearts:

tier 1: Everyone / tier 2: you. (and maybe Aless)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 17, 2020, 07:32:22 pm

I think that is up to me to decide, supported by the forum rules. It is quite obvious the entire st0m thing is a big laugh and a joke, but thanks for playing the white knight in his defence.


Don't put words into our mouths like Grozni is. You are free to give your opinion.

If you think that the rules of a forum are an example of what is good, then you have no idea

There you go again putting words into my mouth... I just said I am following the forum rules, not that I think they make the forum a good place.

well, since what you want is to be right: okay, putting on the list who does not want to be on it makes you a person with a big heart. You are objective, and you have not made the list to feel better at all.

You are quite correct in saying that. As stated in the post above the actual ratings (which I doubt you have read) I have stated it adds a little competition to the scene.

It would be interesting to see the psychological reasons for making a ranking list of the people you play with, but I am lazy to do a psychological analysis of you.

Don't bother, I am quite normal with the exception of my burning passion for lists and gaming.

Oh and this is my objective list of players with hearts:

tier 1: Everyone / tier 2: you. (and maybe Aless).

How can someone - like you - with a tier 1 heart, say something so hurtful... :(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cameron. on December 17, 2020, 07:33:37 pm
sad to see no Eejit / hamish, centurion or Scott / psycho

best 3 nw cav ive ever seen
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 17, 2020, 07:35:27 pm
sad to see no Eejit / hamish, centurion or Scott / psycho

best 3 nw cav ive ever seen
That's why we leave the rating to players in the big regiments, with actual knowledge.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Gibby Jr on December 17, 2020, 07:36:13 pm
The classification of individuals according to lists of competition in any area, from intellectual models to video games, is called classism. And discrimination based on that classification is also called classism.

 Regardless of whether or not this list was made with the objectivity of a Jew threatened by thirty Nazis (are you seriously putting Darklight behind me?), It is totally retrograde and above all shows a conceit that should be motive of shame more than pride from your part.

Probably the most childish characteristic of your list is not to erase the names of those who have asked you, first, because you show an ecpathic character (contrary to empathy) and, second, because you believe that the position that you or anyone who has voted this list is not mere prejudice. When a list is not based on mathematical criteria or objective minimums (empiric stuff), has the same quality that a shopping list has, insubstantial and arbitrary. To give you an idea, FIFA to make its games, relies on more than 5 million specific data to make the rankings of the players and is still considered a subjective and false list.

Asking a minimum of good sense, erase the name of whoever asks you and stop believing that a video game is a reason to believe yourself superior or discriminate against someone.

You can subjectively argue that some of the players have been unfairly rated and are being discriminated against because of personal or regimental relations with those whose opinions have been used in making the list, but the inherent subjectivity of the list itself makes it almost impossible to highlight an example of discrimination. As you correctly point out, it is an arbitrary and insubstantial list based on the given opinions of several players, something which is made worse by the absence of classifications or requirements for each tier. All that means is that, with that knowledge, you should be less concerned with the conclusions of the list, because you know that it is solely based on opinion and subject to arbitration and, surely, to some personal discrimination by the contributors as relating to certain individuals, the latter being something which you could not prove without a stricter classification system or a direct admission.

The continued inclusion of people who request to be removed is not evidence that Ciiges considers himself superior or in a position to discriminate against anyone. That's a leap of logic which doesn't connect. You might say he should respect the wishes of that person and remove them, which is fair, but the fact he doesn't is not necessarily evidence of a belief of superiority as it could just as well be evidence of, and I believe this to be case, his continued commitment to maintaining the list in its whole form. If too many players are purposefully removed then the list no longer displays a full picture and is at a loss for legitimacy. I think it's quite obvious that Ciiges wants to keep everyone on the list because he wants it to be considered a generally accurate picture of the scene relating to skill, not because he thinks he's superior and has the right to dictate everyone's skill level. Not that the last point even stands on its own either, since the ratings are the combined opinion of several players from different parts of the scene and do not represent Ciiges' personal view.

You should accept its subjectivity, which is unavoidable in quite literally any list that is not based on statistical data, and from that you can choose to take it as seriously as you like. I do agree that a more precise classification system would improve the list, especially if it was categorical, and having the opinions of many different people on a wide number of categories would surely improve the perceived accuracy of the list. That said, it's a lot of work for something which would only change players' ratings by a few decimal points.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 17, 2020, 07:36:41 pm
Yes. BNL had nothing to do with the sudden change of regiments in the dutch and belgian community im sure :P it was this list all along!!!
  :o  (I'm sure this happened in some other nations too, although BNL is one of the more obvious examples)

Also, I am pretty sure Pari can speak for himself. If he was that upset about his 1er behind his name he'd have told us no? Especially since he's in the same regiment as Ciiges? Or hell.. On this thread again? Like last time? Or are you his fucking guardian who has to be there to manage everything for him?

Ratings are subjective, plenty that we all think should be different. And sure some of the lower tier players might be better but stuck in worse regiments. But even then, they could've proven themselves this SNC. And there will be tournaments in the future (Fantasy League, etc) where they can do it again.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cameron. on December 17, 2020, 07:37:50 pm
sad to see no Eejit / hamish, centurion or Scott / psycho

best 3 nw cav ive ever seen
That's why we leave the rating to players in the big regiments, with actual knowledge.
well no its because they dont play anymore retard
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 17, 2020, 07:40:11 pm
sad to see no Eejit / hamish, centurion or Scott / psycho

best 3 nw cav ive ever seen
That's why we leave the rating to players in the big regiments, with actual knowledge.
well no its because they dont play anymore retard

You should've looked harder if those are the best 3 you can name lol.
And if they don't play anymore, then why is it sad to not see them? Doesn't it mention it's active cav :/
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cameron. on December 17, 2020, 07:41:57 pm
sad to see no Eejit / hamish, centurion or Scott / psycho

best 3 nw cav ive ever seen
That's why we leave the rating to players in the big regiments, with actual knowledge.
well no its because they dont play anymore retard

You should've looked harder if those are the best 3 you can name lol.
And if they don't play anymore, then why is it sad to not see them? Doesn't it mention it's active cav :/

not the best three i can name and didnt rlly think about it lmao, theyre simply three who i always think of when i think of cav due to their ability

and no it doesnt as youve said
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 17, 2020, 07:42:57 pm
sad to see no Eejit / hamish, centurion or Scott / psycho

best 3 nw cav ive ever seen
That's why we leave the rating to players in the big regiments, with actual knowledge.
well no its because they dont play anymore retard

You should've looked harder if those are the best 3 you can name lol.
And if they don't play anymore, then why is it sad to not see them? Doesn't it mention it's active cav :/

not the best three i can name and didnt rlly think about it lmao, theyre simply three who i always think of when i think of cav due to their ability

and no it doesnt as youve said
Your contribution to this list has been noted, thank you so very much
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 17, 2020, 07:43:11 pm
sad to see no Eejit / hamish, centurion or Scott / psycho

best 3 nw cav ive ever seen
That's why we leave the rating to players in the big regiments, with actual knowledge.
well no its because they dont play anymore retard

You should've looked harder if those are the best 3 you can name lol.
And if they don't play anymore, then why is it sad to not see them? Doesn't it mention it's active cav :/

not the best three i can name and didnt rlly think about it lmao, theyre simply three who i always think of when i think of cav due to their ability

and no it doesnt as youve said

Everyone sure as hell realised it was though, how else are you supposed to give an accurate rating of how people are now?
Not to mention missing names such as Rival, Caylor etc?!?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Lightning. on December 17, 2020, 07:45:43 pm
What even is this mess here? Cant I just be half dead with corona and not have to read a book? Someone wants to tldr this?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 17, 2020, 07:46:30 pm
What even is this mess here? Cant I just be half dead with corona and not have to read a book? Someone wants to tldr this?

sure,

grozni thinks its rigged and its just a recruitment method to force decent players in worse regiments to join the big 4
(cus the players in worse regs are put lower? and cus... Pari with 1er tag after name when hes 10thRH aswell? idk)
then shitshow
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Yuwan on December 17, 2020, 07:52:08 pm
When am i being put on t1? i think this list is rigged i am 1er and not even high rated...
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: SirNelsonGOE on December 17, 2020, 07:54:35 pm
The classification of individuals according to lists of competition in any area, from intellectual models to video games, is called classism. And discrimination based on that classification is also called classism.

 Regardless of whether or not this list was made with the objectivity of a Jew threatened by thirty Nazis (are you seriously putting Darklight behind me?), It is totally retrograde and above all shows a conceit that should be motive of shame more than pride from your part.

Probably the most childish characteristic of your list is not to erase the names of those who have asked you, first, because you show an ecpathic character (contrary to empathy) and, second, because you believe that the position that you or anyone who has voted this list is not mere prejudice. When a list is not based on mathematical criteria or objective minimums (empiric stuff), has the same quality that a shopping list has, insubstantial and arbitrary. To give you an idea, FIFA to make its games, relies on more than 5 million specific data to make the rankings of the players and is still considered a subjective and false list.

Asking a minimum of good sense, erase the name of whoever asks you and stop believing that a video game is a reason to believe yourself superior or discriminate against someone.

You can subjectively argue that some of the players have been unfairly rated and are being discriminated against because of personal or regimental relations with those whose opinions have been used in making the list, but the inherent subjectivity of the list itself makes it almost impossible to highlight an example of discrimination. As you correctly point out, it is an arbitrary and insubstantial list based on the given opinions of several players, something which is made worse by the absence of classifications or requirements for each tier. All that means is that, with that knowledge, you should be less concerned with the conclusions of the list, because you know that it is solely based on opinion and subject to arbitration and, surely, to some personal discrimination by the contributors as relating to certain individuals, the latter being something which you could not prove without a stricter classification system or a direct admission.

The continued inclusion of people who request to be removed is not evidence that Ciiges considers himself superior or in a position to discriminate against anyone. That's a leap of logic which doesn't connect. You might say he should respect the wishes of that person and remove them, which is fair, but the fact he doesn't is not necessarily evidence of a belief of superiority as it could just as well be evidence of, and I believe this to be case, his continued commitment to maintaining the list in its whole form. If too many players are purposefully removed then the list no longer displays a full picture and is at a loss for legitimacy. I think it's quite obvious that Ciiges wants to keep everyone on the list because he wants it to be considered a generally accurate picture of the scene relating to skill, not because he thinks he's superior and has the right to dictate everyone's skill level. Not that the last point even stands on its own either, since the ratings are the combined opinion of several players from different parts of the scene and do not represent Ciiges' personal view.

You should accept its subjectivity, which is unavoidable in quite literally any list that is not based on statistical data, and from that you can choose to take it as seriously as you like. I do agree that a more precise classification system would improve the list, especially if it was categorical, and having the opinions of many different people on a wide number of categories would surely improve the perceived accuracy of the list. That said, it's a lot of work for something which would only change players' ratings by a few decimal points.

First I agree with everything you say about subjectivity, and that is more the fault of whoever takes the list seriously.

But you do not understand, I may like the list, it may seem subjective and it is normal, but my criticism is essentially to introduce people who do not want to be on it. People you play with every day, whom you are not respecting in their decision, before "simple elements of a list" are people, and even more, friends. I don't care if the forum lets him do that, it's just not right. And thats all.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 17, 2020, 07:55:50 pm
How is it not right? And why are you telling me it's not right? I'm not the one rating them.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: FreyrDS on December 17, 2020, 08:03:27 pm
When am i being put on t1? i think this list is rigged i am 1er and not even high rated...
I can only agree with this. Best player I have ever seen play and it's not even close.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Tardet on December 17, 2020, 08:03:45 pm
How is it not right? And why are you telling me it's not right? I'm not the one rating them.
He is not talking about the ratings, he is talking about you refusing to remove people in certain occasions (and anwsering Gibby's point about it).
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 17, 2020, 08:08:20 pm
How is it not right? And why are you telling me it's not right? I'm not the one rating them.
He is not talking about the ratings, he is talking about you refusing to remove people in certain occasions (and anwsering Gibby's point about it).
As of yet St0m is still an active player, despite announcing his retirement. Furthermore it was always a joke in the 4e and it was quite obvious I was joking. I'll remove him if he actually retires.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dokletian on December 17, 2020, 08:39:21 pm
I swear FSE brings out the worst in everyone
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on December 17, 2020, 08:46:08 pm
I think we should stop arguing and talk about the more important things, like finding out who stole grozni's sweetroll
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on December 17, 2020, 09:01:36 pm
I swear FSE brings out the worst in everyone
waaaaiiiittt
So NW brings out the worst in everyone because it's from FSE?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: QuinnML on December 17, 2020, 09:17:47 pm
Prepared to fist fight anyone that thinks I’m lower rating than Kreativer

@Kreativer

https://youtu.be/l3pDHB5P3Xk
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Law on December 17, 2020, 09:50:10 pm
why give attention to a list that will never be perfect and get pissed off for nothing, because no one can know each other's true level

Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Remao on December 17, 2020, 10:06:47 pm
Just to be sure that I understand everything (lazy boy, I read diagonally)

So, Remao, Dokletian, Hannes, Stannis, DeLaBedoyere, Cage, MajorMark, Thyrell, Treiz, Soartex, DarkHawk and Carlok are wrong about tiers of our beauty cavalry community  ???

If I hurt some of you, I'm so sorry  :'(

Let's do some 1v1 to make sure I'm right !!!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Law on December 17, 2020, 10:11:04 pm
Just to be sure that I understand everything (lazy boy, I read diagonally)

So, Remao, Dokletian, Hannes, Stannis, DeLaBedoyere, Cage, MajorMark, Thyrell, Treiz, Soartex, DarkHawk and Carlok are wrong about tiers of our beauty cavalry community  ???

If I hurt some of you, I'm so sorry  :'(

Let's do some 1v1 to make sure I'm right !!!



always the same to ask for 1v1
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 17, 2020, 10:30:03 pm
Just to be sure that I understand everything (lazy boy, I read diagonally)

So, Remao, Dokletian, Hannes, Stannis, DeLaBedoyere, Cage, MajorMark, Thyrell, Treiz, Soartex, DarkHawk and Carlok are wrong about tiers of our beauty cavalry community  ???

If I hurt some of you, I'm so sorry  :'(

Let's do some 1v1 to make sure I'm right !!!

Ur tier 2 maximum
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 17, 2020, 11:23:54 pm
Just to be sure that I understand everything (lazy boy, I read diagonally)

So, Remao, Dokletian, Hannes, Stannis, DeLaBedoyere, Cage, MajorMark, Thyrell, Treiz, Soartex, DarkHawk and Carlok are wrong about tiers of our beauty cavalry community  ???

If I hurt some of you, I'm so sorry  :'(

Let's do some 1v1 to make sure I'm right !!!
Who are you exactly? Your name doesn't ring a bell so I don't think your tier 9 opinion has any value... smh
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Tigrane on December 18, 2020, 12:24:12 am
We all agree that playing in "big" regiments brings more visibility. On the other hand, visibility doesn't necessarily bring more points in the list, it just brings a more precise vision of what the players have of you, so also of those who rate you. So someone can be very good on "cav gf" but bad in 1v1 matches simply because they don't play this kind of matches. So his tier will probably be inaccurate, because other players will not know the he's bad in 1v1 matches, but they will know that he's good on the cav gf server.

I just don't really understand the drama, because let's imagine that this is real and that this list was designed to bring players into the top 4. It's not this list that is going to influence players who are greedy for skills or notoriety to switch to a "better" regiment. If they are already in this mentality they will do so whether this list exists or not.

This is a list that represents the opinion of some recognized players, but that's all. If you don't like it that is your right and you should not pay any more attention to it.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on December 18, 2020, 10:25:03 am
Is this game for you guys really just about winning tournaments? ???

Should i feel bad to not join a good regiment because i've never won a tournament in my 7 years of playing the game?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Elias on December 18, 2020, 10:48:53 am
Is this game for you guys really just about winning tournaments? ???

Should i feel bad to not join a good regiment because i've never won a tournament in my 7 years of playing the game?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: ~Felix~ on December 18, 2020, 11:17:51 am
It's just a list :O
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 18, 2020, 11:53:01 am
Can someone put me tier 1 or I will leave this list
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: SwissGronkh on December 18, 2020, 11:59:46 am
Can someone put me tier 1 or I will leave this list
Spoiler
(https://i.imgflip.com/4qulcw.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 18, 2020, 12:53:05 pm
Just to be sure that I understand everything (lazy boy, I read diagonally)

So, Remao, Dokletian, Hannes, Stannis, DeLaBedoyere, Cage, MajorMark, Thyrell, Treiz, Soartex, DarkHawk and Carlok are wrong about tiers of our beauty cavalry community  ???

If I hurt some of you, I'm so sorry  :'(

Let's do some 1v1 to make sure I'm right !!!
(https://pics.me.me/thumb_who-the-fookis-mero-dat-guy-ufc-memegenerator-net-who-the-54212649.png)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Termito on December 18, 2020, 01:22:34 pm
Even if the list is unfair and wrong, This "list" is updated which is more than others list can say.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 18, 2020, 03:48:57 pm
Can someone put me tier 1 or I will leave this list
Spoiler
(https://i.imgflip.com/4qulcw.jpg)
[close]

it made me laugh congrats :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dusbled on December 18, 2020, 04:26:06 pm
Even if the list is unfair and wrong, This "list" is updated which is more than others list can say.

when was the last time Blader played in a match though? :D
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 18, 2020, 05:32:13 pm
Even if the list is unfair and wrong, This "list" is updated which is more than others list can say.

when was the last time Blader played in a match though? :D

8th vs 4e final


Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Grozni on December 18, 2020, 06:03:42 pm
Even if the list is unfair and wrong, This "list" is updated which is more than others list can say.

If something is unfair and wrong, updating it only serves to keep up the unfairness and wrongness of it.

But in your comment I see one clear example of an argument against statements such as "this is just a list", "you take it too seriously", etc... If it is so unimportant why do so many players want it to exist? Why do you so much like to see it updated even if it is unfair and wrong?

Clearly this list has two states of existence in our minds, it is both important and not important at the same time. And those who were fooled into validating it can switch between the two states as it suits them whenever they argue, to convince others or themselves into something.

Me, who argues that the list has a negative effect and is corruptly run, have no choice but to be locked into "the list is important" state. Therefore, anyone who opposes that view will easily jump to the "the list is not important" argument, without realizing that their words and actions on some other occasions will prove exactly the opposite. In occasions such as being thankful to the editor for running it, or just simply opening the page to look at the latest results. With this in mind, anyone who's argument is "the list is not important" is not providing anything meaningful to the discussion and can be ignored.

With this out of the way, my main point is that the person editing it is a proven liar and authoritarian, and whatever hard work he is doing he is shitting all over it with his words and actions. And everyone who despite that rushes to excuse him and defend him only manage to prove that their main mindset is that "the list is important". Which may as well be the one and only true state of the list, while "the list is not important" is just an illusion and something one tells himself (or more often to others) when he wants to feel morally correct.

We all agree that playing in "big" regiments brings more visibility. On the other hand, visibility doesn't necessarily bring more points in the list, it just brings a more precise vision of what the players have of you, so also of those who rate you. So someone can be very good on "cav gf" but bad in 1v1 matches simply because they don't play this kind of matches. So his tier will probably be inaccurate, because other players will not know the he's bad in 1v1 matches, but they will know that he's good on the cav gf server.

I just don't really understand the drama, because let's imagine that this is real and that this list was designed to bring players into the top 4. It's not this list that is going to influence players who are greedy for skills or notoriety to switch to a "better" regiment. If they are already in this mentality they will do so whether this list exists or not.

This is a list that represents the opinion of some recognized players, but that's all. If you don't like it that is your right and you should not pay any more attention to it.

You are right in that players who would switch regiments to achieve rank increase are unworthy of discussion.

But what is your opinion when it comes to a case of a player who did not fully switch regiments, yet Ciiges intentionally mislabels him on the list, as if his main regiment is one of those four regiments, and then refuses to change the label even when that player privately asks him to?

And then makes his public response to be in the lines of "I have chosen to put him down as a member of 1er because your regiment is shit, not competitive, inactive, and ..." (add further untrue insults).

To not misquote, I will put that piece of writing down here:
The fact of the matter is that your shitty little reg doesn't play enough 1v1's and isn't active enough to be considered an active hussar regiment. Therefore I have decided to put Parilomeus' second reg (the 1er) in his active regiment; because they do play actively and not against shitty teams because they poop themselves at the thought of losing.

What is your opinion on that I wonder? How does this help the idea that this list is not a tool of a few main competitive regiments? How long until some other regiment will be non-competitive enough to be shown on the list, even though that regiment's member somehow ended up on it before even joining one of those competitive regiments?

Furthermore, this kid started lying whenever he opens his mouth

Some example? Apart from Ciiges lying that he has zero input on what is on the front page, but then admits that he can decide what the player's main regiment is? You don't have to go far for the latest example.

Furthermore it was always a joke in the 4e and it was quite obvious I was joking.

Let's look at what that obvious joke was:

Funny you were ok being in the list when you were 2.9, but now you're 3.2 you want to be removed

Ah ah, a real kneeslapper that one, but don't quit your dayjob to become a full blown comedian yet. There is still something missing in your jokes, perhaps humor, rather than aggression caused by panic when you believe that someone will reduce the validity of your list by asking to be removed from it.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Naz on December 18, 2020, 06:25:43 pm
Even if the list is unfair and wrong, This "list" is updated which is more than others list can say.

If something is unfair and wrong, updating it only serves to keep up the unfairness and wrongness of it.

But in your comment I see one clear example of an argument against statements such as "this is just a list", "you take it too seriously", etc... If it is so unimportant why do so many players want it to exist? Why do you so much like to see it updated even if it is unfair and wrong?

Clearly this list has two states of existence in our minds, it is both important and not important at the same time. And those who were fooled into validating it can switch between the two states as it suits them whenever they argue, to convince others or themselves into something.

Me, who argues that the list has a negative effect and is corruptly run, have no choice but to be locked into "the list is important" state. Therefore, anyone who opposes that view will easily jump to the "the list is not important" argument, without realizing that their words and actions on some other occasions will prove exactly the opposite. In occasions such as being thankful to the editor for running it, or just simply opening the page to look at the latest results. With this in mind, anyone who's argument is "the list is not important" is not providing anything meaningful to the discussion and can be ignored.

With this out of the way, my main point is that the person editing it is a proven liar and authoritarian, and whatever hard work he is doing he is shitting all over it with his words and actions. And everyone who despite that rushes to excuse him and defend him only manage to prove that their main mindset is that "the list is important". Which may as well be the one and only true state of the list, while "the list is not important" is just an illusion and something one tells himself (or more often to others) when he wants to feel morally correct.

We all agree that playing in "big" regiments brings more visibility. On the other hand, visibility doesn't necessarily bring more points in the list, it just brings a more precise vision of what the players have of you, so also of those who rate you. So someone can be very good on "cav gf" but bad in 1v1 matches simply because they don't play this kind of matches. So his tier will probably be inaccurate, because other players will not know the he's bad in 1v1 matches, but they will know that he's good on the cav gf server.

I just don't really understand the drama, because let's imagine that this is real and that this list was designed to bring players into the top 4. It's not this list that is going to influence players who are greedy for skills or notoriety to switch to a "better" regiment. If they are already in this mentality they will do so whether this list exists or not.

This is a list that represents the opinion of some recognized players, but that's all. If you don't like it that is your right and you should not pay any more attention to it.

You are right in that players who would switch regiments to achieve rank increase are unworthy of discussion.

But what is your opinion when it comes to a case of a player who did not fully switch regiments, yet Ciiges intentionally mislabels him on the list, as if his main regiment is one of those four regiments, and then refuses to change the label even when that player privately asks him to?

And then makes his public response to be in the lines of "I have chosen to put him down as a member of 1er because your regiment is shit, not competitive, inactive, and ..." (add further untrue insults).

To not misquote, I will put that piece of writing down here:
The fact of the matter is that your shitty little reg doesn't play enough 1v1's and isn't active enough to be considered an active hussar regiment. Therefore I have decided to put Parilomeus' second reg (the 1er) in his active regiment; because they do play actively and not against shitty teams because they poop themselves at the thought of losing.

What is your opinion on that I wonder? How does this help the idea that this list is not a tool of a few main competitive regiments? How long until some other regiment will be non-competitive enough to be shown on the list, even though that regiment's member somehow ended up on it before even joining one of those competitive regiments?

Furthermore, this kid started lying whenever he opens his mouth

Some example? Apart from Ciiges lying that he has zero input on what is on the front page, but then admits that he can decide what the player's main regiment is? You don't have to go far for the latest example.

Furthermore it was always a joke in the 4e and it was quite obvious I was joking.

Let's look at what that obvious joke was:

Funny you were ok being in the list when you were 2.9, but now you're 3.2 you want to be removed

Ah ah, a real kneeslapper that one, but don't quit your dayjob to become a full blown comedian yet. There is still something missing in your jokes, perhaps humor, rather than aggression caused by panic when you believe that someone will reduce the validity of your list by asking to be removed from it.

I have a question men, do you suffer from OLFPD?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 18, 2020, 06:29:07 pm
Even if the list is unfair and wrong, This "list" is updated which is more than others list can say.

Me, who argues that the list has a negative effect and is corruptly run

Where do you base this on? How does it have a negative effect, how is it corruptly run, and why do you seem to be the only one thinking it?

not providing anything meaningful to the discussion and can be ignored.


Because you are adding a lot of meaning to this thread?

With this out of the way, my main point is that the person editing it is a proven liar and authoritarian

Proven even? Where exactly was it proven, and what did I lie about?

and whatever hard work he is doing he is shitting all over it with his words and actions.

In the words of the famos SirNelsonGOE "You are not being very tier 1 kindhearted here"

And everyone who despite that rushes to excuse him and defend him only manage to prove that their main mindset is that "the list is important".

Or... And hear me out here! They don't agree with your 'points'?

You are right in that players who would switch regiments to achieve rank increase are unworthy of discussion.

But if everything you say is based on Parilomeus - who did just that - how worthy are your points and arguments?

But what is your opinion when it comes to a case of a player who did not fully switch regiments, yet Ciiges intentionally mislabels him on the list, as if his main regiment is one of those four regiments, and then refuses to change the label even when that player privately asks him to?

Not really asked, you kind of forced him into changing it. I'm sure Parigonicalus doesn't mind his regiment being labeled as 1er, as he told me so.

And then makes his public response to be in the lines of "I have chosen to put him down as a member of 1er because your regiment is shit, not competitive, inactive, and ..." (add further untrue insults).

Bit out of context, but I guess you read past the fine lines.

To not misquote, I will put that piece of writing down here:
The fact of the matter is that your shitty little reg doesn't play enough 1v1's and isn't active enough to be considered an active hussar regiment. Therefore I have decided to put Parilomeus' second reg (the 1er) in his active regiment; because they do play actively and not against shitty teams because they poop themselves at the thought of losing.

What is your opinion on that I wonder?

Wonder no longer friend! As elaborated quite clearly in my post you quoted, I have decided to put his regiment as 1er because that is the regiment he is most active with in the hussar scene, the regiment that does more 1v1's, the regiment where he has shown his capabilites as a hussar player and the regiment he signs up to tournaments with (such as the hussar cup). I would speculate you could argue that the 1er is his main regiment, no?

Furthermore, this kid started lying whenever he opens his mouth

I'm 21, which means I am an adult globaly! I might not always act as such, but that is not relevant to the point.

Some example? Apart from Ciiges lying that he has zero input on what is on the front page, but then admits that he can decide what the player's main regiment is? You don't have to go far for the latest example.

The ratings, you egg. I don't have any say on the ratings whatsoever. You can speculate in your wee tiny little brain as long as you want and come up with some more little lies, but I do not have any saying on the ratings at all.

Furthermore it was always a joke in the 4e and it was quite obvious I was joking.

Let's look at what that obvious joke was:

Funny you were ok being in the list when you were 2.9, but now you're 3.2 you want to be removed

Ah ah, a real kneeslapper that one, but don't quit your dayjob to become a full blown comedian yet. There is still something missing in your jokes, perhaps humor, rather than aggression caused by panic when you believe that someone will reduce the validity of your list by asking to be removed from it.

For someone who is obviously educated in the arts of joking - as the clown you are - you do seem to miss the point that not every joke has to be funny. It could be that this is not the punchline to the joke? Perhaps the punchline is when I bait st0m into responding very angrily on my post...
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 18, 2020, 06:35:01 pm
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-1qju6V1jLM/maxresdefault.jpg)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Tigrane on December 18, 2020, 06:47:32 pm
What would I do? Personally I would change the tag if the person asks me to, but that doesn't make Ciiges a bad person. This is his choice because this is his list and as long as he doesn't directly offend anyone it shouldn't be a problem. If it disturbs certain people of how they are represented on this list. They should simply not put a value on it. Anyone who disagrees with this list, or the names on this list, should simply not identify themselves with this list.

In conclusion it is impossible to control any representation of what people have of you. Even if this representation bothers you, you can't do much about it. The limit with this kind of thing is respect, and that is the case here, there is a possibility to communicate and under no circumstances is anyone insulted or denigrated here.

The best thing you can do Grozni, and all the other people disturbed by this list is not to feel concerned by this list and not to listen to what you are told about it. That's it, so I hope that everyone now can calm down a bit and enjoy the last moments of this game together!  :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 18, 2020, 06:57:29 pm
What would I do? Personally I would change the tag if the person asks me to, but that doesn't make Ciiges a bad person. This is his choice because this is his list and as long as he doesn't directly offend anyone it shouldn't be a problem. If it disturbs certain people of how they are represented on this list. They should simply not put a value on it. Anyone who disagrees with this list, or the names on this list, should simply not identify themselves with this list.

In conclusion it is impossible to control any representation of what people have of you. Even if this representation bothers you, you can't do much about it. The limit with this kind of thing is respect, and that is the case here, there is a possibility to communicate and under no circumstances is anyone insulted or denigrated here.

The best thing you can do Grozni, and all the other people disturbed by this list is not to feel concerned by this list and not to listen to what you are told about it. That's it, so I hope that everyone now can calm down a bit and enjoy the last moments of this game together!  :)

Let's not forget this is Grozni saying Pari wants it changed, I've yet to see Pari say anything here. And I doubt ciiges wouldn't change if it if Pari truly asked him too.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Rikkert on December 18, 2020, 07:10:57 pm
these are the type of people that light 5g towers on fire
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ry@n on December 18, 2020, 07:17:40 pm
these are the type of people that light 5g towers on fire
well tbf they did cause covid19!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on December 18, 2020, 08:27:59 pm
these are the type of people that light 5g towers on fire
well tbf they did cause covid19!!!!!!!!!!

First covid19 made me isolate from the realworld, now grozvid20 makes me wanna isolate from fse
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Tardet on December 18, 2020, 09:36:27 pm
In all fairness Ciiges, your comment to St0m wasn't a joke or if it was, you can't blame Grozni for thinking it had every sign of you being a bit arrogant in your answer. Don't get me wrong, a few people here know you within private spheres and got to know you (and love you) for that kind of personality you have. I even think that generally speaking, many people in the cav community got used to how you interact with others, friends or others, but in that precise case, it's really hard to find a joke or even the semblance of one.

Everyone in the 4e knows St0m cared a great deal about this list, we had some pretty heated arguments on the whatsapp convo about it, he never felt like he was given the ranking he deserved. When he, in the most serious way possible, asked you to remove him from the list and you gave him that kind of response in an equally serious tone, I'm pretty certain there was no joke intended, or at least if joke there was, you fully knew St0m could very well not take it that way and if your idea was to bait him into answering you in an angry manner, then Grozni's comments about that specific points are entirely legitimate.

I don't see how admitting it weakens the rest of your argument nor does is strengthen Grozni's, but being honest about it can actually make you look like the bigger man in the eyes of the people who can acknowledge what I just said. I fully disagree with him on many other aspects of what he brought publicly on this thread, neither do I think that just because you are the one who posted this thread, you should be observing a perfect behaviour at any given moments. You are a human being and just like the rest of us, you can be subject to mood swings. It has absolutely nothing to do with the relevance of this thread or a so-called conspiration of the 4 big regiments.

@Grozni

I read a big part of your messages on this thread. I wish I would have the time and the motivation to answer it point by point, but I don't even know if it would change anything given the person whom I find the response of absolutely spot-on (Dokletian) didn't seem to have much of an impact on your initial way of thinking. Eventually, I would be interested to discuss it on TS one day or another, which I feel would be way more relaxed than here.

Kudos to the cav scene, regardless of what you think I can guarantee you these sort of arguments are still more mature than what I can see in the infantry scene sometimes.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 18, 2020, 09:55:20 pm
Darkhawk now that you have seen me in your team, you're just obligated to say that I deserve my tier 1  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dusbled on December 18, 2020, 09:59:20 pm
Darkhawk now that you have seen me in your team, you're just obligated to say that I deserve my tier 1  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

I was there and I want to see Lasalle Tier 0
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: QuinnML on December 19, 2020, 12:22:25 am
So, Remao, Dokletian, Hannes, Stannis, DeLaBedoyere, Cage, MajorMark, Thyrell, Treiz, Soartex, DarkHawk and Carlok are wrong about tiers of our beauty cavalry community  ???

True! They're all shit! Especially Remao, Dokletian, Hannes, Stannis, DeLaBedoyere, Cage, MajorMark, Thyrell, Treiz, Soartex, DarkHawk and Carlok...

Bottom text
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Michnicki 1 on December 19, 2020, 12:34:12 am
Hey, I came to watch drama. I don't understand point of this thread. It only gives negative emotions and unnecessary disputes. I recommend everyone to calm down, sit and drink wine or eat a baguette. 
I'm sending you a lot of love and joy.

~ all-knowing, toxic bitchnicki
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Erik le Rouge on December 19, 2020, 01:02:57 am
fuck treiz
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dokletian on December 19, 2020, 01:05:21 am
fuck treiz
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 19, 2020, 01:15:34 am
fuck treiz
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Michnicki 1 on December 19, 2020, 01:20:07 am
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Aless on December 19, 2020, 01:23:09 am
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

Wojslayer
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: QuinnML on December 19, 2020, 03:18:09 am
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

The Golden Tulkasses
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on December 19, 2020, 03:52:12 am
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

The Ciiges Trophy for outstanding arrogance and lack of moral fibre
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 19, 2020, 06:58:30 am
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

The Ciiges Trophy for outstanding arrogance and lack of moral fibre
Long queue ahead of me
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 19, 2020, 11:30:57 am
Darkhawk now that you have seen me in your team, you're just obligated to say that I deserve my tier 1  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

I was there and I want to see Lasalle Tier 0

 :o
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 19, 2020, 11:31:17 am
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

great idea
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dokletian on December 19, 2020, 11:37:30 am
Finally a trophy I can get my hands on!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Lightning. on December 19, 2020, 12:52:15 pm
I literally told you that I dont care unless you break the rules with it
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Aless on December 19, 2020, 01:11:07 pm
(https://i.imgur.com/JyFQCXC.png)

Secret user, reveal yourself.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Treiz35 on December 19, 2020, 02:08:50 pm
fuck treiz
fuck treiz
fuck treiz

fuck erik
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Husarion7k on December 19, 2020, 02:09:27 pm
Finally a trophy I can get my hands on!
I think we can already say who'd prevail  8) 8)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: DragonKing on December 19, 2020, 09:18:11 pm
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

Instead of wanting to write this kind of thing, you should have helped your team who fought 10vs12 against Germany tonight. It's easy to play in big teams, pick up the kills and then say "I'm good" when you then let your team down in matchs you think are too difficult or trying. It's also easy to betray your teammates and spit in their backs while in front of them you say the sweetest words. So as far as the lists are concerned, if I had to make a list of the biggest assholes in the community you would be very well ranked. When I think of all the shit you and Husarion did just to become Captain and Vice Captain of Poland and then in the final only play the matches you are interested in, I find it revolting.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 19, 2020, 09:21:40 pm
fuck erik
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 19, 2020, 09:39:27 pm
Michniki, thank you for standing by your team in the end. DK pulled the gun on that post ;)
Husarion. Expected more from you.

In the future Poland, fight till the end. And stay respectful to your opponents.
I was incredibly lenient tonight, giving multiple "Last" warnings. There's no need for such behaviour in what was an incredibly close and fun match.

Mostly looking at you here, Feezy.

The troll in the first round also was incredibly stupid and unnecessary. You could've tied or won this match if you didn't start out by "Racing to the enemy's Spawn". Come on lads, you are making a joke out of this last SNC match for POL.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Tardet on December 19, 2020, 09:43:44 pm
Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020


 ???
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 19, 2020, 09:45:19 pm
Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020


 ???

Mostly responding to @DK and figured id finish it off here since its the more active one anyways - if u a referring to my SNC post.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: DragonKing on December 19, 2020, 09:50:38 pm
Coming at the beginning of the match when nothing is played yet and arriving at the end when there are only 2 rounds left, it has nothing to do with it. Don't say that he stayed and supported his team the whole game when it's not true and you know it. Anyway this being said I will not continue this debate because indeed the thread is not appropriate.
 It's nice of you to want to defend your buddy but clearly, on this case, there's nothing to be done.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 19, 2020, 09:55:45 pm
One can argue this is a good place to discuss all things cav, altho the SNC might be a more appropriate place. This works fine right ;)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Shadey on December 19, 2020, 10:02:58 pm
Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020


 ???
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on December 19, 2020, 10:12:04 pm
Can someone tell DK he came to the wrong neighbourhood, we're all hussars here and heavies stinky ewwww
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: DragonKing on December 19, 2020, 10:13:33 pm
Can someone tell DK he came to the wrong neighbourhood, we're all hussars here and heavies stinky ewwww

hehehe I'm leaving, BannerLord is waiting for me
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Michnicki 1 on December 19, 2020, 11:58:41 pm
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

Instead of wanting to write this kind of thing, you should have helped your team who fought 10vs12 against Germany tonight. It's easy to play in big teams, pick up the kills and then say "I'm good" when you then let your team down in matchs you think are too difficult or trying. It's also easy to betray your teammates and spit in their backs while in front of them you say the sweetest words. So as far as the lists are concerned, if I had to make a list of the biggest assholes in the community you would be very well ranked. When I think of all the shit you and Husarion did just to become Captain and Vice Captain of Poland and then in the final only play the matches you are interested in, I find it revolting.


1. I'm not Capitan or Vice Capitan of Poland
2. I told my team yesterday that I will be late or I won't come ( I was writing about it even with Stom)
3. Who the fuck are you to comment whole situation?
4. I know that I would be well ranked in disliked players list and I don't care about that. ( at least I would be good opponent for you)
5. I was on every match of the SNC, almost every training match. I have written to people multiple times and begged them to come. A lot them didn't give a shit about it. It's not my fault that for some people LB, Bannerlord or other events are more important than matches and trainings.
6. You shouldn't comment something about you have no idea

Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: 8pu_Filson on December 20, 2020, 12:01:54 am
Michniki, thank you for standing by your team in the end. DK pulled the gun on that post ;)
Husarion. Expected more from you.

In the future Poland, fight till the end. And stay respectful to your opponents.
I was incredibly lenient tonight, giving multiple "Last" warnings. There's no need for such behaviour in what was an incredibly close and fun match.

Mostly looking at you here, Feezy.

The troll in the first round also was incredibly stupid and unnecessary. You could've tied or won this match if you didn't start out by "Racing to the enemy's Spawn". Come on lads, you are making a joke out of this last SNC match for POL.
This troll in the first round was a incident because I had 160 ping and no control over my people. So they just started with chaos on TS and organisation but after 1st round everything was ok. So I really sorry for that 1st round which looks like a troll round.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 20, 2020, 12:22:20 am
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

Instead of wanting to write this kind of thing, you should have helped your team who fought 10vs12 against Germany tonight. It's easy to play in big teams, pick up the kills and then say "I'm good" when you then let your team down in matchs you think are too difficult or trying. It's also easy to betray your teammates and spit in their backs while in front of them you say the sweetest words. So as far as the lists are concerned, if I had to make a list of the biggest assholes in the community you would be very well ranked. When I think of all the shit you and Husarion did just to become Captain and Vice Captain of Poland and then in the final only play the matches you are interested in, I find it revolting.


1. I'm not Capitan or Vice Capitan of Poland
2. I told my team yesterday that I will be late or I won't come ( I was writing about it even with Stom)
3. Who the fuck are you to comment whole situation?
4. I know that I would be well ranked in disliked players list and I don't care about that. ( at least I would be good opponent for you)
5. I was on every match of the SNC, almost every training match. I have written to people multiple times and begged them to come. A lot them didn't give a shit about it. It's not my fault that for some people LB, Bannerlord or other events are more important than matches and trainings.
6. You shouldn't comment something about you have no idea

@DK, Personally... I wouldn't take that.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Husarion7k on December 20, 2020, 12:29:55 am
There's no such thing, which pisses me more than ppl talking shit about something, without actually having any knowledge about it. You are making some fairy tales, suggesting I didn't give a shit about a team during whole comp. That is a fucking, disgusting lie. For a whole tournament, there was no other person in our team, trying to make it as good as possible. Each time some training match was coming, me and michni had to beg our ppl to graciously join, to prevent being shit. No other ppl wasted so much time tryharding on cav gf, to be as good as possible. We did our best to improve our team play, skill and morale. Also we've been present on 4/5 matches, no matter losing or winning. And now, there was one fucking time we were absent, still you are making drama about it. That match took place as planned, we didn't cancell it so we didn't delay the end of the tourney aswell. We also have 2 captains, just for such situation, if the one is absent, the 2nd one takes command and leads. So what's your problem actually? Match happend, Filson was in command, everyone enjoyed it.

Spoiler
Also @Stephan, your are in no position to judge me, for you have no reason nor right to do so. You don't know the reality of polish team, you don't know who really didn't give a shit from the very beginning of this tournament, and who did his best. It wasn't your match (BNL), and my absence did not cause any serious troubles for you as a ref.
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Harford on December 20, 2020, 12:32:16 am
france will win anyway ur all shit
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: DragonKing on December 20, 2020, 12:40:34 am
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

Instead of wanting to write this kind of thing, you should have helped your team who fought 10vs12 against Germany tonight. It's easy to play in big teams, pick up the kills and then say "I'm good" when you then let your team down in matchs you think are too difficult or trying. It's also easy to betray your teammates and spit in their backs while in front of them you say the sweetest words. So as far as the lists are concerned, if I had to make a list of the biggest assholes in the community you would be very well ranked. When I think of all the shit you and Husarion did just to become Captain and Vice Captain of Poland and then in the final only play the matches you are interested in, I find it revolting.


1. I'm not Capitan or Vice Capitan of Poland
2. I told my team yesterday that I will be late or I won't come ( I was writing about it even with Stom)
3. Who the fuck are you to comment whole situation?
4. I know that I would be well ranked in disliked players list and I don't care about that. ( at least I would be good opponent for you)
5. I was on every match of the SNC, almost every training match. I have written to people multiple times and begged them to come. A lot them didn't give a shit about it. It's not my fault that for some people LB, Bannerlord or other events are more important than matches and trainings.
6. You shouldn't comment something about you have no idea

Well, I promised myself I wouldn't write any more messages, but I'm going to answer you anyway so that I won't have to do it later.

1-1: you're not a vice captain but unofficially you're paired with Husarion and I think everyone knows that
2-2: okay, very well I see
3-3: I'm the guy who had to deal with your little war between Poles and who in the end is extremely disappointed with what he sees. I comment on this nonsense
4-4: Wait, it wasn't a troll? Are you really going to do this according to FSE rules? I knew that the community was starting to look like a big pile of toxicity and trolls but actually, I think you're going to hit the jackpot with your list. You can put me in first place directly if you want  that I won't give a shit
5-5: Yet it seems to me that you had been absent during the France vs Poland train. I don't know about the others.
6-6: I'm sending this advice back to you. Once again, I pity the fact that there were only 10 of you and that one of the two parts of the team was abandoned, but nevertheless fought with panache. But indeed, it is not my problem but yours

I don't think I have anything to add after that. Honestly, I am saddened to see players within the NW Cavalry community appearing who are turning the NW Cavalry community into a nest of toxicity and trolls. They are just not funny they are mean. Now, I'm not going to argue about this because I've said what I had to say.

Sorry Ciiges for polluting this Thread with these messages :p
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: ~Felix~ on December 20, 2020, 12:46:03 am
Coming at the beginning of the match when nothing is played yet and arriving at the end when there are only 2 rounds left, it has nothing to do with it. Don't say that he stayed and supported his team the whole game when it's not true and you know it. Anyway this being said I will not continue this debate because indeed the thread is not appropriate.
 It's nice of you to want to defend your buddy but clearly, on this case, there's nothing to be done.

GG Poland and thanks for hosting such a tournament @DK

Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

Instead of wanting to write this kind of thing, you should have helped your team who fought 10vs12 against Germany tonight. It's easy to play in big teams, pick up the kills and then say "I'm good" when you then let your team down in matchs you think are too difficult or trying. It's also easy to betray your teammates and spit in their backs while in front of them you say the sweetest words. So as far as the lists are concerned, if I had to make a list of the biggest assholes in the community you would be very well ranked. When I think of all the shit you and Husarion did just to become Captain and Vice Captain of Poland and then in the final only play the matches you are interested in, I find it revolting.


1. I'm not Capitan or Vice Capitan of Poland
2. I told my team yesterday that I will be late or I won't come ( I was writing about it even with Stom)
3. Who the fuck are you to comment whole situation?
4. I know that I would be well ranked in disliked players list and I don't care about that. ( at least I would be good opponent for you)
5. I was on every match of the SNC, almost every training match. I have written to people multiple times and begged them to come. A lot them didn't give a shit about it. It's not my fault that for some people LB, Bannerlord or other events are more important than matches and trainings.
6. You shouldn't comment something about you have no idea

Well, I promised myself I wouldn't write any more messages, but I'm going to answer you anyway so that I won't have to do it later.

1-1: you're not a vice captain but unofficially you're paired with Husarion and I think everyone knows that
2-2: okay, very well I see
3-3: I'm the guy who had to deal with your little war between Poles and who in the end is extremely disappointed with what he sees. I comment on this nonsense
4-4: Wait, it wasn't a troll? Are you really going to do this according to FSE rules? I knew that the community was starting to look like a big pile of toxicity and trolls but actually, I think you're going to hit the jackpot with your list. You can put me in first place directly if you want  that I won't give a shit
5-5: Yet it seems to me that you had been absent during the France vs Poland train. I don't know about the others.
6-6: I'm sending this advice back to you. Once again, I pity the fact that there were only 10 of you and that one of the two parts of the team was abandoned, but nevertheless fought with panache. But indeed, it is not my problem but yours

I don't think I have anything to add after that. Honestly, I am saddened to see players within the NW Cavalry community appearing who are turning the NW Cavalry community into a nest of toxicity and trolls. They are just not funny they are mean. Now, I'm not going to argue about this because I've said what I had to say.

Sorry Ciiges for polluting this Thread with these messages :p

You wanted to end this debate. I think you know there is no point in discussing that with Husarion and Michnicki. Just clarify that problem via steam
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Treiz35 on December 20, 2020, 12:48:44 am
france will win anyway ur all shit

 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Remao on December 20, 2020, 12:58:46 am
Hey guys, again I read diagonally.

What is the problem here ?

I can read "♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020"
not "♞ Heavy Drama (POL/DK) ♞ UPDATED each Tournament"


And why nobody already contact me, to do 1v1, to update this "biased" list ? 

(OH and gg all french's players, you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Michnicki 1 on December 20, 2020, 01:02:46 am
Guys what do you think about poll for the most disliked player of NW cavalry community? I wanted to call It " Golden dick award " but Lightning told me that's not nice. I'm looking for a nice title. Any advice?

Instead of wanting to write this kind of thing, you should have helped your team who fought 10vs12 against Germany tonight. It's easy to play in big teams, pick up the kills and then say "I'm good" when you then let your team down in matchs you think are too difficult or trying. It's also easy to betray your teammates and spit in their backs while in front of them you say the sweetest words. So as far as the lists are concerned, if I had to make a list of the biggest assholes in the community you would be very well ranked. When I think of all the shit you and Husarion did just to become Captain and Vice Captain of Poland and then in the final only play the matches you are interested in, I find it revolting.


1. I'm not Capitan or Vice Capitan of Poland
2. I told my team yesterday that I will be late or I won't come ( I was writing about it even with Stom)
3. Who the fuck are you to comment whole situation?
4. I know that I would be well ranked in disliked players list and I don't care about that. ( at least I would be good opponent for you)
5. I was on every match of the SNC, almost every training match. I have written to people multiple times and begged them to come. A lot them didn't give a shit about it. It's not my fault that for some people LB, Bannerlord or other events are more important than matches and trainings.
6. You shouldn't comment something about you have no idea

Well, I promised myself I wouldn't write any more messages, but I'm going to answer you anyway so that I won't have to do it later.

1-1: you're not a vice captain but unofficially you're paired with Husarion and I think everyone knows that
2-2: okay, very well I see
3-3: I'm the guy who had to deal with your little war between Poles and who in the end is extremely disappointed with what he sees. I comment on this nonsense
4-4: Wait, it wasn't a troll? Are you really going to do this according to FSE rules? I knew that the community was starting to look like a big pile of toxicity and trolls but actually, I think you're going to hit the jackpot with your list. You can put me in first place directly if you want  that I won't give a shit
5-5: Yet it seems to me that you had been absent during the France vs Poland train. I don't know about the others.
6-6: I'm sending this advice back to you. Once again, I pity the fact that there were only 10 of you and that one of the two parts of the team was abandoned, but nevertheless fought with panache. But indeed, it is not my problem but yours

I don't think I have anything to add after that. Honestly, I am saddened to see players within the NW Cavalry community appearing who are turning the NW Cavalry community into a nest of toxicity and trolls. They are just not funny they are mean. Now, I'm not going to argue about this because I've said what I had to say.

Sorry Ciiges for polluting this Thread with these messages :p

1. I'm playing with him and he's my friend but It doesn't mean that we are one person.
2. great
3. that's right
4. Infantry made something similar without breaking rules, I'm going to do the same. Don't worry, it's supposed to be a fair vote, I'm not gonna pull you anywhere.
5. I missed only this one match and the 8 rounds agianst Germany - that's all 8)
6. Why are you complaining only about me and Husarion? There are 8 players who didn't come as well.

"I don't think I have anything to add after that. Honestly, I am saddened to see players within the NW Cavalry community appearing who are turning the NW Cavalry community into a nest of toxicity and trolls. They are just not funny they are mean. Now, I'm not going to argue about this because I've said what I had to say."

(https://i.imgur.com/d1CncD8.jpg)

Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 20, 2020, 01:04:10 am
Hey guys, again I read diagonally.

What is the problem here ?

I can read "♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020"
not "♞ Heavy Drama (POL/DK) ♞ UPDATED each Tournament"


And why nobody already contact me, to do 1v1, to update this "biased" list ? 


(OH and gg all french's players, you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER)

*Does ft7 vs Remao*
*Gets to 6-6*
*Remao proceeds to 1h me across the map*
*ggs are given *

tell me im wrong Remao xD
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Michnicki 1 on December 20, 2020, 01:08:17 am
Hey guys, again I read diagonally.

What is the problem here ?

I can read "♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020"
not "♞ Heavy Drama (POL/DK) ♞ UPDATED each Tournament"


And why nobody already contact me, to do 1v1, to update this "biased" list ? 

(OH and gg all french's players, you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER)

Okey, Would you like to play ft7 with me?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: tomascadarn on December 20, 2020, 01:09:23 am
Dk firing shots
rat@@@@@@@@@@Michiniki
rekt
his career will never recover
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Remao on December 20, 2020, 01:29:47 am

*Does ft7 vs Remao*
*Gets to 6-6*
*Remao proceeds to 1h me across the map*
*ggs are given *

tell me im wrong Remao xD

I forgot... but let's remake :D


Okey, Would you like to play ft7 with me?

Ofc yes
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on December 20, 2020, 04:03:09 am
Hey guys, again I read diagonally.

What is the problem here ?

I can read "♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020"
not "♞ Heavy Drama (POL/DK) ♞ UPDATED each Tournament"


And why nobody already contact me, to do 1v1, to update this "biased" list ? 

(OH and gg all french's players, you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER)

(https://everythingmarvel.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Thanos-quotes-15.jpg)

...Remao | 7-6 | Tommy
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: DragonKing on December 20, 2020, 04:21:54 am
Hey guys, again I read diagonally.

What is the problem here ?

I can read "♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020"
not "♞ Heavy Drama (POL/DK) ♞ UPDATED each Tournament"


And why nobody already contact me, to do 1v1, to update this "biased" list ? 

(OH and gg all french's players, you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER)

There are no problems with the Polish team and me. I know most of the players for a long time. Most of them are friends with whom I continue to play regularly on BannerLord and also with whom I build projects. Most of them are people with whom I share great memories
No in this case, I would advise you to read the posts again: no problems with the Poles for whom I have great respect. Frankly, they played a great match and a very nice tournament.
The people I blame have not played to the end with those proud Poles who fought valiantly against the Germans this evening and who prove once again that Polish courage is not a myth

I won't dwell on these two people who clearly disappointed me after all the promises made, but they are exceptions among Poles. In itself, I was simply pointing out to players that instead of creating absurd lists, they'd better go and help their companions who were fighting at 10 against 12 but, well, it would seem that the absence was justified...
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Husarion7k on December 20, 2020, 10:04:00 am
Hey guys, again I read diagonally.

What is the problem here ?

I can read "♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020"
not "♞ Heavy Drama (POL/DK) ♞ UPDATED each Tournament"


And why nobody already contact me, to do 1v1, to update this "biased" list ? 

(OH and gg all french's players, you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER)

There are no problems with the Polish team and me. I know most of the players for a long time. Most of them are friends with whom I continue to play regularly on BannerLord and also with whom I build projects. Most of them are people with whom I share great memories
No in this case, I would advise you to read the posts again: no problems with the Poles for whom I have great respect. Frankly, they played a great match and a very nice tournament.
The people I blame have not played to the end with those proud Poles who fought valiantly against the Germans this evening and who prove once again that Polish courage is not a myth

I won't dwell on these two people who clearly disappointed me after all the promises made, but they are exceptions among Poles. In itself, I was simply pointing out to players that instead of creating absurd lists, they'd better go and help their companions who were fighting at 10 against 12 but, well, it would seem that the absence was justified...
As I said already, Polish team is our own business, not yours. And none of that poles blamed us for their defeat, nor was as toxic as u are here. You are literally the only only person making problems after that match, even poles don't give a shit (XD). You have no idea how does it look like from inside, few have. Therefore go play your bannerlord, and stop making toxic mess for no reason.

Spoiler
Good morning
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 20, 2020, 10:13:33 am
Mind your own business !
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Elias on December 20, 2020, 10:23:07 am
Own your mind business !
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 20, 2020, 10:23:57 am
Ye stop this derailing drama now thanks
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: FeezY on December 20, 2020, 10:40:11 am
Ar0ch3r is polish :P (NCO in 10ph)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Bocom on December 20, 2020, 11:52:29 am
Hey guys, again I read diagonally.

What is the problem here ?

I can read "♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020"
not "♞ Heavy Drama (POL/DK) ♞ UPDATED each Tournament"


And why nobody already contact me, to do 1v1, to update this "biased" list ? 

(OH and gg all french's players, you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER)

Finally my skills come to light. I'm waiting for your Tier 1 vote Remao
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Thyrell on December 20, 2020, 12:15:52 pm
Funny that 2 useless arguments bring 161 posts to this Thread
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Octanidas on December 20, 2020, 01:08:59 pm
you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER

But apparently the SNC performance doesn't matter here  :(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dusbled on December 20, 2020, 05:19:42 pm
you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER

But apparently the SNC performance doesn't matter here  :(

most germans got a downgrade for becoming 2nd, only losing 4-6 vs FRA, specially downgrading Carlos is a meme  >:(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 20, 2020, 05:35:19 pm
you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER

But apparently the SNC performance doesn't matter here  :(

most germans got a downgrade for becoming 2nd, only losing 4-6 vs FRA, specially downgrading Carlos is a meme  >:(
I agree on Carlos, though the reason for so many germans being downgraded has nothing to do with their placement in the SNC I assume.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Octanidas on December 20, 2020, 07:01:20 pm
you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER

But apparently the SNC performance doesn't matter here  :(

most germans got a downgrade for becoming 2nd, only losing 4-6 vs FRA, specially downgrading Carlos is a meme  >:(

Indeed, and all the great individual performances in the other Matches seem to have 0 impact on the updated ratings of the affected players. Maybe it's because the results, screenshots and videos of the Matches against UK and ESP were not put on the SNC Threads and most didn't notice them, i don't know.

I agree on Carlos, though the reason for so many germans being downgraded has nothing to do with their placement in the SNC I assume.

But doesn't that mean that something really bad happened, something that outweighed the performances in the tourney? However the SNC was the only relevant Event during the last weeks ...
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on December 20, 2020, 07:25:51 pm
you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER

But apparently the SNC performance doesn't matter here  :(

most germans got a downgrade for becoming 2nd, only losing 4-6 vs FRA, specially downgrading Carlos is a meme  >:(

Indeed, and all the great individual performances in the other Matches seem to have 0 impact on the updated ratings of the affected players. Maybe it's because the results, screenshots and videos of the Matches against UK and ESP were not put on the SNC Threads and most didn't notice them, i don't know.

I agree on Carlos, though the reason for so many germans being downgraded has nothing to do with their placement in the SNC I assume.

But doesn't that mean that something really bad happened, something that outweighed the performances in the tourney? However the SNC was the only relevant Event during the last weeks ...
Think it's based of performances, not placement.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Octanidas on December 20, 2020, 08:41:35 pm
Yes, of course it should be based on the performance
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Shadey on December 21, 2020, 08:05:57 am
Yes, of course it should be based on the performance
Even if it was, the list as a whole would still be majorly flawed because it’s based on a select group of people’s opinions. These will obviously differ between the voters because they will all have different ways of defining what a good player/performance is, plus most of them will also have personal bias towards some players.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Termito on December 21, 2020, 10:53:32 am
Yes, of course it should be based on the performance
Even if it was, the list as a whole would still be majorly flawed because it’s based on a select group of people’s opinions. These will obviously differ between the voters because they will all have different ways of defining what a good player/performance is, plus most of them will also have personal bias towards some players.
You are not good for me, sorry shadey. :D
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Law on December 21, 2020, 12:31:11 pm
Swissy deserves tier 1
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Shadey on December 21, 2020, 05:49:42 pm
Yes, of course it should be based on the performance
Even if it was, the list as a whole would still be majorly flawed because it’s based on a select group of people’s opinions. These will obviously differ between the voters because they will all have different ways of defining what a good player/performance is, plus most of them will also have personal bias towards some players.
You are not good for me, sorry shadey. :D
Stick boy, stop that  :(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: DE14HANNES on December 29, 2020, 03:49:47 pm
you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER

But apparently the SNC performance doesn't matter here  :(

most germans got a downgrade for becoming 2nd, only losing 4-6 vs FRA, specially downgrading Carlos is a meme  >:(

Am i blind ? I dont see any changes in the list
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: StephanGH on December 29, 2020, 03:55:44 pm
you all deserve Tier1, especially Bocom against GER

But apparently the SNC performance doesn't matter here  :(

most germans got a downgrade for becoming 2nd, only losing 4-6 vs FRA, specially downgrading Carlos is a meme  >:(

Am i blind ? I dont see any changes in the list

He removed the colors of who got put lower and higher, but carlos was Tier 2 hes 3.10 now.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: CarlosGER on December 30, 2020, 01:58:46 pm
well, everyone makes mistakes sometimes
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Lightning. on December 30, 2020, 02:31:46 pm
well, everyone makes mistakes sometimes
Yeah you should be way lower
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: CarlosGER on December 30, 2020, 02:52:39 pm
well, everyone makes mistakes sometimes
Yeah you should be way lower

:P
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Goodest on December 31, 2020, 12:18:14 am
LaSalle for Tier1
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on December 31, 2020, 05:42:31 pm
LaSalle for Tier1

You are breathtaking !
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dusbled on December 31, 2020, 05:52:41 pm
LaSalle for Tier1

You are breathtaking !

+1
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on January 11, 2021, 03:22:19 pm
New poll added
Title: Re: %u265E Hussars Rated (EU) %u265E UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: MsEricson on January 16, 2021, 06:05:39 pm
Looking at this thread makes me realize how much of a fucking noname I am lmao

My own fault for not being active in the community
kekw
Title: Re: %u265E Hussars Rated (EU) %u265E UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Tardet on January 16, 2021, 06:33:48 pm
Looking at this thread makes me realize how much of a fucking noname I am lmao

My own fault for not being active in the community
kekw
get INVOLVED
Title: Re: %u265E Hussars Rated (EU) %u265E UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: maskmanmarks on January 16, 2021, 06:51:37 pm
Looking at this thread makes me realize how much of a fucking noname I am lmao

My own fault for not being active in the community
kekw
get INVOLVED

Need to increase the brand
Title: Re: %u265E Hussars Rated (EU) %u265E UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Bocom on January 16, 2021, 08:21:03 pm
Looking at this thread makes me realize how much of a fucking noname I am lmao

My own fault for not being active in the community
kekw

Who are you ?
Title: Re: %u265E Hussars Rated (EU) %u265E UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dusbled on January 16, 2021, 09:42:43 pm
Looking at this thread makes me realize how much of a fucking noname I am lmao

My own fault for not being active in the community
kekw
get INVOLVED

Need to increase the brand

cant wait for the 45thN NA cav to crush the top tier regiments in EU  8)
Title: Re: %u265E Hussars Rated (EU) %u265E UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: MsEricson on January 16, 2021, 10:43:12 pm
Looking at this thread makes me realize how much of a fucking noname I am lmao

My own fault for not being active in the community
kekw
get INVOLVED

Trying my hardest :')
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on January 18, 2021, 05:59:54 pm
Update!
Added a few new players and a regimental section below the main post
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dokletian on January 18, 2021, 09:11:31 pm
Smylie's path to T1 has begun
Title: Re: %u265E Hussars Rated (EU) %u265E UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Olof on January 18, 2021, 09:45:03 pm
Looking at this thread makes me realize how much of a fucking noname I am lmao

My own fault for not being active in the community
kekw
get INVOLVED

Need to increase the brand

cant wait for the 45thN NA cav to crush the top tier regiments in EU  8)
simp
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cage on January 18, 2021, 10:31:01 pm
Smylie's path to T1 has begun
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on January 18, 2021, 11:24:22 pm
Smylie's path to T1 has begun
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Smylie on January 18, 2021, 11:33:13 pm
 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RubBzkZzpUA&vidve=5727&autoplay=1 (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RubBzkZzpUA&vidve=5727&autoplay=1)

Edit - sorry for the cringe :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Cage on January 19, 2021, 12:35:53 pm
Edit - sorry for the cringe :)

dw we're getting used to it
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on January 19, 2021, 02:48:37 pm
great update
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Coco. on January 19, 2021, 03:29:14 pm
where is Ms_Ericson :/
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Lightning. on January 19, 2021, 04:38:49 pm
Who is Ms_Ericson?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on January 20, 2021, 12:44:05 pm
I believe Squall is in the 6e now
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Syrcrim on January 20, 2021, 01:41:39 pm
You can put Ouranos in 45e  :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: OuRaNos on January 20, 2021, 09:27:48 pm
HEHEHE
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on January 21, 2021, 11:50:31 pm
I believe Squall is in the 6e now

You must be more confused than Scooby Doo.
Title: Re: %u265E Hussars Rated (EU) %u265E UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: MsEricson on January 22, 2021, 03:27:36 am
Looking at this thread makes me realize how much of a fucking noname I am lmao

My own fault for not being active in the community
kekw
get INVOLVED

Need to increase the brand

cant wait for the 45thN NA cav to crush the top tier regiments in EU  8)
simp
lmaoo
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on January 22, 2021, 11:31:15 am
I believe Squall is in the 6e now

You must be more confused than Scooby Doo.

Nah scooby doo is a thot
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Shadey on January 22, 2021, 05:09:27 pm
I believe Squall is in the 6e now

You must be more confused than Scooby Doo.

Don’t insult boss man Scooby Doo like that  >:(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: stevve on January 23, 2021, 10:06:51 pm
put Aless in Tier 1 already ffs
 
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Rastignac on January 23, 2021, 10:08:56 pm
I saw Posh's team lost to 2e??? I think he is ranked too high, mediocre perhaps but it's the lowest breed of mediocrity so bring him a bit down if you want to be taken seriously
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on January 24, 2021, 02:32:13 am
I believe Squall is in the 6e now

You must be more confused than Scooby Doo.

Nah scooby doo is a thot

I like you LaSalle but you’re on thin ice
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on January 24, 2021, 10:04:20 am
I believe Squall is in the 6e now

You must be more confused than Scooby Doo.

Nah scooby doo is a thot

I like you LaSalle but you’re on thin ice

I  p r e f e r   S A M Y
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Dokletian on January 25, 2021, 09:59:46 pm
Tier 4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j_lR39K9fc&feature=youtu.be
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on January 25, 2021, 10:41:36 pm
Tier 4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j_lR39K9fc&feature=youtu.be
[close]

LOL!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Ciiges on January 25, 2021, 11:09:46 pm
The truth is out
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Shadey on January 26, 2021, 04:05:02 am
Q’d
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on January 26, 2021, 12:54:47 pm
Ctrl j are for tWaTS
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: TxM on January 26, 2021, 11:22:20 pm
Ctrl j are for tWaTS

+1
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: ~NickCole~ on February 15, 2021, 01:54:52 am
Tommy and Treiz for Top 5!!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: AchillesTheOne on February 15, 2021, 10:14:05 am
Tommy and Treiz for Top 5!!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: QuinnML on February 15, 2021, 09:01:25 pm
Remove me ty
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: LaSalle on February 16, 2021, 01:31:13 pm
f u c k    t r e i z
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 15-12-2020
Post by: Erik le Rouge on February 16, 2021, 02:14:36 pm
f u c k    t r e i z

He is right you know
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Ciiges on February 16, 2021, 05:27:07 pm
UPDATED!

Thanks once again to all the raters, and welcome Erik, here to replace Hannes!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: SwissGronkh on February 16, 2021, 05:30:17 pm
I feel i‘m so stable on my skill level, i love it ;)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: FreyrDS on February 16, 2021, 05:31:33 pm
Who is "Darkhawk"? Never heard of him.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Lightning. on February 16, 2021, 06:25:47 pm
How could you do this to Rasti
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on February 17, 2021, 10:45:28 am
How did Ouranos the virgin win points when the chad lasalle lose some? rEmOvE ME fROm tHe LisT LoL
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on February 17, 2021, 10:57:07 am
Put bedoyere 1.00 Wtf en fait les reuftons
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Dokletian on February 17, 2021, 03:44:24 pm
some still massively overrated  ???
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on February 17, 2021, 03:56:06 pm
some still massively overrated  ???

OMG DOKLETIAN QUOTED MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: SwissGronkh on February 17, 2021, 04:08:19 pm
some still massively overrated  ???
Spoiler
(https://media.makeameme.org/created/he-has-spoken.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Cage on February 17, 2021, 05:28:42 pm
some still massively overrated  ???
dont put yourself down like that dokle, you are still good sometimes!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Thyrell on February 17, 2021, 07:55:40 pm
some still massively overrated  ???
Don't be afraid to refer to yourself. :D
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Dokletian on February 17, 2021, 07:59:18 pm
Spoiler
some still massively overrated  ???
dont put yourself down like that dokle, you are still good sometimes!
[close]
just because I said you have a mediocre ass yesterday  >:(

Also, I do not exclude myself from anything. Cannot judge myself obviously.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: ~Felix~ on February 17, 2021, 11:01:21 pm
Put bedoyere 1.00 Wtf en fait les reuftons

FuNnY LOL!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on February 18, 2021, 01:09:16 am
Put bedoyere 1.00 Wtf en fait les reuftons

FuNnY LOL!
ptdr t ki
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: OuRaNos on February 18, 2021, 03:01:19 pm
How did Ouranos the virgin win points when the chad lasalle lose some? rEmOvE ME fROm tHe LisT LoL

CHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEH !

ez boyz (only 10$ to up)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Dusbled on February 18, 2021, 03:23:19 pm
How did Ouranos the virgin win points when the chad lasalle lose some? rEmOvE ME fROm tHe LisT LoL

CHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEH !

ez boyz (only 10$ to up)

do I get paid when I want a downgrade?  8)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: TxM on February 18, 2021, 05:25:52 pm
How did Ouranos the virgin win points when the chad lasalle lose some? rEmOvE ME fROm tHe LisT LoL

CHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEH !

ez boyz (only 10$ to up)

do I get paid when I want a downgrade?  8)

Not worth the money.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: DE14HANNES on February 18, 2021, 05:44:29 pm
(https://media.giphy.com/media/VIzs0jgs8KmgVeTknN/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on February 22, 2021, 02:03:41 pm
I give money to the guy who downgrade me to tier 5
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: SwissGronkh on February 22, 2021, 02:58:18 pm
Spoiler
Hussar Ranking - Europe

Tier 1

1.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Remao [6e]
1.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Dokletian [4e]
1.35 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Soartex [1er]
1.37 (https://i.imgur.com/KqCeH5p.png) Stannis [8th]
1.65 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Ciiges [1er]
1.88 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) DeLaBedoyere [1er]
1.95 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) MajorMark [1er]

Tier 2

2.05 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Aless [8th]
2.10 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Naz [1er]
2.10 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Thyrell [1er]

2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Thorvic [1er]
2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tommy [8th]
2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Empo [45thN]
2.50 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Skittles [4e]
2.55 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Leensab [6e]
2.75 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Law [6e]
2.75 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Treiz [6e]
2.80 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) FreyrDS [8th]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Jelly [4e]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Shadey [8th]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ouranos [45e]
2.90 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tomas [8th]
2.95 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Andros [8th]
2.95 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Octanidas [8th]


Tier 3

3.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Parigonicalus [1er]
3.00 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Gabriel [10ph]
3.00 (https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/in.gif) Krishna [8th]

3.03 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) MaxenceIV [4e]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Enderby [4e]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Carlos [1er]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Felix [8th]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Goodest [2Lr]
3.07 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Jesu04 [8th]
3.07 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Adelon [2Lr]
3.08 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Carlok [2Lr]
3.10 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) SteFan [8th]
3.10 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harbringer [8th]
3.15 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Cage [8th]
3.15 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gauner [8th]
3.17 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles [2Lr]
3.20 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Giorno [4e]
3.20 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Yuki [1er]
3.24 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Bocom [4e]
3.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Magnum [2Lr]
3.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Strunk [1er]
3.30 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Darklight [4e]
3.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Erik [4e]
3.38 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Destroy [Nr10]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Quack [8th]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Draco [6e]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles [Nr4]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Thales [Nr10]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Domi [1er]
3.42 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/az.gif) Caucasian [4e]
3.43 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Husarion [Nr4]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ace [6e]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaPierre [6e]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) CokeTail [1er]

Tier 4

3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Squall [6e]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Termito [8th]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) SwaP [6e]
3.50 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Kazi [-]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Sharkie [-]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Killa [4e]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kreativer [8th]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Angel [1er]
3.52 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Lindblom [1er]
3.55 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tulkas [Nr10]
3.57 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Nightwing [2Lr]
3.58 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ironfist [Nr10]
3.58 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gorg [4e]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ducopie [6e]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Pyr0z [8th]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Rastignac [8th]
3.65 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Cooper [2Lr]
3.67 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sebi [8th]
3.67 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Foxii [Nr4]
3.70 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Apfelkuchen [4e]
3.70 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) FeezY [10ph]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Lightning [8th]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Zorius [10ph]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Tigrane [6e]
3.78 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) SirLegion [4e]
3.80 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Swissy [32nd]
3.80 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Louis [1er]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Posh [8th]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tengou [1er]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Thorny [4e]
3.95 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Shagon [4e]
3.95 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) EpicPizza [1er]
3.96 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Nelson [8th]
3.97 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tardet [4e]

4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) StephanGH [-]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Rorscharch [1er]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Ilypa [1er]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Iniskill [Nr4]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/MiEoPym.png) Mech [4e]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Stockfisch [Nr4]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Smurf [2Lr]
4.09 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Semon  [4e]
4.10 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kutte [Nr10]
4.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Unforgive [Nr4]
4.29 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Saphyro [1er]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Gibby [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Chuckster [1er]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Skarface [6e]]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Caius [6e]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Norwegian [Nr10]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ezio [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Raphael [8th]
4.30 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/us.gif) Virus [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Raven [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harford [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Huggu [6e]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Rune [1er]
4.35 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ozikan [6e]
4.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Chsuk [1er]
4.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Higen [1er]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Miyu [1er]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/isMBRHK.png) Uganda888 [33rd]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Icephenix [6e]
4.45 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Rapez [Nr4]

Tier 5

4.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ossi [1er]
4.55 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Mozart [-]
4.55 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sky [Nr4]
4.60 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Artigo [Nr4]
4.60 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Coco_Ayala [1er]
4.63 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Gothtrad [6e]
4.63 (https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Johnson [33rd]
4.77 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ichdie [2Lr]
4.80 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) targeknight [-]
4.82 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Belgian_Fury [6e]
4.82 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MarkusVonSTR [Nr4]
4.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Joe_Cobra [6e]
4.90 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/hr.gif) Waxo [8th]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Darracq [6e]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kaiser [4e]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Eisenmann [Nr10]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MiniiDNS [2Lr]
4.91 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Claudius [Nr10]
4.91 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Titus [2Lr]

5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Arthur [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Duke [33rd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Mclaren [8th]
5.00 (https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/il.gif) Chris [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sirox [2Lr]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) The_Joker [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Russel [Nr10]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/isMBRHK.png) Mark [33rd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/3h6BMNB.png) Floop [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) JoJo [Nr4]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Knaddle [Nr4]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Yuwan [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Ar0ch3r [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Clamydia [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Karl [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/C3NhXA5.gif) Aureliano [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Pouwelicious [2e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Papa/WRX3 [32nd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Smylie [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) KosS [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Niemand [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Twinkie [8th]
5.00 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/us.gif) James Baxter [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Basilikum [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/fMBmHUY.png) Dogukan [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) J-M [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaSalle [6e]





Complete votes
(https://i.gyazo.com/1be3db5916b8af8ff8f2a5a1f341e0ac.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/94445dd02230774e7459c4fad1ef1ee1.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/eeed5b7e4bf5bc8f777dc017fec19570.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/3b73596d22702b5f14c8db4f5dd16d14.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/75ca860b06f66cc3fb7f86c430314ac4.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/60d6cba5d7d68e2e7629279a7287e8f8.png)
[close]




 



[close]

I give money to the guy who downgrade me to tier 5
Money pls
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on February 22, 2021, 07:41:55 pm
Spoiler
Hussar Ranking - Europe

Tier 1

1.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Remao [6e]
1.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Dokletian [4e]
1.35 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Soartex [1er]
1.37 (https://i.imgur.com/KqCeH5p.png) Stannis [8th]
1.65 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Ciiges [1er]
1.88 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) DeLaBedoyere [1er]
1.95 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) MajorMark [1er]

Tier 2

2.05 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Aless [8th]
2.10 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Naz [1er]
2.10 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Thyrell [1er]

2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Thorvic [1er]
2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tommy [8th]
2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Empo [45thN]
2.50 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Skittles [4e]
2.55 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Leensab [6e]
2.75 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Law [6e]
2.75 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Treiz [6e]
2.80 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) FreyrDS [8th]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Jelly [4e]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Shadey [8th]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ouranos [45e]
2.90 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tomas [8th]
2.95 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Andros [8th]
2.95 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Octanidas [8th]


Tier 3

3.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Parigonicalus [1er]
3.00 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Gabriel [10ph]
3.00 (https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/in.gif) Krishna [8th]

3.03 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) MaxenceIV [4e]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Enderby [4e]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Carlos [1er]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Felix [8th]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Goodest [2Lr]
3.07 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Jesu04 [8th]
3.07 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Adelon [2Lr]
3.08 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Carlok [2Lr]
3.10 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) SteFan [8th]
3.10 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harbringer [8th]
3.15 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Cage [8th]
3.15 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gauner [8th]
3.17 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles [2Lr]
3.20 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Giorno [4e]
3.20 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Yuki [1er]
3.24 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Bocom [4e]
3.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Magnum [2Lr]
3.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Strunk [1er]
3.30 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Darklight [4e]
3.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Erik [4e]
3.38 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Destroy [Nr10]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Quack [8th]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Draco [6e]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles [Nr4]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Thales [Nr10]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Domi [1er]
3.42 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/az.gif) Caucasian [4e]
3.43 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Husarion [Nr4]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ace [6e]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaPierre [6e]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) CokeTail [1er]

Tier 4

3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Squall [6e]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Termito [8th]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) SwaP [6e]
3.50 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Kazi [-]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Sharkie [-]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Killa [4e]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kreativer [8th]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Angel [1er]
3.52 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Lindblom [1er]
3.55 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tulkas [Nr10]
3.57 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Nightwing [2Lr]
3.58 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ironfist [Nr10]
3.58 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gorg [4e]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ducopie [6e]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Pyr0z [8th]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Rastignac [8th]
3.65 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Cooper [2Lr]
3.67 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sebi [8th]
3.67 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Foxii [Nr4]
3.70 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Apfelkuchen [4e]
3.70 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) FeezY [10ph]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Lightning [8th]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Zorius [10ph]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Tigrane [6e]
3.78 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) SirLegion [4e]
3.80 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Swissy [32nd]
3.80 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Louis [1er]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Posh [8th]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tengou [1er]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Thorny [4e]
3.95 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Shagon [4e]
3.95 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) EpicPizza [1er]
3.96 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Nelson [8th]
3.97 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tardet [4e]

4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) StephanGH [-]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Rorscharch [1er]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Ilypa [1er]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Iniskill [Nr4]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/MiEoPym.png) Mech [4e]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Stockfisch [Nr4]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Smurf [2Lr]
4.09 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Semon  [4e]
4.10 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kutte [Nr10]
4.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Unforgive [Nr4]
4.29 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Saphyro [1er]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Gibby [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Chuckster [1er]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Skarface [6e]]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Caius [6e]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Norwegian [Nr10]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ezio [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Raphael [8th]
4.30 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/us.gif) Virus [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Raven [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harford [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Huggu [6e]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Rune [1er]
4.35 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ozikan [6e]
4.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Chsuk [1er]
4.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Higen [1er]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Miyu [1er]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/isMBRHK.png) Uganda888 [33rd]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Icephenix [6e]
4.45 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Rapez [Nr4]

Tier 5

4.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ossi [1er]
4.55 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Mozart [-]
4.55 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sky [Nr4]
4.60 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Artigo [Nr4]
4.60 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Coco_Ayala [1er]
4.63 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Gothtrad [6e]
4.63 (https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Johnson [33rd]
4.77 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ichdie [2Lr]
4.80 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) targeknight [-]
4.82 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Belgian_Fury [6e]
4.82 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MarkusVonSTR [Nr4]
4.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Joe_Cobra [6e]
4.90 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/hr.gif) Waxo [8th]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Darracq [6e]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kaiser [4e]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Eisenmann [Nr10]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MiniiDNS [2Lr]
4.91 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Claudius [Nr10]
4.91 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Titus [2Lr]

5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Arthur [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Duke [33rd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Mclaren [8th]
5.00 (https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/il.gif) Chris [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sirox [2Lr]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) The_Joker [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Russel [Nr10]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/isMBRHK.png) Mark [33rd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/3h6BMNB.png) Floop [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) JoJo [Nr4]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Knaddle [Nr4]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Yuwan [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Ar0ch3r [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Clamydia [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Karl [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/C3NhXA5.gif) Aureliano [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Pouwelicious [2e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Papa/WRX3 [32nd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Smylie [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) KosS [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Niemand [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Twinkie [8th]
5.00 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/us.gif) James Baxter [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Basilikum [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/fMBmHUY.png) Dogukan [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) J-M [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaSalle [6e]





Complete votes
(https://i.gyazo.com/1be3db5916b8af8ff8f2a5a1f341e0ac.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/94445dd02230774e7459c4fad1ef1ee1.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/eeed5b7e4bf5bc8f777dc017fec19570.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/3b73596d22702b5f14c8db4f5dd16d14.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/75ca860b06f66cc3fb7f86c430314ac4.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/60d6cba5d7d68e2e7629279a7287e8f8.png)
[close]




 



[close]

I give money to the guy who downgrade me to tier 5
Money pls

XDDDD How long did it actually take you ?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: SwissGronkh on February 22, 2021, 08:47:37 pm
Spoiler
Hussar Ranking - Europe

Tier 1

1.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Remao [6e]
1.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Dokletian [4e]
1.35 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Soartex [1er]
1.37 (https://i.imgur.com/KqCeH5p.png) Stannis [8th]
1.65 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Ciiges [1er]
1.88 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) DeLaBedoyere [1er]
1.95 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) MajorMark [1er]

Tier 2

2.05 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Aless [8th]
2.10 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Naz [1er]
2.10 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Thyrell [1er]

2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Thorvic [1er]
2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tommy [8th]
2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Empo [45thN]
2.50 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Skittles [4e]
2.55 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Leensab [6e]
2.75 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Law [6e]
2.75 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Treiz [6e]
2.80 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) FreyrDS [8th]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Jelly [4e]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Shadey [8th]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ouranos [45e]
2.90 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tomas [8th]
2.95 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Andros [8th]
2.95 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Octanidas [8th]


Tier 3

3.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Parigonicalus [1er]
3.00 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Gabriel [10ph]
3.00 (https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/in.gif) Krishna [8th]

3.03 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) MaxenceIV [4e]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Enderby [4e]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Carlos [1er]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Felix [8th]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Goodest [2Lr]
3.07 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Jesu04 [8th]
3.07 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Adelon [2Lr]
3.08 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Carlok [2Lr]
3.10 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) SteFan [8th]
3.10 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harbringer [8th]
3.15 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Cage [8th]
3.15 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gauner [8th]
3.17 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles [2Lr]
3.20 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Giorno [4e]
3.20 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Yuki [1er]
3.24 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Bocom [4e]
3.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Magnum [2Lr]
3.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Strunk [1er]
3.30 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Darklight [4e]
3.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Erik [4e]
3.38 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Destroy [Nr10]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Quack [8th]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Draco [6e]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles [Nr4]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Thales [Nr10]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Domi [1er]
3.42 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/az.gif) Caucasian [4e]
3.43 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Husarion [Nr4]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ace [6e]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaPierre [6e]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) CokeTail [1er]

Tier 4

3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Squall [6e]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Termito [8th]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) SwaP [6e]
3.50 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Kazi [-]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Sharkie [-]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Killa [4e]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kreativer [8th]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Angel [1er]
3.52 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Lindblom [1er]
3.55 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tulkas [Nr10]
3.57 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Nightwing [2Lr]
3.58 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ironfist [Nr10]
3.58 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gorg [4e]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ducopie [6e]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Pyr0z [8th]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Rastignac [8th]
3.65 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Cooper [2Lr]
3.67 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sebi [8th]
3.67 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Foxii [Nr4]
3.70 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Apfelkuchen [4e]
3.70 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) FeezY [10ph]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Lightning [8th]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Zorius [10ph]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Tigrane [6e]
3.78 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) SirLegion [4e]
3.80 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Swissy [32nd]
3.80 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Louis [1er]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Posh [8th]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tengou [1er]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Thorny [4e]
3.95 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Shagon [4e]
3.95 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) EpicPizza [1er]
3.96 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Nelson [8th]
3.97 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tardet [4e]

4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) StephanGH [-]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Rorscharch [1er]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Ilypa [1er]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Iniskill [Nr4]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/MiEoPym.png) Mech [4e]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Stockfisch [Nr4]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Smurf [2Lr]
4.09 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Semon  [4e]
4.10 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kutte [Nr10]
4.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Unforgive [Nr4]
4.29 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Saphyro [1er]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Gibby [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Chuckster [1er]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Skarface [6e]]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Caius [6e]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Norwegian [Nr10]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ezio [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Raphael [8th]
4.30 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/us.gif) Virus [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Raven [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harford [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Huggu [6e]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Rune [1er]
4.35 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ozikan [6e]
4.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Chsuk [1er]
4.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Higen [1er]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Miyu [1er]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/isMBRHK.png) Uganda888 [33rd]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Icephenix [6e]
4.45 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Rapez [Nr4]

Tier 5

4.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ossi [1er]
4.55 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Mozart [-]
4.55 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sky [Nr4]
4.60 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Artigo [Nr4]
4.60 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Coco_Ayala [1er]
4.63 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Gothtrad [6e]
4.63 (https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Johnson [33rd]
4.77 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ichdie [2Lr]
4.80 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) targeknight [-]
4.82 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Belgian_Fury [6e]
4.82 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MarkusVonSTR [Nr4]
4.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Joe_Cobra [6e]
4.90 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/hr.gif) Waxo [8th]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Darracq [6e]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kaiser [4e]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Eisenmann [Nr10]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MiniiDNS [2Lr]
4.91 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Claudius [Nr10]
4.91 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Titus [2Lr]

5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Arthur [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Duke [33rd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Mclaren [8th]
5.00 (https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/il.gif) Chris [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sirox [2Lr]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) The_Joker [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Russel [Nr10]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/isMBRHK.png) Mark [33rd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/3h6BMNB.png) Floop [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) JoJo [Nr4]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Knaddle [Nr4]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Yuwan [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Ar0ch3r [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Clamydia [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Karl [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/C3NhXA5.gif) Aureliano [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Pouwelicious [2e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Papa/WRX3 [32nd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Smylie [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) KosS [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Niemand [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Twinkie [8th]
5.00 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/us.gif) James Baxter [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Basilikum [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/fMBmHUY.png) Dogukan [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) J-M [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaSalle [6e]





Complete votes
(https://i.gyazo.com/1be3db5916b8af8ff8f2a5a1f341e0ac.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/94445dd02230774e7459c4fad1ef1ee1.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/eeed5b7e4bf5bc8f777dc017fec19570.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/3b73596d22702b5f14c8db4f5dd16d14.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/75ca860b06f66cc3fb7f86c430314ac4.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/60d6cba5d7d68e2e7629279a7287e8f8.png)
[close]




 



[close]

I give money to the guy who downgrade me to tier 5
Money pls

XDDDD How long did it actually take you ?
20 secs xD
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on February 23, 2021, 10:33:41 am
Spoiler
Hussar Ranking - Europe

Tier 1

1.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Remao [6e]
1.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Dokletian [4e]
1.35 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Soartex [1er]
1.37 (https://i.imgur.com/KqCeH5p.png) Stannis [8th]
1.65 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Ciiges [1er]
1.88 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) DeLaBedoyere [1er]
1.95 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) MajorMark [1er]

Tier 2

2.05 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Aless [8th]
2.10 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Naz [1er]
2.10 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Thyrell [1er]

2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Thorvic [1er]
2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tommy [8th]
2.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Empo [45thN]
2.50 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Skittles [4e]
2.55 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Leensab [6e]
2.75 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Law [6e]
2.75 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Treiz [6e]
2.80 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) FreyrDS [8th]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Jelly [4e]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Shadey [8th]
2.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ouranos [45e]
2.90 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Tomas [8th]
2.95 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Andros [8th]
2.95 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Octanidas [8th]


Tier 3

3.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Parigonicalus [1er]
3.00 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Gabriel [10ph]
3.00 (https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/in.gif) Krishna [8th]

3.03 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) MaxenceIV [4e]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Enderby [4e]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Carlos [1er]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Felix [8th]
3.05 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Goodest [2Lr]
3.07 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Jesu04 [8th]
3.07 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Adelon [2Lr]
3.08 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Carlok [2Lr]
3.10 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) SteFan [8th]
3.10 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harbringer [8th]
3.15 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Cage [8th]
3.15 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gauner [8th]
3.17 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles [2Lr]
3.20 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Giorno [4e]
3.20 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Yuki [1er]
3.24 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Bocom [4e]
3.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Magnum [2Lr]
3.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Strunk [1er]
3.30 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Darklight [4e]
3.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Erik [4e]
3.38 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Destroy [Nr10]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Quack [8th]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Draco [6e]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Achilles [Nr4]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Thales [Nr10]
3.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Domi [1er]
3.42 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/az.gif) Caucasian [4e]
3.43 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Husarion [Nr4]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ace [6e]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaPierre [6e]
3.45 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) CokeTail [1er]

Tier 4

3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Squall [6e]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Termito [8th]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) SwaP [6e]
3.50 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Kazi [-]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Sharkie [-]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Killa [4e]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kreativer [8th]
3.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Angel [1er]
3.52 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) Lindblom [1er]
3.55 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tulkas [Nr10]
3.57 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Nightwing [2Lr]
3.58 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ironfist [Nr10]
3.58 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Gorg [4e]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ducopie [6e]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Pyr0z [8th]
3.60 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Rastignac [8th]
3.65 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Cooper [2Lr]
3.67 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sebi [8th]
3.67 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Foxii [Nr4]
3.70 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Apfelkuchen [4e]
3.70 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) FeezY [10ph]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Lightning [8th]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Zorius [10ph]
3.75 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Tigrane [6e]
3.78 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) SirLegion [4e]
3.80 (https://i.ibb.co/4N0t6nJ/swiss.png) Swissy [32nd]
3.80 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Louis [1er]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Posh [8th]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tengou [1er]
3.92 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Thorny [4e]
3.95 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Shagon [4e]
3.95 (https://i.imgur.com/I85uBSw.png) EpicPizza [1er]
3.96 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Nelson [8th]
3.97 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Tardet [4e]

4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) StephanGH [-]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Rorscharch [1er]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Ilypa [1er]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Iniskill [Nr4]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/MiEoPym.png) Mech [4e]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Stockfisch [Nr4]
4.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Smurf [2Lr]
4.09 (https://i.imgur.com/ofwQxPm.png) Semon  [4e]
4.10 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kutte [Nr10]
4.25 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Unforgive [Nr4]
4.29 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Saphyro [1er]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Gibby [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Chuckster [1er]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Skarface [6e]]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Caius [6e]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Norwegian [Nr10]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ezio [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Raphael [8th]
4.30 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/us.gif) Virus [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Raven [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Harford [8th]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Huggu [6e]
4.30 (https://i.imgur.com/hXCLCjo.png) Rune [1er]
4.35 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Ozikan [6e]
4.40 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Chsuk [1er]
4.40 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Higen [1er]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Miyu [1er]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/isMBRHK.png) Uganda888 [33rd]
4.44 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Icephenix [6e]
4.45 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Rapez [Nr4]

Tier 5

4.50 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ossi [1er]
4.55 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Mozart [-]
4.55 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sky [Nr4]
4.60 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Artigo [Nr4]
4.60 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Coco_Ayala [1er]
4.63 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Gothtrad [6e]
4.63 (https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Johnson [33rd]
4.77 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Ichdie [2Lr]
4.80 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) targeknight [-]
4.82 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Belgian_Fury [6e]
4.82 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MarkusVonSTR [Nr4]
4.85 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Joe_Cobra [6e]
4.90 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/hr.gif) Waxo [8th]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Darracq [6e]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Kaiser [4e]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Eisenmann [Nr10]
4.90 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) MiniiDNS [2Lr]
4.91 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Claudius [Nr10]
4.91 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Titus [2Lr]

5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Arthur [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/qTMdkRL.png) Duke [33rd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/eHLjyhv.png) Mclaren [8th]
5.00 (https://steamcommunity-a.akamaihd.net/public/images/countryflags/il.gif) Chris [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Sirox [2Lr]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) The_Joker [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Russel [Nr10]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/isMBRHK.png) Mark [33rd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/3h6BMNB.png) Floop [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) JoJo [Nr4]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Knaddle [Nr4]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Yuwan [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/cXl0tMw.png) Ar0ch3r [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Clamydia [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) Karl [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/C3NhXA5.gif) Aureliano [-]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/hScmPmE.png) Pouwelicious [2e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/oKmSTZw.png) Papa/WRX3 [32nd]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/dOFmLhS.png) Smylie [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) KosS [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Niemand [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Twinkie [8th]
5.00 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/us.gif) James Baxter [8th]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/0aYfwo0.png) Basilikum [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/fMBmHUY.png) Dogukan [1er]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) J-M [6e]
5.00 (https://i.imgur.com/R5wa8jb.png) LaSalle [6e]





Complete votes
(https://i.gyazo.com/1be3db5916b8af8ff8f2a5a1f341e0ac.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/94445dd02230774e7459c4fad1ef1ee1.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/eeed5b7e4bf5bc8f777dc017fec19570.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/3b73596d22702b5f14c8db4f5dd16d14.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/75ca860b06f66cc3fb7f86c430314ac4.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/60d6cba5d7d68e2e7629279a7287e8f8.png)
[close]




 



[close]

I give money to the guy who downgrade me to tier 5
Money pls

XDDDD How long did it actually take you ?
20 secs xD

What a Gimp pro
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: SwissGronkh on February 23, 2021, 12:45:09 pm
What a Gimp pro
Just quote the main post and change your position in it :p
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Rastignac on February 23, 2021, 05:30:28 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d8sPnl1VtE
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on February 23, 2021, 06:09:15 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d8sPnl1VtE

Sacrebleu !
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Lonedoge. on February 26, 2021, 03:47:11 am
lancer list when?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Coco. on February 26, 2021, 11:18:41 am
Lonedoge list when?
Hello :3
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: MsEricson on March 01, 2021, 03:22:32 am
Lonedoge list when?
Hello :3
Jeez
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Law on March 04, 2021, 10:23:14 pm
Tommy 7-1 Law Ft7 gg To the best UK player !!

(asked by Tommy while he's bad :-X)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: TxM on March 04, 2021, 10:41:00 pm
 ;)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on March 05, 2021, 11:34:35 am
Tommy 7-1 Law Ft7 gg To the best UK player !!

(asked by Tommy while he's bad :-X)

Imagine losing 7-1 to Tommy, law you're such a bald noob
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Lightning. on March 05, 2021, 12:10:04 pm
Tommy 7-1 Law Ft7 gg To the best UK player !!

(asked by Tommy while he's bad :-X)

Imagine losing 7-1 to Tommy, law you're such a bald noob
what does this have to do with him beeing hairless
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: ~Felix~ on March 05, 2021, 02:17:09 pm
Would be handsome if you would just remove almost all german Nr4 players. Most of them just stopped playing NW and to make this list accurate as possible it would be the best to remove them. Thanks in advance :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Termito on March 05, 2021, 02:46:11 pm
Would be handsome if you would just remove almost all german Nr4 players. Most of them just stopped playing NW and to make this list accurate as possible it would be the best to remove them. Thanks in advance :)

 Remove Felix pls
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: ~Felix~ on March 05, 2021, 05:12:10 pm
Would be handsome if you would just remove almost all german Nr4 players. Most of them just stopped playing NW and to make this list accurate as possible it would be the best to remove them. Thanks in advance :)

 Remove Felix pls

 >:(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on March 05, 2021, 07:09:03 pm
Tommy 7-1 Law Ft7 gg To the best UK player !!

(asked by Tommy while he's bad :-X)

Imagine losing 7-1 to Tommy, law you're such a bald noob
what does this have to do with him beeing hairless

I'm sorry for all the hairless on earth... But law's dad is an exception, he's balder than all the bald
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Hawriil on March 05, 2021, 07:49:58 pm
Change my membership from 10ph to 4e. Thanks //Gabriel
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: maskmanmarks on March 10, 2021, 02:09:20 pm
3.42 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/az.gif) Caucasian [4e]

what flag is this
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Alf on March 10, 2021, 02:19:40 pm
3.42 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/az.gif) Caucasian [4e]

what flag is this

azerbaijan
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Cameron. on March 10, 2021, 03:18:09 pm
3.42 (https://community.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/public/images/countryflags/az.gif) Caucasian [4e]

what flag is this

azerbaijan

thanks alf
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: ArtyParty on March 21, 2021, 05:07:40 am
Can I see how many people rated me and which people rated me?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on March 21, 2021, 11:36:02 am
page 1 babe
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Mr_Sharkie on April 19, 2021, 02:21:36 pm
Damn it, I did not realise there was a list... I missed all the drama  :'(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on April 19, 2021, 03:08:17 pm
Damn it, I did not realise there was a list... I missed all the drama  :'(

no drama here
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Tardet on April 19, 2021, 03:10:09 pm
Damn it, I did not realise there was a list... I missed all the drama  :'(

no drama here
Only but one rising star
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Octanidas on February 27, 2022, 08:21:00 pm
This list hasn't been updated for over a year now!
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Melsyo on March 08, 2022, 11:49:38 pm
treiz and tommy shared first place
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Baliant on March 12, 2022, 12:43:55 am
Why Huggu is not tier 1 ? I don't think you know anything about cavalry, he is the best cav actually (+ he is handsome)         
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on March 29, 2022, 12:29:24 pm
This list hasn't been updated for over a year now!

You rank 1 is the only update the list needs, otherwise it's useless  >:(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Dusbled on March 29, 2022, 07:57:01 pm
This list hasn't been updated for over a year now!

You rank 1 is the only update the list needs, otherwise it's useless  >:(

xd
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Ciiges on September 11, 2022, 03:46:38 pm
is there even a cav community still?
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: SwissGronkh on September 11, 2022, 07:17:05 pm
is there even a cav community still?
only top tier
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Octanidas on September 12, 2022, 08:54:03 am
is there even a cav community still?
only top tier

And low tier :)
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Termito on September 12, 2022, 11:27:13 am
Cav Community, never heard of it.
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: SwissGronkh on September 13, 2022, 10:57:10 am
Cav Community, never heard of it.
only Lancer Community
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: LaSalle on October 28, 2022, 03:08:33 pm
Cav community doesn't exist, Cav family does  :'(
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Harford on November 01, 2022, 12:29:08 am
is it a fast and furious reference
if it is then its good we all died
Title: Re: ♞ Hussars Rated (EU) ♞ UPDATED 16-2-2021
Post by: Dokletian on November 01, 2022, 08:39:57 pm
is it a fast and furious reference
if it is then its good we all died