smh recency bias is actually goin to ruin thisRecency bias happens in the regular awards so it’s not exactly a surprising concept
92nd lives rent-free in your head. I love to see it. :)You are award winning dumb dumb
Doesn't take away it's not true what you say, but it only proves my point over and over again.
True.92nd lives rent-free in your head. I love to see it. :)You are award winning dumb dumb
Doesn't take away it's not true what you say, but it only proves my point over and over again.
haters are not gonna vote out of spiteHonestly even I was annoyed by how often people tried to break into circle jerks about 63e when you guys came to our events back in like 15/16 or whenever you brought like 100-120 guys. I always enjoyed having you guys in our events since you never really broke rules or were rowdy and it was fun watching your cavalry/other specs start to improve over time against our IV korps. What a boring and uninspired train of thought that im sure all those players came up with themselves and didnt repeat to fit in with others, also that shit wasnt even relevant to our line battles and it would still come up in there lol. Either way though most people taking part in the forums are gonna speak from the more niche yet vocal competitive side of your history so my word only goes as far as having enjoyed you guys in our events in the public setting of the community for what thats worth.
P.S. - 1LH best competitive and pub cav all time for NA, also im still the reigning King of NA1 since Maple never returned with his army to rechallenge for the throne again.
I agree With IBhaters are not gonna vote out of spiteHonestly even I was annoyed by how often people tried to break into circle jerks about 63e when you guys came to our events back in like 15/16 or whenever you brought like 100-120 guys. I always enjoyed having you guys in our events since you never really broke rules or were rowdy and it was fun watching your cavalry/other specs start to improve over time against our IV korps. What a boring and uninspired train of thought that im sure all those players came up with themselves and didnt repeat to fit in with others, also that shit wasnt even relevant to our line battles and it would still come up in there lol. Either way though most people taking part in the forums are gonna speak from the more niche yet vocal competitive side of your history so my word only goes as far as having enjoyed you guys in our events in the public setting of the community for what thats worth.
P.S. - 1LH best competitive and pub cav all time for NA, also im still the reigning King of NA1 since Maple never returned with his army to rechallenge for the throne again.
Let me start then.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m8KGoKNmKw
I nominate RGL Final 2020 as biggest Choke and Comeback of the decade:Spoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj6MXmswRu4&t=5460s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYYgxjD6gBg[close]
P.S. - 1LH best competitive and pub cav all time for NA, also im still the reigning King of NA1 since Maple never returned with his army to rechallenge for the throne again.
I was the real king of US_1 the fact that u called it NA_1 means ur a new gen noob :-*
I have no idea how many people are still around that were playing in 2012 but I just assume its not enough for me to use its true name anymore. You can be king of US1 if you want though, ill keep the NA1 kingship since its got lore behind it. Who knows maybe we can even form some sort of union with our kingdoms ???P.S. - 1LH best competitive and pub cav all time for NA, also im still the reigning King of NA1 since Maple never returned with his army to rechallenge for the throne again.
I was the real king of US_1 the fact that u called it NA_1 means ur a new gen noob :-*
Let me start then.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m8KGoKNmKw
I nominate RGL Final 2020 as biggest Choke and Comeback of the decade:Spoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj6MXmswRu4&t=5460s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYYgxjD6gBg[close]
40th losing to literal fossils who had sub 10 hours past 2 weeks was a choke and a half.
Someone who is trash at melee shouldn't be commenting about other players abilities. I do agree however that the 15th comeback match is for sure the biggest choke/comeback and it ain't even close.SpoilerLet me start then.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m8KGoKNmKw
I nominate RGL Final 2020 as biggest Choke and Comeback of the decade:Spoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj6MXmswRu4&t=5460s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYYgxjD6gBg[close]
40th losing to literal fossils who had sub 10 hours past 2 weeks was a choke and a half.[close]
How is this even comparable? Who gives a shit about that NA match?
RGL Final 2020 was the Clash of the 2 best regiments in the game at that time after a lot of trashtalk before and in the event. It was a fairytale comeback in a tournament final which viewers and players will remember till end of their days. Not some silly 1v1 where the players don't know how to block.
All these newfag 92nd kids don't remember the old times.get good and stfu
All these newfag 92nd kids don't remember the old times.get good and stfu
#gfing serverYou beat me to it! That was a legendary choke.
14e vs Nr24 in NWL has to be the best match I've seen.
77y vs 91st (5-5)in NWL has to be the best choke from 91st.
All these newfag 92nd kids don't remember the old times.
Yes that RGL season was as clear as "15th were always supposed to win really", very astute observation of a match that ended 15-14. In reality 92nd and 15th were extremely close in skill at the time. Every tournament before that had been extremely close between 15th and 92nd as well, most of the matches between us were the finals which were often decided by a one round difference. That RGL final is quite easily the best match ever played in this game, anyone that was there at the time would agree with you (maybe not 92nd), regardless of if they are newfags or oldfags.#gfing serverYou beat me to it! That was a legendary choke.
14e vs Nr24 in NWL has to be the best match I've seen.
77y vs 91st (5-5)in NWL has to be the best choke from 91st.
All these newfag 92nd kids don't remember the old times.
On the topic of Nr24, the loss vs 5pp was an hilarious meme at the time. #PolishBobCarry
EDIT: We are talking about decade awards when you guys are only looking at insignificant matches! If we are speaking about 92nd vs 15th, yes it was a legendary choke for many reasons and definitely deserves to be up there, 15th were always supposed to win really, although making 92nd look that silly I am sure wasn't part of the plan ::)
The LG will forever be the best regiment of all-time in NA.No
that is because the chefs of swaziland are NARGL champions and therefore the best of all timeThe LG will forever be the best regiment of all-time in NA.No
NWL mega stacked LG is the most talented lineup in the history of NWThe LG will forever be the best regiment of all-time in NA.No
It is top 5 for sure but I think the 12th, 9y & 18th lineups have a case.NWL mega stacked LG is the most talented lineup in the history of NWThe LG will forever be the best regiment of all-time in NA.No
I think 12th, 71st, and 3eVolt have a case. 9y was stacked but never really proved anything. 18th was a discount 12th with some new people but overall much worse, hell they lost to the Nr37.It is top 5 for sure but I think the 12th, 9y & 18th lineups have a case.NWL mega stacked LG is the most talented lineup in the history of NWThe LG will forever be the best regiment of all-time in NA.No
Top 5 is disrespectful. Nobody touches mega stacked LGIt is top 5 for sure but I think the 12th, 9y & 18th lineups have a case.NWL mega stacked LG is the most talented lineup in the history of NWThe LG will forever be the best regiment of all-time in NA.No
Delusion is rife6te bottom 5 NA comp reg all time
1st - 63eLet’s get you back into the retirement home it’s right this way, I hear they have free KÁN cbd products there
2nd - 12th
3rd - 71st
4th - 3eVolt/LG
5th - LG/3eVolt
63e was the best regiment NA ever had, but you guys are not ready to have this conversation.
Change my mind.
Best NA Event All-Time - NA NWL
Best pub server - NA1
Best GF server - NA_GF (label)
Biggest clutch and choke of all NA time, some guys might remember or some are just new that never heard of this.
12th vs 63e (1st NA regimental GF tournament, around 2013?). Score was 6-6 and Breaches clutched a 1v5 to make it 7-6 (final score, 12th won)
Delusion is rifeHow does my dick taste?
1st - 63eLet’s get you back into the retirement home it’s right this way, I hear they have free KÁN cbd products there
2nd - 12th
3rd - 71st
4th - 3eVolt/LG
5th - LG/3eVolt
63e was the best regiment NA ever had, but you guys are not ready to have this conversation.
Change my mind.
Best NA Event All-Time - NA NWL
Best pub server - NA1
Best GF server - NA_GF (label)
Biggest clutch and choke of all NA time, some guys might remember or some are just new that never heard of this.
12th vs 63e (1st NA regimental GF tournament, around 2013?). Score was 6-6 and Breaches clutched a 1v5 to make it 7-6 (final score, 12th won)
1st - 63e
2nd - 12th
3rd - 71st
4th - 3eVolt/LG
5th - LG/3eVolt
63e was the best regiment NA ever had, but you guys are not ready to have this conversation.
Change my mind.
Best NA Event All-Time - NA NWL
Best pub server - NA1
Best GF server - NA_GF (label)
Biggest clutch and choke of all NA time, some guys might remember or some are just new that never heard of this.
12th vs 63e (1st NA regimental GF tournament, around 2013?). Score was 6-6 and Breaches clutched a 1v5 to make it 7-6 (final score, 12th won)
Who’s Breaches : Pthe second greatest Minnesotan to bless the game
1st - 63e
2nd - 12th
3rd - 71st
4th - 3eVolt/LG
5th - LG/3eVolt
63e was the best regiment NA ever had, but you guys are not ready to have this conversation.
Change my mind.
Best NA Event All-Time - NA NWL
Best pub server - NA1
Best GF server - NA_GF (label)
Biggest clutch and choke of all NA time, some guys might remember or some are just new that never heard of this.
12th vs 63e (1st NA regimental GF tournament, around 2013?). Score was 6-6 and Breaches clutched a 1v5 to make it 7-6 (final score, 12th won)
There’s gonna be so much recency bias in thesebro really?
Delusion is rifeHow does my dick taste?Spoiler(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/785233987051836505/CDDB0F3D4768F208025D6DC755F2D2246C95746D/)[close]
really broThere’s gonna be so much recency bias in thesebro really?
Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Why are we doing NW decade awards when NW is just 8 years oldSome of us need another monthly ego boost.
I'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
here come the historians8)
I think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the best
I think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler
I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th. (imo)Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league’s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Like 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league’s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013
my point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league’s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013
and leading has exponentially degraded since the 12th existedmy point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedSpoilerLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league’s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013[close]
I tale as old as...well NW kekand leading has exponentially degraded since the 12th existedmy point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedSpoilerLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league’s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013[close]
weird balance
this is so much cap I am in painand leading has exponentially degraded since the 12th existedmy point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedSpoilerLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league’s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013[close]
weird balance
here's ur video evidencethis is so much cap I am in painand leading has exponentially degraded since the 12th existedmy point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedSpoilerLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league’s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013[close]
weird balance
I will get video evidence for you later don’t worry
Ah yes a three year old video of one of the three times the 30th played the LGhere's ur video evidencethis is so much cap I am in painand leading has exponentially degraded since the 12th existedmy point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedSpoilerLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league’s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013[close]
weird balance
I will get video evidence for you later don’t worrySpoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IqhUPrsFBI[close]
Ah yes, our inferior leading compared to the 30th. It's not like most of those rounds we missed close shots like this.I don't mean to put the 30th over the LG you guys are clearly the better regiment I meant to highlight how our regiment is kinda shit and how both of our leading here is very scuffed.. and if we're lookin' at the LGs history as a whole we gotta include the rough months pre-45e..Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/6b8f7fe0f9fc42ed0c9f4620283c1983.jpg)[close]
Also third month as a regiment and me as a leader. That's like comparing Aaron Rodgers first year as a QB and judging his career because of that.
It's mostly a joke because I know it tilts you.. :PAh yes a three year old video of one of the three times the 30th played the LGSpoilerhere's ur video evidencethis is so much cap I am in painand leading has exponentially degraded since the 12th existedmy point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedSpoilerLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league’s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013[close]
weird balance
I will get video evidence for you later don’t worrySpoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IqhUPrsFBI[close][close]
4 months into Russian and I’s leading together extravaganza. Forget the other 3-4 years where we adapted new strategies and actually learned to play off each others leading styles and how to counter regiments that run
But wait if we tied Purple Panda but beat AsianP & Karth...PurplePanda better than AsianP and Karth???
I cannot tell if you’re trolling me because you know this stuff tilts me or you’re actually serious
Ah yes, our inferior leading compared to the 30th. It's not like most of those rounds we missed close shots like this.I don't mean to put the 30th over the LG you guys are clearly the better regiment I meant to highlight how our regiment is kinda shit and how both of our leading here is very scuffed.. and if we're lookin' at the LGs history as a whole we gotta include the rough months pre-45e..Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/6b8f7fe0f9fc42ed0c9f4620283c1983.jpg)[close]
Also third month as a regiment and me as a leader. That's like comparing Aaron Rodgers first year as a QB and judging his career because of that.It's mostly a joke because I know it tilts you.. :PAh yes a three year old video of one of the three times the 30th played the LGSpoilerhere's ur video evidencethis is so much cap I am in painand leading has exponentially degraded since the 12th existedmy point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedSpoilerLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league%u2019s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I%u2019d still put Russian above and this isn%u2019t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it%u2019s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian%u2019s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I%u2019d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn%u2019t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there%u2019s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they%u2019re hardly well informed. Old gen %u201Cgolden days%u201D bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn%u2019t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013[close]
weird balance
I will get video evidence for you later don%u2019t worrySpoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IqhUPrsFBI[close][close]
4 months into Russian and I%u2019s leading together extravaganza. Forget the other 3-4 years where we adapted new strategies and actually learned to play off each others leading styles and how to counter regiments that run
But wait if we tied Purple Panda but beat AsianP & Karth...PurplePanda better than AsianP and Karth???
I cannot tell if you%u2019re trolling me because you know this stuff tilts me or you%u2019re actually serious
Didn't mean any disrespect to your e-peen, sir, and I think my original point has been diluded. I was only trying to imply that if you had trouble dealing with the 30th (3months into our existence as well) that your regiment would have a hard time beating the 12th! Please do not let my opinion offend you, it doesn't mean much and there are basically 0 regiments I think that could have beaten them in their prime. I think your regiment was still talented even before the 45e merge I agree, which is why I thought it was completely unnessecary when it happened.That's like comparing Aaron Rodgers first year as a QB and judging his career because of that. Furthermore, our regiment was still talented before the 45e merged into us. We lost a portion of our guys after NWL S7 due to the 3e reforming, but eventually began to win.SpoilerAh yes, our inferior leading compared to the 30th. It's not like most of those rounds we missed close shots like this.I don't mean to put the 30th over the LG you guys are clearly the better regiment I meant to highlight how our regiment is kinda shit and how both of our leading here is very scuffed.. and if we're lookin' at the LGs history as a whole we gotta include the rough months pre-45e..Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/6b8f7fe0f9fc42ed0c9f4620283c1983.jpg)[close]
Also third month as a regiment and me as a leader. That's like comparing Aaron Rodgers first year as a QB and judging his career because of that.It's mostly a joke because I know it tilts you.. :PAh yes a three year old video of one of the three times the 30th played the LGSpoilerhere's ur video evidencethis is so much cap I am in painand leading has exponentially degraded since the 12th existedmy point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedSpoilerLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league’s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I’d still put Russian above and this isn’t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it’s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian’s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I’d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn’t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there’s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they’re hardly well informed. Old gen “golden days” bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn’t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013[close]
weird balance
I will get video evidence for you later don’t worrySpoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IqhUPrsFBI[close][close]
4 months into Russian and I’s leading together extravaganza. Forget the other 3-4 years where we adapted new strategies and actually learned to play off each others leading styles and how to counter regiments that run
But wait if we tied Purple Panda but beat AsianP & Karth...PurplePanda better than AsianP and Karth???
I cannot tell if you’re trolling me because you know this stuff tilts me or you’re actually serious[close]
3e and LG traded wins before and after the 45e merged. Under the 3e name they had more wins against us but we lasted longer and continued to growyall were good but the skill gap from 3eVolt to LG was obvious. Before 45e merged LG was some mid like LG was definitely the 2nd best regiment but 3eVolt was far better than the LG before the 45e joined.That's like comparing Aaron Rodgers first year as a QB and judging his career because of that. Furthermore, our regiment was still talented before the 45e merged into us. We lost a portion of our guys after NWL S7 due to the 3e reforming, but eventually began to win.SpoilerAh yes, our inferior leading compared to the 30th. It's not like most of those rounds we missed close shots like this.I don't mean to put the 30th over the LG you guys are clearly the better regiment I meant to highlight how our regiment is kinda shit and how both of our leading here is very scuffed.. and if we're lookin' at the LGs history as a whole we gotta include the rough months pre-45e..Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/6b8f7fe0f9fc42ed0c9f4620283c1983.jpg)[close]
Also third month as a regiment and me as a leader. That's like comparing Aaron Rodgers first year as a QB and judging his career because of that.It's mostly a joke because I know it tilts you.. :PAh yes a three year old video of one of the three times the 30th played the LGSpoilerhere's ur video evidencethis is so much cap I am in painand leading has exponentially degraded since the 12th existedmy point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedSpoilerLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league%u2019s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I%u2019d still put Russian above and this isn%u2019t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it%u2019s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian%u2019s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I%u2019d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn%u2019t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there%u2019s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they%u2019re hardly well informed. Old gen %u201Cgolden days%u201D bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn%u2019t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013[close]
weird balance
I will get video evidence for you later don%u2019t worrySpoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IqhUPrsFBI[close][close]
4 months into Russian and I%u2019s leading together extravaganza. Forget the other 3-4 years where we adapted new strategies and actually learned to play off each others leading styles and how to counter regiments that run
But wait if we tied Purple Panda but beat AsianP & Karth...PurplePanda better than AsianP and Karth???
I cannot tell if you%u2019re trolling me because you know this stuff tilts me or you%u2019re actually serious[close]
best recruiter thxi might have taken that title from ya. 8)
Well LG was 16-5 vs 91st, 98e, and 42nd then after 42nd died LG mowed through mostly everyone until 40th formed then it was back and fourth wins again, but we got the IRL winwith that logic here wouldn't it just be agreed that 3e would've had that same progression if not better if they continued to be the 3e in the same span the LG was around. (that is if we are not counting 91st 42nd 98e, if we are counting these regiments as the 3e then I would say it's not even an argument at this point.)3e and LG traded wins before and after the 45e merged. Under the 3e name they had more wins against us but we lasted longer and continued to growyall were good but the skill gap from 3eVolt to LG was obvious. Before 45e merged LG was some mid like LG was definitely the 2nd best regiment but 3eVolt was far better than the LG before the 45e joined.That's like comparing Aaron Rodgers first year as a QB and judging his career because of that. Furthermore, our regiment was still talented before the 45e merged into us. We lost a portion of our guys after NWL S7 due to the 3e reforming, but eventually began to win.SpoilerAh yes, our inferior leading compared to the 30th. It's not like most of those rounds we missed close shots like this.I don't mean to put the 30th over the LG you guys are clearly the better regiment I meant to highlight how our regiment is kinda shit and how both of our leading here is very scuffed.. and if we're lookin' at the LGs history as a whole we gotta include the rough months pre-45e..Spoiler(https://i.gyazo.com/6b8f7fe0f9fc42ed0c9f4620283c1983.jpg)[close]
Also third month as a regiment and me as a leader. That's like comparing Aaron Rodgers first year as a QB and judging his career because of that.It's mostly a joke because I know it tilts you.. :PAh yes a three year old video of one of the three times the 30th played the LGSpoilerhere's ur video evidencethis is so much cap I am in painand leading has exponentially degraded since the 12th existedmy point is that melee has evolved exponentially since the 12th existedSpoilerLike 90% of our remaining community were in the LG at some point, what's your point?Do you even know who all makes up prime LG? Look at 70% of your last league%u2019s participants.I'm sorry but you cannot argue that a prime LG wouldn't get washed by a prime 12th.Yeah I operate the sheet of all tournament wins, AsianP has 4 less wins but only 7 first places whereas Russian has 15.SpoilerI think you are holding some bias there but you're entitled to your opinion. There's a thread that highlights the players with the most tournament wins of all time.. although it's probably a little outdated at this point. I remember seeing AsianP in the top 3 at least for most tournaments ever won, I think the others were like Tammo and Russian but even so it's close. When it comes to overall player skill though you have to include leading and I don't think it's very debatable if I were to say AsianP is tier(s) above RussianFury in this category not only because of what he's pioneered with leading but also what he's accomplished with his leading skill (not regimental skill) over the last decade, and no offense to what the LG's accomplished but I feel like late 2017 - 2020 is a very unimpressive era in NW in terms of regimental skill which is where we saw the LG dominate.I%u2019d still put Russian above and this isn%u2019t just him being the lomlI'd agree with this statement.Best player of decade obviously RussianFuryif it's pure skill based its a tough question, if it's overall skill as a player and leader I'd argue AsianP
Tho if it%u2019s pure skill based Yoshie but this is DECADE
Russian%u2019s won more tournaments than any other player and has consistently been a top player the last 6 years. I%u2019d even say prime Russian vs prime AsianP Russian is the better gfer Asian the better dueler
This is debatable tho, also I wouldn%u2019t be surprised if some people put Jackie as the bestSpoiler[close]
My opinion of the category is skill, not leadership (tho I still put Russian ahead on leadership)
Also bruh the last 4 years have been peak skill NW, there%u2019s more competition at the highest level than ever before. I like you man but your only view into comp NW the last few years has been your occasional league you host where you primarily do administration work. You can have your opinions but they%u2019re hardly well informed. Old gen %u201Cgolden days%u201D bias strikes again
LG, 40th, 6te, Godfreid Regs, I forget Jerrys reg name but that one, wipe the floor with old regs that were hailed as GOAT for beating on pub regs in 1v1s once a week.
Game competition didn%u2019t deteriorate over time, it evolved. Now regiments are finally irrelevant
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GhNLuzYxqw4z9t3r5Q8UbLNHOW_2O6qRkKR_XYgnhbQ/
On my phone over lunch sorry if this is incoherent as fuck
Washes, easily.
Piktonss rn would be a top 15 player in 2013[close]
weird balance
I will get video evidence for you later don%u2019t worrySpoilerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IqhUPrsFBI[close][close]
4 months into Russian and I%u2019s leading together extravaganza. Forget the other 3-4 years where we adapted new strategies and actually learned to play off each others leading styles and how to counter regiments that run
But wait if we tied Purple Panda but beat AsianP & Karth...PurplePanda better than AsianP and Karth???
I cannot tell if you%u2019re trolling me because you know this stuff tilts me or you%u2019re actually serious[close]
Also depends on if you count 91st, 42nd, and 98e as 3e or completely new regs
The 71st was the best regiment of the decade and I’m seriousrent free
For me it’s
71st
63e
LG
12th
3e and other reforms
Also why do we still count Windflower as someone with any insight into competitive NW? Few notable accomplishments except for the admittedly successful PSG
42nd comeback vs LG never forget!! 8)
That was a sad day42nd comeback vs LG never forget!! 8)
The 71st was the best regiment of the decade and I%u2019m seriouswhy is the 71st ahead of those other regiments tho?
For me it%u2019s
71st
63e
LG
12th
3e and other reforms
Also why do we still count Windflower as someone with any insight into competitive NW? Few notable accomplishments except for the admittedly successful PSG
Because theodin was in the 71st firstThe 71st was the best regiment of the decade and I’m seriouswhy is the 71st ahead of those other regiments tho?
For me it’s
71st
63e
LG
12th
3e and other reforms
Also why do we still count Windflower as someone with any insight into competitive NW? Few notable accomplishments except for the admittedly successful PSG
the 71st should honestly only be included if you wanna talk about peaks or short spans, not the decadeBecause theodin was in the 71st firstThe 71st was the best regiment of the decade and I’m seriouswhy is the 71st ahead of those other regiments tho?
For me it’s
71st
63e
LG
12th
3e and other reforms
Also why do we still count Windflower as someone with any insight into competitive NW? Few notable accomplishments except for the admittedly successful PSG
Why are we doing NW decade awards when NW is just 8 years old
yes, my argument is that the peaks were the highest of everyone and therefore that should be the determining factor. which is also why the 12th is up therethe 71st should honestly only be included if you wanna talk about peaks or short spans, not the decadeBecause theodin was in the 71st firstThe 71st was the best regiment of the decade and I’m seriouswhy is the 71st ahead of those other regiments tho?
For me it’s
71st
63e
LG
12th
3e and other reforms
Also why do we still count Windflower as someone with any insight into competitive NW? Few notable accomplishments except for the admittedly successful PSG
Typical European math smhWhy are we doing NW decade awards when NW is just 8 years old
;D ;D ;D
I don%u2019t even think their peak was the highest. I%u2019m too lazy to check but didn%u2019t they tie the 63e in NWL and just barely win by points?yes, my argument is that the peaks were the highest of everyone and therefore that should be the determining factor. which is also why the 12th is up therethe 71st should honestly only be included if you wanna talk about peaks or short spans, not the decadeBecause theodin was in the 71st firstThe 71st was the best regiment of the decade and I%u2019m seriouswhy is the 71st ahead of those other regiments tho?
For me it%u2019s
71st
63e
LG
12th
3e and other reforms
Also why do we still count Windflower as someone with any insight into competitive NW? Few notable accomplishments except for the admittedly successful PSG
but if you weigh more in terms of longevity then the 71st goes down a few spots
that 63e was an all time crew. people forgot the melee competence in that lineup, plus the insane shooting and leadership they had. they were a top tier regI don’t even think their peak was the highest. I’m too lazy to check but didn’t they tie the 63e in NWL and just barely win by points?yes, my argument is that the peaks were the highest of everyone and therefore that should be the determining factor. which is also why the 12th is up therethe 71st should honestly only be included if you wanna talk about peaks or short spans, not the decadeBecause theodin was in the 71st firstThe 71st was the best regiment of the decade and I’m seriouswhy is the 71st ahead of those other regiments tho?
For me it’s
71st
63e
LG
12th
3e and other reforms
Also why do we still count Windflower as someone with any insight into competitive NW? Few notable accomplishments except for the admittedly successful PSG
but if you weigh more in terms of longevity then the 71st goes down a few spots
I'm going on a nomination strike until the oppression of my people ends :-X We demand representation!cav bad
dont make me put out an exposée list on which regiments were the best at anti cav >:( >:((number 1 will shock you!)
bad cavI'm going on a nomination strike until the oppression of my people ends :-X We demand representation!cav bad
dont make me put out an exposée list on which regiments were the best at anti cav >:( >:((number 1 will shock you!)
Old gens rule new gens drool
Since we're having old conversations anyway . . .
There are a lot of things to do in NW that take some skill and game knowledge to be good at. Nobody really ever talks about the top artillerists. Cavalry has a wierd place now, but it's been irrelevent in North America for long enough that nobody even remembers the old cav players (except for me, because I don't shut up about it). Shinto at least remembers one of the top sappers ever from his days as a roving walnut. There were even people back in the day who could do it all. Even entire regiments who did it all (not even talking about detachments like the 63e had).
That the entire "best player ever" discussion is solely based on who could best use one weapon as one class, and that the best regiment based on league 1v1s and bayonet melee is all a little sad. Most of the listed regiments couldn't even form double ranks unless they had fifteen minutes and tape on the ground, let alone fast enough to fire and move before artillery landed. How many of them could play anything other than infantry at a reasonably competitive level?
Since we're having old conversations anyway . . .one of? dude, NOBODY can even come close to what that dude did. anyone who thinks someone else is a better sapper than juice kelly is delusional
There are a lot of things to do in NW that take some skill and game knowledge to be good at. Nobody really ever talks about the top artillerists. Cavalry has a wierd place now, but it's been irrelevent in North America for long enough that nobody even remembers the old cav players (except for me, because I don't shut up about it). Shinto at least remembers one of the top sappers ever from his days as a roving walnut. There were even people back in the day who could do it all. Even entire regiments who did it all (not even talking about detachments like the 63e had).
That the entire "best player ever" discussion is solely based on who could best use one weapon as one class, and that the best regiment based on league 1v1s and bayonet melee is all a little sad. Most of the listed regiments couldn't even form double ranks unless they had fifteen minutes and tape on the ground, let alone fast enough to fire and move before artillery landed. How many of them could play anything other than infantry at a reasonably competitive level?
Since we're having old conversations anyway . . .xethos wishes he was attila the nun dropping fat dimes on kids and getting 50+ kills in a map
There are a lot of things to do in NW that take some skill and game knowledge to be good at. Nobody really ever talks about the top artillerists. Cavalry has a wierd place now, but it's been irrelevent in North America for long enough that nobody even remembers the old cav players (except for me, because I don't shut up about it). Shinto at least remembers one of the top sappers ever from his days as a roving walnut. There were even people back in the day who could do it all. Even entire regiments who did it all (not even talking about detachments like the 63e had).
That the entire "best player ever" discussion is solely based on who could best use one weapon as one class, and that the best regiment based on league 1v1s and bayonet melee is all a little sad. Most of the listed regiments couldn't even form double ranks unless they had fifteen minutes and tape on the ground, let alone fast enough to fire and move before artillery landed. How many of them could play anything other than infantry at a reasonably competitive level?
Since we're having old conversations anyway . . .
There are a lot of things to do in NW that take some skill and game knowledge to be good at. Nobody really ever talks about the top artillerists. Cavalry has a wierd place now, but it's been irrelevent in North America for long enough that nobody even remembers the old cav players (except for me, because I don't shut up about it). Shinto at least remembers one of the top sappers ever from his days as a roving walnut. There were even people back in the day who could do it all. Even entire regiments who did it all (not even talking about detachments like the 63e had).
That the entire "best player ever" discussion is solely based on who could best use one weapon as one class, and that the best regiment based on league 1v1s and bayonet melee is all a little sad. Most of the listed regiments couldn't even form double ranks unless they had fifteen minutes and tape on the ground, let alone fast enough to fire and move before artillery landed. How many of them could play anything other than infantry at a reasonably competitive level?
This is something that someone who has never been nominated for a NW Award would say smhSince we're having old conversations anyway . . .
There are a lot of things to do in NW that take some skill and game knowledge to be good at. Nobody really ever talks about the top artillerists. Cavalry has a wierd place now, but it's been irrelevent in North America for long enough that nobody even remembers the old cav players (except for me, because I don't shut up about it). Shinto at least remembers one of the top sappers ever from his days as a roving walnut. There were even people back in the day who could do it all. Even entire regiments who did it all (not even talking about detachments like the 63e had).
That the entire "best player ever" discussion is solely based on who could best use one weapon as one class, and that the best regiment based on league 1v1s and bayonet melee is all a little sad. Most of the listed regiments couldn't even form double ranks unless they had fifteen minutes and tape on the ground, let alone fast enough to fire and move before artillery landed. How many of them could play anything other than infantry at a reasonably competitive level?
These lists are a joke considering they really only consider competitive infantry which is a huge circle jerk anyways. Most of the players can only use muskets and can’t play anything else. Most cav players honestly can do it all from what I’ve seen. Not to mention 1LH who is rarely mentioned yet did very well against these regiments despite only playing cav (along with the IV). If you’re going to have a decade awards list, maybe mention more factors or label it for just infantry. Kinda pointless making the same lists over and over when it’s just the same 20 infantry guys arguing over and over again.
This is something that someone who has never been nominated for a NW Award would say smhSince we're having old conversations anyway . . .
There are a lot of things to do in NW that take some skill and game knowledge to be good at. Nobody really ever talks about the top artillerists. Cavalry has a wierd place now, but it's been irrelevent in North America for long enough that nobody even remembers the old cav players (except for me, because I don't shut up about it). Shinto at least remembers one of the top sappers ever from his days as a roving walnut. There were even people back in the day who could do it all. Even entire regiments who did it all (not even talking about detachments like the 63e had).
That the entire "best player ever" discussion is solely based on who could best use one weapon as one class, and that the best regiment based on league 1v1s and bayonet melee is all a little sad. Most of the listed regiments couldn't even form double ranks unless they had fifteen minutes and tape on the ground, let alone fast enough to fire and move before artillery landed. How many of them could play anything other than infantry at a reasonably competitive level?
These lists are a joke considering they really only consider competitive infantry which is a huge circle jerk anyways. Most of the players can only use muskets and can’t play anything else. Most cav players honestly can do it all from what I’ve seen. Not to mention 1LH who is rarely mentioned yet did very well against these regiments despite only playing cav (along with the IV). If you’re going to have a decade awards list, maybe mention more factors or label it for just infantry. Kinda pointless making the same lists over and over when it’s just the same 20 infantry guys arguing over and over again.
one of? dude, NOBODY can even come close to what that dude did. anyone who thinks someone else is a better sapper than juice kelly is delusional
as far as arty goes, bear and yooper were always really good and they carried godfreid and i to the ship battle championship no cap
That's why I've always put the PLG and LIR in my top regiments of all time. They were so consistently good at what they did and lasted for years. People overlook them all the time even though they are two of the most well-known regiments to exist in the game.
But really, the majority of competitions for this game where for melee infantry and for regimental 1v1s so I would think most people would believe that the best player at those skillsets would be the "Best Player" so that's why everyone discusses it. At that, we barely have enough people to discuss it, the most popular activity. When going into other aspects even fewer people remember.
Just loses validity IMO when it’s focused on one group of players who only really know about infantry. You’d think if you spent years on a game, you’d at least branch out a little bit. But whatever makes you feel better.SpoilerThis is something that someone who has never been nominated for a NW Award would say smhSince we're having old conversations anyway . . .
There are a lot of things to do in NW that take some skill and game knowledge to be good at. Nobody really ever talks about the top artillerists. Cavalry has a wierd place now, but it's been irrelevent in North America for long enough that nobody even remembers the old cav players (except for me, because I don't shut up about it). Shinto at least remembers one of the top sappers ever from his days as a roving walnut. There were even people back in the day who could do it all. Even entire regiments who did it all (not even talking about detachments like the 63e had).
That the entire "best player ever" discussion is solely based on who could best use one weapon as one class, and that the best regiment based on league 1v1s and bayonet melee is all a little sad. Most of the listed regiments couldn't even form double ranks unless they had fifteen minutes and tape on the ground, let alone fast enough to fire and move before artillery landed. How many of them could play anything other than infantry at a reasonably competitive level?
These lists are a joke considering they really only consider competitive infantry which is a huge circle jerk anyways. Most of the players can only use muskets and can’t play anything else. Most cav players honestly can do it all from what I’ve seen. Not to mention 1LH who is rarely mentioned yet did very well against these regiments despite only playing cav (along with the IV). If you’re going to have a decade awards list, maybe mention more factors or label it for just infantry. Kinda pointless making the same lists over and over when it’s just the same 20 infantry guys arguing over and over again.[close]
Sorry King, I can't hear you in the Mess Hall, maybe I could if this was a child board.SpoilerSpoilerone of? dude, NOBODY can even come close to what that dude did. anyone who thinks someone else is a better sapper than juice kelly is delusional
as far as arty goes, bear and yooper were always really good and they carried godfreid and i to the ship battle championship no cap[close]
Nobody ever beat him in building camping, but there were a couple of people who figured out how to bomb the balcony on Arabian Harbor. Although thinking on it, I remember Juice Kelly building elevated platforms for artillery on random maps within a minute, which I don't remember anybody else doing.
Joshly, Gamechanger/Richard, and Munro come to mind for artillery. Munro even got a Thundersnow animation for a signature because of his cannons in MM. More recently, JJ and German Gunner.Everyone forgets too that the PLG started out as infantry, and were actually good at it. I don't remember if Pepper led it originally or if Ice did, but they started as the 1erVL. I still rate the 2013 PLG as the single best NA cav lineup in the game. For what it's worth, the 1LH started the same way, as the . . . 8thRI, I think. They changed names at least once.SpoilerThat's why I've always put the PLG and LIR in my top regiments of all time. They were so consistently good at what they did and lasted for years. People overlook them all the time even though they are two of the most well-known regiments to exist in the game.[close]
I'd probably rate the LIR more highly if they didn't depend so heavily on their regimental lawyer to function for so long. That said, Jetch is the kind of player who I think gets underrated because he didn't focus on bayonets. He was decent at it, reasonably good as a cav player, knew how to get kills with cannons and howitzers, and he could do all of that while micromanaging three detachments and typing essays in internal about how an officer attacking by himself isn't really ramboing if his sergeant is donating to the server box fund.
I still want to rate Smithy's Marins at or near the top just because they did everything with the same group of people and won at just about everything. This being before they quit playing by, what, 2013 because they hated the upstab replacing the awlpike overswing that MM had.SpoilerBut really, the majority of competitions for this game where for melee infantry and for regimental 1v1s so I would think most people would believe that the best player at those skillsets would be the "Best Player" so that's why everyone discusses it. At that, we barely have enough people to discuss it, the most popular activity. When going into other aspects even fewer people remember.[close]
Everybody in the NA cavalry community hated each other too much to do many tournaments, and basically none of the top cav players wanted to do anything competitive when cav was at its peak. There's just no data for cav, and I get the inevitable limitations to talking about cav players that causes. That and, even if there were stats from over the years, K/D means substantially less in cav groupfighting than infantry groupfighting. I don't even know how to begin ranking artillery players other than watching them extensively . . . something you can't do to compare, say, Niko to Joshly.
That said, I don't think the correct response to being unable to identify minute differences between cav or arty players is to completely write off every non-infantry class. Playing at a comparatively high level in several different classes is harder than playing at a high level in one class. I couldn't do it, even back when I was passable at cav. It's become a lost art, and I don't think that's a good thing. Surely having more than one skill counts for something.[close]
Irish is top 1 NA
Since we're having old conversations anyway . . .
There are a lot of things to do in NW that take some skill and game knowledge to be good at. Nobody really ever talks about the top artillerists. Cavalry has a wierd place now, but it's been irrelevent in North America for long enough that nobody even remembers the old cav players (except for me, because I don't shut up about it). Shinto at least remembers one of the top sappers ever from his days as a roving walnut. There were even people back in the day who could do it all. Even entire regiments who did it all (not even talking about detachments like the 63e had).
That the entire "best player ever" discussion is solely based on who could best use one weapon as one class, and that the best regiment based on league 1v1s and bayonet melee is all a little sad. Most of the listed regiments couldn't even form double ranks unless they had fifteen minutes and tape on the ground, let alone fast enough to fire and move before artillery landed. How many of them could play anything other than infantry at a reasonably competitive level?
These lists are a joke considering they really only consider competitive infantry which is a huge circle jerk anyways. Most of the players can only use muskets and can’t play anything else. Most cav players honestly can do it all from what I’ve seen. Not to mention 1LH who is rarely mentioned yet did very well against these regiments despite only playing cav (along with the IV). If you’re going to have a decade awards list, maybe mention more factors or label it for just infantry. Kinda pointless making the same lists over and over when it’s just the same 20 infantry guys arguing over and over again.
I don't see how casual regiments and players are any relevant in a discussion about the best regiment and player. You probably can do a category for each, competitive reg, casual reg and cav, but if we talk the best player anything other than competitive inf is literally irrelevant as musket infantry is arguably the hardest class to master.In my opinion the best players are loyal, moral, ethical, dedicated, and good friends, melees just a potential bonus
3eVolt should be considered the best regiment of the decade, it's the only regiment that's had a consistent competitive impact in pretty much every era of competitive NW, I would say its peak skill doesn't quite match the LG's S9 roster, because no one does, but if we're really talking about a decade and not month-long or 1-2 year spans, it should be 3eVolt, which was competitive since 2013 (although has disbanded/reformed a few times).All the reforms make it really hard to rank the 3e imo
If 63e had continued to be relevant past mid-2016 I would potentially consider them, but I think 3eVolt continuing past that gives it the edge, but otherwise, kind of the same list fartknocker has.
3eVolt is a top 5 NA regiment all time or top 3 (debatable), but its a joke to say it was the best during the decade. 3e was always on 12th's and 63e's shadow. Those 2 regiments had to disband to finally achieve something. (2012-2015?). I could be wrong, havent played anything competetive after 2015.63e finishing top 2 in NWL the first 6 seasons is pretty impressive.
I agree AsianP (duel/gf)/Tammo(duel) as the best player of the decade.
Russian indeed is the best player after 2016.
Or just start bringing "palmares" of all regiments, and make a real comparison.
3eVolt is a top 5 NA regiment all time or top 3 (debatable), but its a joke to say it was the best during the decade. 3e was always on 12th's and 63e's shadow. Those 2 regiments had to disband to finally achieve something. (2012-2015?). I could be wrong, havent played anything competetive after 2015.63e finishing top 2 in NWL the first 6 seasons is pretty impressive.
I agree AsianP (duel/gf)/Tammo(duel) as the best player of the decade.
Russian indeed is the best player after 2016.
Or just start bringing "palmares" of all regiments, and make a real comparison.
People forget how Karth made a mediocre competitive roster into a contender for years3eVolt is a top 5 NA regiment all time or top 3 (debatable), but its a joke to say it was the best during the decade. 3e was always on 12th's and 63e's shadow. Those 2 regiments had to disband to finally achieve something. (2012-2015?). I could be wrong, havent played anything competetive after 2015.63e finishing top 2 in NWL the first 6 seasons is pretty impressive.
I agree AsianP (duel/gf)/Tammo(duel) as the best player of the decade.
Russian indeed is the best player after 2016.
Or just start bringing "palmares" of all regiments, and make a real comparison.
3eVolt should be considered the best regiment of the decade it's the only regiment that's had a consistent competitive impact in pretty much every era of competitive NW, I would say its peak skill doesn't quite match the LG's S9 roster, because no one does, but if we're really talking about a decade and not month-long or 1-2 year spans, it should be 3eVolt, which was competitive since 2013 (although has disbanded/reformed a few times).No way bro.
If 63e had continued to be relevant past mid-2016 I would potentially consider them, but I think 3eVolt continuing past that gives it the edge, but otherwise, kind of the same list fartknocker has.
3eVolt is a top 5 NA regiment all time or top 3 (debatable), but its a joke to say it was the best during the decade
Where’s best casual regiment of the decade
If you intend to nominate one player of the decade for the whole nw, then its come down to ExtaZz94. All the players you guys have previously mentioned, and by an incommensurable margin, do not qualify. tchaobycimer ;)
If you intend to nominate one player of the decade for the whole nw, then its come down to ExtaZz94. All the players you guys have previously mentioned, and by an incommensurable margin, do not qualify. tchaobycimer ;)simp
Remember when Russian was in Odyreg? That should disqualify him from any awardssimp
anything other than competitive inf is literally irrelevant as musket infantry is arguably the hardest class to master.Honestly I feel like the best players should be able to play anything. My point is cav players usually do it all. Infantry has a difficult time fighting people with swords. There’s also more to cav than just 50/50 fights. Blocking on horseback is pretty impressive. Mounted vs dismounted, groupfighting etc.
And @Xethos you’re right about the self sabotage in the cav community. When I was CR I tried to get more competitive events happening with Cav, but the amount of infighting and toxicity was unreal, especially from some of the big leaders. If cav had even tried to make a competitive scene I’d argue for their inclusion into the awards but it was a crazy amount of effort to even make one league work, even with a whole new cav reg comprised of just infantryYou say this like infantry regiments aren’t the most toxic and get downright nasty to each other. Competitive cav was difficult since there wasn’t a large number and they didn’t really care enough. There’s a huge age gap and personality difference from cav and infantry. We also used to host our own 1v1s and group fighting things but honestly everyone just played for fun. The only real drama was probably with Les and banter between who was best which doesn’t even matter cause it’s not like many people played.
And @Xethos you’re right about the self sabotage in the cav community. When I was CR I tried to get more competitive events happening with Cav, but the amount of infighting and toxicity was unreal, especially from some of the big leaders. If cav had even tried to make a competitive scene I’d argue for their inclusion into the awards but it was a crazy amount of effort to even make one league work, even with a whole new cav reg comprised of just infantry
Fireboy OPWhere’s best casual regiment of the decade
1stReddit sweeps that category easily
I shall say more later but
Yes 63e did a lot and was very good for awhile but on the other hand they were also really bad for a long time also at points
ex LG 16-2 record vs 63e (while Karth was still around also)
kekekekekrkekeI shall say more later but
Yes 63e did a lot and was very good for awhile but on the other hand they were also really bad for a long time also at points
ex LG 16-2 record vs 63e (while Karth was still around also)
It is true that the LG had a stronger roster than the 63e. But doesn't matter. The 12th had it too.
Dont worry, LG is a top 5 in NA :-*, but in our hearts we know 12th and 63e are the greatest regiments.
Cav is harder to master, thats for sure... but the community was always more infantry focused.
The best cav reg was the 12th cav detachment, with our flying dolphins.
Where’s best casual regiment of the decadeDoesn't need to be included because everyone already knows it was the 29th without question
I shall say more later butAh yes you mean after the entire community boycotted the regiment because we controlled the best/only active server which held the entirety of the public player base. And then we were forced to only play against regiments that would be willing to break the boycott, meaning we had to play a mega stacked LG over and over again until we were eventually dead once Holdfast released.
Yes 63e did a lot and was very good for awhile but on the other hand they were also really bad for a long time also at points
ex LG 16-2 record vs 63e (while Karth was still around also)
And @Xethos you’re right about the self sabotage in the cav community. When I was CR I tried to get more competitive events happening with Cav, but the amount of infighting and toxicity was unreal, especially from some of the big leaders. If cav had even tried to make a competitive scene I’d argue for their inclusion into the awards but it was a crazy amount of effort to even make one league work, even with a whole new cav reg comprised of just infantry
DAMN! DAMN! DAMN! I wish I coulda seen the aforementioned toxicity first hand because if it was anything like the old 1LH/PLG rivalry its pretty hilarious to look back on, granted we purposefully tried to stay out of any true drama as much as we could but id say from the lens of our guys looking at the rest of the cav community it was mostly just bullshitting with each other all around and not really any real animosity although I do recall some people having issues with each other but I never considered that very representative of their regiments overall dispositions towards each other, certainly nothing that would stop members from taking part in tournaments at the least.
What time period were you CR and pushing for events though Theo? was this during the time I was pushing for a competitive cav sub board? I just personally dont remember who it was at that time, but I do remember trying to spring board us further into public eye after the most successful string of cav tournaments by year ever in 2017 that I got denied. It is unfortunate that not as much of the public was aware as I would have liked that there was multiple large tournaments every week for cav 2v2s and sword 1v1s that the 1LH/PLG were hosting for years, eventually we joined the two together to make much larger brackets. The problem was that by the eye test nobody in large was interested in cav tournies so the easiest way to find yourself invited to them was to spend time in NA Cav groupfighting which routinely 2-4 times a week would be locked for tournies in which randoms would be notified were about to happen and in the case of our tournies often invited to them.
Overall I think I had a good relationship with pretty much every cav reg by the time we stopped regularly playing in mid 2019.. which also is apparently far back enough that people dont remember you for dominating pretty much every event multiple days a week that you went to for the previous 4-5 years, I do realize however this is partly my fault for not being buds with many of the newer regs/guys that popped up after the old guard were all retiring so it would be accurate to say our PR was lacking but it still sucks to see nonetheless.. If only I bumped their threads with memes like everyone else (https://i.imgur.com/0kn6ypS.png)
You say this like infantry regiments aren’t the most toxic and get downright nasty to each other. Competitive cav was difficult since there wasn’t a large number and they didn’t really care enough. There’s a huge age gap and personality difference from cav and infantry. We also used to host our own 1v1s and group fighting things but honestly everyone just played for fun. The only real drama was probably with Les and banter between who was best which doesn’t even matter cause it’s not like many people played.
Fireboy OPWhere’s best casual regiment of the decade
1stReddit sweeps that category easilySpoiler(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/620717922481860717/04AC43B8BC8A109F32DF50808A25C8C652E5D32B/)[close]63e N00bs(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/619597880761369187/713078B3D0CAA7CA15F9CF40E3482BB915431EF2/)[close]
Yeah get shit on nerd, it was before and after alsoI shall say more later butAh yes you mean after the entire community boycotted the regiment because we controlled the best/only active server which held the entirety of the public player base. And then we were forced to only play against regiments that would be willing to break the boycott, meaning we had to play a mega stacked LG over and over again until we were eventually dead once Holdfast released.
Yes 63e did a lot and was very good for awhile but on the other hand they were also really bad for a long time also at points
ex LG 16-2 record vs 63e (while Karth was still around also)
anything other than competitive inf is literally irrelevant as musket infantry is arguably the hardest class to master.Honestly I feel like the best players should be able to play anything. My point is cav players usually do it all. Infantry has a difficult time fighting people with swords. There’s also more to cav than just 50/50 fights. Blocking on horseback is pretty impressive. Mounted vs dismounted, groupfighting etc.
Haven’t seen any other regiment get boycotted because of how much they ran the game 🤷🏻♂️Yeah get shit on nerd, it was before and after alsoI shall say more later butAh yes you mean after the entire community boycotted the regiment because we controlled the best/only active server which held the entirety of the public player base. And then we were forced to only play against regiments that would be willing to break the boycott, meaning we had to play a mega stacked LG over and over again until we were eventually dead once Holdfast released.
Yes 63e did a lot and was very good for awhile but on the other hand they were also really bad for a long time also at points
ex LG 16-2 record vs 63e (while Karth was still around also)
well it would have been nice to have some comp connected cav players like yourself yooper to help integrate the communities but no one ever tried
The best, biggest, and most strategic monopoly of all-time. 63e_NA_Groupfighting was lit though.Haven’t seen any other regiment get boycotted because of how much they ran the game 🤷🏻♂️Yeah get shit on nerd, it was before and after alsoI shall say more later butAh yes you mean after the entire community boycotted the regiment because we controlled the best/only active server which held the entirety of the public player base. And then we were forced to only play against regiments that would be willing to break the boycott, meaning we had to play a mega stacked LG over and over again until we were eventually dead once Holdfast released.
Yes 63e did a lot and was very good for awhile but on the other hand they were also really bad for a long time also at points
ex LG 16-2 record vs 63e (while Karth was still around also)
3eVolt is a top 5 NA regiment all time or top 3 (debatable), but its a joke to say it was the best during the decade. 3e was always on 12th's and 63e's shadow. Those 2 regiments had to disband to finally achieve something. (2012-2015?). I could be wrong, havent played anything competetive after 2015.
I agree AsianP (duel/gf)/Tammo(duel) as the best player of the decade.
Russian indeed is the best player after 2016.
Or just start bringing "palmares" of all regiments, and make a real comparison.
anything other than competitive inf is literally irrelevant as musket infantry is arguably the hardest class to master.Honestly I feel like the best players should be able to play anything. My point is cav players usually do it all. Infantry has a difficult time fighting people with swords. There’s also more to cav than just 50/50 fights. Blocking on horseback is pretty impressive. Mounted vs dismounted, groupfighting etc.
3e tied the 63e in the regular season and actually would have lost if there wernt playoffs3eVolt is a top 5 NA regiment all time or top 3 (debatable), but its a joke to say it was the best during the decade. 3e was always on 12th's and 63e's shadow. Those 2 regiments had to disband to finally achieve something. (2012-2015?). I could be wrong, havent played anything competetive after 2015.
I agree AsianP (duel/gf)/Tammo(duel) as the best player of the decade.
Russian indeed is the best player after 2016.
Or just start bringing "palmares" of all regiments, and make a real comparison.
3eVolt literally dismantled 63e in NANWL S6. Yes it spent 1.5 years in 12ths shadow, and if it was a best of 2012-15, you'd have a point, but with the games entire history in consideration you're way off.
Jackie is overall best pre-2016, AsianP was overall best post-2016.
Putting Tammo as best duelist of the decade is bad cap.
3eVolt is a top 5 NA regiment all time or top 3 (debatable), but its a joke to say it was the best during the decade. 3e was always on 12th's and 63e's shadow. Those 2 regiments had to disband to finally achieve something. (2012-2015?). I could be wrong, havent played anything competetive after 2015.
I agree AsianP (duel/gf)/Tammo(duel) as the best player of the decade.
Russian indeed is the best player after 2016.
Or just start bringing "palmares" of all regiments, and make a real comparison.
3eVolt literally dismantled 63e in NANWL S6. Yes it spent 1.5 years in 12ths shadow, and if it was a best of 2012-15, you'd have a point, but with the games entire history in consideration you're way off.
71st would have had that NANWL. We beat the 3e and 63e consistently during the league period, but certain individuals just didn't want us in3e tied the 63e in the regular season and actually would have lost if there wernt playoffs3eVolt is a top 5 NA regiment all time or top 3 (debatable), but its a joke to say it was the best during the decade. 3e was always on 12th's and 63e's shadow. Those 2 regiments had to disband to finally achieve something. (2012-2015?). I could be wrong, havent played anything competetive after 2015.
I agree AsianP (duel/gf)/Tammo(duel) as the best player of the decade.
Russian indeed is the best player after 2016.
Or just start bringing "palmares" of all regiments, and make a real comparison.
3eVolt literally dismantled 63e in NANWL S6. Yes it spent 1.5 years in 12ths shadow, and if it was a best of 2012-15, you'd have a point, but with the games entire history in consideration you're way off.
Jackie is overall best pre-2016, AsianP was overall best post-2016.
Putting Tammo as best duelist of the decade is bad cap.
And I’m pretty sure the 71st were still the best regiment at the time. We just missed the sign up date
Nope the actual son we currently have. NW made life. Maybe you'll get one eventuallyWhat son? The one you aborted years ago? Yeah he'll be the best player to come out the grave LMAOwell it would have been nice to have some comp connected cav players like yourself yooper to help integrate the communities but no one ever tried
God only knows my son will be playing this game in a few years since this game won’t die already. And I’m sure the lists will still be the same lol
I hope you and the hobo get along good at the Christmas gatherings.Nope the actual son we currently have. NW made life. Maybe you'll get one eventuallyWhat son? The one you aborted years ago? Yeah he'll be the best player to come out the grave LMAOwell it would have been nice to have some comp connected cav players like yourself yooper to help integrate the communities but no one ever tried
God only knows my son will be playing this game in a few years since this game won’t die already. And I’m sure the lists will still be the same lol
Life must be difficult when you need constant validation on the internet on a virtually dead game getting awards for all playing the same unit with the same stats and same weapon reach and speed that you cant even think of new jokesI hope you and the hobo get along good at the Christmas gatherings.Nope the actual son we currently have. NW made life. Maybe you'll get one eventuallyWhat son? The one you aborted years ago? Yeah he'll be the best player to come out the grave LMAOwell it would have been nice to have some comp connected cav players like yourself yooper to help integrate the communities but no one ever tried
God only knows my son will be playing this game in a few years since this game won’t die already. And I’m sure the lists will still be the same lol
shouldnt this be renamed to NW NA Decade Awards?There's a seperate EU section... if you actually looked at the nomination form
either way CLEARLY Sanitarium was and is the best player ever and MM was better thanks for coming to my TED talk
i also nominate sztinman
Life must be difficult when you need constant validation on the internet on a virtually dead game getting awards for all playing the same unit with the same stats and same weapon reach and speed that you cant even think of new jokesI hope you and the hobo get along good at the Christmas gatherings.Nope the actual son we currently have. NW made life. Maybe you'll get one eventuallyWhat son? The one you aborted years ago? Yeah he'll be the best player to come out the grave LMAOwell it would have been nice to have some comp connected cav players like yourself yooper to help integrate the communities but no one ever tried
God only knows my son will be playing this game in a few years since this game won’t die already. And I’m sure the lists will still be the same lol
3eVolt is a top 5 NA regiment all time or top 3 (debatable), but its a joke to say it was the best during the decade. 3e was always on 12th's and 63e's shadow. Those 2 regiments had to disband to finally achieve something. (2012-2015?). I could be wrong, havent played anything competetive after 2015.
I agree AsianP (duel/gf)/Tammo(duel) as the best player of the decade.
Russian indeed is the best player after 2016.
Or just start bringing "palmares" of all regiments, and make a real comparison.
3eVolt literally dismantled 63e in NANWL S6. Yes it spent 1.5 years in 12ths shadow, and if it was a best of 2012-15, you'd have a point, but with the games entire history in consideration you're way off.
Competition was huge back then (regs, tournaments, players, forum activity, etc.)
The only reason I put the 63e as the greatest (doesnt matter if they disbanded in 2016?) is that they had a shitty roster and still managed to have success (NWL 1-4)
2x NWL Champions (almost got their 3rd, 71st got it)
Top 2 during 6 seasons (in a row)
2x GF champions
1x runner up (1st NA reg tournament) - https://challonge.com/ticohasbigpenis
3eVolt - https://challonge.com/3gf
The biggest 3e achievement is that they were able to beat the 12th, 2 times.
71st would have had that NANWL. We beat the 3e and 63e consistently during the league period, but certain individuals just didn't want us in3e tied the 63e in the regular season and actually would have lost if there wernt playoffs3eVolt is a top 5 NA regiment all time or top 3 (debatable), but its a joke to say it was the best during the decade. 3e was always on 12th's and 63e's shadow. Those 2 regiments had to disband to finally achieve something. (2012-2015?). I could be wrong, havent played anything competetive after 2015.
I agree AsianP (duel/gf)/Tammo(duel) as the best player of the decade.
Russian indeed is the best player after 2016.
Or just start bringing "palmares" of all regiments, and make a real comparison.
3eVolt literally dismantled 63e in NANWL S6. Yes it spent 1.5 years in 12ths shadow, and if it was a best of 2012-15, you'd have a point, but with the games entire history in consideration you're way off.
Jackie is overall best pre-2016, AsianP was overall best post-2016.
Putting Tammo as best duelist of the decade is bad cap.
And I’m pretty sure the 71st were still the best regiment at the time. We just missed the sign up date
I think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
I think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
The 63e did the most with the least. And still achieved more than 99.9% of any regiments. And did it for years.Yeah I don't think having a shaky final year with Karth really changes anything about their legacy... they competed at the top for so long with much weaker players and if they weren't the best at the time they were not far behind at all for 2nd best (besides maybe 2013 where the 12th and 3e were better), their ability to work cohesively as a singular unit in a competetive environment has been unparallelled.
And no the reason the 63e went to Holdfast wasn’t because we kept getting smacked. It was cause we thought Holdfast would replace NW and had a whole new player base to tap into and get members from (like everyone else thought at the time). We were still doing groupfights and 1v1s even after Holdfast came out for a couple months until we moved fully to Holdfast. Even then I convinced Zen to come back to NW and I got the 45e/Nr4 to join too. We actually had a somewhat competitive lineup for a while.
The 63e did the most with the least. And still achieved more than 99.9% of any regiments. And did it for years.
And no the reason the 63e went to Holdfast wasn’t because we kept getting smacked. It was cause we thought Holdfast would replace NW and had a whole new player base to tap into and get members from (like everyone else thought at the time). We were still doing groupfights and 1v1s even after Holdfast came out for a couple months until we moved fully to Holdfast. Even then I convinced Zen to come back to NW and I got the 45e/Nr4 to join too. We actually had a somewhat competitive lineup for a while.
The 63e did the most with the least. And still achieved more than 99.9% of any regiments. And did it for years.Yeah I don't think having a shaky final year with Karth really changes anything about their legacy... they competed at the top for so long with much weaker players and if they weren't the best at the time they were not far behind at all for 2nd best (besides maybe 2013 where the 12th and 3e were better), their ability to work cohesively as a singular unit in a competetive environment has been unparallelled.
And no the reason the 63e went to Holdfast wasn’t because we kept getting smacked. It was cause we thought Holdfast would replace NW and had a whole new player base to tap into and get members from (like everyone else thought at the time). We were still doing groupfights and 1v1s even after Holdfast came out for a couple months until we moved fully to Holdfast. Even then I convinced Zen to come back to NW and I got the 45e/Nr4 to join too. We actually had a somewhat competitive lineup for a while.
All the EU's should need is here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wF6-_XTwtp7xZio7wyTqGlzoMlrbrkCqQ2XMkYCz-LY/edit#gid=1622017021
Yeah, you have a good point if you're measuring in years.. it could also be weighed on how much you value the tournament that each regiment won depending on what you value more. For example would you value the 63e's second place in League 1 to the 71st more than the 3e's NWGL win in whichever year it was where the competition was lackluster? I mean yeah the 3e and LG were top regiments of all time but if they're the only two regiments competing against each other than it just seems not as impactful no matter the size of the rivalry, I also don't think it's fair to count reformations under different names the same regiment but that's just imo. It's fine if you value the longevity in the competitive scene the most too it's all opinionated really there's no definite way of saying it.The 63e did the most with the least. And still achieved more than 99.9% of any regiments. And did it for years.Yeah I don't think having a shaky final year with Karth really changes anything about their legacy... they competed at the top for so long with much weaker players and if they weren't the best at the time they were not far behind at all for 2nd best (besides maybe 2013 where the 12th and 3e were better), their ability to work cohesively as a singular unit in a competetive environment has been unparallelled.
And no the reason the 63e went to Holdfast wasn’t because we kept getting smacked. It was cause we thought Holdfast would replace NW and had a whole new player base to tap into and get members from (like everyone else thought at the time). We were still doing groupfights and 1v1s even after Holdfast came out for a couple months until we moved fully to Holdfast. Even then I convinced Zen to come back to NW and I got the 45e/Nr4 to join too. We actually had a somewhat competitive lineup for a while.
Yes, 63e was the best regiment/2nd best regiment of 2014-2015, between them and 71st. And was a top 5 regiment of 2016.
3eVolt was the 2nd best regiment of 2013, was a top 5 regiment in 2015, best of 2016, and traded off being 1st/2nd with LG & 6te from 2017-2020.
It's really comparing 3 years of competing to 6, which is my point. If you're talking about a *decade*, 3eVolts the only regiment that's had a competitive impact for the better part of a decade. If 63e had not gone to Holdfast, and continued to be an actual presence in NANW comp, then sure, I could see them having a case.
Leaving doesn't hurt their legacy as a regiment, it's still a top 3 all-time regiment, I just can't understand how it would be considered the best regiment of the decade, when it competed for 3/8 years of NW, as opposed to 3eVolt who competed for 6/8 years.
Imo top 5 for the decade should really be
3eVolt
63e
LG
71st
12th
ye probs cuz I copied it from the other spreadsheet which was never double checked. oopsie. Tbf that tab was never used for any list anyways so it is just for flair.All the EU's should need is here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wF6-_XTwtp7xZio7wyTqGlzoMlrbrkCqQ2XMkYCz-LY/edit#gid=1622017021
Read this. Bit confused.
15thYR:
Golds 9
Silvers 5
Total Top 2: 16
Should that be 14 or am I looking at the wrong thing?
Nice spreadsheet though. Respectable.
Well since that’s not subjective, if you can find the top 3/5 longest lived regiments I’ll include them all as a special prizeI think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
77y, 33rd and 18e.Ah I see we are capping already
There you go, done ::)
77y, 33rd and 18e.(https://i.imgur.com/GgIktOW.jpg)
There you go, done ::)
77y, 33rd and 18e.
There you go, done ::)
@Godfreid So are you saying the 3eVolt was better than the 9y? Because obviously the 12th is #1
The LG will forever be the best regiment of all-time in NA.
As long as Movement still gets the #1 disbander reward idgaf xD77y, 33rd and 18e.
There you go, done ::)
Fairly sure 18e disbanded about 200 times if not renamed xd
Well since that’s not subjective, if you can find the top 3/5 longest lived regiments I’ll include them all as a special prizeI think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
Well since that’s not subjective, if you can find the top 3/5 longest lived regiments I’ll include them all as a special prizeI think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
For the NA side probably 1stRddt, LIR and eh cant really think of a 3rd
USMC lived for a long time if you include that other reg that was basically just a name change :-X.Well since that’s not subjective, if you can find the top 3/5 longest lived regiments I’ll include them all as a special prizeI think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
For the NA side probably 1stRddt, LIR and eh cant really think of a 3rd
Maybe the 87th
Nov 2012-Sept 2017 (they formed the 42nd North Carolina in 2012 and USMC in august of 2013)USMC lived for a long time if you include that other reg that was basically just a name change :-X.Well since that’s not subjective, if you can find the top 3/5 longest lived regiments I’ll include them all as a special prizeI think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
For the NA side probably 1stRddt, LIR and eh cant really think of a 3rd
Maybe the 87th
did someone say 42nd NCNov 2012-Sept 2017 (they formed the 42nd North Carolina in 2012 and USMC in august of 2013)SpoilerUSMC lived for a long time if you include that other reg that was basically just a name change :-X.Well since that’s not subjective, if you can find the top 3/5 longest lived regiments I’ll include them all as a special prizeI think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
For the NA side probably 1stRddt, LIR and eh cant really think of a 3rd
Maybe the 87th[close]
Sorry, number 1 of 2013.@Godfreid So are you saying the 3eVolt was better than the 9y? Because obviously the 12th is #1The LG will forever be the best regiment of all-time in NA.
disbanded ur reg from this rgl seasonAs long as Movement still gets the #1 disbander reward idgaf xD77y, 33rd and 18e.
There you go, done ::)
Fairly sure 18e disbanded about 200 times if not renamed xd
Yeah, you have a good point if you're measuring in years.. it could also be weighed on how much you value the tournament that each regiment won depending on what you value more. For example would you value the 63e's second place in League 1 to the 71st more than the 3e's NWGL win in whichever year it was where the competition was lackluster? I mean yeah the 3e and LG were top regiments of all time but if they're the only two regiments competing against each other than it just seems not as impactful no matter the size of the rivalry, I also don't think it's fair to count reformations under different names the same regiment but that's just imo. It's fine if you value the longevity in the competitive scene the most too it's all opinionated really there's no definite way of saying it.The 63e did the most with the least. And still achieved more than 99.9% of any regiments. And did it for years.Yeah I don't think having a shaky final year with Karth really changes anything about their legacy... they competed at the top for so long with much weaker players and if they weren't the best at the time they were not far behind at all for 2nd best (besides maybe 2013 where the 12th and 3e were better), their ability to work cohesively as a singular unit in a competetive environment has been unparallelled.
And no the reason the 63e went to Holdfast wasn’t because we kept getting smacked. It was cause we thought Holdfast would replace NW and had a whole new player base to tap into and get members from (like everyone else thought at the time). We were still doing groupfights and 1v1s even after Holdfast came out for a couple months until we moved fully to Holdfast. Even then I convinced Zen to come back to NW and I got the 45e/Nr4 to join too. We actually had a somewhat competitive lineup for a while.
Yes, 63e was the best regiment/2nd best regiment of 2014-2015, between them and 71st. And was a top 5 regiment of 2016.
3eVolt was the 2nd best regiment of 2013, was a top 5 regiment in 2015, best of 2016, and traded off being 1st/2nd with LG & 6te from 2017-2020.
It's really comparing 3 years of competing to 6, which is my point. If you're talking about a *decade*, 3eVolts the only regiment that's had a competitive impact for the better part of a decade. If 63e had not gone to Holdfast, and continued to be an actual presence in NANW comp, then sure, I could see them having a case.
Leaving doesn't hurt their legacy as a regiment, it's still a top 3 all-time regiment, I just can't understand how it would be considered the best regiment of the decade, when it competed for 3/8 years of NW, as opposed to 3eVolt who competed for 6/8 years.
Imo top 5 for the decade should really be
3eVolt
63e
LG
71st
12th
@Godfreid So are you saying the 3eVolt was better than the 9y? Because obviously the 12th is #1
Sure, I respect that. I would be looking more outside of the #1 and 2 spots though personally. For example, if you look here (http://bracketcloud.com/tournament/20482) in a previous season of NANWL, it shows around 5 or 6 regiments in League 1. The 63e and 71st ofc, and then we have the 18th, 58e, 1tes, and MoskovGren who dropped out somewhere during the season.You mean the year of NANWL where 63e and 71st basically 7-3'd - 10-0'd every other regiment in League 1 except each other who they tied? Does that sound familiar?SpoilerYeah, you have a good point if you're measuring in years.. it could also be weighed on how much you value the tournament that each regiment won depending on what you value more. For example would you value the 63e's second place in League 1 to the 71st more than the 3e's NWGL win in whichever year it was where the competition was lackluster? I mean yeah the 3e and LG were top regiments of all time but if they're the only two regiments competing against each other than it just seems not as impactful no matter the size of the rivalry, I also don't think it's fair to count reformations under different names the same regiment but that's just imo. It's fine if you value the longevity in the competitive scene the most too it's all opinionated really there's no definite way of saying it.The 63e did the most with the least. And still achieved more than 99.9% of any regiments. And did it for years.Yeah I don't think having a shaky final year with Karth really changes anything about their legacy... they competed at the top for so long with much weaker players and if they weren't the best at the time they were not far behind at all for 2nd best (besides maybe 2013 where the 12th and 3e were better), their ability to work cohesively as a singular unit in a competetive environment has been unparallelled.
And no the reason the 63e went to Holdfast wasn’t because we kept getting smacked. It was cause we thought Holdfast would replace NW and had a whole new player base to tap into and get members from (like everyone else thought at the time). We were still doing groupfights and 1v1s even after Holdfast came out for a couple months until we moved fully to Holdfast. Even then I convinced Zen to come back to NW and I got the 45e/Nr4 to join too. We actually had a somewhat competitive lineup for a while.
Yes, 63e was the best regiment/2nd best regiment of 2014-2015, between them and 71st. And was a top 5 regiment of 2016.
3eVolt was the 2nd best regiment of 2013, was a top 5 regiment in 2015, best of 2016, and traded off being 1st/2nd with LG & 6te from 2017-2020.
It's really comparing 3 years of competing to 6, which is my point. If you're talking about a *decade*, 3eVolts the only regiment that's had a competitive impact for the better part of a decade. If 63e had not gone to Holdfast, and continued to be an actual presence in NANW comp, then sure, I could see them having a case.
Leaving doesn't hurt their legacy as a regiment, it's still a top 3 all-time regiment, I just can't understand how it would be considered the best regiment of the decade, when it competed for 3/8 years of NW, as opposed to 3eVolt who competed for 6/8 years.
Imo top 5 for the decade should really be
3eVolt
63e
LG
71st
12th[close]
No, I wouldn't value 63e's 2nd place in League 1 over 3e's NWGL win because saying competition was better in 1 year and lackluster in another is a disingenuous argument to make because what happened in that year of NANWL is not an anomaly, it's a standard, as I've said about NANW comp before, you usually have a very clear #1 & #2, sometimes a #3, and the competition is really between those 2, sometimes 3 regiments. So just because there are fewer shitter regiments for those 2-3 main competitors to obliterate, doesn't really make that competitive year less valuable.
The only time I would really subscribe to that idea is if #2 was a highly contested spot, and #1 was just basically in a tier of its own.
Sure, I respect that. I would be looking more outside of the #1 and 2 spots though personally. For example, if you look here (http://bracketcloud.com/tournament/20482) in a previous season of NANWL, it shows around 5 or 6 regiments in League 1. The 63e and 71st ofc, and then we have the 18th, 58e, 1tes, and MoskovGren who dropped out somewhere during the season.You mean the year of NANWL where 63e and 71st basically 7-3'd - 10-0'd every other regiment in League 1 except each other who they tied? Does that sound familiar?SpoilerYeah, you have a good point if you're measuring in years.. it could also be weighed on how much you value the tournament that each regiment won depending on what you value more. For example would you value the 63e's second place in League 1 to the 71st more than the 3e's NWGL win in whichever year it was where the competition was lackluster? I mean yeah the 3e and LG were top regiments of all time but if they're the only two regiments competing against each other than it just seems not as impactful no matter the size of the rivalry, I also don't think it's fair to count reformations under different names the same regiment but that's just imo. It's fine if you value the longevity in the competitive scene the most too it's all opinionated really there's no definite way of saying it.The 63e did the most with the least. And still achieved more than 99.9% of any regiments. And did it for years.Yeah I don't think having a shaky final year with Karth really changes anything about their legacy... they competed at the top for so long with much weaker players and if they weren't the best at the time they were not far behind at all for 2nd best (besides maybe 2013 where the 12th and 3e were better), their ability to work cohesively as a singular unit in a competetive environment has been unparallelled.
And no the reason the 63e went to Holdfast wasn’t because we kept getting smacked. It was cause we thought Holdfast would replace NW and had a whole new player base to tap into and get members from (like everyone else thought at the time). We were still doing groupfights and 1v1s even after Holdfast came out for a couple months until we moved fully to Holdfast. Even then I convinced Zen to come back to NW and I got the 45e/Nr4 to join too. We actually had a somewhat competitive lineup for a while.
Yes, 63e was the best regiment/2nd best regiment of 2014-2015, between them and 71st. And was a top 5 regiment of 2016.
3eVolt was the 2nd best regiment of 2013, was a top 5 regiment in 2015, best of 2016, and traded off being 1st/2nd with LG & 6te from 2017-2020.
It's really comparing 3 years of competing to 6, which is my point. If you're talking about a *decade*, 3eVolts the only regiment that's had a competitive impact for the better part of a decade. If 63e had not gone to Holdfast, and continued to be an actual presence in NANW comp, then sure, I could see them having a case.
Leaving doesn't hurt their legacy as a regiment, it's still a top 3 all-time regiment, I just can't understand how it would be considered the best regiment of the decade, when it competed for 3/8 years of NW, as opposed to 3eVolt who competed for 6/8 years.
Imo top 5 for the decade should really be
3eVolt
63e
LG
71st
12th[close]
No, I wouldn't value 63e's 2nd place in League 1 over 3e's NWGL win because saying competition was better in 1 year and lackluster in another is a disingenuous argument to make because what happened in that year of NANWL is not an anomaly, it's a standard, as I've said about NANW comp before, you usually have a very clear #1 & #2, sometimes a #3, and the competition is really between those 2, sometimes 3 regiments. So just because there are fewer shitter regiments for those 2-3 main competitors to obliterate, doesn't really make that competitive year less valuable.
The only time I would really subscribe to that idea is if #2 was a highly contested spot, and #1 was just basically in a tier of its own.
Looking at NWGL's regiments you have the 98e and LG, then your best regiments after that are probably the 15e, LIR, HRE. I would certainly say that the 63e/71st had a much harder path to victory considering the 18th (who beat the 71st during the season), and 58e (who beat the 18th during the season) were participating and were definitely given much more of a chance to win the season then the 15e and LIR ever were.
I don't think it's disingenous to say that the competition was stronger that year considering people don't really think of competitive regiments when they think of the 15e, LIR, and HRE, and that's all the 58e and 18th pretty much lived for.
So much history in the first 4 seasons.. and a lot that I don't remember. But as somebody who's participated in every season, I can confidently say it's the best event NA has ever had, its 9 iterations speaks for itself though tbh.Sure, I respect that. I would be looking more outside of the #1 and 2 spots though personally. For example, if you look here (http://bracketcloud.com/tournament/20482) in a previous season of NANWL, it shows around 5 or 6 regiments in League 1. The 63e and 71st ofc, and then we have the 18th, 58e, 1tes, and MoskovGren who dropped out somewhere during the season.You mean the year of NANWL where 63e and 71st basically 7-3'd - 10-0'd every other regiment in League 1 except each other who they tied? Does that sound familiar?SpoilerYeah, you have a good point if you're measuring in years.. it could also be weighed on how much you value the tournament that each regiment won depending on what you value more. For example would you value the 63e's second place in League 1 to the 71st more than the 3e's NWGL win in whichever year it was where the competition was lackluster? I mean yeah the 3e and LG were top regiments of all time but if they're the only two regiments competing against each other than it just seems not as impactful no matter the size of the rivalry, I also don't think it's fair to count reformations under different names the same regiment but that's just imo. It's fine if you value the longevity in the competitive scene the most too it's all opinionated really there's no definite way of saying it.The 63e did the most with the least. And still achieved more than 99.9% of any regiments. And did it for years.Yeah I don't think having a shaky final year with Karth really changes anything about their legacy... they competed at the top for so long with much weaker players and if they weren't the best at the time they were not far behind at all for 2nd best (besides maybe 2013 where the 12th and 3e were better), their ability to work cohesively as a singular unit in a competetive environment has been unparallelled.
And no the reason the 63e went to Holdfast wasn’t because we kept getting smacked. It was cause we thought Holdfast would replace NW and had a whole new player base to tap into and get members from (like everyone else thought at the time). We were still doing groupfights and 1v1s even after Holdfast came out for a couple months until we moved fully to Holdfast. Even then I convinced Zen to come back to NW and I got the 45e/Nr4 to join too. We actually had a somewhat competitive lineup for a while.
Yes, 63e was the best regiment/2nd best regiment of 2014-2015, between them and 71st. And was a top 5 regiment of 2016.
3eVolt was the 2nd best regiment of 2013, was a top 5 regiment in 2015, best of 2016, and traded off being 1st/2nd with LG & 6te from 2017-2020.
It's really comparing 3 years of competing to 6, which is my point. If you're talking about a *decade*, 3eVolts the only regiment that's had a competitive impact for the better part of a decade. If 63e had not gone to Holdfast, and continued to be an actual presence in NANW comp, then sure, I could see them having a case.
Leaving doesn't hurt their legacy as a regiment, it's still a top 3 all-time regiment, I just can't understand how it would be considered the best regiment of the decade, when it competed for 3/8 years of NW, as opposed to 3eVolt who competed for 6/8 years.
Imo top 5 for the decade should really be
3eVolt
63e
LG
71st
12th[close]
No, I wouldn't value 63e's 2nd place in League 1 over 3e's NWGL win because saying competition was better in 1 year and lackluster in another is a disingenuous argument to make because what happened in that year of NANWL is not an anomaly, it's a standard, as I've said about NANW comp before, you usually have a very clear #1 & #2, sometimes a #3, and the competition is really between those 2, sometimes 3 regiments. So just because there are fewer shitter regiments for those 2-3 main competitors to obliterate, doesn't really make that competitive year less valuable.
The only time I would really subscribe to that idea is if #2 was a highly contested spot, and #1 was just basically in a tier of its own.
Looking at NWGL's regiments you have the 98e and LG, then your best regiments after that are probably the 15e, LIR, HRE. I would certainly say that the 63e/71st had a much harder path to victory considering the 18th (who beat the 71st during the season), and 58e (who beat the 18th during the season) were participating and were definitely given much more of a chance to win the season then the 15e and LIR ever were.
I don't think it's disingenous to say that the competition was stronger that year considering people don't really think of competitive regiments when they think of the 15e, LIR, and HRE, and that's all the 58e and 18th pretty much lived for.
Just look at this, https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=22206.msg934229#msg934229
First 4 NA NWL seasons, I didnt remember the 2te played in season 2. 2te was another 9y. Same dudes.
edit: didnt remember the 3e dropped from season 2 :/. https://challonge.com/League1NANWL
If you guys didnt vote for NA NWL as best event, you're a disgrace. The Champions League of NA.
Look at me with a sexy 44 ping. Now I get 120 :/. Damn.Spoilerhttps://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/597006409387170796/5039DAB0CE70140C3943142263E637114AC76A48/[close]
NW frisbee was more official than NWGL
NW frisbee was more official than NWGL
NW frisbee was more official than NWGL
Cytiuz’s 1v1 tournament was more official than the NWGL
Neither should count for anything but LG did go 9-2 in rounds and 3-0 in matches in it 8)
such ironCytiuz’s 1v1 tournament was more official than the NWGL
Neither should count for anything but LG did go 9-2 in rounds and 3-0 in matches in it 8)
Oh, the irony
Sure, I respect that. I would be looking more outside of the #1 and 2 spots though personally. For example, if you look here (http://bracketcloud.com/tournament/20482) in a previous season of NANWL, it shows around 5 or 6 regiments in League 1. The 63e and 71st ofc, and then we have the 18th, 58e, 1tes, and MoskovGren who dropped out somewhere during the season.You mean the year of NANWL where 63e and 71st basically 7-3'd - 10-0'd every other regiment in League 1 except each other who they tied? Does that sound familiar?SpoilerYeah, you have a good point if you're measuring in years.. it could also be weighed on how much you value the tournament that each regiment won depending on what you value more. For example would you value the 63e's second place in League 1 to the 71st more than the 3e's NWGL win in whichever year it was where the competition was lackluster? I mean yeah the 3e and LG were top regiments of all time but if they're the only two regiments competing against each other than it just seems not as impactful no matter the size of the rivalry, I also don't think it's fair to count reformations under different names the same regiment but that's just imo. It's fine if you value the longevity in the competitive scene the most too it's all opinionated really there's no definite way of saying it.The 63e did the most with the least. And still achieved more than 99.9% of any regiments. And did it for years.Yeah I don't think having a shaky final year with Karth really changes anything about their legacy... they competed at the top for so long with much weaker players and if they weren't the best at the time they were not far behind at all for 2nd best (besides maybe 2013 where the 12th and 3e were better), their ability to work cohesively as a singular unit in a competetive environment has been unparallelled.
And no the reason the 63e went to Holdfast wasn’t because we kept getting smacked. It was cause we thought Holdfast would replace NW and had a whole new player base to tap into and get members from (like everyone else thought at the time). We were still doing groupfights and 1v1s even after Holdfast came out for a couple months until we moved fully to Holdfast. Even then I convinced Zen to come back to NW and I got the 45e/Nr4 to join too. We actually had a somewhat competitive lineup for a while.
Yes, 63e was the best regiment/2nd best regiment of 2014-2015, between them and 71st. And was a top 5 regiment of 2016.
3eVolt was the 2nd best regiment of 2013, was a top 5 regiment in 2015, best of 2016, and traded off being 1st/2nd with LG & 6te from 2017-2020.
It's really comparing 3 years of competing to 6, which is my point. If you're talking about a *decade*, 3eVolts the only regiment that's had a competitive impact for the better part of a decade. If 63e had not gone to Holdfast, and continued to be an actual presence in NANW comp, then sure, I could see them having a case.
Leaving doesn't hurt their legacy as a regiment, it's still a top 3 all-time regiment, I just can't understand how it would be considered the best regiment of the decade, when it competed for 3/8 years of NW, as opposed to 3eVolt who competed for 6/8 years.
Imo top 5 for the decade should really be
3eVolt
63e
LG
71st
12th[close]
No, I wouldn't value 63e's 2nd place in League 1 over 3e's NWGL win because saying competition was better in 1 year and lackluster in another is a disingenuous argument to make because what happened in that year of NANWL is not an anomaly, it's a standard, as I've said about NANW comp before, you usually have a very clear #1 & #2, sometimes a #3, and the competition is really between those 2, sometimes 3 regiments. So just because there are fewer shitter regiments for those 2-3 main competitors to obliterate, doesn't really make that competitive year less valuable.
The only time I would really subscribe to that idea is if #2 was a highly contested spot, and #1 was just basically in a tier of its own.
Looking at NWGL's regiments you have the 98e and LG, then your best regiments after that are probably the 15e, LIR, HRE. I would certainly say that the 63e/71st had a much harder path to victory considering the 18th (who beat the 71st during the season), and 58e (who beat the 18th during the season) were participating and were definitely given much more of a chance to win the season then the 15e and LIR ever were.
I don't think it's disingenous to say that the competition was stronger that year considering people don't really think of competitive regiments when they think of the 15e, LIR, and HRE, and that's all the 58e and 18th pretty much lived for.
Cytiuz’s 1v1 tournament was more official than the NWGL
Neither should count for anything but LG did go 9-2 in rounds and 3-0 in matches in it 8)
The NWGL point is Moraine literally decided that 42nd vs LG would be the finals and that the remaining like 6 weeks of the league wouldn’t happen. I think the LG did a total of 2 or 3 matches out of a scheduled 8 or something. I can get the specifics when I’m on my computer later. Not to mention Moraine decided last minute to have a sudden death 1 round OT rather than count the match a tie and move on with the season like any other league would have.
Say what you will but if LG hadn’t thrown our 4-2 lead I wouldn’t be going around flexing our NWGL win
I don’t think 42nd, 29y, or 98e stuff should even count for the 3e. Sure some same people but very different regiments overall imo. I wasn’t apart of it tho so I can’t say that much. (And I still think 3e should be considered the 2nd greatest all time behind LG)
The NWGL point is Moraine literally decided that 42nd vs LG would be the finals and that the remaining like 6 weeks of the league wouldn’t happen. I think the LG did a total of 2 or 3 matches out of a scheduled 8 or something. I can get the specifics when I’m on my computer later. Not to mention Moraine decided last minute to have a sudden death 1 round OT rather than count the match a tie and move on with the season like any other league would have.
Say what you will but if LG hadn’t thrown our 4-2 lead I wouldn’t be going around flexing our NWGL win
I don’t think 42nd, 29y, or 98e stuff should even count for the 3e. Sure some same people but very different regiments overall imo. I wasn’t apart of it tho so I can’t say that much. (And I still think 3e should be considered the 2nd greatest all time behind LG)
42nd and LG was the finals regardless, whoever won that match won the league. Aside from us, it was like 3 South American regiments (who dropped out), LIR, 15e, HRE, 8thKGL & 8thEPI. I don't see how playing out the rest of the weeks would have changed the outcome.
Both regiments gave it their all to the last, had you guys not thrown your 5-2 lead, or had won the OT, I wouldn't say anything about you guys counting it among your victories.
42nd/etc. was lead by me and AsianP, had the same community as 3eVolt etc. they were renames because AsianP had wanted to retire the 3eVolt name, but it wasn't different regiments. It's roster didn't vary any more than LG's did, the only difference was LG kept a consistent name. So yes, their stuff should count for the 3eVolt, because it's literally the same group/has been the same leadership, it's just different names.
It was the 1 rnd OT mainly. Really should’ve been tie match then go to either a playoffs where we play again or rounds ratio at the endSpoilerThe NWGL point is Moraine literally decided that 42nd vs LG would be the finals and that the remaining like 6 weeks of the league wouldn’t happen. I think the LG did a total of 2 or 3 matches out of a scheduled 8 or something. I can get the specifics when I’m on my computer later. Not to mention Moraine decided last minute to have a sudden death 1 round OT rather than count the match a tie and move on with the season like any other league would have.
Say what you will but if LG hadn’t thrown our 4-2 lead I wouldn’t be going around flexing our NWGL win
I don’t think 42nd, 29y, or 98e stuff should even count for the 3e. Sure some same people but very different regiments overall imo. I wasn’t apart of it tho so I can’t say that much. (And I still think 3e should be considered the 2nd greatest all time behind LG)
42nd and LG was the finals regardless, whoever won that match won the league. Aside from us, it was like 3 South American regiments (who dropped out), LIR, 15e, HRE, 8thKGL & 8thEPI. I don't see how playing out the rest of the weeks would have changed the outcome.
Both regiments gave it their all to the last, had you guys not thrown your 5-2 lead, or had won the OT, I wouldn't say anything about you guys counting it among your victories.
42nd/etc. was lead by me and AsianP, had the same community as 3eVolt etc. they were renames because AsianP had wanted to retire the 3eVolt name, but it wasn't different regiments. It's roster didn't vary any more than LG's did, the only difference was LG kept a consistent name. So yes, their stuff should count for the 3eVolt, because it's literally the same group/has been the same leadership, it's just different names.[close]
LG maintained the same leaders and core members throughout its life excluding this last RGL. 3e group was very similar but I’d say your rosters differed a lot more than LG. I also just value name value a lot (hence always keeping LG, it’s like the identity)
It’s fair for you to lean that way for 42nd 98e tho. 12e is really stretching it
that would mean LG had nearly a 2-1 win loss vs 3e tho so at the least give us that best of 2016 beyond award 8)
FULL REGIMENTAL POWER RANKINGS BY WASTEE COMING AFTER NOMINATONS CLOSE
maybe if i feel like it, might just play rocket league instead
32nd have just had their 10th anniversary, 3 colonels since formation and never disbanded :)Well since that’s not subjective, if you can find the top 3/5 longest lived regiments I’ll include them all as a special prizeI think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
32nd is based regiment32nd have just had their 10th anniversary, 3 colonels since formation and never disbanded :)Well since that’s not subjective, if you can find the top 3/5 longest lived regiments I’ll include them all as a special prizeI think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
So the special award will go to the 77y, 33rd, 1stRddt, and 87th. Am I missing anyone?21st for 6 years?
I nominate babyj as worst among us playerim voting movement
if the john price video isnt number 1 these awards will be even more gay than they already are
Alright anyone else?32nd have just had their 10th anniversary, 3 colonels since formation and never disbanded :)Well since that’s not subjective, if you can find the top 3/5 longest lived regiments I’ll include them all as a special prizeI think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc
if the john price video isnt number 1 these awards will be even more gay than they already arepurple crayon ist mein favorite
The real question is what video of John Price?if the john price video isnt number 1 these awards will be even more gay than they already arepurple crayon ist mein favorite
i'm about to have my twenty second anniversary so yeah meAlright anyone else?Spoiler32nd have just had their 10th anniversary, 3 colonels since formation and never disbanded :)Well since that’s not subjective, if you can find the top 3/5 longest lived regiments I’ll include them all as a special prizeI think there should be a special award for the regs that haven't disbanded like 77y or 33rd etc[close]
Thats the one!
Good days eh Godfreid!
It was the 1 rnd OT mainly. Really should’ve been tie match then go to either a playoffs where we play again or rounds ratio at the endSpoilerThe NWGL point is Moraine literally decided that 42nd vs LG would be the finals and that the remaining like 6 weeks of the league wouldn’t happen. I think the LG did a total of 2 or 3 matches out of a scheduled 8 or something. I can get the specifics when I’m on my computer later. Not to mention Moraine decided last minute to have a sudden death 1 round OT rather than count the match a tie and move on with the season like any other league would have.
Say what you will but if LG hadn’t thrown our 4-2 lead I wouldn’t be going around flexing our NWGL win
I don’t think 42nd, 29y, or 98e stuff should even count for the 3e. Sure some same people but very different regiments overall imo. I wasn’t apart of it tho so I can’t say that much. (And I still think 3e should be considered the 2nd greatest all time behind LG)
42nd and LG was the finals regardless, whoever won that match won the league. Aside from us, it was like 3 South American regiments (who dropped out), LIR, 15e, HRE, 8thKGL & 8thEPI. I don't see how playing out the rest of the weeks would have changed the outcome.
Both regiments gave it their all to the last, had you guys not thrown your 5-2 lead, or had won the OT, I wouldn't say anything about you guys counting it among your victories.
42nd/etc. was lead by me and AsianP, had the same community as 3eVolt etc. they were renames because AsianP had wanted to retire the 3eVolt name, but it wasn't different regiments. It's roster didn't vary any more than LG's did, the only difference was LG kept a consistent name. So yes, their stuff should count for the 3eVolt, because it's literally the same group/has been the same leadership, it's just different names.[close]
LG maintained the same leaders and core members throughout its life excluding this last RGL. 3e group was very similar but I’d say your rosters differed a lot more than LG. I also just value name value a lot (hence always keeping LG, it’s like the identity)
It’s fair for you to lean that way for 42nd 98e tho. 12e is really stretching it
that would mean LG had nearly a 2-1 win loss vs 3e tho so at the least give us that best of 2016 beyond award 8)
FULL REGIMENTAL POWER RANKINGS BY WASTEE COMING AFTER NOMINATONS CLOSE
maybe if i feel like it, might just play rocket league instead
just a reminder of the hottest track of the decadeI think Zen had the craziest song ngl ::)
Glenn really thought we'd forget LMAO! Man got COOKEDjust a reminder of the hottest track of the decadeI think Zen had the craziest song ngl ::)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzYgVRe80cI&ab_channel=XenoyiaI personally found the 83rd Video to be funnier, but its kinda funny that they are both clutch related. Thank you Rommel and Murphy.
83rd video was over-memed though and I contributed very little to it other than just being at the event :Dhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzYgVRe80cI&ab_channel=XenoyiaI personally found the 83rd Video to be funnier, but its kinda funny that they are both clutch related. Thank you Rommel and Murphy.
Does the LG count as the 71st because cheesy was in it?yo we had
71st/LG for best regiment of the decade thenDoes the LG count as the 71st because cheesy was in it?yo we had
Cheesey, Russian, Me, You, Theo, Boob, Yoshie, Rothgar, Orcaryo, Will, Nevino, Bauer, Saltyy, Gi, Caskie, Domino, Skinny, Havoc and some others so we pretty much are the same
71st had all the 12th guys also so add that in71st/LG for best regiment of the decade thenDoes the LG count as the 71st because cheesy was in it?yo we had
Cheesey, Russian, Me, You, Theo, Boob, Yoshie, Rothgar, Orcaryo, Will, Nevino, Bauer, Saltyy, Gi, Caskie, Domino, Skinny, Havoc and some others so we pretty much are the same
best quote is ezWhen my regiment gets the first mention UwU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0Bh7eBvR0c
+1. Miss that group :(71st/LG for best regiment of the decade thenDoes the LG count as the 71st because cheesy was in it?yo we had
Cheesey, Russian, Me, You, Theo, Boob, Yoshie, Rothgar, Orcaryo, Will, Nevino, Bauer, Saltyy, Gi, Caskie, Domino, Skinny, Havoc and some others so we pretty much are the same
Wait how am i again nominated for cringe toxic and memeryou are cringe and toxic
2020 i get that, but not the decade xddWait how am i again nominated for cringe toxic and memeryou are cringe and toxic
you are that cringe and toxic2020 i get that, but not the decade xddWait how am i again nominated for cringe toxic and memeryou are cringe and toxic
btw someone else actually look at the spreadsheet for me because I left all the ones I had no idea about in their original form so maybe I missed something
get your glasses on, old manbtw someone else actually look at the spreadsheet for me because I left all the ones I had no idea about in their original form so maybe I missed something
gieb link
mfw Hekko is not most influential when he created the gf format & the first gf tournaments+1'd
and the nwwc format (more like nwec at the time)
get your glasses on, old manbtw someone else actually look at the spreadsheet for me because I left all the ones I had no idea about in their original form so maybe I missed something
gieb link
http://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1abXt8qcNQ9iPy7PVELYNtim3B1xHpguGRV-chM4ANdg
and Hunter.get your glasses on, old manbtw someone else actually look at the spreadsheet for me because I left all the ones I had no idea about in their original form so maybe I missed something
gieb link
http://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1abXt8qcNQ9iPy7PVELYNtim3B1xHpguGRV-chM4ANdg
thank you dear x
edit:
pls add Hekko to most Influential.
Could even consider Rommel/Caz I think for making RGL
ed is a meme?no it's the best meme
ed is a meme?no it's the best meme
Bob you're already my most influential vote i can't give you everythinged is a meme?no it's the best meme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jW5f8nLtfyA&ab_channel=bobertini32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Na_7ICiL3JA&ab_channel=bobertini32
Add Bumfluff to most toxic in EU please.
Add Bumfluff to most toxic in EU please.
thank you! :) RGL was invented by Hunter, Phoenix and me and I can say that im very proud how far it has come.and Hunter.get your glasses on, old manbtw someone else actually look at the spreadsheet for me because I left all the ones I had no idea about in their original form so maybe I missed something
gieb link
http://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1abXt8qcNQ9iPy7PVELYNtim3B1xHpguGRV-chM4ANdg
thank you dear x
edit:
pls add Hekko to most Influential.
Could even consider Rommel/Caz I think for making RGL
thank you! :) RGL was invented by Hunter, Phoenix and me and I can say that im very proud how far it has come.and Hunter.get your glasses on, old manbtw someone else actually look at the spreadsheet for me because I left all the ones I had no idea about in their original form so maybe I missed something
gieb link
http://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1abXt8qcNQ9iPy7PVELYNtim3B1xHpguGRV-chM4ANdg
thank you dear x
edit:
pls add Hekko to most Influential.
Could even consider Rommel/Caz I think for making RGL
I think of myself as relevant in 2015-2016, but thats not a long time if you compare it with Herishey for example. But thank you for thinking of me anyway :D
ed is a meme?no it's the best meme
if tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointless
JEWALERTif tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointlessSpoiler(https://imgur.com/q5Ubzty.png)[close]
if tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointless
if tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointless
Were you even born then?
Go die again. Not that everyone had FSE back in the days.if tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointless
Were you even born then?
Dont think you are someone who can try to trashtalk newgens
(https://i.gyazo.com/cec052e661693c8a4abf992d06166464.png)
if tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointless
Were you even born then?
Dont think you are someone who can try to trashtalk newgens
(https://i.gyazo.com/cec052e661693c8a4abf992d06166464.png)
if tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointless
Were you even born then?
Dont think you are someone who can try to trashtalk newgens
(https://i.gyazo.com/cec052e661693c8a4abf992d06166464.png)
You realise this is a new account I created in 2016 I have multiple accounts :-X
You can find me on the 22nd roster for RGT 2013 when you still didn't know how to block 1 attack :-[
guarantee 2015 me would've shat on 2015 you, i just stopped playing NW, you didnt :-Xif tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointless
Were you even born then?
guarantee 2015 me would've shat on 2015 you, i just stopped playing NW, you didnt :-Xif tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointless
Were you even born then?
Wursti in shamblesDont think you are someone who can try to trashtalk newgensif tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointless
Were you even born then?
(https://i.gyazo.com/cec052e661693c8a4abf992d06166464.png)
You realise this is a new account I created in 2016 I have multiple accounts :-X
You can find me on the 22nd roster for RGT 2013 when you still didn't know how to block 1 attack :-[
Wursti in shamblesDont think you are someone who can try to trashtalk newgensif tavington donations doesnt get biggest meme then this is pointless
Were you even born then?
(https://i.gyazo.com/cec052e661693c8a4abf992d06166464.png)
You realise this is a new account I created in 2016 I have multiple accounts :-X
You can find me on the 22nd roster for RGT 2013 when you still didn't know how to block 1 attack :-[
I voted for Hekko as most influential. Even if he has not been around for a long time, he shaped NW for the next 8 years (so far) which I think should earn the spot most definitely.cap
Yes I did wtfUnless it was sent via post it's not here kid
wtf can I still do it? I remember filling it outsmh you were one of the idiots that didn't put a name on it and it got thrown out...
Most Toxicyou didn't even nominate him smh
Golden
Obelix
Pieter
Rikkert
Vegi
Where BumFluff at????!!!
Most Toxicyou didn't even nominate him smh
Golden
Obelix
Pieter
Rikkert
Vegi
Where BumFluff at????!!!
i didMost Toxicyou didn't even nominate him smh
Golden
Obelix
Pieter
Rikkert
Vegi
Where BumFluff at????!!!
you didn't even submit a nomination formi didMost Toxicyou didn't even nominate him smh
Golden
Obelix
Pieter
Rikkert
Vegi
Where BumFluff at????!!!
What!!!???no idea but it's not there chief
Then it must been bugged out or something >:( :(
I’m not sure I saw mine either but I didn’t look very hardYou’re there
how come Chicken Mastas isnt nominated 4 best team they were killers in the OG groupfighting tournamentsThis is the only thing I'll agree with you on.
how come Chicken Mastas isnt nominated 4 best team they were killers in the OG groupfighting tournamentsBecause not enough people nominated them?
recency bias smhhow come Chicken Mastas isnt nominated 4 best team they were killers in the OG groupfighting tournamentsBecause not enough people nominated them?
(https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/001/921/436/04c)how come Chicken Mastas isnt nominated 4 best team they were killers in the OG groupfighting tournamentsThis is the only thing I'll agree with you on.
Sorry I got busy but voting will start later today when I can make the ballot
(https://i.gyazo.com/31a2e655416758e5e22d16fd883d83f4.png)whoops
Well that was quick
Eyy why am I not on the list. I Nominated myself!yeah and noone else did smh
Karth and 63e 2021I mean probably malakith
Nobody has introduced more players to the regimental side of the game.
Which 92nd it is ? Donald ?
so the current 92nd?Which 92nd it is ? Donald ?
The one that actually won something yeah
Karth and 63e 2021😐 🚪 <—🚶♀️
Nobody has introduced more players to the regimental side of the game.
If Hekko doesn't get most influential than my hope for this community is truly gone.Barely anyone voted for him from what I saw. But I put mine in for him and I completely agree.
You may have not know him in person but the fact the influence he held still lives up through some people nowadays is a testimony of the mark he left in this community, almost 10 years after.
Wait you can see who voted?If Hekko doesn't get most influential than my hope for this community is truly gone.Barely anyone voted for him from what I saw. But I put mine in for him and I completely agree.
You may have not know him in person but the fact the influence he held still lives up through some people nowadays is a testimony of the mark he left in this community, almost 10 years after.
Wait you can see who voted?If Hekko doesn't get most influential than my hope for this community is truly gone.Barely anyone voted for him from what I saw. But I put mine in for him and I completely agree.
You may have not know him in person but the fact the influence he held still lives up through some people nowadays is a testimony of the mark he left in this community, almost 10 years after.
Eyy why am I not on the list. I Nominated myself!yeah and noone else did smh
Typical Olaf ::)
Some of these nominations are crazy.godfreid for most toxic
Some of these nominations are crazy.Crazy.
if NA1 doesnt win i call recency bias
8)Eyy why am I not on the list. I Nominated myself!yeah and noone else did smh
I had no idea that you had to get several people nominating you... You should have told me. I have many alts.
If Hekko doesn't get most influential than my hope for this community is truly gone.
You may have not know him in person but the fact the influence he held still lives up through some people nowadays is a testimony of the mark he left in this community, almost 10 years after.
If Hekko doesn't get most influential than my hope for this community is truly gone.
You may have not know him in person but the fact the influence he held still lives up through some people nowadays is a testimony of the mark he left in this community, almost 10 years after.
Wow this hecko guy sounds like the second coming of jesus
Wow this hecko guy sounds like the second coming of jesus
Dan is spending extra time to rig the vote so it looks legit.
sorry king I had a lot of snow to shovelDan is spending extra time to rig the vote so it looks legit.
don't think it is very fair to write mine and Herishey's list off as "entirely subjective and means nothing". the latter part is arguable, but it is disingenuous to argue the former. all of the team ratings are based on a complete database provided by Tardet and Tiberias of every tournament placement by every team. the by-era aspect is essentially based entirely on this, with some lesser credit given to wins in things like tournaments involving swords. the all-time team list is both a tallying up of placements by each team as well as an accommodation of the era in which they were playing and the competition they had at that time. for individual players it is much the same - the era ratings are largely a result of placements in tournaments within each era, while the all time ratings are a consideration of their entire time in NW. this means that, again, it is not solely about their total tournament placements, but about the era in which they achieved those placements and how much competition they had for it.Gibby just FYI this should not be taken seriously
there's a formula at play: for instance, all of the tier 1 all time placements placed in the top 10 in at least two eras. all of the tier 2 all time placements are either players who managed a top 10 in one era, or who reached top 20 in several. it's very formulaic, at least for tiers 1 and 2, although you can argue more subjectively about the tier 3-5 placements. that is the case for players, but the regimental and team assessments are based almost entirely on statistical data. i don't mind if you think the list means nothing but i think it's unfair to lump it in with the kind of lists which consist of a single person's arbitrary opinion with no additional substance, particularly when Herishey in particular spent a lot of time talking to a lot of people to try and be as objective as possible
This award is zzzzz2018-90 Votes
True datThis award is zzzzz2018-90 Votes
2019-65
2020-250
Decade-90
that's literally just maskman bussing in votes I think
CHADMAN ROBBEDMALAKITH ROBBED
This award is zzzzz2018-90 Votes
2019-65
2020-250
Decade-90
that's literally just maskman bussing in votes I think
NA1 shouldve won
CHADMAN ROBBED
We would have a higher advertising budgetThis award is zzzzz2018-90 Votes
2019-65
2020-250
Decade-90
that's literally just maskman bussing in votes I think
If the NW awards had its own child board there would have been more votes
Waste didn't even need suitcases, just a card holder.