Author Topic: [CCL - S1] Discussion Thread  (Read 39801 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline StephanGH

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 2281
    • View Profile
  • Nick: StephanGH | frozen
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #150 on: February 11, 2019, 01:22:18 pm »
Also, for future references, if you are not involved in a fight/argument, avoid posting. This will prevent potential drama to escalate further than they should. Thanks!  :)

Drama is what I strive on.
Who dis new phone?

Have you used a forum before olof. It's on the left of my post

Offline Erik le Rouge

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 4853
  • Depardieu best dieu
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 4e_Huss_Cpt_Erik
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #151 on: February 11, 2019, 01:24:14 pm »
Quote from: Treiz35
fuck erik
Quote from: Dokletian
fuck erik
Quote from: Sinjide
yeah fuck erik
Quote from: Aless
fuck erik
Quote from: Michnicki 1
fuck Erik
Quote from: Charles la Valette
i love erik
Quote from: TxM
fuck erik
Quote from: FreyrDS
fuck Erik
Quote from: Termito
fuck erik.
Quote from: Ciiges
fuck erik
Quote from: Remao
fuck Erik

Offline Ciiges

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 445
  • swift as death
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1er_Huss_Brg_Ciiges[4]
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #152 on: February 11, 2019, 01:31:20 pm »

Offline targeknight

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 45
  • proud Oberleutnant of the Nr.6
    • View Profile
  • Nick: targeknight
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #153 on: February 11, 2019, 02:05:31 pm »
Fuck lancers lol

Offline StephanGH

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 2281
    • View Profile
  • Nick: StephanGH | frozen
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #154 on: February 11, 2019, 02:06:26 pm »
Fuck lancers lol

still salty bout that CNC Loss huh

Offline Dokletian

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 3458
  • unironisch
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 4e_Huss_Dokletian
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #155 on: February 11, 2019, 02:18:07 pm »
Can I just say that I’m really impressed with the cav community, 10x more mature than the inf community and a lot less tolerant of the cancerous players

Offline Ciiges

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 445
  • swift as death
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 1er_Huss_Brg_Ciiges[4]
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #156 on: February 11, 2019, 02:54:11 pm »
don't include lancers in anything ever. I can say as a native veteran who's played lancer for too long, the imbalance vs swordcav (hussars especially) is too great. If I were to get a team with native's top 10 lancers vs NW's top 10 hussars, lancers would win purely because of the imbalance alone.

Offline StephanGH

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 2281
    • View Profile
  • Nick: StephanGH | frozen
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #157 on: February 11, 2019, 02:59:17 pm »
don't include lancers in anything ever. I can say as a native veteran who's played lancer for too long, the imbalance vs swordcav (hussars especially) is too great. If I were to get a team with native's top 10 lancers vs NW's top 10 hussars, lancers would win purely because of the imbalance alone.

Sad but true. I remembee the "monkeys with sticks"

Offline ~Felix~

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 1314
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Nr4_Major_Felix
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #158 on: February 11, 2019, 03:42:30 pm »

Offline DE14HANNES

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 4e_Huss_Cvl_DE14HANNES
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #159 on: February 11, 2019, 04:22:23 pm »
don't include lancers in anything ever. I can say as a native veteran who's played lancer for too long, the imbalance vs swordcav (hussars especially) is too great. If I were to get a team with native's top 10 lancers vs NW's top 10 hussars, lancers would win purely because of the imbalance alone.

Sad but true. I remembee the "monkeys with sticks"

this was epic xD

Offline Squall

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 190
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 5ehuss_Rec_Squall
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #160 on: February 11, 2019, 09:25:19 pm »
I'm glad to hear that some of you are not so negative with the heavys, as a leader I had a lot of trouble organizing meetings against other regiments, including hussar regiments that are positioned anti-heavy, that saddens me, because we have less and less friendly match, and this has a direct impact on the regiment, because we are a competitive regiment and we focus only on the field of competition.

So when I learn that some people do not want to play with us because our class is cheat or other completely absurd reason, I find it unfortunate for us who love to play this class and for the members who make the regiment live and who continues to playing the game to make it live, it leaves a hope for the 1erRC to continue to exist after the CCL.

Spoiler
Je suis content d'apprendre que certain d'entre vous ne soit pas aussi négatif avec les heavys, en tant que leader j'ai eu beaucoup de mal à organiser des rencontres contre d'autres régiments, notamment des régiments de hussards qui se positionne anti-heavy, cela m'attriste, car nous avons de moins en moins de rencontres amicales, et cela, impact directement sur le régiment, car nous sommes un régiment compétitif et nous nous concentrons que sur ce domaine.

Donc quand j'apprends que certaines personnes ne souhaitent pas jouer avec nous, car notre classe est cheat ou autre raison complètement absurde, je trouve cela dommage pour nous qui aimons jouer cette classe et pour les membres qui font vivre le régiment et qui continue de jouer au jeu pour le faire vivre, ça laisse un espoir pour le 1erRC de continuer à exister après la CCL.
[close]
lol = ban

Offline Lilja Mariasdóttir

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2013
  • Ist ein Schaf in einer Tasse
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #161 on: February 11, 2019, 10:10:58 pm »
For my part, I am and always was heavy-positive. But 1erRC-negative just kidding or am I? dont hate me please let me be your referee again ;(
Seehofer schafft das Heer ab.

Offline Squall

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 190
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 5ehuss_Rec_Squall
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #162 on: February 11, 2019, 10:12:50 pm »
For my part i prefer GOOODEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  ;) :D ;D 8)
lol = ban

Offline Lilja Mariasdóttir

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2013
  • Ist ein Schaf in einer Tasse
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #163 on: February 11, 2019, 10:16:11 pm »
For my part i prefer GOOODEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  ;) :D ;D 8)

Seehofer schafft das Heer ab.

Offline Dusbled

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1428
  • Squadron Corporal Major of 45thN
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Saphyro
  • Side: Neutral
Re: [CCL] Discussion Thread
« Reply #164 on: February 11, 2019, 10:33:51 pm »
For my part i prefer GOOODEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  ;) :D ;D 8)


I thought you prefer me :'( :'(