Hey, so serious question. I would like to know the general community viewing of the 4th and myself as it's leader. Not looking to start a banter fest in any way, I am just curious. I may reply but don't take it in any way that is like "mad" and such I just am open to having civil discussion about the regiment from my perspective as well as yours and how they relate. I'd prefer long replies similar to that one that was written for Irish about the 6te because it was informative. Yknow, the one that Risk uses as his sig.
Thanks guys.
Spoiler
Just want to re-iterate that I am not looking to cause conflict, just an exchange of opinions and perspectives. The title of being a "good leader" or running a "good regiment" doesn't mean very much to me since I left the scene a little over a year ago. I do believe in my own opinion that I was a decent leader, likely better organizationally then I was on the battlefield but i was alright there too. I felt the 4th was really good at times and not so good at others. Very much lacked consistency.
Be careful Nico, your human need for importance and trying to justify the fact that we all spend thousands of hours on this game and crave the recognition of others is showing.
Not really looking to justify anything. I am happy with what I accomplished in the game and had fun doing it, thats all that really matters to me. Just read that thing that Spartan wrote about the 6te and was just curious in all honesty.
When my time came to leave the community I left but I totally enjoyed my time playing NW/leading the 4th, even if sometimes it sucked.
The 4th wasn’t really anything special. Just your average competitive regiment that appeared through out the years. *throws up*
I'd disagree and say in season 6 of NWL we were pretty exceptional IMO. The season 7 4th and the OG 4th in TNWL season 1 were pretty average competitively speaking I'd agree with you on that front but they were good for what they were. The OG 4th was a semi-pro regiment with no known players until Tammo and Godfreid joined in late 2015, towards the end of it's life. The season 7 4th, in my opinion, had we/I been more committed probably could have contended for the win in the league, however we were a shadow of the season 6 4th and in the competitive history of the game 2017 wasn't exactly strong regiment wise.
Basically this
Spoiler
Hey, so serious question. I would like to know the general community viewing of the 4th and myself as it's leader. Not looking to start a banter fest in any way, I am just curious. I may reply but don't take it in any way that is like "mad" and such I just am open to having civil discussion about the regiment from my perspective as well as yours and how they relate. I'd prefer long replies similar to that one that was written for Irish about the 6te because it was informative. Yknow, the one that Risk uses as his sig.
Thanks guys.
Spoiler
Just want to re-iterate that I am not looking to cause conflict, just an exchange of opinions and perspectives. The title of being a "good leader" or running a "good regiment" doesn't mean very much to me since I left the scene a little over a year ago. I do believe in my own opinion that I was a decent leader, likely better organizationally then I was on the battlefield but i was alright there too. I felt the 4th was really good at times and not so good at others. Very much lacked consistency.
the 4th was dust in the wind
The 4th spent 6 months going head to head with the best NA regiments at the time and beating most of them, coming in 3rd place in league 1 during the largest season of NANWL. Even when it came back for Season 7 and was pretty much a discount version of its former self it managed to remain credibly competitive.
