[RGL9] General Discussions

[Wursti]

Not rescheduling when asked and then dropping to 15 thats the sportsmanship I expect and wanna see from Vegi

[Steinmann]

Not rescheduling when asked and then dropping to 15 thats the sportsmanship I expect and wanna see from Vegi

. POG

[Vegi.]

Not rescheduling when asked and then dropping to 15 thats the sportsmanship I expect and wanna see from Vegi

I didn't reschedule the match since DarkTemplar messaged me about the issue 71st was having but ignored me for the next coming days. Blackham messaged me Friday, but in my opinion that was already way too late, since the effort to reschedule wasn't really showed IMO. Also, both sides had a lot of their key players missing, and next week I'm pretty busy so having 2 RGL matches in 1 week wasn't the solution for me.

And the dropping to 15 maybe a bit silly, but it's a fucking tournament. I'll always try to find a solution to win our matches and if dropping to 15/16 is that solution I'll do it again and again.

[Steinmann]

Not rescheduling when asked and then dropping to 15 thats the sportsmanship I expect and wanna see from Vegi

I didn't reschedule the match since DarkTemplar messaged me about the issue 71st was having but ignored me for the next coming days. Blackham messaged me Friday, but in my opinion that was already way too late, since the effort to reschedule wasn't really showed IMO. Also, both sides had a lot of their key players missing, and next week I'm pretty busy so having 2 RGL matches in 1 week wasn't the solution for me.

And the dropping to 15 maybe a bit silly, but it's a fucking tournament. I'll always try to find a solution to win our matches and if dropping to 15/16 is that solution I'll do it again and again.

u suck!

[Nock]

And the dropping to 15 maybe a bit silly, but it's a fucking tournament. I'll always try to find a solution to win our matches and if dropping to 15/16 is that solution I'll do it again and again.

I have to say, people have been dropping to 15 / the minimum required amount of players for ages

I honestly don't understand why people have been whining about it for years, it's a tournament after all.
And it might have to include dropping to 15 if one side thinks it helps them win.

[Alf]

And the dropping to 15 maybe a bit silly, but it's a fucking tournament. I'll always try to find a solution to win our matches and if dropping to 15/16 is that solution I'll do it again and again.

I have to say, people have been dropping to 15 / the minimum required amount of players for ages

I honestly don't understand why people have been whining about it for years, it's a tournament after all.
And it might have to include dropping to 15 if one side thinks it helps them win.

This, 15v15 is the standard think of more as a bonus not 15 as the minimum

[Fietta]

And the dropping to 15 maybe a bit silly, but it's a fucking tournament. I'll always try to find a solution to win our matches and if dropping to 15/16 is that solution I'll do it again and again.

I have to say, people have been dropping to 15 / the minimum required amount of players for ages

I honestly don't understand why people have been whining about it for years, it's a tournament after all.
And it might have to include dropping to 15 if one side thinks it helps them win.

This, 15v15 is the standard think of more as a bonus not 15 as the minimum

It's a regimental tournament, there shouldn't be any 'standard', you should be playing as many as you can muster to show true regimental strength and depth; this obviously isn't the case but 15 is a minimum. 15 is used as a 'minimum' to actually classify if your regiment is a regiment and not a GF team.

[Alf]

Different regiments are strong at different numbers, for example I’d argue 15v15 it’s 15thYR and 13e that are the best, but if we were all playing 30v30 it’s probably the 45thN, tournaments don’t show “true regimental strength” at all because it’s literally just a big groupfight, RGT is your best 10 and this is your best 15 with some extras if you want to, all the top regs are gonna want to play 15 against each other anyway

[BlitzkriegMBNW]

And the dropping to 15 maybe a bit silly, but it's a fucking tournament. I'll always try to find a solution to win our matches and if dropping to 15/16 is that solution I'll do it again and again.

I have to say, people have been dropping to 15 / the minimum required amount of players for ages

I honestly don't understand why people have been whining about it for years, it's a tournament after all.
And it might have to include dropping to 15 if one side thinks it helps them win.

This, 15v15 is the standard think of more as a bonus not 15 as the minimum

It's a regimental tournament, there shouldn't be any 'standard', you should be playing as many as you can muster to show true regimental strength and depth; this obviously isn't the case but 15 is a minimum. 15 is used as a 'minimum' to actually classify if your regiment is a regiment and not a GF team.

The quantification and classification of a regiment is the ability of the regiment to bring 15 players, but I don’t think any regiment is required to bring more than that or even field more than that.

[Fietta]

Different regiments are strong at different numbers

Well yeah, but the depth of a regiment also is a leading factor for regimental strength, it's why if you have the players, don't just make them chill in spectator, if they're in the grens, they're good enough to play.

[Alf]

Different regiments are strong at different numbers

Well yeah, but the depth of a regiment also is a leading factor for regimental strength, it's why if you have the players, don't just make them chill in spectator, if they're in the grens, they're good enough to play.

13e don’t have “grens” as a separate thing, nor do we, or the 71st, I’d argue as well if we were playing 15v15 with you guys and then python shows up late, you wouldn’t go to 16 if the guy you’re putting in is your worst gren and we’re getting the best player in the game, you play your best lineup as does everyone else

[Herishey]

Playing with higher numbers benefits some regiments just as playing with lower numbers benefits others. Can't really force or complain about either side tbh.

[Fietta]

I'd always consider 15 as a 'last resort' if you don't have enough to field more, rather than the 'standard' to use; it's obviously been adopted as a 'standard' but I wouldn't think that it was the original intention, I guess that just comes with competition.

[Vegi.]

Playing with higher numbers benefits some regiments just as playing with lower numbers benefits others. Can't really force or complain about either side tbh.

[~NickCole~]

Playing with higher numbers benefits some regiments just as playing with lower numbers benefits others. Can't really force or complain about either side tbh.