Over The Top: WWI Steam Store PageNew Game announced! Add Over the Top: WWI to your Steam Wishlist!
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
I think we can agree on that point, Marxeil has to find clear criterias for his list before anything else because considering what Dren told me, they didn't even know on what they were supposed to rate players, which makes those current rankings out of any proper context.
i have never see cela. rejection perssonel.good luck all in the tournament.Quote from: LeBrave on Today at 11:49:30 pmvotre appréciable et glorieux pote LeBrave.
lebrave : i will do to do me listeSpoilerGod Tiers:-lebrave-lebrave-lebrave-lebrave-lebrave-lebrave-lebrave-lebrave-lebraveThe Rest :-Plebs-Plebs-Plebs-Plebs[close]
@Herishey & StarkI mean, that's fair enough, everyone is entitled to an opinion and Dayboul and Teddy are two players I respect so it doesn't bother me too much to see them above me. However, in a ranking from 73 to 95, they're certainly not 7 points ahead of me. I still would be interested to see what sort of arguments can lead you to such statement because my problem with people ranking others is that in every lists/rankings which have ever be done, there is often very little work of research made behind them and this one among many others is the perfect exemple. They're better and more consistent in duels, certainly not in groupfighting.As Jammo pointed it out, Teddy could be considered as a competitive player but he certainly wasn't the last few months he played the game with the 85e. He played 2 RGL matches and I had way better stats overall in term of ratio and efficiency since kills don't matter much as I played more matches than he did. That's the only competitive he played recently if I recall with maybe the RGT (Where neither him or I had a good performances in that case as the whole 85e squad was off this event). As for Dayboul, I think he actually had a really good impact in the 15thYR when they played the RGL but I only saw him performing good against us, not sure what he did overall. What I can only judge of is that my regiment won the tournament and that Tiberias stats proved I was one of the players having the most impact in that victory with consistency throughout each matches.There are actually players like Dren, Centurion, Planta which I also both out-performed in the RGL but who are still ahead of me, way ahead in case of Dren. So I know how to make the difference, no point trying that argument on me.I'm sorry if this look as someone trying to prove he got a bigger e-peen than someone else but that's the point of the thread anyways. I usually don't act that way, I'm used to being underrated a lot and I guess I will always be to an extend but all I'm pointing out are facts based on solid proofs against opinions of solid and experienced players, but opinions nontheless and I personally always placed facts above in every situations, so ain't changing now
I AM BEST ESPAÑA Nerdo¡¡¡ARRIBAAAA!!!
Quote from: Nero_ on August 21, 2017, 09:06:21 pmI AM BEST ESPAÑA Nerdo¡¡¡ARRIBAAAA!!!
Quote from: ImKaMiKaze on September 06, 2017, 05:07:37 pmQuote from: Nero_ on August 21, 2017, 09:06:21 pmI AM BEST ESPAÑA Nerdo¡¡¡ARRIBAAAA!!!learn to quote???
With no statistical data, context or thorough analysis of past tournaments and melee leagues every list ever made is an opinion piece that suffers from heavy bias.
Quote from: Ledger on September 07, 2017, 08:41:23 amWith no statistical data, context or thorough analysis of past tournaments and melee leagues every list ever made is an opinion piece that suffers from heavy bias. ok ändy