Dead

[Ciiges]

The. Ratings. I. Currently. Posess. Are. From. An. Old. List.

I. Will. Edit. The. Ratings. Accordingly. By. Watching. Players. Play. Myself.

I. Don't. Need. Permission. To. Continue. This. Project.

Goosbye

[DragonKing]

So you do not look at what you post and you claims that it is the ranking of the best hussars?

You can post it after your modifications.?

have a nice day ofc

[Ciiges]

I've claimed it's a skeleton list and will be completed throughout the weeks to make it an accurate portrayal of the best hussars

[DragonKing]

I've claimed it's a skeleton list and will be completed throughout the weeks to make it's My accurate portrayal of the best hussars

without investigations or stats, you cannot make an official list.

You cannot class people with "performs". You have stats? all KD ? and then for the dismount? for the damage assist? where are your informations which give you power to make this thread?

Your idea is good, but you cannot make this without investigation. it's all.

[Ciiges]

I tend to leave MY oppinion out of it, and base it of actual performances compared to eachother, which is what an accurate list represents. Besides, besides a few ratings, most of these are +/- correct.

[DragonKing]

it's not the opignion of many people. But you don't care and how you compare perfoms ? explain me

[Ciiges]

it's not the opignion of many people. But you don't care and how you compare perfoms ? explain me

I'm an experienced players who has eyes? It's like asking me how I compare the color red to the color yellow, there's a clear destinction between them. Are you truely that incapable of seperating a good player from a lesser one?

[Remao]

One of the biggest problem is, when you are strong, but you got irregular companions, how you calculate his performance ? An inverse of you, you are in a strong regiment, so not really a problem to do good score.

Gl & Hf to become the best hussard   

[DragonKing]

Spoiler

it's not the opignion of many people. But you don't care and how you compare perfoms ? explain me

I'm an experienced players who has eyes? It's like asking me how I compare the color red to the color yellow, there's a clear destinction between them. Are you truely that incapable of seperating a good player from a lesser one?

[close]

However, you have not been to all the matches of any of these players. In fact, you had just play against them sometimes.

that is exactly the problem :

Spoiler

A one time thing cannot be considered your avarage skill level. You've performed up to a somewhat high standard that time, although Napoleon could also have performed below his standard. Besides, consistency is what makes a good player a top player.

[close]

So in fact, you  can see a men one time or two times but youare not the true, that cannot be an official hussars rated without investigation or stats (yes i repeat) You are not blind, but you cannot be everywhere. this thread is just your opignion and only your opignion.

[BrokenCrayon]

bad list im not top


best ire lancer

Excuse me, what the fuck?

[Ciiges]

One of the biggest problem is, when you are strong, but you got irregular companions, how you calculate his performance ? An inverse of you, you are in a strong regiment, so not really a problem to do good score.

Gl & Hf to become the best hussard   

It's not about the scores, it's about the performance, which includes 1v1, dismounted and groupfighting. Kills are a number and indicate NOTHING. I can see for myself wether or not you are doing a good job by supporting, damaging, surviving, etcetc.

Spoiler

it's not the opignion of many people. But you don't care and how you compare perfoms ? explain me

You seem very impatient for some reason, just wait and see.
I'm an experienced players who has eyes? It's like asking me how I compare the color red to the color yellow, there's a clear destinction between them. Are you truely that incapable of seperating a good player from a lesser one?

[close]

However, you have not been to all the matches of any of these players. In fact, you had just play against them sometimes.

that is exactly the problem :

Spoiler

A one time thing cannot be considered your avarage skill level. You've performed up to a somewhat high standard that time, although Napoleon could also have performed below his standard. Besides, consistency is what makes a good player a top player.

[close]

So in fact, you  can see a men one time or two times but youare not the true, that cannot be an official hussars rated without investigation or stats (yes i repeat) You are not blind, but you cannot be everywhere. this thread is just your opignion and only your opignion.

You seem incapable of understanding that I've based these results of nothing but an old list which wasn't even made by me. The ratings will get eddited ACCORDINGLY throughout a period of a few weeks. I'm not ignorant enough to take single-time performances into account so don't accuse me of that.

[StephanGH]

The list he currently has put down is a slightly modified version of my Hussars rated

[C@rlok]

Hi, I just wanted to mention that I‘m actually a proud swiss citizen and not german.
-Pls edit-

—> Thank you

[King Stannis Baratheon]

Kazi is also Swiss btw

[Ciiges]

Kazi is also Swiss btw

Thank you lad