Poll

Should we allow NAs to play 10 rounds on their Server ?

Yes
118 (49.4%)
No
121 (50.6%)

Total Members Voted: 233

Voting closed: January 31, 2016, 09:35:02 pm

Author Topic: NWWC 2016  (Read 479279 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kore

  • The Sideblock King
  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 8603
  • Best Czech player on the Moon. uaa
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Oubliette*******
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2535 on: March 06, 2016, 12:10:24 pm »
Quote
P.S. It's better to unite 5 groups in 2 with 9 teams in each one (4 best teams in each group go further), in my opinion. So that will be more interesting tourney, cuz all teams will get more chances to pass the group stage.
So it'd be like 8 matches per team, just for the group stage. Too long imo, it would take ages to complete the tournament.

Not really, still better than having 5 groups with only 2 teams in the last one, lol.
One of the best side blockers in the game. Often reffered as 'the Sideblock King'.

Offline DayBoul

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1574
  • question mark
    • View Profile
  • Nick: [15th_YR] DayBoul
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2536 on: March 06, 2016, 01:08:07 pm »
Fuck my ass with Group D :(

D for Death
The Group of Death
lying requires that one first knows the truth, bullshitting calls for no such precondition - X Æ A-12


Offline Cazasar

  • Lieutenant General
  • ***
  • Posts: 9179
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2537 on: March 06, 2016, 01:48:35 pm »
We will most likely not change the groups, most people seem fine with em.
CAUTION: INTERACTIVE SCREENSHOTS NOT MEANT FOR MEDIUM EYES
Cazasar interacting with the boys
[close]
me and cazasar interacting
[close]

Offline Melton

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 320
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2538 on: March 06, 2016, 02:50:36 pm »
We will most likely not change the groups, most people seem fine with em.
6 groups with 3 teams in each would be more fitting though.

Offline DayBoul

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1574
  • question mark
    • View Profile
  • Nick: [15th_YR] DayBoul
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2539 on: March 06, 2016, 03:28:23 pm »
We will most likely not change the groups, most people seem fine with em.

I'm a bit surprised that Turkey and Canada are in the same group x)
lying requires that one first knows the truth, bullshitting calls for no such precondition - X Æ A-12


Offline Kore

  • The Sideblock King
  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 8603
  • Best Czech player on the Moon. uaa
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Oubliette*******
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2540 on: March 06, 2016, 04:21:57 pm »
We will most likely not change the groups, most people seem fine with em.
6 groups with 3 teams in each would be more fitting though.

Or this. ^

The way it is made now doesn't give me much sense.
One of the best side blockers in the game. Often reffered as 'the Sideblock King'.

Offline Bagel

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2541 on: March 06, 2016, 04:45:30 pm »
We will most likely not change the groups, most people seem fine with em.
6 groups with 3 teams in each would be more fitting though.

+ 1

Offline bobertini

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 3763
  • Stark <3<3<3
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2542 on: March 06, 2016, 04:57:44 pm »
Just keep it like it is.

Offline Melton

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 320
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2543 on: March 06, 2016, 04:58:04 pm »

Offline bobertini

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 3763
  • Stark <3<3<3
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2544 on: March 06, 2016, 04:58:34 pm »

Offline Melton

  • Second Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 320
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2545 on: March 06, 2016, 04:59:59 pm »
I will find you

Offline bobertini

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 3763
  • Stark <3<3<3
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2546 on: March 06, 2016, 05:00:40 pm »
Go check ur mum's bedroom.  :-*


Offline Elessar

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 120
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2547 on: March 06, 2016, 05:34:17 pm »
Quote
P.S. It's better to unite 5 groups in 2 with 9 teams in each one (4 best teams in each group go further), in my opinion. So that will be more interesting tourney, cuz all teams will get more chances to pass the group stage.
So it'd be like 8 matches per team, just for the group stage. Too long imo, it would take ages to complete the tournament.
1) Not longer than NWL, NLC or RGL, cuz 1 match not take longer than 20-30 minutes unlike NWL's lb
2) That works unlike the table with 5 or 6 groups (number of groups has to be 2*n)
3) NWWC is an annual cup so every country wants to play more than 1 or 2 matches in such tournament.
4) Organisers will not have to change the brackets but just unite them e.g. A with B and C with D.
So, at the beginning offer your idea before to criticize someone, suka.

Offline Kore

  • The Sideblock King
  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 8603
  • Best Czech player on the Moon. uaa
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Oubliette*******
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2548 on: March 06, 2016, 05:47:32 pm »
Sort of have to agree with Elessar here.  :)
One of the best side blockers in the game. Often reffered as 'the Sideblock King'.

Offline Elessar

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 120
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWWC 2016
« Reply #2549 on: March 06, 2016, 05:53:22 pm »
Sort of have to agree with Elessar here.  :)
8)