What I was saying is there is enough reasonable doubt that the 75th would have won the round to warrant a reset. Also I don't think Jackie was alive. Also red viper admited in internal admin chat that the slay was a misclick by him. And another thing, you typed FoL in admin chat while the melee was going on that's just terrible admining as many people get distracted by the bright purple text on their screen or are unable to see what's happening.
Edit: When I talked to you in teamspeak you said this sort of thing has happened before and no reset was granted. I have never seen this sort of thing happen when the stakes were this high so its different. Also a similar action has a resetable precedent that I beleieve this sort of thing should be copied from, for example if a 1v1 is down to 1 member vs a team of say 6 and the team of 6 FoL the one guy there is a reasonable doubt that the one person would have clutched and the round is reset even though that is less likely that a 9vs11. This can be seen happening two times in the AEF vs 3e volt match as well as a number of other times in line battles from years past.
"I have never seen this sort of thing happen when the stakes were this high so its different."
=/=
"I have never seen this sort of thing happen, therefore it hasn't"
Bad Logic, but I'll address it.
Last NANWL when 4th fought MoskovGren, Rex who was easily one of our best and highest contributing meleers, shot Ody while Ody was behind his Line, which doesn't warrant a slay or reset, however he got slayed. That slay tilted us pretty hard and contributed to us losing the round, but we weren't given a chance to redo the round because of it, and we didn't really expect to be able to. The only person who really gets a reset is an officer.
"Also a similar action has a resetable precedent that I beleieve this sort of thing should be copied from, for example if a 1v1 is down to 1 member vs a team of say 6 and the team of 6 FoL the one guy there is a reasonable doubt that the one person would have clutched and the round is reset even though that is less likely that a 9vs11"
Firstly, it's not that similar of an action.
But the main problem with this argument is you misunderstand the general reason for resetting in that situation. Though sometimes if you can see the observable quality of the six alive is vastly inferior to the 1 alive, then perhaps it's a case of reasonable doubt, but a vast majority of the time it isn't about there being reasonable doubt that the 1 guy can clutch vs the remaining six. It's about sending a clear message to the offending six and their team that what they did was totally unacceptable, and will not be tolerated (as it will cost them rounds). Similarly to mass FoC/FoL. Besides all they need to do in that situation is form a line to make it a valid tactic.
"This can be seen happening two times in the AEF vs 3e volt match as well as a number of other times in line battles from years past."
This is kind of vague. What can be seen happening in what AEF vs 3eVolt match? 9vs11 clutches? From which side?
