Poll

Interested in this format of tournament?

Yes
37 (88.1%)
No
5 (11.9%)

Total Members Voted: 42

Author Topic: Regimental 2v2 LB tournie - thoughts?  (Read 6390 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline higened243ed

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 1372
  • 243 grouped co-captained
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 85e / 2eFusGre
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Regimental 2v2 LB tournie - thoughts?
« Reply #60 on: February 19, 2020, 03:49:24 pm »
I played some 2vs2s and there was less to no camping. In 1h we were ablento play 6-8 rounds, with one round allcharge included. So with a bit more defensive playstil its hard to play 10 rounds in 1h...
+1

Online Vegi.

  • Where is my stack?!
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 8189
  • Divide and Conquer
    • View Profile
  • Nick: King of Stack
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Regimental 2v2 LB tournie - thoughts?
« Reply #61 on: February 19, 2020, 03:54:29 pm »
I feel like 10 rounds are too much. I'd say you should go for a BO format.
I guess BO 6-8 rounds would be acceptable. If you don't want to have draws you can also just go for a BO7
BO7 looks fine. Great idea.
Stop looking at my posts Fietta #RentFree

The Master of stack, the voice of racism.

Offline 33rdKincaid

  • Major General
  • **
  • Posts: 3200
  • 33rd_Col_Kincaid
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Kincaid
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Regimental 2v2 LB tournie - thoughts?
« Reply #62 on: February 20, 2020, 11:28:25 am »
I played some 2vs2s and there was less to no camping. In 1h we were ablento play 6-8 rounds, with one round allcharge included. So with a bit more defensive playstil its hard to play 10 rounds in 1h...
I agree and certainly hope that camping won't be much of an issue :D I've put the sign-up thread up with a voting option - I have excluded BO7 as it wouldn't be ideal not allowing for an even side swap. If the FT5 option was favoured (offering playing as few as 5 rounds or as many as 9) would probably play with a sideswap every 2 rounds.