Tier 1:
Hard to disagree with most of it. Haven't watched Lonedoge, Rikkert and Voluble in EGS enough to argue if they deserve their current ranking but I wouldn't know who to replace them with even if they didn't.
Tier2: Mostly accurate.
- Golden is probably a bit too low even based on recent performances
- Quenouille's rating seems off to me, based on what performance do you justify his ranking?
- Ivan didn't play the last three tournaments, why did you put him there?
- Based purely on performance, Fwuffy hasn't been a tier 2 player in recent tournaments. He would probably fit more at the top of tier 3.
- Barro's rating seems off too, based on what performance do you justify his ranking?
Tier 3: Erm
- Drake didn't play the last three tournaments, why did you put him there?
- Janne and Axiom seem a bit low to me.
- Did Komar play tournaments recently?
- Altair definitely has the potential to be T3 but based on what performances do you justify his ranking?
- Maximou didn't play the last three tournaments either?
----
Obviously, it's all opinionated and the list still makes sense for a large part of it (positively surprised about the perception of your own level, probably one of the most accurate ratings in the list) but there are many questionable choices especially in regards to people who did not play at all recently and somehow still manage to make it to the tier 2/3 of your list.
Interested to see the lower tiers.