Chuckster Points TOP 30 - 31-01-2021

[Ilypa]

I just noticed me and chuckster have same stats makes sense now

[AccursedGull]

Free Player app Steinmann Gull

[Smylie]

4th place with boiz and won virgins which one fucked up chuckster in groupstages - still 133 

twice won asatro 5-2 and 5-1 - they're still better than NaVi or Virgins(they won asatro 15-3 in EGL)

Use ur brain u guys got 5-0 and 7-2'd by Caza. Asatro isn't better than Caza but we beat them, down to the fact that their playstyle is one we are better against and just how we played in that match. You can't decide a teams skill by who they beat on one day, especially if you play a passive playstyle like yours, as it takes a lot more concentration to counter and beat. If you know Asatro well enough, patience isn't our thing, we find it almost impossible to beat teams like that. Virgins is a very talented team and imo is under rated by lots of people, coming from someone who doesn't have the best track record with coco, but NaVi can do well vs some teams because of ur patience but vs others u get completely outmatched due to a clear difference in skill or just other teams experience in dealing with passive cunts. In effect, beating Cazadores doesnt make Asatro better, nor does losing to NaVi make u guys better.

[Arch4ngel]

4th place with boiz and won virgins which one fucked up chuckster in groupstages - still 133 

twice won asatro 5-2 and 5-1 - they're still better than NaVi or Virgins(they won asatro 15-3 in EGL)

Use ur brain u guys got 5-0 and 7-2'd by Caza. Asatro isn't better than Caza but we beat them, down to the fact that their playstyle is one we are better against and just how we played in that match. You can't decide a teams skill by who they beat on one day, especially if you play a passive playstyle like yours, as it takes a lot more concentration to counter and beat. If you know Asatro well enough, patience isn't our thing, we find it almost impossible to beat teams like that. Virgins is a very talented team and imo is under rated by lots of people, coming from someone who doesn't have the best track record with coco, but NaVi can do well vs some teams because of ur patience but vs others u get completely outmatched due to a clear difference in skill or just experience with dealing with passive cunts. In effect, beating Cazadores doesnt make Asatro better, nor does losing to NaVi make u guys better.

5-4 against asatro - caza? khee nice 322 throw
i fpicked ur dogs guys in groupstage in 5-10 secs from beginning, what a passive cunt i'm

should i think if we played with lit 5-4 we are top 2? but caza not our opponent? LOL

u really thinks 2 mathes 5-2 and 5-1 prove nothing? if u win caza once - maybe u will do it twice? why after re with us u didnt ask the same against caza?

sorry for instults

[Wursti]

Ure saying u only lost cuz we play passive? Kingsom, ironreign, Archangel basically push 24/7, i started stabbing 24/7 too especially with my new ping. And if youre saying Cazadores' playstyle fits you, then idk how you can suddenly lose to a ,for you, passive team? Without trying to offend Cazadores, Imo they played giga passive atleast against us

Its the typical excuse "u just counter us" instead of "you were just better than us that day"

If youre a good player / team you have to be able to play against everything and adapt. Cazadores also beat us with a passive playstyle and we (or atleast I) just accept that they were better no matter the reason.

[nIvan]

Ure saying u only lost cuz we play passive? Kingsom, ironreign, Archangel basically push 24/7, i started stabbing 24/7 too especially with my new ping. And if youre saying Cazadores' playstyle fits you, then idk how you can suddenly lose to a ,for you, passive team? Without trying to offend Cazadores, Imo they played giga passive atleast against us

Its the typical excuse "u just counter us" instead of "you were just better than us that day"

If youre a good player / team you have to be able to play against everything and adapt. Cazadores also beat us with a passive playstyle and we (or atleast I) just accept that they were better no matter the reason.

ironreign is a cheater

[Smylie]

4th place with boiz and won virgins which one fucked up chuckster in groupstages - still 133 

twice won asatro 5-2 and 5-1 - they're still better than NaVi or Virgins(they won asatro 15-3 in EGL)

Use ur brain u guys got 5-0 and 7-2'd by Caza. Asatro isn't better than Caza but we beat them, down to the fact that their playstyle is one we are better against and just how we played in that match. You can't decide a teams skill by who they beat on one day, especially if you play a passive playstyle like yours, as it takes a lot more concentration to counter and beat. If you know Asatro well enough, patience isn't our thing, we find it almost impossible to beat teams like that. Virgins is a very talented team and imo is under rated by lots of people, coming from someone who doesn't have the best track record with coco, but NaVi can do well vs some teams because of ur patience but vs others u get completely outmatched due to a clear difference in skill or just experience with dealing with passive cunts. In effect, beating Cazadores doesnt make Asatro better, nor does losing to NaVi make u guys better.

5-4 against asatro - caza? khee nice 322 throw
i fpicked ur dogs guys in groupstage in 5-10 secs from beginning, what a passive cunt i'm

should i think if we played with lit 5-4 we are top 2? but caza not our opponent? LOL

u really thinks 2 mathes 5-2 and 5-1 prove nothing? if u win caza once - maybe u will do it twice? why after re with us u didnt ask same against caza?

ngl i have absolutely no clue what ur saying
We only had to re match you guys because u went crying to the admins about it, we didn't try and stop the re match once and said gg after we lost. You out played us in 2 matches but 2 matches mean nothing on your overall skill. U can check previous tournaments, but every time we have played u before last night we have beaten you. What you're doing is basically like a 5 year old girl kicking and screaming because a group of people you don't know don't think you're as good as you think u are, get a reality check and maybe get a test to check that you have 46 chromosomes.

[DOMI]

Ure saying u only lost cuz we play passive? Kingsom, ironreign, Archangel basically push 24/7, i started stabbing 24/7 too especially with my new ping. And if youre saying Cazadores' playstyle fits you, then idk how you can suddenly lose to a ,for you, passive team? Without trying to offend Cazadores, Imo they played giga passive atleast against us

Its the typical excuse "u just counter us" instead of "you were just better than us that day"

If youre a good player / team you have to be able to play against everything and adapt. Cazadores also beat us with a passive playstyle and we (or atleast I) just accept that they were better no matter the reason.

ironreign is a cheater

[Shogun.]

Marx winning  tournament after a long time,goes from 25 to 28, nice one, good list

[Arch4ngel]

Ure saying u only lost cuz we play passive? Kingsom, ironreign, Archangel basically push 24/7, i started stabbing 24/7 too especially with my new ping. And if youre saying Cazadores' playstyle fits you, then idk how you can suddenly lose to a ,for you, passive team? Without trying to offend Cazadores, Imo they played giga passive atleast against us

Its the typical excuse "u just counter us" instead of "you were just better than us that day"

If youre a good player / team you have to be able to play against everything and adapt. Cazadores also beat us with a passive playstyle and we (or atleast I) just accept that they were better no matter the reason.

ironreign is a cheater

he is immortal 24/7 turkish-autoblock pusher

[Wursti]

Spoiler

4th place with boiz and won virgins which one fucked up chuckster in groupstages - still 133 

twice won asatro 5-2 and 5-1 - they're still better than NaVi or Virgins(they won asatro 15-3 in EGL)

Use ur brain u guys got 5-0 and 7-2'd by Caza. Asatro isn't better than Caza but we beat them, down to the fact that their playstyle is one we are better against and just how we played in that match. You can't decide a teams skill by who they beat on one day, especially if you play a passive playstyle like yours, as it takes a lot more concentration to counter and beat. If you know Asatro well enough, patience isn't our thing, we find it almost impossible to beat teams like that. Virgins is a very talented team and imo is under rated by lots of people, coming from someone who doesn't have the best track record with coco, but NaVi can do well vs some teams because of ur patience but vs others u get completely outmatched due to a clear difference in skill or just experience with dealing with passive cunts. In effect, beating Cazadores doesnt make Asatro better, nor does losing to NaVi make u guys better.

5-4 against asatro - caza? khee nice 322 throw
i fpicked ur dogs guys in groupstage in 5-10 secs from beginning, what a passive cunt i'm

should i think if we played with lit 5-4 we are top 2? but caza not our opponent? LOL

u really thinks 2 mathes 5-2 and 5-1 prove nothing? if u win caza once - maybe u will do it twice? why after re with us u didnt ask same against caza?

ngl i have absolutely no clue what ur saying
We only had to re match you guys because u went crying to the admins about it, we didn't try and stop the re match once and said gg after we lost. You out played us in 2 matches but 2 matches mean nothing on your overall skill. U can check previous tournaments, but every time we have played u before last night we have beaten you. What you're doing is basically like a 5 year old girl kicking and screaming because a group of people you don't know don't think you're as good as you think u are, get a reality check and maybe get a test to check that you have 46 chromosomes.

[close]

Ure talking about the 2 times we fought? I thought 2 wins mean nothing

[Snowwi]

maybe get a test to check that you have 46 chromosomes.

that escalated quickly

[Python | Smeagol]

Ure saying u only lost cuz we play passive? Kingsom, ironreign, Archangel basically push 24/7, i started stabbing 24/7 too especially with my new ping. And if youre saying Cazadores' playstyle fits you, then idk how you can suddenly lose to a ,for you, passive team? Without trying to offend Cazadores, Imo they played giga passive atleast against us

Its the typical excuse "u just counter us" instead of "you were just better than us that day"

If youre a good player / team you have to be able to play against everything and adapt. Cazadores also beat us with a passive playstyle and we (or atleast I) just accept that they were better no matter the reason.

ironreign is a cheater

[Smylie]

Spoiler

4th place with boiz and won virgins which one fucked up chuckster in groupstages - still 133 

twice won asatro 5-2 and 5-1 - they're still better than NaVi or Virgins(they won asatro 15-3 in EGL)

Use ur brain u guys got 5-0 and 7-2'd by Caza. Asatro isn't better than Caza but we beat them, down to the fact that their playstyle is one we are better against and just how we played in that match. You can't decide a teams skill by who they beat on one day, especially if you play a passive playstyle like yours, as it takes a lot more concentration to counter and beat. If you know Asatro well enough, patience isn't our thing, we find it almost impossible to beat teams like that. Virgins is a very talented team and imo is under rated by lots of people, coming from someone who doesn't have the best track record with coco, but NaVi can do well vs some teams because of ur patience but vs others u get completely outmatched due to a clear difference in skill or just experience with dealing with passive cunts. In effect, beating Cazadores doesnt make Asatro better, nor does losing to NaVi make u guys better.

5-4 against asatro - caza? khee nice 322 throw
i fpicked ur dogs guys in groupstage in 5-10 secs from beginning, what a passive cunt i'm

should i think if we played with lit 5-4 we are top 2? but caza not our opponent? LOL

u really thinks 2 mathes 5-2 and 5-1 prove nothing? if u win caza once - maybe u will do it twice? why after re with us u didnt ask same against caza?

ngl i have absolutely no clue what ur saying
We only had to re match you guys because u went crying to the admins about it, we didn't try and stop the re match once and said gg after we lost. You out played us in 2 matches but 2 matches mean nothing on your overall skill. U can check previous tournaments, but every time we have played u before last night we have beaten you. What you're doing is basically like a 5 year old girl kicking and screaming because a group of people you don't know don't think you're as good as you think u are, get a reality check and maybe get a test to check that you have 46 chromosomes.

[close]

Ure talking about the 2 times we fought? I thought 2 wins mean nothing

My point is that you can't just beat a team in one tournament and claim your better, even if i was to use ur logic of i beat a team therefore im better we would still be ontop due to past matchups. However, you can't claim you're better than another team who consistently makes it out of groups and normally to the quarters and has been doing so for a long time, when you barely make it out of the groups and will probably disband when u get mad or things aren't going your way.

[Arch4ngel]

4th place with boiz and won virgins which one fucked up chuckster in groupstages - still 133 

twice won asatro 5-2 and 5-1 - they're still better than NaVi or Virgins(they won asatro 15-3 in EGL)

Use ur brain u guys got 5-0 and 7-2'd by Caza. Asatro isn't better than Caza but we beat them, down to the fact that their playstyle is one we are better against and just how we played in that match. You can't decide a teams skill by who they beat on one day, especially if you play a passive playstyle like yours, as it takes a lot more concentration to counter and beat. If you know Asatro well enough, patience isn't our thing, we find it almost impossible to beat teams like that. Virgins is a very talented team and imo is under rated by lots of people, coming from someone who doesn't have the best track record with coco, but NaVi can do well vs some teams because of ur patience but vs others u get completely outmatched due to a clear difference in skill or just experience with dealing with passive cunts. In effect, beating Cazadores doesnt make Asatro better, nor does losing to NaVi make u guys better.

5-4 against asatro - caza? khee nice 322 throw
i fpicked ur dogs guys in groupstage in 5-10 secs from beginning, what a passive cunt i'm

should i think if we played with lit 5-4 we are top 2? but caza not our opponent? LOL

u really thinks 2 mathes 5-2 and 5-1 prove nothing? if u win caza once - maybe u will do it twice? why after re with us u didnt ask same against caza?

ngl i have absolutely no clue what ur saying
We only had to re match you guys because u went crying to the admins about it, we didn't try and stop the re match once and said gg after we lost. You out played us in 2 matches but 2 matches mean nothing on your overall skill. U can check previous tournaments, but every time we have played u before last night we have beaten you. What you're doing is basically like a 5 year old girl kicking and screaming because a group of people you don't know don't think you're as good as you think u are, get a reality check and maybe get a test to check that you have 46 chromosomes.

my last tourmanents:
7v7 - monsters - 3rd place 40-50+ kills
gojp with maxim kamikaze whos dying in 3 secs idk which place
and this one, 80% groupstage i played agressive and and didnt think about blocks, made fps against virgins, but beeing so passive ONLY against caza, wolpis flank was op against us.

so if we beat u 10-3 in sum ur btw stronger than us, we beat virgins who won u in egl 15-3, so its nothing, just luck:)