The match with the 79th upset Littlefield a lot because they were using mercs or something despite that being against the rules. I might be wrong on that, citation needed, but we were definitely capable of beating the 79th, the 63e, and whoever else many times.
People will argue to the ends of the earth to prove someone's group wasn't the at top of a semi-popular game at a single point in time. El em ay oh.
P.S. We were only league 2 because we joined too late or something. We destroyed every league 2 regiment for a reason--we were more than capable of destroying all if not most of league 1. We beat about all top regiment that challenged us, and never bothered to fill up our winrate with easy wins on less capable regiments, so we never challenged anyone, and the only losses I can remember (very few in total honesty) always had some sort of rule breaking on the other side, mostly with invites pretending to be actual members. Often times that led to some of our best players saying "I'll be there the next match, you guys got this easily" and thus it often ended pretty unbalanced. My argument is that there were very few regiments, if any, in NA at the time that could have beat us with our best line up of players. We were one of the best organized, lead, structured, and skilled of our brief time. There were certainly better players, but I'd say 92nd really was a perfect storm with few real competitors at its best. That was the only reason I came back to NW after essentially being "bullied out" months prior; it was too good to pass up on.