Author Topic: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853  (Read 23756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yusufmh

  • Volunteer
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #45 on: February 15, 2013, 12:20:24 am »
That's very interesting that the game is developed under C#, I thought it's written in Python or something like that.

Offline Danik

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 292
  • Better than Justin Bieber since 1960
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #46 on: February 15, 2013, 12:46:35 am »
I wonder how i will look in-game. Will the fps be omptimized to shoot from the ironsight?

Offline Wismar

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 3838
  • Med Gud o' Sveas allmoge för Konung och Fosterland
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Radical
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #47 on: February 15, 2013, 10:47:45 am »
I wonder how i will look in-game. Will the fps be omptimized to shoot from the ironsight?
I hope so.

Offline MackCW

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 4522
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #48 on: February 15, 2013, 08:01:20 pm »
That's very interesting that the game is developed under C#, I thought it's written in Python or something like that.

Warband was...totally new engine.

Offline Jacob

  • Alpha Tester
  • *
  • Posts: 3003
  • Back after a long long time away :)
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Jacob
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #49 on: February 16, 2013, 04:55:26 am »
That's very interesting that the game is developed under C#, I thought it's written in Python or something like that.

Warband was...totally new engine.

The Unity engine will be a lot nicer and hopefully it will be a lot better in terms of graphics, smoothness of play and hopefully a lot less buggy

Offline Cirry

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 164
  • Thou shalt not fear because I is here
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 77y_Mrks_Cirry
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #50 on: February 18, 2013, 05:29:47 pm »
That's very interesting that the game is developed under C#, I thought it's written in Python or something like that.

Warband was...totally new engine.

The Unity engine will be a lot nicer and hopefully it will be a lot better in terms of graphics, smoothness of play and hopefully a lot less buggy

Hurray for non-laggy sieges where eveything can get destroyed xD

Offline joer5835

  • Brigadier General
  • *
  • Posts: 2482
  • My face is tired.
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Joer
  • Side: Union
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #51 on: February 18, 2013, 07:04:00 pm »
Praise the lord and pass the ammunition.
Polan is of dangerous to FSE
Im from Poland , a land of lawlessness

Offline CKtheFat

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #52 on: February 23, 2013, 09:52:13 pm »
Quote
I guess showing you C# code is not that interesting

It is to me :P

Offline munky-wunky

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1774
  • Oh, I'm a good old rebel, Now thats just what I am
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #53 on: March 03, 2013, 06:20:26 am »
will there be a springfield 1861 for yankeys?
Spoiler
Welcome to FSE hun. Enjoy your stay on s.s. Duuring. Lifeboat is to be found on upper left corner as "log out". We wish you enjoy the journey. Thank you for choosing Dutch Sea For your vacation.
[close]

Offline Olafson

  • FSE Developer
  • ****
  • Posts: 3996
  • #friendsforever
    • View Profile
  • Nick: FSE_Olafson
  • Side: Union
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #54 on: March 03, 2013, 02:21:36 pm »
Yes!

Offline Tor

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Beidh muid ag troid ar son Uncail Sam, beidh sé ma
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #55 on: September 09, 2013, 06:18:58 pm »
Nevermind, the question above me answered my question.

Second question, if you do add the 1861 Springfield, how about the 1852 Mississippi?
« Last Edit: September 10, 2013, 04:38:18 pm by Tor »
The only time people say Wiki isn't reliable is when it doesn't support their argument. The rest of the time they're always using it.

Offline Tor

  • First Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Beidh muid ag troid ar son Uncail Sam, beidh sé ma
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #56 on: September 09, 2013, 06:32:15 pm »
Btw, Awesome job on everything. :)
« Last Edit: September 10, 2013, 04:37:48 pm by Tor »
The only time people say Wiki isn't reliable is when it doesn't support their argument. The rest of the time they're always using it.

Offline Millander

  • Donator
  • *
  • Posts: 4776
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #57 on: October 27, 2013, 08:14:47 am »
shouldn't the barell be blued for an Enfield?
Of course, I also think lines should be able to move in double rank without having emotional breakdowns.

Offline Rejenorst

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2348
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #58 on: October 27, 2013, 10:02:21 am »
Nevermind, the question above me answered my question.

Second question, if you do add the 1861 Springfield, how about the 1852 Mississippi?

Well there's the 1841 Mississippi rifle already created, not sure if FSE will include the 1852 version:
https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=8776.0
« Last Edit: October 27, 2013, 10:04:43 am by Rejenorst »
Spoiler

[close]

Offline MackCW

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 4522
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Developer Blog 10 - Enfield Pattern 1853
« Reply #59 on: October 29, 2013, 01:14:30 am »
shouldn't the barell be blued for an Enfield?

I'll point you to this article Milly...

http://www.authentic-campaigner.com/articles/walden/enfblue.htm

which states:

Quote
I'll give you the bottom line right up front: there is no period evidence to support an all-or-none stand on either side. That is, there is no clear-cut period evidence to support an opinion that either a blued or bright finish is more authentic. Of course, this could be modified for specific units at specific times and locations, but as a general rule, both Federals and Confederates used Enfields that were both blued and bright, and in-depth research does not indicate that either finish was in enough of a majority to be the clear-cut more authentic choice for the finish on a repro Enfield today. So to those who put out the all-or-none rule … that all (or the vast majority) Enfields were exported to America with bright finishes or were struck bright once they got here, thus, all repro Enfields must be bright in order to be authentic … sorry, folks, it just isn't true, and you can’t back it up with period evidence.