Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Nappy Surena

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 55
16
Regiment name: 93rd
Contact (1stIC/2ndIC): Nick and Me
Expected attendance: 15+
Do you agree to the rules?:yes

I'm waiting for the Impending rage quit lmao

17
Shame the 6te didnt challenge any rounds one of them should have been voided for a made up rule on the spot and not having an official one added. <-- Yes thats my agrument, not having a set rule in the rule books so it challenges the integrety of the rules.

It's the responsibility of the referee to enforce the rules, and If necessary that it doesn't exist to adapt to the situation and tell the regiments what he will and will not allow. If we brought up not having a set rule for specific things over the years, nearly every match before S7 would've been overturned because of the redux of the ruleset that happened during Amit's season


This video is a perfect example, I was reffing with Glenn and Bean was there spectating during this match and AsianP officer ramboed and at the time there was no rule as to say what to do in that encounter, so we adapted.

18
By the logic of virtually every 6te member on this thread; if you’re caught within melee range you can simply run away and sacrifice yourself to avoid the melee and continue running. You weren’t being cut-off because you were afk in spawn returning to your line or because you were THAT far removed from either the front or back of the line, you were caught because we fucked you with reverses and got within charging distance. That’s your fault for getting caught. If anyone was attempting to exploit the rules it was Raf and Irish when they would continually make themselves intentional rambos to avoid an actual melee.

*Edit: Also, if you’re going to complain about melee; maybe don’t bring 5 EU’s who seemingly apparated out of thin air for this match and a bunch of guys who either hardly play, or hardly melee. Thnx
Ok, but what about the fact that almost every time that this happend, and there was never a slay given to Raf for ramboing. I only saw a slay given to Irish and Raf on a small amount of instances(correct me if im wrong cause I cant recall every instance). It was absurd. The 6te were not allowed to shoot after there players died? we had a reform rule for this reason so we avoid what happend exactly last match. Personally It doesn't make sense to me why there was so little slays given out. In some cases the LG would be running down towards the 6te while running at Raf which is all technically rambos and nothing was done about it. As someone who really doesn't care about who wins that match but rather specing it for my own personal pleasure I found it just disgusting to watch and flat out sad. The LG would rather win petty then actually make a basis out of a 1v1, and I found a lot of rule bending happening during this match and a ton of times were slays should have been handed out. Im not necessarily saying that anyone was deliberately cheating, however, there was something completely off about this match that really just ruined the conception of a 1v1.

Slaying an officer is the most controversial thing a referee can do, and the referee has to atleast give them a chance to return to their line despite the chances
Im talking about the cases were they ran cross map and it was obvious he wasn't making it back.

My answer still stands, the opposing regiment who's officer was slain could just say he had the chance to make it back and request a reset. Better to give him a chance and avoid the drama despite the distance. If this was a regular player I would agree with you, but it wasn't.

19
By the logic of virtually every 6te member on this thread; if you’re caught within melee range you can simply run away and sacrifice yourself to avoid the melee and continue running. You weren’t being cut-off because you were afk in spawn returning to your line or because you were THAT far removed from either the front or back of the line, you were caught because we fucked you with reverses and got within charging distance. That’s your fault for getting caught. If anyone was attempting to exploit the rules it was Raf and Irish when they would continually make themselves intentional rambos to avoid an actual melee.

*Edit: Also, if you’re going to complain about melee; maybe don’t bring 5 EU’s who seemingly apparated out of thin air for this match and a bunch of guys who either hardly play, or hardly melee. Thnx
Ok, but what about the fact that almost every time that this happend, and there was never a slay given to Raf for ramboing. I only saw a slay given to Irish and Raf on a small amount of instances(correct me if im wrong cause I cant recall every instance). It was absurd. The 6te were not allowed to shoot after there players died? we had a reform rule for this reason so we avoid what happend exactly last match. Personally It doesn't make sense to me why there was so little slays given out. In some cases the LG would be running down towards the 6te while running at Raf which is all technically rambos and nothing was done about it. As someone who really doesn't care about who wins that match but rather specing it for my own personal pleasure I found it just disgusting to watch and flat out sad. The LG would rather win petty then actually make a basis out of a 1v1, and I found a lot of rule bending happening during this match and a ton of times were slays should have been handed out. Im not necessarily saying that anyone was deliberately cheating, however, there was something completely off about this match that really just ruined the conception of a 1v1.

Slaying an officer is the most controversial thing a referee can do, and the referee has to atleast give them a chance to return to their line despite the chances

20
Suiciding is obviously not a viable option.
That being said, ofcourse people are going to get cut off with how fucking huge the lines were. On EU when an officer or single dude gets cut off the other line lets them return to their line most of the time, in my experience at least. You won't have any scenarios where the whole line is chasing after the one officer.

For the people saying that Irish and Rafael weren't going towards their own line: when you get cut off, it is often easier to run around the back of the enemy line to get back to the other side. A 30 man line charging after you obviously makes it impossible to run around them. The LG can just spread out and surround you, giving you no possible way back to your line and driving you to the map edge.

While I agree with your point on how it's typically easier to run around an enemy line to get back to your own It's also a viable tactic to cut off the officer and delay that effort, From my experience this is typically done from maneuvering from the regiment attempting it, However, what the LG did was a viable tactic and from what I can remember the first time Its happened. When this season started Risk made it a point for regiments attempting to reform to always be on the same page aka be running back towards their line before Its fully counted outside of the melee and able to reform. The reason why It's Important in this scenario is that the fact still stands that anyone cut off still has to find their way back to the line or they'll be unable to undertake any other action or It'll just turn into a cluster fuck with one man kyting running the literal opposite direction of his line, while they're able to shoot, the number of people in the event is Irrelevant to this.



By the logic of virtually every 6te member on this thread; if you’re caught within melee range you can simply run away and sacrifice yourself to avoid the melee and continue running. You weren’t being cut-off because you were afk in spawn returning to your line or because you were THAT far removed from either the front or back of the line, you were caught because we fucked you with reverses and got within charging distance. That’s your fault for getting caught. If anyone was attempting to exploit the rules it was Raf and Irish when they would continually make themselves intentional rambos to avoid an actual melee.

*Edit: Also, if you’re going to complain about melee; maybe don’t bring 5 EU’s who seemingly apparated out of thin air for this match and a bunch of guys who either hardly play, or hardly melee. Thnx

It's a tough analysis but I gotta agree with some points here.

21
who the fuck makes a tier list alphabetical. That's the lowest form of lists. "North American Definitive" more like " North American Lazy"

Rune's list is the only one that matters!
Honestly, it was much harder to do it in alphabetical order because Gavin and I pretty much had to teach Vetro the alphabet
tf i had to teach you the alphabet aswell, also #gamingdocTier1

lmfao

22
The Mess Hall / Re: Best NA Tier List
« on: July 28, 2019, 07:42:46 pm »

23
League: 1
Server: doesn't matter
Teams: IB vs LIR
Date & Time: 07/28/2019 @ 9:15 EST
Steam Profiles: https://steamcommunity.com/id/75675555715314527
https://steamcommunity.com/id/Jetch3
Preferred Ref (if any): Jolly, Jakester, Moraine

24
The Mess Hall / Re: Cytiuz's Tier List [NA]
« on: July 23, 2019, 11:10:48 pm »
Spoiler
[close]
smh my head
cant even be lowest tier

25
League: 1
Server: Server 3 I think for 6te?
Teams: IB vs 6te
Date & Time: 07/20/2019 @ 9 EST
Steam Profiles: https://steamcommunity.com/id/75675555715314527
Preferred Ref (if any): Jolly, Jakester, Moraine

26
Since Glenn wasn't here to record LG's perspective. I decided to record, but instead of mouse and keyboard I used an Xbox controller the whole match. Video cumming soon fuckos.

this about to be a big W

Move over Glenn there's a new sheriff in town

27
The Mess Hall / Re: GAVIN HACKING??!!!??!?!?!??!?!
« on: July 10, 2019, 07:26:13 am »
lol

29
It actually was me all this time! I’d like to take this chance to apologize to absolutely nobody the ONLY NAPL double champ does what the fuck he wants.
El GOAT

30
Yeah if you wouldn't post on this thread unless if pertains to NANWL that'd be great

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 55