This way, you can ensure that teams including players like Raime, Fluxxy, Lebrun and Vegi are not all on the same team when the rest playing field clearly doesn't come close to the same amount solidity. Some of those players should be playing in these kinds of tournaments, just not all together.
It's a joke to say that when ''Lebrun Miloradovich and Raime'' are considered bots on the game it's the first tournament I won in my life for example ahahaahah
The only people who would call them bots are those who play in L1, but that's completely irrelevant to the topic. What matters is
relative skill vs the competition. The competition consisted of many low skilled teams, whilst Renaissance and Stoiki's team consisted of many of the best/most successful L2 players and even some L1 players last season.
...it's the first tournament I won in my life for example ahahaahah
I'm assuming you aren't using this logic to say that your team
altogether didn't have players who were too strong when combined, since we can look at many examples for strong L2 and even L1 players who haven't won a tournament at all. We also have clear examples of players who have won many tournaments who are debatably not as strong as some of the best L2 players. This isn't, and never has been, a comprehensive or even meaningful metric of skill.
If you want more, Lisowczyk AND Raime played in L1 last EGS season, so they already stand above the average L2 player, and they, just as you do, regularly prac vs L1 teams and hold their own. Vegi is a dominant L2 player (too scared to play L1), and Lebrun solidified himself as a top L2 player last EGS season where he carried his team in at least two of the tournaments to the best of his ability.
We could ignore you being in the team completely and it would still be much stronger team than the relative opposition. Remember, per my last post, both Renaissance and Stoiki's team were too strong compared to the rest of the teams, that's what you guys are being compared against.
