28th (North Gloucestershire) Regiment of Foot - "The Slashers" [EU]

[David_Schrein]

YES I LOVED THE TIME WHERE NOBODY APART FROM RIKIMARU COULD BLOCK

kind regards
my caps-lock key

and now everyone blocks except riki

[John Price]

2011-2014 were considered the hay days because of the depth of regiments, not how they would stack up to 2018-19 bandwagons.

Like Murphy said we consider it the hay day because of the quality of lines and events. My favorite was always the 14e and 91st ones, mostly 14e for my regiment honestly because they had 1 cannon on a Sunday that spiced things up abit.

Nothing like taking a 91st/92nd/14e 50 man death volley. Really made my penis erect.

P.S people could actually lead back then. Yeah, I said it.

[Kore]

pretty sad to see so many people on this thread in denial, it is a known FACT, that literally NOBODY would defeat the Nr.24 Dream Team in a groupfighting, nobody, none of the current regiments

[John Price]

Nr.24 beat themselves hello ?

[sirkaide]

Exactly Python. Why do old players label the golden age of NW as 2013/2014? And great regiments afterwards are automatically ranked below them.

It's funny because other than myself and Gaz, we're likely the only line regiment leaders who led in that *supposed* golden age and is still leading now. Not to be rude but has anyone else led a line against all of these 'legendary regiments' ? The tactics, leading and melee is of a greater quality now than in 2014. When it used to mainly be shoot and charge.

And the quality is better now. Although the player base and competitive scene has decreased notably.

2011-2013 was the golden era you noob. I used to love a 91st Sunday LB in 2011 with 70 people in one big long snakey line fighting an equally long snakey line belonging to the 92nd. Fucking good times.

"Noob" 10/10 insult. Murphy your just another old inactive dinoausar that pops his head up every time the "golden age" is mentioned. Yet when the golden age was round your regiment was no where to be seen. Every time one of these topics appears the same old people wheel themselves out of retirement.

I don't understand why people who haven't played NW in years still linger on FSE talking about the "good old days". Sounding like a bunch of old men.  Them days are gone man move on. You don't see the likes of Sven, Tavington or Donald stalking FSE reminding everyone about their successes or the great age. Them regiments were great but that doesn't mean that the regiments that came after 2014 are any worse. If you played NW in the past and still care enough to post on FSE then re-join a regiment and get involved. Surely with your "golden age" experience you can help out...

I enjoyed watching the Nr24 Kore. I would like to think that they would of been better then the 91st. I think the KGL beat them before they disbanded?  Can't remember.

[Vegi.]

Exactly Python. Why do old players label the golden age of NW as 2013/2014? And great regiments afterwards are automatically ranked below them.

It's funny because other than myself and Gaz, we're likely the only line regiment leaders who led in that *supposed* golden age and is still leading now. Not to be rude but has anyone else led a line against all of these 'legendary regiments' ? The tactics, leading and melee is of a greater quality now than in 2014. When it used to mainly be shoot and charge.

And the quality is better now. Although the player base and competitive scene has decreased notably.

2011-2013 was the golden era you noob. I used to love a 91st Sunday LB in 2011 with 70 people in one big long snakey line fighting an equally long snakey line belonging to the 92nd. Fucking good times.

"Noob" 10/10 insult. Murphy your just another old inactive dinosaur that pops his head up every time the "golden age" is mentioned.

[Herishey]

Exactly Python. Why do old players label the golden age of NW as 2013/2014? And great regiments afterwards are automatically ranked below them.

It's funny because other than myself and Gaz, we're likely the only line regiment leaders who led in that *supposed* golden age and is still leading now. Not to be rude but has anyone else led a line against all of these 'legendary regiments' ? The tactics, leading and melee is of a greater quality now than in 2014. When it used to mainly be shoot and charge.

And the quality is better now. Although the player base and competitive scene has decreased notably.

2011-2013 was the golden era you noob. I used to love a 91st Sunday LB in 2011 with 70 people in one big long snakey line fighting an equally long snakey line belonging to the 92nd. Fucking good times.

"Noob" 10/10 insult. Murphy your just another old inactive dinoausar that pops his head up every time the "golden age" is mentioned. Yet when the golden age was round your regiment was no where to be seen. Every time one of these topics appears the same old people wheel themselves out of retirement.

I don't understand why people who haven't played NW in years still linger on FSE talking about the "good old days". Sounding like a bunch of old men.  Them days are gone man move on. You don't see the likes of Sven, Tavington or Donald stalking FSE reminding everyone about their successes or the great age. Them regiments were great but that doesn't mean that the regiments that came after 2014 are any worse. If you played NW in the past and still care enough to post on FSE then re-join a regiment and get involved. Surely with your "golden age" experience you can help out...

I enjoyed watching the Nr24 Kore. I would like to think that they would of been better then the 91st. I think the KGL beat them before they disbanded?  Can't remember.

1stKGL beat them once (6-4) shortly before then losing twice 8-2 and 9-1 and disbanding not too long after. What I said pretty much sums it up, you really can't compare old and new regiments because of course the average skill level is going to go up the longer a game is out. Equally as I said the 'top' players now are pretty much only in 3 regiments where as before they were spread out between about 6-10 depending on the year. In terms of leadership I don't think it's really changed as much as people say, leaders have changed but leadership styles always varied between regiments and I don't think the tactics have changed as much as people claim, people were simply more patient before.

[Nosswill]

I enjoyed watching the Nr24 Kore. I would like to think that they would of been better then the 91st. I think the KGL beat them before they disbanded?  Can't remember.

But the 91st never got trashed by the 5pp

[Herishey]

I enjoyed watching the Nr24 Kore. I would like to think that they would of been better then the 91st. I think the KGL beat them before they disbanded?  Can't remember.

But the 91st never got trashed by the 5pp

Or 1stKGL!

[Eamon]

Just hear to say the 66th was shit thanks

[Keita]

pretty sad to see so many people on this thread in denial, it is a known FACT, that literally NOBODY would defeat the Nr.24 Dream Team in a groupfighting, nobody, none of the current regiments

elite bait

[Ry@n]

Newgen bestgen   don't @ me

[John Price]

Just hear to say the 66th was shit thanks

Literally the only good comment here.

9-1 hello?

[Nock]

Exactly Python. Why do old players label the golden age of NW as 2013/2014? And great regiments afterwards are automatically ranked below them.

It's funny because other than myself and Gaz, we're likely the only line regiment leaders who led in that *supposed* golden age and is still leading now. Not to be rude but has anyone else led a line against all of these 'legendary regiments' ? The tactics, leading and melee is of a greater quality now than in 2014. When it used to mainly be shoot and charge.

And the quality is better now. Although the player base and competitive scene has decreased notably.

2011-2013 was the golden era you noob. I used to love a 91st Sunday LB in 2011 with 70 people in one big long snakey line fighting an equally long snakey line belonging to the 92nd. Fucking good times.

"Noob" 10/10 insult. Murphy your just another old inactive dinoausar that pops his head up every time the "golden age" is mentioned. Yet when the golden age was round your regiment was no where to be seen. Every time one of these topics appears the same old people wheel themselves out of retirement.

I don't understand why people who haven't played NW in years still linger on FSE talking about the "good old days". Sounding like a bunch of old men.  Them days are gone man move on. You don't see the likes of Sven, Tavington or Donald stalking FSE reminding everyone about their successes or the great age. Them regiments were great but that doesn't mean that the regiments that came after 2014 are any worse. If you played NW in the past and still care enough to post on FSE then re-join a regiment and get involved. Surely with your "golden age" experience you can help out...

I enjoyed watching the Nr24 Kore. I would like to think that they would of been better then the 91st. I think the KGL beat them before they disbanded?  Can't remember.

1stKGL beat them once (6-4) shortly before then losing twice 8-2 and 9-1 and disbanding not too long after. What I said pretty much sums it up, you really can't compare old and new regiments because of course the average skill level is going to go up the longer a game is out. Equally as I said the 'top' players now are pretty much only in 3 regiments where as before they were spread out between about 6-10 depending on the year. In terms of leadership I don't think it's really changed as much as people say, leaders have changed but leadership styles always varied between regiments and I don't think the tactics have changed as much as people claim, people were simply more patient before.

This.

[Kore]

I enjoyed watching the Nr24 Kore. I would like to think that they would of been better then the 91st. I think the KGL beat them before they disbanded?  Can't remember.

But the 91st never got trashed by the 5pp

Or 1stKGL!

That's why I'm talking about a groupfight. But sure, stay delusional for what it's worth.