Author Topic: NWL - Referees  (Read 20695 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DasBrot

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1076
  • Inventor of NWL, Leader of 6te
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
NWL - Referees
« on: May 27, 2016, 08:16:08 pm »



This thread provides a list with all current official referees of NWL.
Regimental leaders can post their ref requests in this thread as well as
complaints about them. If you wish to, please provide proof eg. screenshots
or unedited video footage.

You can also upvote refs after a match here. Please do that objectively,
as the rating should be both informational for regiments and motivational           
for referees. We can use the feedback to improve our referees' performances.
To upvote, post a short summary of your experience with that ref.
This includes matches of the past few matchdays.
Rating form
Match:
Referee:
Statement:
Grade (optional):
[close]

Referees can also ask questions about refereeing and handling certain situations       
in this thread.

You want to become a referee? Post an application in this thread.
Quote
Ingame - Name:
Regiment:
Steam Link:
Admin experience, references:
Former NWL ref?







72nd_Wüstenfuchs
72nd_Darktemplar
72nd_Slade
72nd_Scrootch
72nd_Gerd_Stegemann
72nd_Pheon!x
AlekoTheGreek
18e_Krowbar
8th_Hursty
2te_Horstel
6te_Brot
6te_Elias
6te_Hablab
66th_Salakien
77y_Myghtypain
77y_Highlord
78th_Etheron
59th_Hypno
9e_NickCole


[/td][/tr][/table]
« Last Edit: March 29, 2018, 07:12:07 pm by DasBrot »

Offline Wolfster

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 4365
  • 44th best th
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Referees
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2016, 09:27:02 pm »
Match: 44th vs 3pp
Referee: Rommel
Statement: Didn't slay or reset a round for officer aim. Even after losing the round.
Grade: (+ or -) -

Match: 44th vs 1stKGL
Referee: Ragnar
Statement: Overall good admin, good decisions etc...
Grade: (+ or -) +

Match: 44th vs 42nd
Referee: Temp representative; Layneb.
Statement: Overall good admin, was not one sided.
Grade: (+ or -) +

Match: 44th vs 25th
Referee: Cazasar
Statement: Good referee, not one sided at all.
Grade: (+ or -) +

Match: 44th vs 4eGren
Referee: Sp00ns
Statement: Good referee, slayed fairly etc...
Grade: (+ or -) +

Match: 44th vs 72nd
Referee: Wustenfuchs
Statement: Decent referee overall but he did slay for gaps.
Grade: (+ or -) Not good, but not bad.


Offline 88th Infantry Regiment

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 92
    • View Profile
Re: Referees
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2016, 10:04:46 pm »
Match: 88th vs 16pp
Referee: Nock
Statement: Good referee, good guy.
Grade: (+ or -) +, 10/10

Match: 88th vs 88y
Referee: Chicken
Statement: Good referee, good guy.
Grade: (+ or -) +, 10/10

Match: 88th vs 17e
Referee: Yoshi
Statement: bad referee, shit guy.
Grade: (+ or -) -, 2/10

Offline DasBrot

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1076
  • Inventor of NWL, Leader of 6te
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Referees
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2016, 10:13:33 pm »
Match: 88th vs 16pp
Referee: Nock
Statement: Good referee, good guy.
Grade: (+ or -) +, 10/10

Match: 88th vs 88y
Referee: Chicken
Statement: Good referee, good guy.
Grade: (+ or -) +, 10/10

Match: 88th vs 17e
Referee: Yoshi
Statement: bad referee, shit guy.
Grade: (+ or -) -, 2/10

Would you please be a bit more precise about why they are good/bad? This is especially required if you mark ppl with a minus.

Offline Salakien

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2714
  • Execute order 66 .
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Doublebread´s husband basically.
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Referees
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2016, 10:29:05 pm »
Im fked now :D

Offline DasBrot

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 1076
  • Inventor of NWL, Leader of 6te
    • View Profile
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Referees
« Reply #5 on: May 27, 2016, 10:51:46 pm »
I've decided to remove the minus stuff, I don't want this to end in a bashing thread.

Keep in mind that referees sacrifice time and effort for your match. Usually the only thing they get for it is hate and salt. I want to change that a bit by giving you the possibility to actually thank referees.

Offline Johann Aubke

  • Sergeant Major
  • *
  • Posts: 74
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Harris
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: Referees
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2016, 10:55:18 pm »
I've decided to remove the minus stuff, I don't want this to end in a bashing thread.

Keep in mind that referees sacrifice time and effort for your match. Usually the only thing they get for it is hate and salt. I want to change that a bit by giving you the possibility to actually thank referees.

Rip

Offline Salakien

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 2714
  • Execute order 66 .
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Doublebread´s husband basically.
  • Side: Neutral
Re: Referees
« Reply #7 on: May 27, 2016, 10:57:46 pm »
Keep that minus pls , referee list that we met this seasson

Match: 66pp vs 17th
Ref : Harris + (Great sense about formation of the lines , did great job and have a good sense of humour in internal admin chat) 10/10

Match: 66pp vs 51st
Ref : Harris + Same 10/10

Match: 66Pp vs 63e
Ref: Acid 5/10 well i have to say you didnt wait for my accept of the map and did not slay few fic from 63e but you catch 90% of problems from that match

Match : 66Pp vs 6te
Ref :  Abe  + 66/77 one of the best refs of this seasson :) funny and just for every regiment

Offline Mitchell

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 1298
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 45thN_Mitchell
  • Side: Union
Re: NWL - Referees
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2016, 04:02:19 pm »
1stKGL vs 61e, we still need a referee for tonight, is anybody available to ref? (Match is at 7:00pm GMT)

Online John Price

  • Block guys what is this!?
  • General
  • ****
  • Posts: 21381
  • Destroyer of RGL
    • View Profile
  • Side: Union
Re: NWL - Referees
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2016, 04:15:02 pm »
but I want to do a minus :'(

Need a reff for 1v1 against 77y tonight.
Knightmare is from Albania, no?
Sorry, I can't accept this team.

Offline Helvete

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Helvete
  • Side: Union
Re: NWL - Referees
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2016, 09:12:00 pm »
Petrograd_LG vs 46e
Referee: Chieef -
I suppose, he's a good referee if both regiments are french. 2 absolutely not fair decisions, changed the score of the whole match in the good of 46e.

Offline Faze

  • First Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1724
  • 46e ; Sultans , Faze Clan xdptdr
    • View Profile
  • Nick: 46e_Col_Faze
  • Side: Neutral
Re: NWL - Referees
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2016, 09:17:29 pm »
We agreed to play the match while they were only 14. Meanwhile, Petrograd started insulting us and the admin.
Coucou, ça te dis un morceau de pain?

Offline Helvete

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Helvete
  • Side: Union
Re: NWL - Referees
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2016, 09:21:19 pm »
We agreed to play the match while they were only 14. Meanwhile, Petrograd started insulting us and the admin.
Sure thing, some of my men was writing in all-chat. Im sorry for that, our matches with other regiments was more disciplined. But you cannot deny, that referee did everything he could to make you win.

Offline Chieef

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 1676
  • Corporate Lawyer in the City of London.
    • View Profile
  • Side: Confederacy
Re: NWL - Referees
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2016, 09:22:54 pm »
You FoL's the majority of the rounds and global insulted multiple times. We started the game much later after having waited for you to get only 14 men on, please be more grateful for my time. Either way I don't mind a little criticism but please don't accuse me of being biased since I have no reason to be anyway. :)

Offline Helvete

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
  • Nick: Helvete
  • Side: Union
Re: Referees
« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2016, 09:23:16 pm »
I've decided to remove the minus stuff, I don't want this to end in a bashing thread.
Well, damn. But still, our match wasnt fair in these 2 incidents.