Hey, so serious question. I would like to know the general community viewing of the 4th and myself as it's leader. Not looking to start a banter fest in any way, I am just curious. I may reply but don't take it in any way that is like "mad" and such I just am open to having civil discussion about the regiment from my perspective as well as yours and how they relate. I'd prefer long replies similar to that one that was written for Irish about the 6te because it was informative. Yknow, the one that Risk uses as his sig.
Thanks guys.
Spoiler
Just want to re-iterate that I am not looking to cause conflict, just an exchange of opinions and perspectives. The title of being a "good leader" or running a "good regiment" doesn't mean very much to me since I left the scene a little over a year ago. I do believe in my own opinion that I was a decent leader, likely better organizationally then I was on the battlefield but i was alright there too. I felt the 4th was really good at times and not so good at others. Very much lacked consistency.
