Flying Squirrel Entertainment

Mount & Blade Warband: Napoleonic Wars => Events: EU => Community => Competitive EU Events/Tournaments => Topic started by: 33rdKincaid on June 21, 2019, 02:39:57 pm

Title: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on June 21, 2019, 02:39:57 pm
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48046218442_65c6cf0972_o.png)


Introduction


Welcome to the NWBC - a revival of the tournament of the same name, from back in 2016! The general concept of this tournament is to pitch large pre-arranged teams against each other, to apply a more competitive and coordinated atmosphere to otherwise typical NW Linebattles.

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48099748296_bed02d20d1_o.png)

Noteable differences from the previous iteration of this league:

-  Fire in Charge has been removed for all classes.
-  Minimum player count has been reduced from 70 to 50.
-  Artillery can still included but must be agreed upon by both teams, on a match by match basis.
-  Each team is required to maintain a 1:1 ratio of Line to Specials in their team  at all times.
-  A range of custom maps added, ranging in terrain and size.
-  Changed format to a 2-group stage to start (sign-up dependant), then proceeding to single-elimination with an Upper & Lower bracket (1st & 2nd place claimed in the upper, 3rd in the lower).


Accepted Sign-Ups: 8/8
Spoiler
Group Name: The Cool Casuals
Group Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/nobomin/, https://steamcommunity.com/id/mountandblade4life/
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: Any  :)

Regiment #1 Name: 19th Yorkshire Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 25-30
Preferred Class: Infantry, Cav, Skirms and Arty
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/nobomin/

Regiment #2 Name: 1st Evil Brigade
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/mountandblade4life/

Regiment #3 Name: 1st Call to Arms
Estimated Attendance: ~15
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198454766130/
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Oberst Ipoa (http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197991510567/), Oberst Faser (https://steamcommunity.com/id/faser40/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: !YES!
Preferred Faction: Prussia

Regiment #1 Name: 2. Leib-Regiment
Estimated Attendance: 40
Preferred Class: Cav, Inf, Arty, Skirms
Contacts (Steam ID): Oberst Ipoa (http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197991510567/), Rittmeister Adelon (https://steamcommunity.com/id/xXAdelonXx/), Leutnant Lakuna (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198366042311/), Feuerwerkshauptmann Mogawolf (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198040002360/), Hauptmann Hansel (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198018518111/)

Regiment #2 Name:Infanterie-Regiment Herwarth v. Bittenfeld (1. Westfälisches) Nr. 13
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Inf
Contacts (Steam ID): Oberst Faser (https://steamcommunity.com/id/faser40/)
Group Name: The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Mitchell (https://steamcommunity.com/id/2ndMitchell/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: UK

Regiment #1 Name: 2nd Queen's Royal Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-40
Preferred Class: Line, Rifles, Artillery
Contacts (Steam ID): KGL - Mitchell (https://steamcommunity.com/id/2ndMitchell/), CR - Voluble (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198141137472/), KGA - Sam (https://steamcommunity.com/id/51stSam/)

Regiment #2 Name: 10thRH RRA
Estimated Attendance: 8-12
Preferred Class: Cav
Contacts (Steam ID): Grozni (https://steamcommunity.com/id/grozni/)

Regiment #3 Name: 92nd Gordon's Highlanders Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): Wolffe (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198166480987/)

Regiment #3 Name: 98° Reggimento di Parma
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): Ritsoko (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198156190219/)
Group Name: The Best Alliance
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Señor Noel (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SchnoezelausModor/) |  Barlinkraut (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197984993202/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: United Kingdom

Regiment #1 Name: 2nd 'Hessian' Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-40
Preferred Class: Line, Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Jakob van Bicke [Line] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198099015972/) | Flash [Lights/Skirms] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198117445124/) | Artigo [Cavalry] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198092096513/)

Regiment #2 Name: Feld Artillerie Regiment Prinz August von Preußen Nr.1
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Artillery, Line
Contacts (Steam ID):Karass [Line]  (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198026317198) | Two Steps [Arty] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198065902259)

Regiment #3 Name: 56e Régiment d'infanterie
Estimated Attendance: 20-30
Preferred Class: Line, lights
Contacts (Steam ID): Aggofan [Line], [url=https://steamcommunity.com/id/LadyNaomi/]Naomi [Lights]
 (https://steamcommunity.com/id/AggofanCZ/)
Group Name: The French coalition
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Steam ID:  DragonKing  (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: probably yes
Preferred Faction: France

Regiment #1 Name: 10. Pułk Kirasjerów
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: heavy cav
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/

Regiment #2 Name: 2eFusGre
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198120430703
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198161469447

Regiment #3 Name: 2e Régiment d'infanterie légère
Estimated Attendance: 10-12
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Dalinky

Regiment #4 Name: 8e régiment d'artillerie
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Art
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujinhttps://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujin

Regiment #5 Name:61e Régiment d'infanterie
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/lecourbe/
Group Name: The Old Guard
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Kaide: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198042695689/ Krytenn: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198023332890/ Hursty:https://steamcommunity.com/id/HurstyMB/ Wookie: https://steamcommunity.com/id/elWookie/
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: UK

Regiment #1 Name: 59th Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-35
Preferred Class: Line, Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): (See Above) Kaide, Krytenn, Hursty (Line) Wookie (Lights)

Regiment #2 Name: 77y
Estimated Attendance: 15 Line + 10 Arty
Preferred Class: Line + Artillery
Contacts (Steam ID): Gaz: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198009894136/ Aztir: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198009894136/ Highlord: https://steamcommunity.com/id/77yTheHighLord

Regiment #3 Name: Nr4
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Felix: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Felix5557/
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Spoons (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdSpoons/), Lieutenant Colonel Kincaid (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdKincaid/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: No
Preferred Faction: UK

Regiment #1 Name: 33rd Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 35-40
Preferred Class: Lights, Line, Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Spoons (Lights) (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdSpoons/), Lieutenant Colonel Kincaid (Line) (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdKincaid/), Captain Tylerus (Cavalry) (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TylerusUK/)

Regiment #2 Name: 1stelvN
Estimated Attendance:1 15-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198013728828/
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Ulfur (https://steamcommunity.com/id/UlfurtheWolf/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: No
Preferred Faction: United Kingdom

Regiment #1 Name: 40th (2nd Somersetshire) Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-40
Preferred Class: Infantry & Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Ulfur, (https://steamcommunity.com/id/UlfurtheWolf/) Major Namelol [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheNamelol/)  (http://) Lieutenant Sam [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SamChocola/) Quartermaster Norwegian [Cavalry], (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198028707328/) Lance Corporal Odin [Cavalry] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198170942785/)

Regiment #2 Name: 57th Turkish Regiment
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): DeliTürk[57th General], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/generaldeliturk/)  Colonel Ibraham Pasha[57th Colonel], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Ibrahim_Pasha/) Mordeviesta[57th Lt Colonel], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Mordeviesta/)

Regiment #3 Name: kk_Legion
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): kRIEGER[Unterlieutnant], (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198045784473/) Prophet[Gefreyter],
 (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198007480838/)
[close]

Current Regiments (Looking for Groups):
Spoiler
Regiment Name: 26th "The Cameronian" Regiment of foot
Estimated Attendance: 10+
Preferred Class: Line
Preferred Faction: UK
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Whitelocke69/
Quote
Regiment #2 Name: 2tes Garde-Feldartillerie-Regiment von Liechtenstein
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Artillery
Contacts (Steam ID):  Nightwing (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198192985946/)
[close]

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48099717846_058235f120_o.png)




Participants


| Group A |

   
Referees:


                                       
The Cool Casuals
(CC)

Group Contacts (Steam ID): El Presidente (https://steamcommunity.com/id/nobomin/), Romulus (https://steamcommunity.com/id/mountandblade4life/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: UK
Spoiler
Regiment #1 Name: 19th Yorkshire Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 25-30
Preferred Class: Infantry, Cav, Skirms and Arty
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/nobomin/

Regiment #2 Name: 1st Evil Brigade
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/mountandblade4life/

Regiment #3 Name: 1st Call to Arms
Estimated Attendance: ~15
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198454766130/
[close]


The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out
(GBT)

Group Contacts (Steam ID): Mitchell (https://steamcommunity.com/id/2ndMitchell/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: UK
Spoiler
Regiment #1 Name: 2nd Queen's Royal Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-40
Preferred Class: Line, Rifles, Artillery
Contacts (Steam ID): KGL - Mitchell (https://steamcommunity.com/id/2ndMitchell/), CR - Voluble (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198141137472/), KGA - Sam (https://steamcommunity.com/id/51stSam/)

Regiment #2 Name: 10thRH RRA
Estimated Attendance: 8-12
Preferred Class: Cav
Contacts (Steam ID): Grozni (https://steamcommunity.com/id/grozni/)

Regiment #3 Name: 92nd Gordon's Highlanders Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): Wolffe (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198166480987/)

Regiment #3 Name: 98° Reggimento di Parma
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): Ritsoko (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198156190219/)
[close]
                             
The Best Alliance
(TBA)

Group Contacts (Steam ID): Señor Noel (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SchnoezelausModor/) |  Barlinkraut (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197984993202/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: United Kingdom
Spoiler
Regiment #1 Name: 2nd 'Hessian' Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-40
Preferred Class: Line, Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Jakob van Bicke [Line] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198099015972/) | Flash [Lights/Skirms] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198117445124/) | Artigo [Cavalry] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198092096513/)

Regiment #2 Name: Feld Artillerie Regiment Prinz August von Preußen Nr.1
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Artillery, Line
Contacts (Steam ID):Karass [Line]  (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198026317198) | Two Steps [Arty] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198065902259)

Regiment #3 Name: 56e Régiment d'infanterie
Estimated Attendance: 20-30
Preferred Class: Line, lights
Contacts (Steam ID): Aggofan [Line], [url=https://steamcommunity.com/id/LadyNaomi/]Naomi [Lights]
 (https://steamcommunity.com/id/AggofanCZ/)
[close]


1ste3rdN
(1ste3rdN)

Group Contacts (Steam ID): Spoons (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdSpoons/), Kincaid (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdKincaid/), Robbin (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198013728828/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: No
Preferred Faction: UK
Spoiler
Regiment #1 Name: 33rd Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 35-40
Preferred Class: Lights, Line, Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Spoons (Lights) (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdSpoons/), Lieutenant Colonel Kincaid (Line) (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdKincaid/), Captain Tylerus (Cavalry) (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TylerusUK/)

Regiment #2 Name: 1stelvN
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198013728828/
[close]
                                       



   
Kincaid (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198013174435/)
JakobvanBicke (https://steamcommunity.com/id/7432732735/)
Samu (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SamChocola/)
Stephan (https://steamcommunity.com/id/StephGH/)
El Presidente (https://steamcommunity.com/id/nobomin/)
Cameron (http://steamcommunity.com/id/BooneyBoys/)
Tardet (https://steamcommunity.com/id/MBTardet/)
Noel (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SchnoezelausModor/)
Skitty (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Skittykiller/)
Krytten (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198023332890/)
Grekos (http://steamcommunity.com/id/ GreatLeaderTsipras/)
Kaiser (https://steamcommunity.com/id6561198017683850/)
Anna (https://steamcommunity.com/id/buschinstein/)

Trial Referees:

Must Ref their first match with one of the main Referees

Smokey (https://steamcommunity.com/id/83584105/)
Darkling (https://steamcommunity.com/id/1198073898962/)

| Group B |

      

                                       
Gardekorps
(GK)

Group Contacts (Steam ID): Oberst Ipoa (http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197991510567/), Oberst Faser (https://steamcommunity.com/id/faser40/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: Prussia
Spoiler
Regiment #1 Name: 2. Leib-Regiment
Estimated Attendance: 40
Preferred Class: Cav, Inf, Arty, Skirms
Contacts (Steam ID): Oberst Ipoa (http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197991510567/), Rittmeister Adelon (https://steamcommunity.com/id/xXAdelonXx/), Leutnant Lakuna (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198366042311/), Feuerwerkshauptmann Mogawolf (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198040002360/), Hauptmann Hansel (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198018518111/)

Regiment #2 Name:Infanterie-Regiment Herwarth v. Bittenfeld (1. Westfälisches) Nr. 13
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Inf
Contacts (Steam ID): Oberst Faser (https://steamcommunity.com/id/faser40/)
[close]


The French coalition
(FC)

Group Contacts (Steam ID): Steam ID:  DragonKing  (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: France
Spoiler
Regiment #1 Name: 10. Pułk Kirasjerów
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: heavy cav
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/

Regiment #2 Name: 2eFusGre
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198120430703
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198161469447

Regiment #3 Name: 2e Régiment d'infanterie légère
Estimated Attendance: 10-12
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Dalinky

Regiment #4 Name: 8e régiment d'artillerie
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Art
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujinhttps://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujin

Regiment #5 Name:61e Régiment d'infanterie
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/lecourbe/
[close]
                             
The Old Guard
(OG)

Group Contacts (Steam ID) Kaide (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198042695689/), Krytenn (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198023332890/), Hursty (https://steamcommunity.com/id/HurstyMB/), Wookie (https://steamcommunity.com/id/elWookie/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: UK
Spoiler
Regiment #1 Name: 59th Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-35
Preferred Class: Line, Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): (See Above) Kaide, Krytenn, Hursty (Line) Wookie (Lights)

Regiment #2 Name: 77y
Estimated Attendance: 15 Line + 10 Arty
Preferred Class: Line + Artillery
Contacts (Steam ID): Gaz: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198009894136/ Aztir: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198009894136/ Highlord: https://steamcommunity.com/id/77yTheHighLord

Regiment #3 Name: Nr4
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Felix: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Felix5557/
[close]


The Central Powers
(CP)

Group Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Ulfur (https://steamcommunity.com/id/UlfurtheWolf/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: No
Preferred Faction: United Kingdom
Spoiler
Regiment #1 Name: 40th (2nd Somersetshire) Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-40
Preferred Class: Infantry & Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Ulfur, (https://steamcommunity.com/id/UlfurtheWolf/) Major Namelol [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheNamelol/)  (http://) Lieutenant Sam [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SamChocola/) Quartermaster Norwegian [Cavalry], (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198028707328/) Lance Corporal Odin [Cavalry] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198170942785/)

Regiment #2 Name: 57th Turkish Regiment
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): DeliTürk[57th General], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/generaldeliturk/)  Colonel Ibraham Pasha[57th Colonel], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Ibrahim_Pasha/) Mordeviesta[57th Lt Colonel], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Mordeviesta/)

Regiment #3 Name: kk_Legion
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): kRIEGER[Unterlieutnant], (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198045784473/) Prophet[Gefreyter], (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198007480838/)
[close]
                                       
      





Rules


1. Basic rules

   
2. Rule-breaks

   
3. Attendance

   
4. Matches

1.1  FiC, RiC & OA is not allowed for any, by any units (though OA on any class bar lines will likely only result in a revive for the victim, not a slay for the offender - see rule breaks).

1.2  Sign-up coalitions should consist of Line, Lights and cavalry as a minimum. Artillery may also be included in your sign-up but depending on your opponent there is no guarantee that they will be able to play as that class.

1.3  All Charges may be called (Ref discretion) if either; both teams are considered camping (see rule-breaks) or if 10mins of the round have elapsed.
   2.1  Should any rule-breaks occur the victim will always be eligible for a revive. A slay may also be issued to the offender if the rule-break was potentially deliberate (discretion of the referee); for example a cross-map Officer aim will only result in a revive for the officer, not a slay of the shooter.

2.2  If either team is considered to be camping (neither attempting to gain or give ground) for a prolonged period of time the referee may issue a warning. Should the warning be ignored the team may be forced to forfeit the round. If BOTH teams are considered to be camping the referee may resolve the round with an 'all charge'.
   3.1  Minimum attendance to matches is 50 players, consisting of at least 50% Line infantry regardless of the special limits specified below. Should one team bring less, the opposition may still field at least 50. If teams bring greater than 50 players, the maximum one team can outnumber the other is dependant on the number of players the smaller team has:
-  50-59 (+3)
-  60-69 (+4)
-  70+   (+5)

2.3  Regiments Hugging the edge of the map either individually to fight cavalry or en masse to avoid fighting or to delay is not permitted. The latter is largely subjective and down to ref discretion. Warnings to be issued as with the camping rule.

3.2  Both teams must balance their teams to the above restrictions within the first 30 seconds of each round (notified by refs). Should any team not action a drop in players specified by the ref during this time period, they will either reset the round to give the team further time or slay at random to achieve balance (do not try the refs patience!). After this 30 second spawn period the round is Live and no revives or balancing by the teams (as a result of disconnects) will be required.

3.3  This tournament will not use GUID's for obvious reasons, we do however reserve the right to disqualify the offending coalition if excessive inviting is discovered. Inviting from other regiments which are also participating in the tournament will not be tolerated if discovered, regardless of whether this is excessive or not.
   4.1  Matches will consist of 4 rounds on one custom map (with a side swap). After 10mins from the arranged time have elapsed, either side has the right to force the match to begin. To keep the tournament as active and snappy as possible, we will be using the 1 match per week system which most leagues of this kind use.

4.2  Matches should be fought in the order specified in the brackets. Should any match run over into a second week it is expected that those regiments play two matches in that week, to keep pace with the rest of the attendees.

4.3  Matches should be overseen by at least 2 referees.

4.4  Should either of the participants of match or the ref wish to, all-chat can be disallowed. Warnings may be issues if members do not observe this rule.

5. Lights

   
6. Lines

   
7. Cavalry

   
8. Artillery

5.1  15 Max, including officer
5.2  May spread up to 5-man spacing
5.3  May crouch
5.4  May manoeuvre spread out
5.5  Must take either Lights or Rifles (not both)
5.6  Must stop all firing/reloading as soon as any member of the unit is in charge; should that player die and the rest of the unit escape (partaking in no attacks or blocks) for a reasonable period of time, they can be considered no longer in charge (ref discretion)
5.7  Must join a line when numbers drop below 5 (when not in charge)
   6.1  Minimum of 12 per line, teams must consist of 50% Line at all times
6.2  May crouch when out of action (neither shooting nor reloading)
6.3  Fix gaps before shooting
6.4  Must not Fire our of Line (FoL)
6.5  Must maintain close formation whilst manoeuvring (2-3 man gaps)
6.6  Must join a friendly unit when numbers drop below 5 (when not in charge)
   7.1  15 Max, including officer
7.2  May stay mounted during 'All-Charge'
-  Lancers & Light dragoons are not permitted
7.3  Must maintain formation whilst manoeuvring
7.4  Must not engage more than 1 units (unless two or more are in close proximity)
7.5  Must dismount and join a friendly unit when numbers drop below 5 (when not in charge)
7.6  Must consistently attack the unit it has charged to be considered 'in charge' (1 or 2 horseman left must make an effort to engage and not stall for an extended period of time)
   8.1  10 Max, including officer, Sapper & Train
8.2  May spread up to 5-man spacing
8.3  May use 1 or 2 pieces, agreed upon by both teams before starting
8.4  May use 1 howitzer if using 2 pieces
8.5  May make use of 40 Build points to construct defences
8.6  Crew must stay together at all times
8.7  Must join a friendly unit when numbers drop below 3 (when not in charge)
8.8  Use of Artillery must be agreed upon by both regiments prior to match




Custom Map Selection


Plains


Forest


Snow


Desert

Flat
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271941437_6a82197fc0_c.jpg)
[close]
Low Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271862031_b6d02d1aa0_c.jpg)
[close]
Medium Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271941272_8c4f51aca8_c.jpg)
[close]
River
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271861896_9b7e7e38d4_c.jpg)
[close]
Flat
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271941137_e5ff4776e5_c.jpg)
[close]
Low Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271940992_36e649c345_c.jpg)
[close]
Medium Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271940892_772c57c130_c.jpg)
[close]
River
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271940727_798e21684c_c.jpg)
[close]
Flat
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271861296_20d9a3584b_c.jpg)
[close]
Low Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271861246_e9335dd77c_c.jpg)
[close]
Medium Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271861176_0d04b2648f_c.jpg)
[close]
River
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271940417_06f7bd3c2b_c.jpg)
[close]
Flat
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271861056_de7c7264c1_c.jpg)
[close]
Low Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271940362_215d3f9666_c.jpg)
[close]
Medium Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271860976_f92ddc49ea_c.jpg)
[close]
River
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271860936_731617ce48_c.jpg)
[close]




Sign-up Templates


Regiment (looking for a group)
Code
Regiment Name:
Estimated Attendance:
Preferred Class:
Preferred Faction:
Contacts (Steam ID):


Group (min 50 attendance)
Code
Group Name:
Group Contacts (Steam ID):
Signing-up with Artillery?:
Preferred Faction:

Regiment #1 Name:
Estimated Attendance:
Preferred Class:
Contacts (Steam ID):

Regiment #2 Name:
Estimated Attendance:
Preferred Class:
Contacts (Steam ID):

Regiment #3 Name:
Estimated Attendance:
Preferred Class:
Contacts (Steam ID):


Referee Application
Code
Steam ID:
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?)
Prior experience/comment:


Match booking
Code
Match week:
Participants:
Involved classes:
Date/Time:
Referee #1:
Referee #2:




Tournament Contacts:


(https://steamsignature.com/profile/english/76561198013174435.png) (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198013174435/)
[/td][/tr][/table]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: 33rdKincaid on June 21, 2019, 02:40:09 pm
Introduction

Please Note:


Depending on sign-ups we are looking at a vague start date of late July at present, in order to be sufficiently ahead of time that we don't impact other regiment tournaments planned in September. All being good I estimate NWBC to last around a month and a half; 3-4 weeks for the group stage and 2-3 weeks for the final stage.

I strongly encourage all sign-ups to be as pessimistic with your attendance estimates as possible and try to make sure the lower bracket of your estimates ends up greater than 50! This will help hugely when it comes to flexibility of arranging matches, help compensate for individual regiment drop-outs and help compensate from loss of numbers if other events overlap this tournament. On a positive note, this should also allow for some of the matches attendance to soar above 50 when none of the annoying things above occur (hopefully)!!

Any questions please direct them to me, or consult the discussion thread I posted a few weeks prior, as this may have the answers... https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=41829.0
[close]
| Match-week 1 | 22nd July

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48317582506_e08d17ef24_o.png)



|  Group A  |

|  Group B  |



The Cool Casuals 2 - 2 The Best Alliance



Gardekorps 3 - 1 The Central Powers


The Good the Bad & the Timed-out 4 - 0 1ste3rdN


The Old Guard 4 - 0 The French Coalition
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

[close]
| Match-week 2 | 29th July


(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48348629877_c629e7eb05_o.png)



|  Group A  |

|  Group B  |



The Cool Casuals 0 - 4 1ste3rdN



Gardekorps 1 - 3 The Old Guard


The Good the Bad & the Timed-out 3 - 1 The Best Alliance


The French Coalition 4 - 0 The Central Powers
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

[close]
| Match-week 3 | 5th August


(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48348629782_de54a3c4cd_o.png)



|  Group A  |

|  Group B  |



The Cool Casuals 4 - 0 The Good the Bad & the Timed-out



Gardekorps 3 - 1 The French Coalition


The Best Alliance 1 - 3 1ste3rdN


The Central Powers     VS     The Old Guard
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

[close]
| Semi-Finals | 26th August

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48595661182_b8328583f1_o.png)



|  Upper Bracket  |

|  Lower Bracket  |



1ste3rdN     VS     The Old Guard



The Cool Casuals 4 - 0 The Central Powers


The Good the Bad & the Time-out 3 - 2 GardeKorps


The Best Alliance 1 - 3 The French Coalition
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

[close]
| Final | 2nd September
[close]
| Score table |
  Group A 

|                       Team                       |
|  Won  |
|  Lost  |
|  Draw  |
|  Rounds  |
The Good the Bad & the Timed-out
2
1
0
(7)
1ste3rdN
2
1
0
(7)
The Cool Casuals
1
1
1
(6)
The Best Alliance
0
2
1
(4)
     
  Group B 

|                       Team                       |
|  Won  |
|  Lost  |
|  Draw  |
|  Rounds  |
The Old Guard
3
0
0
(11)
GardeKorps
2
1
0
(7)
The French Coalition
1
2
0
(5)
The Central Powers
0
3
0
(1)
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Tardet on June 21, 2019, 02:45:36 pm
Glad you got to make this project a reality Kincaid. Will likely not play myself but might consider signing up as a referee if I have availabilities in late July. Good luck with the organisation!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: DragonKing on June 21, 2019, 02:56:03 pm
an interesting format to follow
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Señor Noel on June 21, 2019, 04:04:10 pm
Group Name: TBA (The Best Alliance)
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Señor Noel (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SchnoezelausModor/) |  Barlinkraut (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197984993202/) |  AggofanCZ (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198030012743/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: United Kingdom

Regiment #1 Name: 2nd 'Hessian' Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-40
Preferred Class: Line, Light, Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Jakob van Bicke [Line] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198099015972/) | Flash [Lights/Skirms] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198117445124/) | Artigo [Cavalry] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198092096513/)

Regiment #2 Name: Feld Artillerie Regiment Prinz August von Preußen Nr.1
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Artillery, Line
Contacts (Steam ID):Karass [Line]  (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198026317198) | Two Steps [Arty] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198065902259)

Regiment #3 Name: 56e
Estimated Attendance: Line ca 20 / Light ca 10
Preferred Class: Line/ Light
Contacts (Steam ID):  AggofanCZ (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198030012743/)

Regiment #4 Name: 2tesGFR
Estimated Attendance: 5-10
Preferred Class: fill the ranks
Contacts (Steam ID): Nightwing (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Nachtfluegel/)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Jakob van Bicke on June 21, 2019, 04:25:05 pm
Referee Application

Steam ID:  JakobvanBicke  (https://steamcommunity.com/id/7432732735/)
In Regiment participating?: yes, 2nd 'Hessian' Regiment of Foot
Prior experience/comment: admin in a few linebattles and lots of 1vs1s. Would love to see "Wüstis admintool 2.0" installed on the server as it doesn't really work with custom maps without being installed on the server
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Dokletian on June 21, 2019, 05:35:31 pm
Best of luck!

looking good
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: King_George on June 22, 2019, 12:38:15 am
Good luck bae  ;D 8) 8) :-*
(https://media.giphy.com/media/IEL7TVu4JMjok/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: ~Felix~ on June 22, 2019, 10:01:03 pm
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): -
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: Prussia

Regiment #1 Name: Schlesisches Husaren-Regiment „GrafVonZieten“ Nr.4
Estimated Attendance: 10-15
Preferred Class: Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID):  Felix (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/Felix55557)

Regiment #2 Name: 2tes Garde-Feldartillerie-Regiment von Liechtenstein
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Artillery
Contacts (Steam ID):  Nightwing (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198192985946/)

Regiment #3 Name: TBA
Estimated Attendance: TBA
Preferred Class: TBA
Contacts (Steam ID): TBA
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Vegi. on June 23, 2019, 10:20:15 am
Regiment Name: 92nd Gordon's Highlanders Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 15 - 20 Line and 8 - 14 Lights
Preferred Class: Line and Light
Preferred Faction: UK
Contacts (Steam ID):
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198166480987
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198090772038
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198182697275
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: [2ndHess] lukasoh on June 23, 2019, 10:52:04 am
Regiment Name: 92nd Gordon's Highlanders Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 15 - 20 Line and 8 - 14 Lights
Preferred Class: Line and Light
Preferred Faction: UK
Contacts (Steam ID):
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198166480987
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198090772038
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198182697275
Not sure if you doining this right ::)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Jakob van Bicke on June 23, 2019, 01:26:42 pm
Regiment Name: 92nd Gordon's Highlanders Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 15 - 20 Line and 8 - 14 Lights
Preferred Class: Line and Light
Preferred Faction: UK
Contacts (Steam ID):
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198166480987
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198090772038
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198182697275
Not sure if you doining this right ::)

He is. There's a different sign up template for regiments that don't have a group yet
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Cameron. on June 23, 2019, 01:48:38 pm
looks sexc
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: 26th_Official on June 23, 2019, 07:19:58 pm
Regiment Name: 26th "The Cameronian" Regiment of foot
Estimated Attendance: 10+
Preferred Class: Line
Preferred Faction: UK
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Whitelocke69/
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: DragonKing on June 23, 2019, 11:56:52 pm
Group Name: French coalition
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Steam ID:  DragonKing  (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: probably yes
Preferred Faction: France

Regiment #1 Name: 10. Pułk Kirasjerów
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: heavy cav
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/

Regiment #2 Name: 2eFusGre
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198120430703
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198161469447

Regiment #3 Name: 2e Régiment d'infanterie légère
Estimated Attendance: 10/12
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Dalinky

Regiment #4 Name: 8e régiment d'artillerie
Estimated Attendance: 10/12
Preferred Class: Art
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujinhttps://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujin

Regiment #5 Name:61e Régiment d'infanterie
Estimated Attendance: ~ 15
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/lecourbe/
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: 33rdKincaid on June 24, 2019, 10:17:08 am
Thanks very much for all the Applications and the votes of confidence thus far!! ;D

I have added all Regiment & Group applications to the lead post and will continue to do so daily. Any newcomers take a look here to see if you may be perfect to fill certain gaps or team up with other applicants.

Also worth noting that the 8 teams total suggested is just an ideal, we could move forward to play with more or less.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Herishey on June 24, 2019, 10:21:51 am
Good luck.  :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Muhataa on June 24, 2019, 11:32:04 am
Good luck.  :)
good luck to me
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Vegi. on June 24, 2019, 11:33:35 am
If someone likes to play Arty and Cav with us, hit me up on steam, so we can make a group.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: El_Presidente on June 24, 2019, 01:30:58 pm
Group Name: The Cool Casuals
Group Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/nobomin/, https://steamcommunity.com/id/mountandblade4life/
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: Any  :)

Regiment #1 Name: 19th Yorkshire Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 25-30
Preferred Class: Infantry, Cav, Skirms and Arty
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/nobomin/

Regiment #2 Name: 1st Evil Brigade
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/mountandblade4life/

Regiment #3 Name: 1st Call to Arms
Estimated Attendance: ~15
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198454766130/

I've put extremely pessimistic numbers like you asked for us all. I honestly think we should get more than this, we're currently in negotiations with the 1stCTA about adding them to our team as well though  :). If not we'll look for another nice casual reg.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: sirkaide on June 24, 2019, 09:59:12 pm
It would be nice to add that the 59th lead coalition won the previous NWBC!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: 33rdKincaid on June 24, 2019, 10:04:10 pm
It would be nice to add that the 59th lead coalition won the previous NWBC!
Yes indeed; the 15thYR, 63e & 59th Coalition won back in 2016.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: sirkaide on June 24, 2019, 10:05:17 pm
It would be nice to add that the 59th lead coalition won the previous NWBC!
Yes indeed; the 15thYR, 63e & 59th Coalition won back in 2016.

 Nah the 63e wasn't in it! What are the rules regarding the classes? Do you have to bring arty etc? Can you bring Two lines?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: 33rdKincaid on June 24, 2019, 10:21:55 pm
It would be nice to add that the 59th lead coalition won the previous NWBC!
Yes indeed; the 15thYR, 63e & 59th Coalition won back in 2016.
Nah the 63e wasn't in it! What are the rules regarding the classes? Do you have to bring arty etc? Can you bring Two lines?
For class specific rules check the first post - you don't need to sign-up with arty if you don't wish to. Two lines is fine, provided their numbers operates within the rules on the opening post.
Pretty sure they were, also I forgot the beloved Miquelets aswell...

Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyP1OTlxYcw
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Ipoa on June 26, 2019, 10:37:32 pm
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Oberst Ipoa (http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197991510567/), Oberst Faser (https://steamcommunity.com/id/faser40/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: !YES!
Preferred Faction: Prussia

Regiment #1 Name: 2. Leib-Regiment
Estimated Attendance: 40
Preferred Class: Cav, Inf, Arty, Skirms
Contacts (Steam ID): Oberst Ipoa (http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197991510567/), Rittmeister Adelon (https://steamcommunity.com/id/xXAdelonXx/), Leutnant Lakuna (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198366042311/), Feuerwerkshauptmann Mogawolf (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198040002360/), Hauptmann Hansel (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198018518111/)

Regiment #2 Name:Infanterie-Regiment Herwarth v. Bittenfeld (1. Westfälisches) Nr. 13
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Inf
Contacts (Steam ID): Oberst Faser (https://steamcommunity.com/id/faser40/)

Regiment #3 Name: TBA
Estimated Attendance:
Preferred Class:
Contacts (Steam ID):
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Mitchell on June 27, 2019, 02:32:24 am
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Mitchell (https://steamcommunity.com/id/2ndMitchell/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: UK

Regiment #1 Name: 2nd Queen's Royal Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 25-35
Preferred Class: Line, Rifles, Artillery
Contacts (Steam ID): KGL - Mitchell (https://steamcommunity.com/id/2ndMitchell/), CR - Voluble (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198141137472/), KGA - Sam (https://steamcommunity.com/id/51stSam/)

Regiment #2 Name: 10thRH RRA
Estimated Attendance: 8-12
Preferred Class: Cav
Contacts (Steam ID): Grozni (https://steamcommunity.com/id/grozni/)

Regiment #3 Name: 92nd Gordon's Highlanders Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): Wolffe (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198166480987/)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: El_Presidente on June 27, 2019, 05:59:58 am
I've added the CTA to our group application!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: 33rdKincaid on June 27, 2019, 09:29:29 am
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Spoons (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdSpoons/), Lieutenant Colonel Kincaid (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdKincaid/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: No
Preferred Faction: UK

Regiment #1 Name: 33rd Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-50
Preferred Class: Lights, Line, Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Spoons (Lights) (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdSpoons/), Lieutenant Colonel Kincaid (Line) (https://steamcommunity.com/id/33rdKincaid/), Captain Tylerus (Cavalry) (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TylerusUK/)

Regiment #2 Name: TBA
Estimated Attendance:
Preferred Class: Inf
Contacts (Steam ID):



Update:


Some brilliant groups coming together so far guys and thanks for being pessimistic with the numbers - it'll really help when we start off!! As we're approaching the 8 team limit I'll say this about any applications beyond this total: an odd number of final sign-ups will result in a reserve (in case any drop-out) but an even number we may be able to accommodate by expanding the groups. The final stage will end up looking abit whacky but we can seed those based off points scored in the group stages when we get there.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Krytenn on June 28, 2019, 02:41:27 pm
Group Name: The Old Guard
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Kaide: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198042695689/ Krytenn: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198023332890/ Hursty:https://steamcommunity.com/id/HurstyMB/ Wookie: https://steamcommunity.com/id/elWookie/
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: UK

Regiment #1 Name: 59th Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-35
Preferred Class: Line + Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): (See Above) Kaide, Krytenn, Hursty (Line) Wookie (Lights)

Regiment #2 Name: 77y
Estimated Attendance: 15 Line + 10 Arty
Preferred Class: Line + Artillery
Contacts (Steam ID): Gaz: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198009894136/ Aztir: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198009894136/ Highlord: https://steamcommunity.com/id/77yTheHighLord


Regiment #3 Name: Nr4
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Felix: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Felix5557/
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Skittykiller on June 28, 2019, 03:27:25 pm
Sinch my colonel signed up here. I still have a question tho, sinch we signed up as just a line do we have to search for another group to join or will we be assigned to one?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: 33rdKincaid on June 28, 2019, 03:47:39 pm
Sinch my colonel signed up here. I still have a question tho, sinch we signed up as just a line do we have to search for another group to join or will we be assigned to one?
I would have your CO enquire with the current sign-ups, although you could leave this until later - it may be slimmer pickings by then.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Rhen on June 28, 2019, 09:47:46 pm
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Rhen (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Guequierre/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: No
Preferred Faction: United Kingdom

Regiment #1 Name: 40th (2nd Somersetshire) Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-40
Preferred Class: Infantry and Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Rhen, (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Guequierre/) Major Namelol [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheNamelol/)  (http://) Lieutenant Sam [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SamChocola/) Cornet Akimoto [Cavalry] (https://steamcommunity.com/id/StephGH/)

Regiment #2 Name:
Estimated Attendance:
Preferred Class:
Contacts (Steam ID):

Regiment #3 Name:
Estimated Attendance:
Preferred Class:
Contacts (Steam ID):
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Samu on June 28, 2019, 09:49:01 pm
Steam ID: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SamChocola/
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?) 40th
Prior experience/comment: EIC and NWL
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: StephanGH on June 28, 2019, 09:49:40 pm
Steam ID: https://steamcommunity.com/id/StephGH/
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?) 40th
Prior experience/comment: Nr4 Tourney, GH Tourney, GH LB, Few 1v1s here and there.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: El_Presidente on June 29, 2019, 01:01:33 am
Steam ID: https://steamcommunity.com/id/nobomin/
In Regiment participating?: 19th Yorkshire
Prior experience/comment: Linebattle events (33rd ones from ~2013, currently 19th Saturday and Sunday), NRP, a few groupfights/1v1s
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Shadey on June 29, 2019, 03:16:33 am
Bit late, but best of luck with this  :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Vegi. on June 29, 2019, 11:05:48 am
40th and 92nd coalition  :-* :-* :-*
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: StephanGH on June 29, 2019, 03:55:01 pm
40th and 92nd coalition  :-* :-* :-*

Look forward to it :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: El_Presidente on June 29, 2019, 04:23:58 pm
Mitchell's group will need to find a new line if the 92nd are leaving them.

I assume they were told?  :-\
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Vegi. on June 29, 2019, 10:31:31 pm
Mitchell's group will need to find a new line if the 92nd are leaving them.

I assume they were told?  :-\
no shit Sherlock
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: El_Presidente on June 29, 2019, 10:44:47 pm
Mitchell's group will need to find a new line if the 92nd are leaving them.

I assume they were told?  :-\
no shit Sherlock

um, is there any need for that?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Xaos on June 30, 2019, 04:28:07 pm
Mitchell's group will need to find a new line if the 92nd are leaving them.

I assume they were told?  :-\
no shit Sherlock
Thats rude :/
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Rhen on June 30, 2019, 05:00:46 pm
Mitchell's group will need to find a new line if the 92nd are leaving them.

I assume they were told?  :-\
no shit Sherlock

um, is there any need for that?

You're saying that to Vegi
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Smokey_6147 on June 30, 2019, 09:31:26 pm
Steam ID:STEAM_0:0:83584105
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?)59th
Prior experience/comment:EIC,some groupfights and regimental events
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Wolffe on June 30, 2019, 10:46:37 pm
To clear any confusion, 92nd is sticking with the 2nd.
I misinterpreted them accepting another line of with replacing us since I never gave them a valid answer since I after all was still deciding what to do and with who to go.
My apologies to the 40th I’m sure you’ll find someone better to suit your needs and I look forward to fighting you on the field of glory.
Hope this clears it up :D


Ps. Get back in your cage vegi
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Mitchell on June 30, 2019, 11:32:26 pm
As the 92nd have (finally  ;)) decided they are sticking with us, I'll update our application too...  :)

Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Mitchell (https://steamcommunity.com/id/2ndMitchell/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: UK

Regiment #1 Name: 2nd Queen's Royal Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-40
Preferred Class: Line, Rifles, Artillery
Contacts (Steam ID): KGL - Mitchell (https://steamcommunity.com/id/2ndMitchell/), CR - Voluble (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198141137472/), KGA - Sam (https://steamcommunity.com/id/51stSam/)

Regiment #2 Name: 10thRH RRA
Estimated Attendance: 8-12
Preferred Class: Cav
Contacts (Steam ID): Grozni (https://steamcommunity.com/id/grozni/)

Regiment #3 Name: 92nd Gordon's Highlanders Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): Wolffe (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198166480987/)

Regiment #3 Name: 98° Reggimento di Parma
Estimated Attendance: 15-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): Ritsoko (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198156190219/)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Crush on July 01, 2019, 12:03:01 am
Incredible Tourny  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Mitchell on July 01, 2019, 12:06:16 am
Incredible Tourny  ;D ;D ;D

My 33rd bias senses are tingling  :o ;)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 01, 2019, 10:38:14 am
Incredible Tourny  ;D ;D ;D

My 33rd bias senses are tingling  :o ;)

Don't know what gave him away ::)

I've updated the lead post and accepted 3 groups which now have at least 50 attendance within their lowest estimate. We still have 6 teams which are not quite there but looking for regiments to join their ranks!

Thanks also for the multitude of ref apps - it's highly appreciated, I will be getting in contact with you shortly.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: DragonKing on July 01, 2019, 02:47:56 pm
Group Name: French coalition
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Steam ID:  DragonKing  (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: probably yes
Preferred Faction: France

Regiment #1 Name: 10. Pułk Kirasjerów
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: heavy cav
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/

Regiment #2 Name: 2eFusGre
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198120430703
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198161469447

Regiment #3 Name: 2e Régiment d'infanterie légère
Estimated Attendance: 10/12
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Dalinky

Regiment #4 Name: 8e régiment d'artillerie
Estimated Attendance: 10/12
Preferred Class: Art
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujinhttps://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujin

updated
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 01, 2019, 02:55:58 pm
Group Name: French coalition
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Steam ID:  DragonKing  (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: probably yes
Preferred Faction: France

Regiment #1 Name: 10. Pułk Kirasjerów
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: heavy cav
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/

Regiment #2 Name: 2eFusGre
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198120430703
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198161469447

Regiment #3 Name: 2e Régiment d'infanterie légère
Estimated Attendance: 10/12
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Dalinky

Regiment #4 Name: 8e régiment d'artillerie
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Art
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujinhttps://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujin

Thanks mate - 1 more line should see your team well set I think :) updated on the lead post. Also updated the arty numbers to 10, since that is the max they can field within the rules.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Sir-Legion on July 01, 2019, 03:11:49 pm
Bumps
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Skittykiller on July 02, 2019, 12:00:53 am
Regiment Name: 26th "The Cameronian" Regiment of foot
Estimated Attendance: 10+
Preferred Class: Line
Preferred Faction: UK
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Whitelocke69/

Oh ye, if anyone wants us add me on steam as how whitelocke is away - my steam Skittykiller
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Krytenn on July 02, 2019, 09:24:11 pm
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Kaide: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198042695689/ Krytenn: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198023332890/ Hursty:https://steamcommunity.com/id/HurstyMB/ Wookie: https://steamcommunity.com/id/elWookie/
Signing-up with Artillery?: Yes
Preferred Faction: UK

Regiment #1 Name: 59th Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-35
Preferred Class: Line + Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): (See Above) Kaide, Krytenn, Hursty (Line) Wookie (Lights)

Regiment #2 Name: 77y
Estimated Attendance: 15 Line + 10 Arty
Preferred Class: Line + Artillery
Contacts (Steam ID): Gaz: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198009894136/ Aztir: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198009894136/ Highlord: https://steamcommunity.com/id/77yTheHighLord


Regiment #3 Name: Nr4
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Felix: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Felix5557/

Updated to add the 77y to the team (as line and arty) and the Nr4 as cavalry.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 4/8 Accepted...
Post by: ~Felix~ on July 05, 2019, 09:00:17 am
You can remove 2tesGFR, 23rd and Nr4 as coalition because we didn’t find enough German lines sorry for the troubles
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: DragonKing on July 05, 2019, 01:05:01 pm
Group Name: French coalition
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Steam ID:  DragonKing  (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: probably yes
Preferred Faction: France

Regiment #1 Name: 10. Pułk Kirasjerów
Estimated Attendance: 15
Preferred Class: heavy cav
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198403441359/

Regiment #2 Name: 2eFusGre
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198120430703
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198161469447

Regiment #3 Name: 2e Régiment d'infanterie légère
Estimated Attendance: 10/12
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Dalinky

Regiment #4 Name: 8e régiment d'artillerie
Estimated Attendance: 10/12
Preferred Class: Art
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujinhttps://steamcommunity.com/id/Neko_Fujin

Regiment #5 Name:61e Régiment d'infanterie
Estimated Attendance: ~ 15
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/lecourbe/

updated
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 4/8 Accepted...
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 05, 2019, 01:34:31 pm
You can remove 2tesGFR, 23rd and Nr4 as coalition because we didn’t find enough German lines sorry for the troubles

Sorry to hear that mate, I've added your regiments to the 'Looking for Group' section on the lead post. Were the 23rd part of your sign-up? Don't have details for them.

Updated lead post to include a 5th Accepted group.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 4/8 Accepted...
Post by: sirkaide on July 05, 2019, 04:07:22 pm
You can remove 2tesGFR, 23rd and Nr4 as coalition because we didn’t find enough German lines sorry for the troubles

Sorry to hear that mate, I've added your regiments to the 'Looking for Group' section on the lead post. Were the 23rd part of your sign-up? Don't have details for them.

Updated lead post to include a 5th Accepted group.

Why are you stopping the nr4 from joining our coalition?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 4/8 Accepted...
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 05, 2019, 04:12:28 pm
You can remove 2tesGFR, 23rd and Nr4 as coalition because we didn’t find enough German lines sorry for the troubles

Sorry to hear that mate, I've added your regiments to the 'Looking for Group' section on the lead post. Were the 23rd part of your sign-up? Don't have details for them.

Updated lead post to include a 5th Accepted group.

Why are you stopping the nr4 from joining our coalition?

I have not stopped it, I've asked for it to be discussed as there is a concern that it's now a team fully comprised of comp regs, which could de-stabilize the balance. I have contacted Krytten and Felix to discuss in person and find an amicable way to go forward so that all regiments can still participate.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 4/8 Accepted...
Post by: sirkaide on July 05, 2019, 04:20:13 pm
You can remove 2tesGFR, 23rd and Nr4 as coalition because we didn’t find enough German lines sorry for the troubles

Sorry to hear that mate, I've added your regiments to the 'Looking for Group' section on the lead post. Were the 23rd part of your sign-up? Don't have details for them.

Updated lead post to include a 5th Accepted group.

Why are you stopping the nr4 from joining our coalition?

I have not stopped it, I've asked for it to be discussed as there is a concern that it's now a team fully comprised of comp regs, which could de-stabilize the balance. I have contacted Krytten and Felix to discuss in person and find an amicable way to go forward so that all regiments can still participate.

I don't understand, last time, the 33rd teamed up with the 77y and had a significantly stronger team than everyone else. Yet, it was still a close and competitive game. In the last two NWBC's there has never been an attempt to stop teams forming their own coalitions. This is a competitive tournament, if you want to balanced teams, then split the 33rd companies into separate brigades.

I organised our coalition because we have good relations and history between our regiments.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 4/8 Accepted...
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 05, 2019, 04:35:21 pm
You can remove 2tesGFR, 23rd and Nr4 as coalition because we didn’t find enough German lines sorry for the troubles

Sorry to hear that mate, I've added your regiments to the 'Looking for Group' section on the lead post. Were the 23rd part of your sign-up? Don't have details for them.

Updated lead post to include a 5th Accepted group.

Why are you stopping the nr4 from joining our coalition?

I have not stopped it, I've asked for it to be discussed as there is a concern that it's now a team fully comprised of comp regs, which could de-stabilize the balance. I have contacted Krytten and Felix to discuss in person and find an amicable way to go forward so that all regiments can still participate.

I don't understand, last time, the 33rd teamed up with the 77y and had a significantly stronger team than everyone else. Yet, it was still a close and competitive game. In the last two NWBC's there has never been an attempt to stop teams forming their own coalitions. This is a competitive tournament, if you want to balanced teams, then split the 33rd companies into separate brigades.

I organised our coalition because we have good relations and history between our regiments.

I am not trying to tear apart regiments which have good relations, simply maintain a good balance; all the groups in participation so far are comprised of a maximum of two competitive regiments each, some less. Imo having one group where all the regiments are competitive in their own right may potentially be de-stabilizing when compared to the other groups, but I am open to a discussion (ts) on the subject to find a resolution that is amicable. I am afterall just trying to make the tournament as balanced and enjoyable for all participants as possible. Please could we refrain discussing further on here, as it is more suited to a discussion in person with those few regiments it concerns - thanks in advance! :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 5/8 Accepted...
Post by: 77y.Regiment on July 05, 2019, 05:36:49 pm
Thats fine, we arnt a competitive regiment anymore, you can ask the other regiments, we dont do tournaments anymore or regular 1v1's and Gf's so you couldnt class us as competitive.
Solved
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 5/8 Accepted...
Post by: Cameron. on July 05, 2019, 08:53:52 pm
Steam ID: 76561197972617957  http://steamcommunity.com/id/BooneyBoys
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?) 33rd
Prior experience/comment: Many past comps, events and servers on a variety of modules
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 6/8 Accepted...
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 05, 2019, 10:55:04 pm
After discussing with all the current accepted participants the general consensus has been to accept the newest Coalition headed up by the 59th. Apologies if it appeared as if I was being obstructive for the hell of it; balance being a chief priority raised by the community when I initially pitched the tournie, I wanted to ensure that all participants were happy - hopefully this demonstrates my own commitment to make it work for all involved!

With that team accepted we now have two remaining slots open. Any regiments who wish to take part please do get in touch with one of the existing team applicants (on the lead post) or even submit an application for your own group!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 6/8 Accepted...
Post by: [33rd] Grekos on July 06, 2019, 01:40:25 pm
Referee Application

Steam ID:http://steamcommunity.com/id/
GreatLeaderTsipras

In Regiment participating? Yes, 33rd

Past experience: Have a few hours in using the administration board but never in tournaments like this one
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 6/8 Accepted...
Post by: Kaiserinio on July 09, 2019, 08:46:02 pm
Ref Application
Steam ID: https://steamcommunity.com/id/MostOrginaliD/
In Regiment participating?: 33rd
Prior experience/comment: i'm co-admin in 33rd saturday event, but i still lack expreince with comp matches.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 6/8 Accepted...
Post by: DarklingGames on July 10, 2019, 07:21:43 pm
Referee Application

Steam ID: you have it babe  :-*
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?) you know too
Prior experience/comment: none, here to try it out but if it counts i ran the epic tolkien tuesday event ;P
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 6/8 Accepted...
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 11, 2019, 12:16:58 am
Added to Trial refs, cheers guys.

We have a working start date of w/c 22nd July for this now guys. Any issues with rules etc, now would be the time to raise them.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Samu on July 12, 2019, 02:29:27 pm
Spoiler
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Ulfur (https://steamcommunity.com/id/UlfurtheWolf/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: No
Preferred Faction: United Kingdom

Regiment #1 Name: 40th (2nd Somersetshire) Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 25-35
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Ulfur, (https://steamcommunity.com/id/UlfurtheWolf/) Major Namelol [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheNamelol/)  (http://) Lieutenant Sam [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SamChocola/)

Regiment #2 Name: 57th Turkish Regiment
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): DeliTürk[57th General], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/generaldeliturk/)  Colonel Ibraham Pasha[57th Colonel], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Ibrahim_Pasha/) Mordeviesta[57th Lt Colonel], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Mordeviesta/)

Regiment #3 Name: kk_Legion
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): Krieger[Unterlieutnant], (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198045784473/) Prophet[Gefreyter],
 (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198007480838/)
Regiment #4 Name:
Estimated Attendance:
Preferred Class: Cav
Contacts (Steam ID):
[close]
I have redone our battalion roster, we are happy to welcome both the 57th and the kk_Legion into our battalion  :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 12, 2019, 02:38:31 pm
Spoiler
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Ulfur (https://steamcommunity.com/id/UlfurtheWolf/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: No
Preferred Faction: United Kingdom

Regiment #1 Name: 40th (2nd Somersetshire) Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 25-35
Preferred Class: Infantry
Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Ulfur, (https://steamcommunity.com/id/UlfurtheWolf/) Major Namelol [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheNamelol/)  (http://) Lieutenant Sam [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SamChocola/)

Regiment #2 Name: 57th Turkish Regiment
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): DeliTürk[57th General], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/generaldeliturk/)  Colonel Ibraham Pasha[57th Colonel], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Ibrahim_Pasha/) Mordeviesta[57th Lt Colonel], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Mordeviesta/)

Regiment #3 Name: kk_Legion
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): Krieger[Unterlieutnant], (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198045784473/) Prophet[Gefreyter],
 (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198007480838/)
Regiment #4 Name:
Estimated Attendance:
Preferred Class: Cav
Contacts (Steam ID):
[close]
I have redone our battalion roster, we are happy to welcome both the 57th and the kk_Legion into our battalion  :)

Brilliant - cheers mate! If any cavalry regiments may be able to assist with completing our final group then do get in touch with the 40th.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 7/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Tardet on July 12, 2019, 02:48:31 pm
Steam ID: Tardet (https://steamcommunity.com/id/MBTardet/)
In Regiment participating?: No.
Prior experience/comment: Countless experience as an administrator, host and referee across four different warband multiplayers communities, during a time span of approxmatively 8 years. As of late, EIC/M-NWWC should give a good sample of my capabilities as a referee.

This represents a new challenge as I have not yet been a referee of such large battles but as stated earlier on this thread, I very much like the idea and would like to contribute where I can, potentially as a support of more experienced referees. My commitment with the EIC/M-NWWC should be finished or close to finishing when the NWBC start so there should be no scheduling/availabilties conflict when it comes strictly to NW.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 7/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 12, 2019, 04:40:27 pm
Steam ID: Tardet (https://steamcommunity.com/id/MBTardet/)
In Regiment participating?: No.
Prior experience/comment: Countless experience as an administrator, host and referee across four different warband multiplayers communities, during a time span of approxmatively 8 years. As of late, EIC/M-NWWC should give a good sample of my capabilities as a referee.

This represents a new challenge as I have not yet been a referee of such large battles but as stated earlier on this thread, I very much like the idea and would like to contribute where I can, potentially as a support of more experienced referees. My commitment with the EIC/M-NWWC should be finished or close to finishing when the NWBC start so there should be no scheduling/availabilties conflict when it comes strictly to NW.

Thanks Tardet - will be a huge help :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Skittykiller on July 12, 2019, 07:15:28 pm
Regiment Name: 26th "The Cameronian" Regiment of foot
Estimated Attendance: 10+
Preferred Class: Line
Preferred Faction: UK
Contacts (Steam ID): https://steamcommunity.com/id/Skittykiller/

We are also willing to play Artillery if anyone wants us, don't have to be just line. https://steamcommunity.com/id/Skittykiller/
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 7/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Señor Noel on July 12, 2019, 09:26:19 pm
Steam ID: https://steamcommunity.com/id/SchnoezelausModor/
In Regiment participating?: 2ndHess
Prior experience/comment: 2x EIC, Some german leagues and some more stuff i cant remember ;)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 7/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 13, 2019, 02:28:07 pm
Thanks Noel, much appreciated!

Updated the map selection of the lead post, hopefully this will give a nice even spread of terrain types to suit all. All are currently 600x600 which should do for matches of varying size and whether they include arty or not.


Plains


Forest


Snow


Desert

Flat
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271941437_6a82197fc0_c.jpg)
[close]
Low Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271862031_b6d02d1aa0_c.jpg)
[close]
Medium Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271941272_8c4f51aca8_c.jpg)
[close]
River
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271861896_9b7e7e38d4_c.jpg)
[close]
Flat
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271941137_e5ff4776e5_c.jpg)
[close]
Low Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271940992_36e649c345_c.jpg)
[close]
Medium Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271940892_772c57c130_c.jpg)
[close]
River
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271940727_798e21684c_c.jpg)
[close]
Flat
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271861296_20d9a3584b_c.jpg)
[close]
Low Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271861246_e9335dd77c_c.jpg)
[close]
Medium Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271861176_0d04b2648f_c.jpg)
[close]
River
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271940417_06f7bd3c2b_c.jpg)
[close]
Flat
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271861056_de7c7264c1_c.jpg)
[close]
Low Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271940362_215d3f9666_c.jpg)
[close]
Medium Hills
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271860976_f92ddc49ea_c.jpg)
[close]
River
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48271860936_731617ce48_c.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open!
Post by: Samu on July 13, 2019, 09:48:39 pm

This is our complete Battalion roster, the Team Name will be decided soon. Thank-you Kincaid for being so patient while we sign up


Spoiler
Group Name: TBA
Group Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Ulfur (https://steamcommunity.com/id/UlfurtheWolf/)
Signing-up with Artillery?: No
Preferred Faction: United Kingdom

Regiment #1 Name: 40th (2nd Somersetshire) Regiment of Foot
Estimated Attendance: 30-40
Preferred Class: Infantry & Cavalry
Contacts (Steam ID): Colonel Ulfur, (https://steamcommunity.com/id/UlfurtheWolf/) Major Namelol [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheNamelol/)  (http://) Lieutenant Sam [Infantry], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/SamChocola/) Quartermaster Norwegian [Cavalry], (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198028707328/) Lance Corporal Odin [Cavalry] (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198170942785/)

Regiment #2 Name: 57th Turkish Regiment
Estimated Attendance: 10-20
Preferred Class: Line
Contacts (Steam ID): DeliTürk[57th General], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/generaldeliturk/)  Colonel Ibraham Pasha[57th Colonel], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Ibrahim_Pasha/) Mordeviesta[57th Lt Colonel], (https://steamcommunity.com/id/Mordeviesta/)

Regiment #3 Name: kk_Legion
Estimated Attendance: 10
Preferred Class: Lights
Contacts (Steam ID): kRIEGER[Unterlieutnant], (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198045784473/) Prophet[Gefreyter],
 (https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198007480838/)


[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Crush on July 15, 2019, 02:40:23 pm
LOVELY
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 15, 2019, 06:34:31 pm

Update:


Well everything has thankfully come together, we are just awaiting a few ID's & team names from participants...

Map screenshots and Group brackets have been updated on the lead post, in addition two NWBC servers are live and ready to go (based in France, hosted by the 33rd, hopefully two will be sufficient). Since all teams are arguably fairly balanced, I have seeded the groups at random with one exception; I have intentionally put the 40th & 33rd teams in differing groups, as these are the only teams that will not be playing with arty - this will impact the rest of the teams matches to the most minimal degree.

Stay tuned for the first match week opponents (I'll update the 2nd post on this thread with that) - I'll also be inviting all team contacts and refs to the groupchat tonight. This may be of limited use, but just incase I have setup 4 chat channels; the purpose of these is to enable all the regiments participating in a single match to discuss match arrangement in a single place, hopefully this is of assistance to teams which are made up of several regiments.

Any questions, as always direct them to myself! :D Best of Luck all x

Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Tardet on July 15, 2019, 07:36:14 pm
Let's get this baby rolling.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: [2ndHess] lukasoh on July 15, 2019, 10:13:51 pm
Hyped!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Barro112 on July 15, 2019, 11:53:30 pm
Let's get this baby rolling.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Anna on July 16, 2019, 11:02:57 pm
Steam ID: https://steamcommunity.com/id/buschinstein/
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?) 40th
Prior experience/comment: None, but I assisted [40th] Sam in the past.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Skittykiller on July 16, 2019, 11:25:52 pm
Steam ID: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Skittykiller/
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?) None so I should be free a lot
Prior experience/comment: EIC Ref for 2-3 seasons, was admin of events and lots of 1v1,s.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Cameron. on July 17, 2019, 05:34:24 pm
Spoiler
Steam ID: https://steamcommunity.com/id/buschinstein/
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?) 40th
Prior experience/comment: None, but I assisted [40th] Sam in the past.
[close]
Have you never used admin at an event?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Tardet on July 17, 2019, 05:45:26 pm
To be fair, having to take care of such large scale fights will be a two men jobs (at minimum). Someone with little experience but who is willing to learn could totally fit in and be helpful.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Anna on July 17, 2019, 07:09:22 pm
Spoiler
Steam ID: https://steamcommunity.com/id/buschinstein/
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?) 40th
Prior experience/comment: None, but I assisted [40th] Sam in the past.
[close]
Have you never used admin at an event?
lol of course, I have
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 17, 2019, 07:15:22 pm
Agree with Tardet, may even take out the 'permitting 1 admin' from the rules. Don't think it would be feasible to maintain the high standard of rules without two.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: ~NickCole~ on July 17, 2019, 11:51:49 pm
3-4 admins would be good. You could do 2 per team or 1 per team and a extra to learn and look over both sides.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Krytenn on July 18, 2019, 06:51:06 pm
Steam ID: Krytenn https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198023332890/
In Regiment participating?: (if so which?) 59th
Prior experience/comment: EIC, several  seasons of NWL, a number of group fighting tournaments, numerous regimental events etc.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 18, 2019, 10:37:38 pm
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48317582506_e08d17ef24_o.png)



|  Group A  |

|  Group B  |



The Cool Casuals     VS     The Best Alliance



Gardekorps     VS     The Central Powers


The Good the Bad & the Timed-out     VS     33rd & 1steIvN


The French Coalition     VS     The Old Guard
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Mitchell on July 21, 2019, 10:02:14 pm
Match week: 1
Participants: The Good, The Bad and The Timed-Out vs *Insert Coalition Name here* - 33rd and 1steIvN
Involved classes: Line, Skirms, Cav
Date/Time: 28/07/2019
Referee #1: Tardet
Referee #2:
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 22, 2019, 09:55:34 am
Just to clarify to all - the first match week starts today, running Monday to Sunday. Try to get your match in to this week but if this is impossible then it can be played in the next; we will have a 4th match-week at the end of the group-stage, for all delayed matches to be wrapped up before knock-outs.

Also, this seems like a good name ;D
*Insert Coalition Name here*
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Vegi. on July 22, 2019, 12:21:42 pm
Match week: 1
Participants: The Good, The Bad and The Timed-Out vs *Insert Coalition Name here* - 33rd and 1steIvN
Involved classes: Line, Skirms, Cav
Date/Time: 28/07/2019
Referee #1: Tardet
Referee #2:
Spicy first match! :D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Samu on July 22, 2019, 03:40:25 pm
Match week: 1
Participants: Gardekorps     VS     The Central Powers
Involved classes: Line, Lights & Cavalry
Date/Time: 29/07/2019 - 7pm GMT
Referee #1: Tardet
Referee #2:


Also regarding "The Good, The Bad and The Timed-Out vs *Insert Coalition Name here* - 33rd and 1steIvN" match. I messaged Mitchell saying I would like to ref with Tardet so hopefully that goes through.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Sign-ups Open | 8/8 Accepted | 22nd July Start date
Post by: Mitchell on July 22, 2019, 05:38:35 pm
Match week: 1
Participants: The Good, The Bad and The Timed-Out vs *Insert Coalition Name here* - 33rd and 1steIvN
Involved classes: Line, Skirms, Cav
Date/Time: 28/07/2019
Referee #1: Tardet
Referee #2: Samu

Samu is in as the 2nd ref now  :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Krytenn on July 24, 2019, 02:18:06 am
Match week: 1
Participants: The Old Guard vs The French Coalition
Involved classes: Line, Skirms, Cav, Arty
Date/Time: 27/07/2019 7pm BST 
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: DragonKing on July 24, 2019, 03:07:37 pm
Match week: 1
Participants: The Old Guard vs The French Coalition
Involved classes: Line, Skirms, Cav, Arty
Date/Time: 27/07/2019 7pm BST 
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed

Guy, i asked on steam 20:30 CEST and not 20. So you will not force us to play at your time. Already that you don't answer our messages, and that you are arrogant you won't impose the time on us that's for sure.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: [33rd] Grekos on July 24, 2019, 03:14:20 pm
Match week: 1
Participants: Gardekorps     VS     The Central Powers
Involved classes: Line, Lights & Cavalry
Date/Time: 29/07/2019 - 7pm GMT
Referee #1: Tardet
Referee #2:


Also regarding "The Good, The Bad and The Timed-Out vs *Insert Coalition Name here* - 33rd and 1steIvN" match. I messaged Mitchell saying I would like to ref with Tardet so hopefully that goes through.
BTW I'm 2nd ref for this match spoke with Samu
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Samu on July 24, 2019, 03:18:43 pm
Match week: 1
Participants: Gardekorps     VS     The Central Powers
Involved classes: Line, Lights & Cavalry
Date/Time: 29/07/2019 - 7pm GMT
Referee #1: Tardet
Referee #2: Grekos


Also regarding "The Good, The Bad and The Timed-Out vs *Insert Coalition Name here* - 33rd and 1steIvN" match. I messaged Mitchell saying I would like to ref with Tardet so hopefully that goes through.
BTW I'm 2nd ref for this match spoke with Samu

Sorry ive just forgotten to update the post
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 24, 2019, 03:21:50 pm
Match week: 1
Participants: The Old Guard vs The French Coalition
Involved classes: Line, Skirms, Cav, Arty
Date/Time: 27/07/2019 7pm BST 
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed

Guy, i asked on steam 20:30 CEST and not 20. So you will not force us to play at your time. Already that you don't answer our messages, and that you are arrogant you won't impose the time on us that's for sure.

Potentially a compromise of 7:15 BST could be reached? I should be free to ref this one, will confirm by tomorrow though.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: DragonKing on July 24, 2019, 04:55:33 pm
That's okay for me
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Krytenn on July 25, 2019, 05:04:05 pm
Sorry for the mix up Kincaid, but Dragon King, I messaged you as I was putting up the post asking whether you had said 7pm UK time, and you said ok to it. I mean 7:15/7:30 is fine by us. But there's no reason to be rude...
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 25, 2019, 06:35:03 pm
Sorry for the mix up Kincaid, but Dragon King, I messaged you as I was putting up the post asking whether you had said 7pm UK time, and you said ok to it. I mean 7:15/7:30 is fine by us. But there's no reason to be rude...
I'm sure the language barrier played its part to a certain extent, glad it's been resolved amicably! I am free to ref this if anyone would care to join me? x
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Tardet on July 25, 2019, 06:39:30 pm
I wish I could join you but I will be playing myself in that one!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Samu on July 25, 2019, 09:13:24 pm
Match week: 1
Participants: The Old Guard vs The French Coalition
Involved classes: Line, Skirms, Cav, Arty
Date/Time: 27/07/2019 7pm BST 
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed

Guy, i asked on steam 20:30 CEST and not 20. So you will not force us to play at your time. Already that you don't answer our messages, and that you are arrogant you won't impose the time on us that's for sure.

Potentially a compromise of 7:15 BST could be reached? I should be free to ref this one, will confirm by tomorrow though.

I can ref with Kincaid and possibly a third if need be
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 26, 2019, 09:38:11 am
A brilliant practice match was played yesterday by 'The Best Alliance' & 'The Garde Korps', resulting in an even but hard fought draw!

Other than being good practice and fun for those involved it was an excellent opportunity to review the rule set, to identify where these required clarification or amendment. I'm also relived to say that the map size 600x600 should suffice for artillery engagements aswell.

Please see below for amendments made to the rule-set, as discussed by the refs who attended (worth noting that the points in these rules were not all an issue during that match, just things that occurred to us refs as we were seeing the match play-out!):

Rule Amendments/Additions 25-07-19
(3. Attendance)
3.2  Both teams must balance their teams to the above restrictions within the first 30 seconds of each round (notified by refs). Should any team not action a drop in players specified by the ref during this time period, they will either reset the round to give the team further time or slay at random to achieve balance (do not try the refs patience!). After this 30 second spawn period the round is Live and no revives or balancing by the teams (as a result of disconnects) will be required.

3.3  This tournament will not use GUID's for obvious reasons, we do however reserve the right to disqualify the offending coalition if excessive inviting is discovered. Inviting from other regiments which are also participating in the tournament will not be tolerated if discovered, regardless of whether this is excessive or not.


(4. Matches)
4.4  Should either of the participants of match or the ref wish to, all-chat can be disallowed. Warnings may be issues if members do not observe this rule.


(5. Lights)
5.6  Must stop all firing/reloading as soon as any member of their unit is in charge; should that player die and the rest of the unit escape, partaking in no attacks or blocks for a reasonable period of time, they can be considered no longer in charge (ref discretion)


(6. Lines)
6.4  Must not Fire our of Line (FoL)


(7. Cavalry)
7.6  Must consistently attack the unit it has charged to be considered 'in charge' (1 or 2 horseman left must make an effort to engage and connect attacks, not stalling for an extended period of time)


(8. Artillery)
8.5  May make use of 40 Build points to construct defences
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Cameron. on July 26, 2019, 02:20:35 pm
Nice adjustments kind sir
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: DragonKing on July 26, 2019, 05:39:21 pm
Thanks you Kincaid and Samu for referring our match !
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Tardet on July 27, 2019, 09:10:05 pm
Congratulations to the Old Guard and good luck for your next matches. We got outclassed in pretty much every single way and lacked in both skills and cohesion in that match. Thanks to Samu and Kincaid for being our referees tonight.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 27, 2019, 09:14:39 pm
The Old Guard 4 - 0 The French Coalition

Well played to both sides, the match was not as cut and dry as the score suggests; some close rounds with some excellent charges from both sides cavalry particularly! Minimal rule breaks and thankyou to the Old Guard for playing with a good few specs.

Spoiler
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48389613382_2cde204e89_o.jpg)
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48389612252_75b99a396e_o.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Krytenn on July 27, 2019, 09:17:35 pm
GG was a fun match, thanks to the refs as well.  :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Spoons on July 28, 2019, 06:54:58 pm
Match week: 2
Participants: 1ste3rdN / 19th and friends
Involved classes: everything but arty
Date/Time: Weds 31/07/2019 /7:00 pm UK time
Referee #1: needed
Referee #2:
required
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Señor Noel on July 28, 2019, 09:13:41 pm
Match week: 2
Participants: 2ndHess/Ar_Nr1/56e/2tesGFR vs 19thYR/1stEvilBrig/1stCA
Involved classes: Line Infantry, Skirms/Light, Cavalry, Artillery
Date/Time: 30/07/2019 | 7pm BST
Referee #1: needed
Referee #2: needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Tardet on July 28, 2019, 10:35:51 pm
The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out 4 -0 1ste3rdN

Referees: Samu, Anna & Tardet

It was a good match without too many incidents. Some small issues with camping but nothing too heavy and the rest was sorted privately. Please remember that referees are not perfect and can make mistakes but do not make justice yourself and keep the sassy comments out of the chat. That concerns 5-6 individuals at max, the majority behaved perfectly and I thank them for that.

Sorry I'm posting this so late btw, had to quickly jump to 3v3 sword tournament to do my referee duties.

Spoiler
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/775100884849241426/355B4236ECD03C938459730985C57505648379F0/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/775100884849242133/99C10E7054D57E1C382206282081DCDFCB4B1F1A/)
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Mitchell on July 28, 2019, 10:38:26 pm
The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out 4 -0 1ste3rdN

It was a good match without too many incidents. Some small issues with camping but nothing too heavy and the rest was sorted privately. Please remember that referees are not perfect and can make mistakes but do not make justice yourself and keep the sassy comments out of the chat. That concerns 5-6 individuals at max, the majority behaved perfectly and I thank them for that.

Spoiler
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/775100884849241426/355B4236ECD03C938459730985C57505648379F0/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/775100884849242133/99C10E7054D57E1C382206282081DCDFCB4B1F1A/)
[close]
Massive thanks to Tardet and Samu for reffing and GG to all of the regiments involved. It was a great match to be a part of :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Tardet on July 28, 2019, 10:40:29 pm
Don't forget Anna who did a splendid job and contributed to making this a successful match as much as we did. But it was my pleasure to be your referee, and I'm glad to do it again if required.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 28, 2019, 10:53:20 pm
Thanks all, was a damn good match - just some serious bad luck on our part! The only thing I have to say re. potential changes ties in with a request I had from both cav regiments in the first match on Saturday; they requested removal of wall-hugging, which was similar in part on the odd occasion in todays match with hugging the map edges, so will be looking to implement a rule regarding it for next match-week if everyone approves.

Thanks again Refs and the 2nd team! :D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Mitchell on July 28, 2019, 10:53:55 pm
Don't forget Anna who did a splendid job and contributed to making this a successful match as much as we did. But it was my pleasure to be your referee, and I'm glad to do it again if required.

Apologies, thankyou to Anna as well  :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Wolffe on July 28, 2019, 11:16:49 pm
Was a good match all around!
Good job to all participating regiments!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: El_Presidente on July 28, 2019, 11:27:13 pm
wow guys so hyped for the big Cool Casual games this coming week!!!

Wednesday is my birthday, so if you'd just let us win 33rd that'd be grand.

 :-*
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 77y.Regiment on July 28, 2019, 11:31:25 pm
Would the wall hugging rule would have to be defined carefully as units like arty do sometimes tend to set up near the edges of the map for the hill or to have the largest feild of view they can with out having to move the cannons from left to right all the time. It could be treated like the camping rule maybe but restirct it to line an lights/skirms. If they are repatedly using the map edge against cav charges ect then I dont have to many issues against the rule, but we have all played the game for several years now and should know how to deal with lines that are using the map edge to avoid getting cav charged.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 29, 2019, 10:02:41 am
wow guys so hyped for the big Cool Casual games this coming week!!!

Wednesday is my birthday, so if you'd just let us win 33rd that'd be grand.

 :-*
With our 0-4 from last night I can only apologize - we'll be doing everything we can get to a win, Birthday or not!!


Would the wall hugging rule would have to be defined carefully as units like arty do sometimes tend to set up near the edges of the map for the hill or to have the largest feild of view they can with out having to move the cannons from left to right all the time. It could be treated like the camping rule maybe but restirct it to line an lights/skirms. If they are repatedly using the map edge against cav charges ect then I dont have to many issues against the rule, but we have all played the game for several years now and should know how to deal with lines that are using the map edge to avoid getting cav charged.
Certainly when the rule is implemented it will explicitly refer to only Lines & Lights; artillery understandably needs to make best use of the most elevated terrain, be it on the map edge or not :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 29, 2019, 10:05:12 am



(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48348629877_c629e7eb05_o.png)



|  Group A  |

|  Group B  |



The Cool Casuals     VS     1ste3rdN



Gardekorps     VS     The Old Guard


The Good the Bad & the Timed-out     VS     The Best Alliance


The French Coalition     VS     The Central Powers
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          


Rule Amendments
As requested by the DCL, Nr4 & 33rd:

2.3  Regiments Hugging the edge of the map either individually to fight cavalry or en masse to avoid fighting or to delay is not permitted. The latter is largely subjective and down to ref discretion. Warnings to be issued as with the camping rule.


Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Cameron. on July 29, 2019, 01:00:31 pm
Good luck to all in week two.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 29, 2019, 01:32:00 pm
Good luck to all in week two.
Indeed, best of luck all!

Please be aware of the rule changes a few days ago after our first practice match which can be found here (https://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=41976.105), in addition to the one rule change above for the start of week 2; All are fairly small tweaks but good to be aware of.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: [2ndHess] lukasoh on July 29, 2019, 02:08:09 pm
Is it possible to keep an eye on the 5 men spacing for lights? I know many skirms play with 10-15 men spacing but in this cup i rather prefer strict admins about that rule.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 29, 2019, 02:47:02 pm
Is it possible to keep an eye on the 5 men spacing for lights? I know many skirms play with 10-15 men spacing but in this cup i rather prefer strict admins about that rule.

Thanks you are right this is often ambiguous and should be kept in check, which I think has been done pretty well so far. I will circulate this along with the rule changes to the current refs tonight, although if at the time you feel this isn't being adhered to feel free to message the ref for them to pull the offending reg up on it.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Anna on July 29, 2019, 05:27:14 pm
Don't forget Anna who did a splendid job and contributed to making this a successful match as much as we did. But it was my pleasure to be your referee, and I'm glad to do it again if required.
Thank you genuinely, Tardet! It's a pleasure working with you.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Kaiserinio on July 29, 2019, 09:10:30 pm
29/07/2019 Match Results:
Gardekorps 3 - 1 The Central Powers

Refs: Kincaid, Grekos, Kaiser

Today's battle showed a high level of participating regiments. It contained some decent volleys and charges from both sides. To sum it up, the match was good, and without major rulebreaks, few of them occured but none of them affected the rounds scores.

Spoiler
(https://i.imgur.com/Dz2fitJ.png)
[close]


Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Kaiserinio on July 29, 2019, 09:16:44 pm
Also some screens form match:

Spoiler
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/793115688825878116/93A1396097A1A998A75312D09B612B2656464AA4/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/793115688825877635/1A55F2C2E889EA252E35A4CE55EEC7F98B8EABCD/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/793115688825875584/182AE224012C8D0DE87E7DE126663725425CFB9F/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/785233987054958712/AEF135061AA38CFE2EDC39012C0434EA233E89C1/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/785233987054958395/E22D256D764C08F146BA789D5F13140933BDDCE3/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/785233987054958168/2CD27C54EBE9FDD25AFE1835FB320B5C018DEB89/)
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Auror Davee on July 29, 2019, 09:35:41 pm
Good match and GG  :D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Ipoa on July 29, 2019, 11:58:16 pm
gg wp, was a great Match. Really enjoyed it. Looking forward to our next Match
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: [2ndHess] lukasoh on July 30, 2019, 09:36:24 am
Match week: 2
Participants: 2ndHess/Ar_Nr1/56e/2tesGFR vs 19thYR/1stEvilBrig/1stCA
Involved classes: Line Infantry, Skirms/Light, Cavalry, Artillery
Date/Time: 30/07/2019 | 7pm BST
Referee #1: needed
Referee #2: needed
Still need some refs, someone free tonight?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Tardet on July 30, 2019, 10:13:30 am
29/07/2019 Match Results:
Gardekorps 3 - 1 The Central Powers

Refs: Kincaid, Grekos, Kaiser

Today's battle showed a high level of participating regiments. It contained some decent volleys and charges from both sides. To sum it up, the match was good, and without major rulebreaks, few of them occured but none of them affected the rounds scores.

Spoiler
(https://i.imgur.com/Dz2fitJ.png)
[close]

Really sorry I couldn't be there, but thanks everyone for being understanding and huge props to Kincaid for taking over my role. Glad to see everything went well.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 30, 2019, 10:30:17 am
29/07/2019 Match Results:
Gardekorps 3 - 1 The Central Powers

Refs: Kincaid, Grekos, Kaiser

Today's battle showed a high level of participating regiments. It contained some decent volleys and charges from both sides. To sum it up, the match was good, and without major rulebreaks, few of them occured but none of them affected the rounds scores.

Spoiler
(https://i.imgur.com/Dz2fitJ.png)
[close]

Really sorry I couldn't be there, but thanks everyone for being understanding and huge props to Kincaid for taking over my role. Glad to see everything went well.

No worries mate it happens! Left it all to Kaiser and Grekos really - upping them and Anna to full refs.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Cameron. on July 30, 2019, 06:17:17 pm
Match week: 2
Participants: 2ndHess/Ar_Nr1/56e/2tesGFR vs 19thYR/1stEvilBrig/1stCA
Involved classes: Line Infantry, Skirms/Light, Cavalry, Artillery
Date/Time: 30/07/2019 | 7pm BST
Referee #1: needed
Referee #2: needed
Still need some refs, someone free tonight?
hmu on steam
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: yecgga on July 30, 2019, 06:21:28 pm
This looks fun. Can we still apply to join?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 30, 2019, 08:50:35 pm
This looks fun. Can we still apply to join?
I don't think any groups are struggling to get the minimum attendance, but you could apply so that the teams know you're ready to help out should any team lose a reg etc.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: Samu on July 30, 2019, 09:04:35 pm
30/07/2019 Match Results:
The Cool Casuals 2 - 2 The Best Alliance

Refs: Kaiser, Cameron, Samu

Both regiments bought a large number of players and the balance was mostly equal. The match itself had a few minor rulebreaks, however, there was camping in every round other than the 1st and this caused us to call an All Charge during the three last rounds. Global Chat was a slight issue although this was dealt with swiftly.

Spoiler
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/773975426911088332/134A0BF1BEA1AD42DE6246EE5985457D50F2DAAF/)
[close]




Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: El_Presidente on July 30, 2019, 09:15:19 pm
Yes good effort friends.

We really struggled coordinating with the different regiments since we didn't really have a proper communication system!

I actually think I'd prefer without arty. In the last round we were terrified of it so ended up getting forced into a corner as I tired to coordinate everyone through text chat. I do love a good mass all charge melee though.

EDIT:

On a side note, we managed to mobilise 60+ guys for the 19th alone. The totalkrieg was a great success!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: Cameron. on July 30, 2019, 09:58:26 pm
Yes Presidente we could see both teams struggling to fully utilise arty and also both teams playing conserved tactics to stay hidden from arty and other teams which did cause a lot of time wasting and camping to try and keep numbers even but this caused many opportunities to go begging.

Ps nice turn out, merge
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: El_Presidente on July 30, 2019, 10:04:33 pm
Haha yeah. We were completely paralysed by virtually no communication though, it makes attacking impossible especially with the (I think) ranged advantage of the TBA. I do think we had the superior melee team overall but using that requires carefully executed attacks to avoid what happened in the first round. (Order 227 mass assault after the 1stEB suicide charged  8) ). We just couldn't coordinate those attacks.

I'm glad Spoons doesn't want to play with arty tomorrow, hopefully it'll play differently. We've established a direct line of communication with the 1stCTA just got to get one with the 1stEB.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: Romulus76 on July 31, 2019, 10:47:41 am
Sad I missed the battle yesterday, sounded fun and epic. Looking forward to actually turning up for the one today. Should be interesting!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: Xaos on July 31, 2019, 12:51:04 pm
Sad I missed the battle yesterday, sounded fun and epic. Looking forward to actually turning up for the one today. Should be interesting!
1st Epic Brigade  8)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Tardet on July 31, 2019, 09:41:10 pm
The Cool Casuals 0-4 1ste3rdN

Referees: Samu, Anna & Tardet

It was a good match without too many rule breaks. All of us (Samu, Anna and I) had to jump in as referees last minute but everyone behaved quite well. Despite the score, the match was quite balanced on the first half and ended up in some massive melees at the end of each round. The third round was the decisive one with a very well executed push from the 1ste3rdN coalition, rushing the enemy spawn, taking the control of the river close it and using it at their advantage to decimate the Cool Casual lines.

Well played everyone and good luck for your future matches.

Spoiler
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/773975541473065960/BDC214B8D0565ACD6C0867CD3B756D9CA0473F91/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/773975541473066250/E64C368C44BCC98D8888CB28275EDC2A3BE238F1/)
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: 33rdKincaid on July 31, 2019, 09:49:21 pm
Thoroughly enjoyable match with lots of close action, hats off to the 19th, 1stEB & 1stCTA.

Also thanks to everyone for finishing off the first match-week matches - on to the next!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: El_Presidente on August 01, 2019, 03:15:29 pm
Don't confuse good plays with giving up and killing ourselves Tardet!

 :-*
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: Wolffe on August 01, 2019, 04:23:25 pm
Don't confuse good plays with giving up and killing ourselves Tardet!

 :-*

I’m sure he knows the difference :-*
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: Tardet on August 01, 2019, 04:28:09 pm
We, the scummy competitive tryhards, usually don't give-up at half time. That's probably why I cannot really relate to it.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: Wolffe on August 01, 2019, 04:30:12 pm
We, the scummy competitive tryhards, usually don't give-up at half time. That's probably why I cannot really relate to it.
Ye stop destroying NW with your sportsmanship and dedication Tardet!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: El_Presidente on August 01, 2019, 08:34:07 pm
No, you just go about slaying people for denting egos in global chat instead  :-*.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 01, 2019, 09:46:30 pm
No, you just go about slaying people for denting egos in global chat instead  :-*.
Well all I can say to that is insult the ref at your own risk eh ;) probs a good moment to thank all the refs so far actually as it seems to have been more or less the same pool of 6 or so people x
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: El_Presidente on August 01, 2019, 10:19:48 pm
If only it were insulting the refs and not just typing anything in global  :'(
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: Krytenn on August 03, 2019, 01:16:57 am
Match week: 2
Participants: The Old Guard vs Gardekorps
Involved classes: Line Infantry, Skirms/Light, Cavalry, Artillery
Date/Time: 11.08.2019  | 7pm BST
Referee #1: needed
Referee #2: needed

Sorry for the delay on this, but it was the only day both brigades could do.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 2
Post by: Jakob van Bicke on August 04, 2019, 06:05:54 pm
Match week: 2
Participants: The Old Guard vs Gardekorps
Involved classes: Line Infantry, Skirms/Light, Cavalry, Artillery
Date/Time: 11.08.2019  | 7pm BST
Referee #1: needed
Referee #2: needed

Sorry for the delay on this, but it was the only day both brigades could do.

Should be able to take that one
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 05, 2019, 11:32:31 am
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48348629782_de54a3c4cd_o.png)



|  Group A  |

|  Group B  |



The Cool Casuals     VS     The Good the Bad & the Timed-out



Gardekorps     VS     The French Coalition


The Best Alliance     VS     1ste3rdN


The Central Powers     VS     The Old Guard
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

Notes:

Nothing of note has changed for this week, we have 3 matches late from last week but one of these has been arranged. Lets get those late matches organised alongside this weeks if we can. Week commencing 12th will be used as an overflow week for us to all play catch-up. If anyone needs assistance in arranging their matches or finding refs as always speak to me!! ;D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Vegi. on August 05, 2019, 02:00:50 pm
Lets clap some cheeks this week
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Cameron. on August 05, 2019, 02:53:24 pm
Best alliance wants UK as well  :o this is an outrage
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 05, 2019, 03:41:20 pm
Best alliance wants UK as well  :o this is an outrage
We'll set both to UK. Should be an interesting match.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Vegi. on August 05, 2019, 03:49:41 pm
Best alliance wants UK as well  :o this is an outrage
We'll set both to UK. Should be an interesting match.
2 nations playing UK. That's epic magic!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 05, 2019, 03:52:20 pm
Best alliance wants UK as well  :o this is an outrage
We'll set both to UK. Should be an interesting match.
2 nations playing UK. That's epic magic! tk's
There is always the option to re-skin the rebel UK. Make it all Scottish or something.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Cameron. on August 05, 2019, 04:18:33 pm
that is what i call, an epic gamer move
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Vegi. on August 05, 2019, 04:29:36 pm
REEEEEEE
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 05, 2019, 04:31:43 pm
Nah mate your just jealous for if we make an all scotch faction ;) in all fairness that might be something nice to incorporate, since we've got quite a few UK factions.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Vegi. on August 05, 2019, 04:38:29 pm
Nah mate your just jealous for if we make an all scotch faction ;) in all fairness that might be something nice to incorporate, since we've got quite a few UK factions.
Lowlander scum can think they are highlanders... not epic gamer move!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Auror Davee on August 05, 2019, 05:48:07 pm
Nah mate your just jealous for if we make an all scotch faction ;) in all fairness that might be something nice to incorporate, since we've got quite a few UK factions.
Lowlander scum can think they are highlanders... not epic gamer move!
+1
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 05, 2019, 07:02:19 pm
Forgotten about this :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRKYcyUFLAQ
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Mitchell on August 06, 2019, 10:16:25 pm
Match week: 2
Participants: The Good the Bad & the Timed-out vs The Best Alliance
Involved classes: Line, Lights / Skirms, Cav
Date/Time: 07/08/19
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: DragonKing on August 06, 2019, 10:54:52 pm
Match week: 2
Participants: French Coalition (FC) vs The Central Powers (TCP)
Involved classes: infantry, light, cav
Date/Time: 20:15 CEST Wednesday 14th.
Referee #1: needed
Referee #2: needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Wolffe on August 07, 2019, 06:00:54 pm
Match week: 2
Participants: The Good the Bad & the Timed-out vs The Best Alliance
Involved classes: Line, Lights / Skirms, Cav
Date/Time: 07/08/19
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
i believe were still looking for refs anyone got time tonight?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Cameron. on August 07, 2019, 07:44:54 pm
me and grekos doing, in future try to organise a ref and time before
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Cameron. on August 07, 2019, 09:09:39 pm
7/8/2019 Match Results:
The Good, The Bad, The Timed out 3 - 1 The Best Alliance

Refs: Kincaid, Cameron, Grekos. Skitty

Both regiments fielded a good stock of players and the balance was mostly equal throughout the match. The match itself had a few minor rulebreaks in it, there was little camping overall so hats off for playing aggressive and dynamic strats. Thank you both teams for the fun match that was relatively easy to ref, all the best in your battles to come.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Vegi. on August 07, 2019, 09:17:28 pm
gg the enemy regiments
Spoiler
the cav rules seems dumb for me, because the coalition with some cav left has such big advantage
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Cameron. on August 07, 2019, 09:19:37 pm
that is somewhat of the point xD
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Vegi. on August 07, 2019, 09:25:29 pm
that is somewhat of the point xD
Well i think its stupid, but i'm not the host, if it is so. So be it.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Mitchell on August 07, 2019, 11:14:08 pm
Spoiler
7/8/2019 Match Results:
The Good, The Bad, The Timed out 3 - 1 The Best Alliance

Refs: Kincaid, Cameron, Grekos. Skitty

Both regiments fielded a good stock of players and the balance was mostly equal throughout the match. The match itself had a few minor rulebreaks in it, there was little camping overall so hats off for playing aggressive and dynamic strats. Thank you both teams for the fun match that was relatively easy to ref, all the best in your battles to come.
[close]

Thanks to all the refs for their great job and being able to do the match with relatively short notice (apologies for that), and GG to everybody involved, was a very close game overall.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 08, 2019, 02:04:20 am
Spoiler
7/8/2019 Match Results:
The Good, The Bad, The Timed out 3 - 1 The Best Alliance

Refs: Kincaid, Cameron, Grekos. Skitty

Both regiments fielded a good stock of players and the balance was mostly equal throughout the match. The match itself had a few minor rulebreaks in it, there was little camping overall so hats off for playing aggressive and dynamic strats. Thank you both teams for the fun match that was relatively easy to ref, all the best in your battles to come.
[close]

Thanks to all the refs for their great job and being able to do the match with relatively short notice (apologies for that), and GG to everybody involved, was a very close game overall.

Our pleasure; this was a pretty brilliant match to watch, being 80 aside at one point without any arty. All those liiiiinnnneesssss ;D wp to both x
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Grozni on August 08, 2019, 12:25:23 pm
was relatively easy to ref

Especially when you ignore the cav completely.

Other than that, great fun this competition, gg all.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Cameron. on August 08, 2019, 12:26:26 pm
was relatively easy to ref

Especially when you ignore the cav completely.

Other than that, great fun this competition, gg all.
Wdym ignore the cav completely eks de
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 08, 2019, 12:40:14 pm
was relatively easy to ref

Especially when you ignore the cav completely.

Other than that, great fun this competition, gg all.
Wdym ignore the cav completely eks de
As refs we responded to all all-chat complaints appropriately and there were many regarding cav. Both Cav regs in this match were fairly generous with their movement in formation so I don't think you really have a leg to stand on with this comment personally Grozni.

Thanks for the compliment re the tournie though, I agree it does appear to be going well! From my perspective as a ref the matches without arty seem to be especially dynamic, but I don't know whether that translates to greater enjoyment by the participants :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Grozni on August 08, 2019, 12:51:55 pm
Both Cav regs in this match were fairly generous with their movement in formation so I don't think you really have a leg to stand on with this comment personally Grozni.
I really don't know what you mean by this, our cav didn't break formation rule in any significant volume, and if it did the referees would do their job and tell us so through admin chat, thereby leaving the evidence in logs, which I don't think you have.

was relatively easy to ref

Especially when you ignore the cav completely.

Other than that, great fun this competition, gg all.
Wdym ignore the cav completely eks de

Well since you had to ask:

3rd round - 2ndHess cav rambos the all charge, I know that because our last guy did his best to leave only two of them mounted and too far from the infantry to take part in the all charge mounted, which they did anyway. This may pass on an ordinary LB but really shouldn't on a competitive event. Unless all charge means "stay mounted no matter how far and few you are", in which case I am looking forward to exploit that rule in future. But never mind that, you will not believe what happened in the 4th round.

4th round - 2ndHess cav member who is also a colonel rambos us near the beginning of the round. Meaning he was following our cav squad alone and attempting to attack. Witnesses are everyone who were on our side of the map. Luckily he sucks at ramboing so he only managed to dismount one of our guys I think, before we put this rabid dog down. Still, very sub-standard of our referees, since he was at it for a long time and wasn't getting slayed, nor even told off afterwards. Unless cav leaders are allowed to attack alone, in which case, again, I am looking forward to exploit that rule in future matches.

So as far as cav is concerned, it seems admin standards were lower on this event than on your typical every day line battle.  All four refs probably focused on lines too much.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Vegi. on August 08, 2019, 01:02:34 pm
Both Cav regs in this match were fairly generous with their movement in formation so I don't think you really have a leg to stand on with this comment personally Grozni.
I really don't know what you mean by this, our cav didn't break formation rule in any significant volume, and if it did the referees would do their job and tell us so through admin chat, thereby leaving the evidence in logs, which I don't think you have.

was relatively easy to ref

Especially when you ignore the cav completely.

Other than that, great fun this competition, gg all.
Wdym ignore the cav completely eks de

Well since you had to ask:

3rd round - 2ndHess cav rambos the all charge, I know that because our last guy did his best to leave only two of them mounted and too far from the infantry to take part in the all charge mounted, which they did anyway. This may pass on an ordinary LB but really shouldn't on a competitive event. Unless all charge means "stay mounted no matter how far and few you are", in which case I am looking forward to exploit that rule in future. But never mind that, you will not believe what happened in the 4th round.

4th round - 2ndHess cav member who is also a colonel rambos us near the beginning of the round. Meaning he was following our cav squad alone and attempting to attack. Witnesses are everyone who were on our side of the map. Luckily he sucks at ramboing so he only managed to dismount one of our guys I think, before we put this rabid dog down. Still, very sub-standard of our referees, since he was at it for a long time and wasn't getting slayed, nor even told off afterwards. Unless cav leaders are allowed to attack alone, in which case, again, I am looking forward to exploit that rule in future matches.

So as far as cav is concerned, it seems admin standards were lower on this event than on your typical every day line battle.  All four refs probably focused on lines too much.
I think you made your point here Grozni
It didn't affect the score that hard, we won anyway. I think that's the most important thing tho
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Cameron. on August 08, 2019, 01:07:31 pm
They were 5, your last cav attacked them (sounds similar to your other complaint except your guy was actually trying to attack by pretty sure he was continuing the charge) and dismounted and killed some so they continued their all charge with 2 or 3 people into the lines which is allowed as all CHARGE is one big CHARGE and they started it with the minimum needed numbers. Mind blowing.

The colonel was scouting and seemed he went afk and was trying to avoid the lines and your cav purposely intercepted him, you team dismounted the horse and did a team hit I was literally spectating, so again, a somewhat useless point when you can’t see the whole picture and don’t know the rules in their entirety.

Also threaten to exploit or rulebreak I’ll jus not let you compete in matches I’m reffing x

If you wish to continue the butthurt chat about things that didn’t affect rounds and aren’t rule breaks feel free to message the leader of your team and he can message us privately if he so wishes
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Skittykiller on August 08, 2019, 01:10:11 pm
On a request from Mitchell more for entertainment purpose i will be uploading my recordings of this battle on a random Channel i have. Im not sure if i have everything recorded where some of you are complaining about but if it has i hope it might clear some stuff out when i release it. I will upload it later on the day tho due to me being out for most of the day.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 08, 2019, 01:10:58 pm
Spoiler
Both Cav regs in this match were fairly generous with their movement in formation so I don't think you really have a leg to stand on with this comment personally Grozni.
I really don't know what you mean by this, our cav didn't break formation rule in any significant volume, and if it did the referees would do their job and tell us so through admin chat, thereby leaving the evidence in logs, which I don't think you have.

was relatively easy to ref

Especially when you ignore the cav completely.

Other than that, great fun this competition, gg all.
Wdym ignore the cav completely eks de

Well since you had to ask:

3rd round - 2ndHess cav rambos the all charge, I know that because our last guy did his best to leave only two of them mounted and too far from the infantry to take part in the all charge mounted, which they did anyway. This may pass on an ordinary LB but really shouldn't on a competitive event. Unless all charge means "stay mounted no matter how far and few you are", in which case I am looking forward to exploit that rule in future. But never mind that, you will not believe what happened in the 4th round.

4th round - 2ndHess cav member who is also a colonel rambos us near the beginning of the round. Meaning he was following our cav squad alone and attempting to attack. Witnesses are everyone who were on our side of the map. Luckily he sucks at ramboing so he only managed to dismount one of our guys I think, before we put this rabid dog down. Still, very sub-standard of our referees, since he was at it for a long time and wasn't getting slayed, nor even told off afterwards. Unless cav leaders are allowed to attack alone, in which case, again, I am looking forward to exploit that rule in future matches.

So as far as cav is concerned, it seems admin standards were lower on this event than on your typical every day line battle.  All four refs probably focused on lines too much.
[close]

My intention with my first comment was in reference to the fact that 'cav should maintain formation at all times' is a subjective rule, so the fact that both regiments in participation followed it to a similar degree gave the match balance. For example if the degree to which this rule was being followed differed between two regiments in one match I would pull up the slacking reg on it. That wasn't necessary here thankfully.

Re your comment on the 3rd round - when the all-charge is called the entire map & all units are 'in one charge', therefore if when the all-charge is called the cav unit has 5 mounted (which to my knowledge they were) they will be able to remain mounted until the end of the charge and the round. In any case this round ended with at least 20 left alive on the TBA team, so in my opinion their dismounting would not have affected the outcome of the round.

Re your comment on the 4th round - I may have the wrong end of the stick here but I was told by the ref who was watching that side of the map that there was a cavalryman on his own but that it was an afk attempting to rejoin his regiment. I therefore assumed the short combat that ensued as self-defence but I may have been wrong in this assumption. Similarly this rule-break did not affect the outcome of the round.

I hope this clarifies our position, did I miss anything you would like to be addressed Grozni?

Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Grozni on August 08, 2019, 01:27:53 pm
Spoiler
Both Cav regs in this match were fairly generous with their movement in formation so I don't think you really have a leg to stand on with this comment personally Grozni.
I really don't know what you mean by this, our cav didn't break formation rule in any significant volume, and if it did the referees would do their job and tell us so through admin chat, thereby leaving the evidence in logs, which I don't think you have.

was relatively easy to ref

Especially when you ignore the cav completely.

Other than that, great fun this competition, gg all.
Wdym ignore the cav completely eks de

Well since you had to ask:

3rd round - 2ndHess cav rambos the all charge, I know that because our last guy did his best to leave only two of them mounted and too far from the infantry to take part in the all charge mounted, which they did anyway. This may pass on an ordinary LB but really shouldn't on a competitive event. Unless all charge means "stay mounted no matter how far and few you are", in which case I am looking forward to exploit that rule in future. But never mind that, you will not believe what happened in the 4th round.

4th round - 2ndHess cav member who is also a colonel rambos us near the beginning of the round. Meaning he was following our cav squad alone and attempting to attack. Witnesses are everyone who were on our side of the map. Luckily he sucks at ramboing so he only managed to dismount one of our guys I think, before we put this rabid dog down. Still, very sub-standard of our referees, since he was at it for a long time and wasn't getting slayed, nor even told off afterwards. Unless cav leaders are allowed to attack alone, in which case, again, I am looking forward to exploit that rule in future matches.

So as far as cav is concerned, it seems admin standards were lower on this event than on your typical every day line battle.  All four refs probably focused on lines too much.
[close]

Re your comment on the 3rd round - when the all-charge is called the entire map & all units are 'in one charge', therefore if when the all-charge is called the cav unit has 5 mounted (which to my knowledge they were) they will be able to remain mounted until the end of the charge and the round. In any case this round ended with at least 20 left alive on the TBA team, so in my opinion their dismounting would not have affected the outcome of the round.

Our cav was in a valid 1v1 engagement with their cav. Our last mounted survivor had the right to continue, which he did leaving only two of them mounted. Even if they had 3 mounted which are some claims, the minimum is 5, so I am pretty sure they were supposed to dismount before joining the all charge which wasn't near them at all. The idea that they had 5 mounted when they attacked infantry in all charge came from imagination of one of referees. Anyway, if this is allowed and considered minor, all cav regs will do the same, and if it turns out that one cav guy can kill 10+ enemies in all charge I hope no one will complain too much.

Re your comment on the 4th round - I may have the wrong end of the stick here but I was told by the ref who was watching that side of the map that there was a cavalryman on his own but that it was an afk attempting to rejoin his regiment. I therefore assumed the short combat that ensued as self-defence but I may have been wrong in this assumption. Similarly this rule-break did not affect the outcome of the round.

I hope this clarifies our position, did I miss anything you would like to be addressed Grozni?

He was riding into the back of our squad, literally following as we were trying to shake him off. There is a possibility that he confused us with his own line, but I am pretty sure he wasn't "intercepted", rather we decided to turn around and fight him so he stops hindering our movement, thereby doing the admin job with our own weapons and risking our own health. If you have logs you will see I tried to notify refs in chat. If I ordered a guy to be intercepted on purpose, why would I be complaining about it here? My only intention is to make refs aware of their mistakes so we can keep this competition fun and clean.
Update: when we "intercepted" him he was steering into the fight, not away from it, thereby turning it into spontaneous ramboing.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 08, 2019, 01:52:35 pm
3rd round - that was my point though, the all-charge was called when they had 5 mounted and when that is called the 'all charge' isn't isolated to where the infantry were - it's the whole map! :)

Like I said I made assumptions with that 4th round Rambo and it was difficult to tell from my position whether the Rambo was intentional or not. I concede the point that this may have been Rambo however and I'm just glad it did not affect the outcome of the round.

I have no doubt that the intention of these issues raised was to benefit the fairness of the tournaments rules, so thankyou on that score. All I would recommend is that you raise future complaints more politely rather than the fairly obnoxious comment which started this debate; I was reffing this match when I could have been playing my regiments event and I don't take kindly to such comments, constructive criticism followed by reasonable discussion (which thankfully this turned into) I can gratefully accept.

Hopefully these issues are now resolved and we can all look forward to the next match :D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: [2ndHess] lukasoh on August 08, 2019, 02:10:35 pm
In my opinion its way more interesting, that we played two matches for now and both time we faced a player called Xaos  :o
Maybe he will show up in our 3rd match, who knows... but quite interestingcthat half of the cav has an invite tag, the other half blames on fse. Another player plays for two regs, witch play in the same group in the tourney. Was an interesting match, but that is quite weird.
And the fact, that we have to start at 20:15 because their cav didnt manage to join the server ( maybe they needed the time to call some invites) is quite weird, too :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Wolffe on August 08, 2019, 02:14:47 pm
alright guys lets keep this chat clear, if you have any other complaints or whatever take it to a private chat or whatever.

no need to crawl eachothers eyes out here :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Vegi. on August 08, 2019, 02:46:15 pm
alright guys lets keep this chat clear, if you have any other complaints or whatever take it to a private chat or whatever.

no need to crawl eachothers eyes out here :)
The supreme leader his words are final
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Cameron. on August 08, 2019, 03:02:42 pm
Somewhat interesting random people complain after but their leaders seem to have no issues whatsoever during the match.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 08, 2019, 03:11:04 pm
The issue with inviting has slowly crept in and my stance on it up to this point is this; minimal inviting (1 or 2) from regiments not participating in the tournament is acceptable, anything exceeding this potentially warranting a warning. Inviting from other regiments partaking in the tournament however was never intended to be accepted and would warrant a warning.

I shall review the logs of these first 6 matches to see where we stand and issue warnings where necessary, if these go ignored teams will then be deducted points or disqualified entirely.

I will ask refs to take a more active role in identifying invites in matches at point of play, but as we all know this is easily worked around without having ID rosters. Therefore (in fair warning to all teams) please take measures to ensure your inviting is within the boundaries stated above, or I will be either issuing warnings, deducting points or disqualifying teams based on retrospective evidence, depending on the severity of the inviting offences!!

Hope that clears that up :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Wolffe on August 08, 2019, 04:08:45 pm
Somewhat interesting random people complain after but their leaders seem to have no issues whatsoever during the match.
Shhh lad let it go
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Spoons on August 11, 2019, 03:51:25 pm
Match week: 3
Participants: TBA vs  thirsty third N
Involved classes: Line, Lights / Skirms, Cav
Date/Time: 14/08/19 7:00 pm UK time
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Ipoa on August 11, 2019, 10:22:18 pm
Thanks for the Match today. The better Team won and so i am here to say GG WP
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Jakob van Bicke on August 11, 2019, 10:47:12 pm
The Old Guard 3 - 1 Gardekorps

Nice and close match. Most rounds ended with like max. 10 people alive
Only the first round was a bit campy and we had to call for an all charge with like 60 ppl on both sides.
Few rule infringements by both sides but only a few slays had to be issued.
Other than that obviously Cameron and me got flamed a lot by rankers but I didn't hear any complaints from the Officers.

GG WP both sides

PS: Maybe tell your rankers to take a look at the rules. As I had to explain like 10 times that I won't revive anyone after 59:30 who died cause of timeout or smth like that
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Cameron. on August 11, 2019, 10:49:35 pm
Humble in victory and defeat.
ggwp pretty close match
Prefer playing and reffing no arty tbh far less campy so all charge is not enforced as much.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: Octanidas on August 12, 2019, 09:11:23 am
GG
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 12, 2019, 10:08:14 am

Match-week 4 : Overflow week!

First off thankyou to all teams which have arranged matches since last week! With the final week of the group stage now over we will as promised maintain an extra week for the remaining (5) matches to be completed. Ideally please arrange your remaining matches within this week as it will allow us to crack on with the two week long knock-outs, to have the tournament wrapped up by the end of this month. If we can get these matches into this timescale it will give all participants an ample two weeks break prior to the Champions league starting - good luck all and as usual if you need any assistance with your matches please do come to me!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Mitchell on August 12, 2019, 10:45:27 pm
Match week: 4
Participants: The Good, The Bad & The Timed Out vs The Cool Casuals
Involved classes: Line, Rifles / Lights and Cav
Date/Time: 16/08/2019 (This Friday)
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 5th August : Match-week 3
Post by: DragonKing on August 13, 2019, 12:40:41 pm
Match week: 2
Participants: French Coalition (FC) vs The Central Powers (TCP)
Involved classes: infantry, light, cav
Date/Time: 20:15 CEST Wednesday 14th.
Referee #1: needed
Referee #2: needed

Match week: 3
Participants: French Coalition (FC) vs GardeKorps (GK)
Involved classes: infantry, light, cav and art
Date/Time: Sunday 18th 20:15 CEST
Referee #1: needed
Referee #2: needed

So we have two match this week
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Cameron. on August 13, 2019, 01:26:44 pm
On holiday this week and get back next week, good luck to all refs hope some of you step up  :o
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 13, 2019, 01:42:10 pm
Thanks to all for arranging these last few - think we're only waiting on one now which is fantastic :)

We've got two matches going on tomorrow so if any refs aren't playing in either of those matches please do get involved; due to the teams which are taking part it actually does knock-out a great deal of our more regular refs like Samu, Tardet, Anna, Me, Cameron, Kaiser, Grekos and Jakob!!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Vegi. on August 13, 2019, 02:23:40 pm
One of the first tournaments where's no delay lols
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Skittykiller on August 13, 2019, 06:04:01 pm
Thanks to all for arranging these last few - think we're only waiting on one now which is fantastic :)

We've got two matches going on tomorrow so if any refs aren't playing in either of those matches please do get involved; due to the teams which are taking part it actually does knock-out a great deal of our more regular refs like Samu, Tardet, Anna, Me, Cameron, Kaiser, Grekos and Jakob!!

I mean i wouldnt mind reffing. But i only get called when no one else is avaiable ;D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Samu on August 14, 2019, 12:33:23 am
Thanks to all for arranging these last few - think we're only waiting on one now which is fantastic :)

We've got two matches going on tomorrow so if any refs aren't playing in either of those matches please do get involved; due to the teams which are taking part it actually does knock-out a great deal of our more regular refs like Samu, Tardet, Anna, Me, Cameron, Kaiser, Grekos and Jakob!!

Gonna add that i am away till the 24th but once im back I will ref religiously as i had been doing :D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: El_Presidente on August 14, 2019, 09:09:38 pm
The French Coalition 4 - 0 The Central Powers

The match mostly went ok the FC didn't quite bring the minimum of 50 though so the CP had a slight numerical advantage. Minimal OA and FiC as far as I could tell. The FC heavy cavalry seemed to be the decisive factor.

One complaint raised by Ulfur is that the FC cavalry charged multiple units when charging which isn't allowed so I'd be mindful of this in the future, though personally I didn't see this (Most fights were mass close proximity melee which can be very confusing for the participants involved). Equally I did spare the 40th from any FiC punishment when a stray cadet was killed by a cav technically making their line in melee, but proceeded to shoot anyway. So I hope both sides more or less felt the admining was good enough given I had to do it myself.

Shoutout again to the 40th for having to do a mass mobilisation when your team doesn't bring their promised numbers! We've been there too.

Spoiler
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/775102709102082278/76E7FF166F93311420EFE354AE55A583B6076B37/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/775102709102079927/7D4213167D0A8CDF819B45182D262B5759F7BCD0/)
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Krytenn on August 14, 2019, 09:15:42 pm
33rd/1stELvN 3:1 TBA

A good competitive match with fine shooting and melee. A couple of instances of Fic/FoL and OA from both sides. I would like to remind people however that I was the only admin there, and trying to watch every engagement in all corners of the map is not always possible. So if I missed a couple of rulebreaks I apologise.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 14, 2019, 11:39:29 pm
Huge thanks to both Presidente and Krytten for reffing these matches on their own; as they have said it is by no means an easy affair, having to keep two eyes on sometimes as many as 10 different units and to maintain the high standard of rules which this tournament has. Hats off to them and participating regs tonight.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: sirkaide on August 15, 2019, 09:31:13 am
Huge thanks to both Presidente and Krytten for reffing these matches on their own; as they have said it is by no means an easy affair, having to keep two eyes on sometimes as many as 10 different units and to maintain the high standard of rules which this tournament has. Hats off to them and participating regs tonight.
It was a really fun game to watch GG to everyone involved.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Skittykiller on August 16, 2019, 08:59:02 pm
The Cool Casuals 4:0 The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out

A good match with fine shooting and melee, melee for sure. A couple of instances of Fic/FoL and a few RiC on CR Rifles and OA from both sides. I would say it went all decent a lot of complaining tho. If you people dont like certain rules please dont shout them in the event or at me, give a notification to kincaid or any other maker of this league they can do more then me.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Kaiserinio on August 17, 2019, 12:22:09 am
There were some juicy cav engages, and huge mele fights. pretty good match in my opinion. Also gg for both teams.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 18, 2019, 09:30:51 pm
GardeKorps 3 - 1 The French Coalition

Well played to both teams and thankyou for the 2Lr's understanding by dropping so many players to spec to achieve balance. The match was highly active with a great deal of close ranged shooting and the superb cav on both teams made for some incredibly long and difficult cavalry charges! There were some minimal issues with FiC, mainly around light infantry but most if not all offences were remedied with revives. Should any side wish to appeal any rounds please get in contact with me or Kaiser.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Ipoa on August 18, 2019, 11:08:24 pm
We spoke with the French Coalition (Leaders) and there will be no Rematch! I am very sorry for the FC but it was a hard Match for us, many ppl had to spec or leave and most of my guys, the same for the Nr13, are angry with the whole thing. If we start a Rematch i am afraid i cant bring the minimum numbers! From our side both Teams had a few Rulebreaks (as it is in every match i think) but the biggest part of the Match was ok and we Won it within playing by the Rules. Last round was a mistake by FC but it was their fault - Sorry!
I wanna say at tghis point that the 2Lr had NO INVITES at this Match, we brought about 80 ppl to the battlefield and there was not a single Invite in our Regiment. I am not 100% Sure about the Nr13 but i did not see a Single one at least. I can not say the same about our enemy. Their cav was very strong and i think a lot of guys Invited there. Maybe this is not the Spirit of this event. I am looking forward and we have for the knockoutrounds a better Rule for this invite thingy.

Anyways i wanna say GG WP in capital Letters because the fight was close and hard. Very intense and took for sure a few years of my life ;) It was Fun and we are Happy to reach the next round. A big respect to the French ppl for giving us a very hard Fight, French guys are really Strong and everyone should not underestimate them!

Also sorry for my English, its for sure not the best - my apologies for that.

A happy Colonel from the 2Lr ;)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Kaiserinio on August 19, 2019, 03:15:44 am
I wanna say at this point that the 2Lr had NO INVITES at this Match, we brought about 80 ppl to the battlefield and there was not a single Invite in our Regiment. I am not 100% Sure about the Nr13 but i did not see a Single one at least. I can not say the same about our enemy. Their cav was very strong and i think a lot of guys Invited there. Maybe this is not the Spirit of this event. I am looking forward and we have for the knockoutrounds a better Rule for this invite thingy.

To adress the problem of invites, they are allowed simply due to fact that not all regs can provide their full strenght for all of the events (you had example in todays match), and bringing them allows oposite teams to get most of their men on the battlefield. I do not support the extensive usage of invites because that really might disturb the idea of Regiments fighting each other in ther groups, but as i've stated above i also do not see problem with getting additional men into the meat grinder, if they are no more then eg. 20 % of a line. I also support the idea of  clarifying the rules for inviting.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Skittykiller on August 19, 2019, 09:51:58 am
As i did in most matches i reffed. I stated to myself i would only adress it if any team has more then 5 invites. I think 5 is already quite a lot. But sins its allowed 5 is a decent number, but 20% of line is WAY to much.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: [2ndHess] lukasoh on August 19, 2019, 10:35:26 am
True, 5 invites, 1 per company is ok, even better if the invites dont play in any other team. But just 3 ppl of a 15 men line is too much in my opinion.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Tardet on August 19, 2019, 11:21:21 am
Quote
Their cav was very strong and i think a lot of guys Invited there. Maybe this is not the Spirit of this event. I am looking forward and we have for the knockoutrounds a better Rule for this invite thingy.

For the record, the DLC is a mix of some of the strongest and most experienced heavy cavalry players in the community. While it's true that certain of their players are double regimenting (which is not necessarily covered by the rules) or that they may used invites from time to time (I wasn't there yesterday evening but I already saw it happening in previous matches) they would still remain a deadly force to contain with, even without these particular players.

With that being said, I understand the general concern about invites and while I appreciate the current approach of the organisation to not be too strict about it, it indeeds seems like more and more people are worried about it so it's a good thing Kaide is willing to deal with in a more serious manner. Just remember that coalitions are between 100 and 200 members strong and that keeping an eyes on more than a thousand players without a ID system will likely end-up in a honest struggle. Being understanding and showing patience towards the adminstration of such an event is definitely the best approach you can chose to opt for.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Ipoa on August 19, 2019, 01:47:07 pm
As i already told Kincaide, we accepted the Rules and we will finish this Championship by playing Within the Rules. I think IT is/was OK as it was but maybe now we only have 4 remaining coalitions and 4 remaining Fights. It maybe now is possible to have a better look for invites. I think skitty is right, 5 invites is already a large Number maybe IT can be something Like 1 invite per 12 Players or 1 invite per Regiment/unit at the field (yes thats also very much but maybe IT IS something WE all can Deal With). OFC without id ITS hard to overwatch this but i hope that the remaining Regiments are willing to follows the Rules on their own.
As i already Said WE will continue this Championship and IT doesnt Matter If there are rulechanges or Not. Also If the Admins are Going on to allow invites WE will stay and Fight!
Maybe the FC had No "invites" maybe These Guys are in this Regiment by Double claning and IT IS Not forbidden by the Rules. It was Not my opinion to Attack Simeone With my Posting i Just wanted to Say that the 2Lr has No invites and IT IS forbidden to doubleclan in our Regiment.

Again sorry for my English and my typing but i wrote IT on my Mobile Phone and the autocorrect maybe Changed some words and the Letters 😅 🤭
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 19, 2019, 02:10:42 pm
Already spoken on the subject of invites a page or two ago and the actions we are taking going forward.

Just to clarify as there may be some confusion - there are two brackets of knockouts, a lower and upper; 1st and 2nd place will be claimed in the upper and 3rd claimed by the winner of the lower bracket. This is to offer incentive for those in the lower bracket to continue play, against regiments of more similar standing.

Due to the even scoring of GBT & 1ste3rdN we'll unfortunately have to randomize the seeding of the upper bracket. Just one more match to play of the group-stage (for which this Wednesday 21st has been pencilled in) and then we will be able to press on with the knock-outs! :D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Kaiserinio on August 19, 2019, 07:06:07 pm
Since subject of invites requires to be put in simple way, im gonna present a project of new rule regarding the invites.

Based on single team numbers, they can bring:
- 50-59 (+3 invites)
-  60-69 (+4 invites)
-  70+  (+5 invites)

Also considering that couple good players can change the outcome of mele engage, i would also limit the number of invites per regiment/company to 1 (depending on internal structure of regiment). That solution would give us max 5 invites, without increasing the strenght of reg too much. On top of that, if reg reps will agree there might be possibility of adding more then 1 inv to reg, but thats only for special cases.

As always i'm open for discussion and applying changes to this project, because we wont make it live without agreement from all participants. Also i think this should be implemented with next stage in tournament.

P. S. Yes it is based on attendance rule, but i think it's fair.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Ipoa on August 19, 2019, 08:13:40 pm
This is looking very good. I am accepting it!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Krytenn on August 19, 2019, 09:33:02 pm
Match week: 4
Participants: The Old Guard vs The Central Powers
Involved classes: Line/Lights/Cav
Date/Time: 21/08/2019
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Smokey_6147 on August 19, 2019, 10:08:47 pm
Match week: 4
Participants: The Old Guard vs The Central Powers
Involved classes: Line/Lights/Cav
Date/Time: 21/08/2019
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed

ill admin this
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Octanidas on August 20, 2019, 08:00:41 am
Already spoken on the subject of invites a page or two ago and the actions we are taking going forward.

Just to clarify as there may be some confusion - there are two brackets of knockouts, a lower and upper; 1st and 2nd place will be claimed in the upper and 3rd claimed by the winner of the lower bracket. This is to offer incentive for those in the lower bracket to continue play, against regiments of more similar standing.

Due to the even scoring of GBT & 1ste3rdN we'll unfortunately have to randomize the seeding of the upper bracket. Just one more match to play of the group-stage (for which this Wednesday 21st has been pencilled in) and then we will be able to press on with the knock-outs! :D

I'm very sorry but i really cannot understand why you want random matches for the upper bracket. If you cannot determine 1st and 2nd place of Group A just let the winner of Group B decide who they want to fight in the semi finals. Randomizing matches would be unfair and would destroy the typical advantage of the 1st place of the groupstages. That's at least my point of view.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 20, 2019, 08:58:12 am
Already spoken on the subject of invites a page or two ago and the actions we are taking going forward.

Just to clarify as there may be some confusion - there are two brackets of knockouts, a lower and upper; 1st and 2nd place will be claimed in the upper and 3rd claimed by the winner of the lower bracket. This is to offer incentive for those in the lower bracket to continue play, against regiments of more similar standing.

Due to the even scoring of GBT & 1ste3rdN we'll unfortunately have to randomize the seeding of the upper bracket. Just one more match to play of the group-stage (for which this Wednesday 21st has been pencilled in) and then we will be able to press on with the knock-outs! :D

I'm very sorry but i really cannot understand why you want random matches for the upper bracket. If you cannot determine 1st and 2nd place of Group A just let the winner of Group B decide who they want to fight in the semi finals. Randomizing matches would be unfair and would destroy the typical advantage of the 1st place of the groupstages. That's at least my point of view.

Well that is my point - there is no quantifiable advantage to choose since the two top teams in Group A achieved the same score. I'll grant you it is definitely bizarre the way this has came about. Just goes to show how uncertain the outcome of these larger scale matches can be.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Octanidas on August 20, 2019, 09:44:29 am
But isn't there a winner of Group B who deserved an advantage? I understand that both winners of Group A should be given same chances but i think it's more unfair to take the advantage of the Group B winner than opposing both Group A winners with enemies of a different level. Otherwhise we don't need to play the last match of the Group Stage. Our opponent won't be able to become 2nd or 1st of our group and when the matches of the upper bracket will be randomized, the outcome of our last match match wouldn't matter (OG hast 7 rounds won, GK too. But OG has still one Match again CP and needs one more round to be 1st place alone).

Don't understand me wrong. The matches are cool and i would like to play all of them! And it's very good that we can discuss this topic. I understand your opinion but maybe consider this point of view:
Both winners of Group A missed their chance of gaining an advantage (but they still reached semi finals!). But most likely there is a winner of Group B who definately deserved one. Maybe i understand this wrong but it seems like the advantage is being taken to balance two coalitions which both didn't manage to gain one.

If you explain this to me i will be open to your was to go. I just didn't get the point of the sense behind randomizing  :-[

Spoiler
Maybe there is a way to determine a winner of Group A. If both coalitions agree they could face each other for sudden death or maybe best of three. So both would have a chance of becoming the only winner of their group. But maybe i'm wrong and this would cost too much time or whatever xD
[close]

But really thank you for talking to me and understanding me! That's a rare thing in most tounaments and should be admired!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 20, 2019, 10:49:31 am
Not a problem and thanks for the discussion!

I totally understand your desire to see the first placed team in B to have an 'advantage' - but this here in my eyes is where the issue lies; there is no advantage for the team to be pitched against one team in group A over the other, as they both scored exactly the same. As you suggested there could be a decider match between 1ste3rdN and GBT, but I'm not keen on this option since we are already overrunning time wise and each week longer that we take impacts the amount of time between this tournie and the champions league.

Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Octanidas on August 20, 2019, 11:13:47 am
The only advantage i can see is the right of chosing the enemy for the semi finals. According to points this is no advantage, of course. But it just feels better than fighting a random opponent and i think every coalition has an opponent they would like to fight and one they wouldn't.

I just think that there will be a huge discussions after the semi finals like "If we fought the other coalition we would have won." or "They just had luck with their opponents.". That's the Problem with random decisions.
But now i do understand you in a better way and of course won't complain about your way to go. Just wanted to make my statement clear.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Tardet on August 20, 2019, 11:57:54 am
Due to the even scoring of GBT & 1ste3rdN we'll unfortunately have to randomize the seeding of the upper bracket.

Out of curiosity, given the fact that GBT & 1ste3rdN being on the same points create an issue in seeding your knockout stage, why don't you use head to head to decide their respective final placings in the group stage?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: Vegi. on August 20, 2019, 01:41:28 pm
Just do 1/2 final and Finals after with a bronze match instead of the 2nd playing of the brackets playing for the 3th/4th place
Spoiler
Correct me if i'm wrong cuz i might not payed a lot of attention recently
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Tardet on August 21, 2019, 09:23:40 pm
The Old Guard 4 - 0 The Central Powers

Spoiler
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/773977439680097938/7BF6F3D173AB2E8AFE14A278F0F9BCD81BF0355C/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/773977439680098561/66B5082E03C20953404AEB154A860682BD20D73B/)
[close]

Referee: Presidente, Jakob & Tardet

Well played to both teams, it was a good match without too much rulebreaking. No global chat was requested by CP at one point but there were no excessively bad behaviours on either side, just a bit of spam chat. Despite valiant efforts from the Central Powers, the Old Guard was just too strong tonight and minus a close ending in the last round, the score reflects that. Good luck to both teams onto the next stage, the group-stage is now well and truly concluded.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Jakob van Bicke on August 21, 2019, 10:44:48 pm
The Old Guard 4 - 0 The Central Powers

Spoiler
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/773977439680097938/7BF6F3D173AB2E8AFE14A278F0F9BCD81BF0355C/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/773977439680098561/66B5082E03C20953404AEB154A860682BD20D73B/)
[close]

Referee: Presidente, Jakob & Tardet

Well played to both teams, it was a good match without too much rulebreaking. No global chat was requested by CP at one point but there were no excessively bad behaviours on either side, just a bit of spam chat. Despite valiant efforts from the Central Powers, the Old Guard was just too strong tonight and minus a close ending in the last round, the score reflects that. Good luck to both teams onto the next stage, the group-stage is now well and truly concluded.

A nice match to watch and ref. We had some cases in which we were unsure about how to act (for example stone-hugging) but those never of high enough importance to void a round.
The chat restriction was put in place but sometimes not followed to the fullest (mostly broken by 1 ranker from the Nr4). As his chat wasn't really provoking or anything like that the other refs and I decided to ignore it.

Also, as I noticed it in both matches I reffed for OG up until now: If the Nr4 has any problem with me personally or with the way I ref the matches, you guys may as well tell me so or look for another ref. Cause insulting me in ingame chat might actually not be the smartest idea (for obvious reasons).

1 last thing to mention though. We refs can't see everything. If you have complaints or wanna point smth out, please do so in the Steam Groupchat or Steam direct chat. We can't keep track of everything being written in ingame chat.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 21, 2019, 10:46:30 pm
Thanks to you both for covering the reffing — will have the semi final matches up in the morning and we will be going ahead with tardets suggestion as to how to seed the upper bracket.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 12th August : Match-week 4
Post by: El_Presidente on August 21, 2019, 10:49:04 pm
I helped with the reffing too  :-[
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 22, 2019, 09:21:20 am



(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48595661182_b8328583f1_o.png)



|  Upper Bracket  |

|  Lower Bracket  |



1ste3rdN     VS     The Old Guard


The Cool Casuals     VS     The Central Powers


The Good the Bad & the Time-out     VS     GardeKorps


The Best Alliance     VS     The French Coalition
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          


Rule Amendments:

First off thanks to all the teams for playing out their matches in good time and sticking with us through the tournament so far! We're a small step away from rounding this all off, but it did occur to me that I did leave an ever so slight gaping whole in the rule-set for when it came to the knock-outs - how to resolve draws...

Unless anyone has any objection we shall resolve all draws with a 5th and final deciding round; in my view anything more than this would take far too long. Any issues with this let me know but aside from that, best of luck with your semi-final matches!

It is also worth noting that the 65y have kindly stepped in to replace the 57thTR on the Central Powers team; we all know that the 40th has struggled the last few matches, having to bring most if not all the attendance themselves - so hats off to them for staying on board and I wish them the best of luck with this addition to their team.

PS
Sorry El Presidente bae <3 thanks too hun x
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Señor Noel on August 28, 2019, 06:59:36 pm
Match week: 4
Participants: TBA vs French Coalation
Involved classes: without arty
Date/Time: 28/08/2019
Referee #1: tba
Referee #2: tba
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Krytenn on August 28, 2019, 09:25:51 pm
TBA 1:3 French Coalition

Decent and competitive match despite the score line and with reasonably little camping on the whole, French coalition managed to win despite sporting a sizeable numbers deficiency. Good shooting and melee and some good cavalry v cavalry fights. Few fic/fol here and there nothing too serious. 1 instance of OA. Couple of rambo slays as well. Well played to both teams!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Tardet on August 28, 2019, 09:40:08 pm
Thanks to Krytenn and Presidente for referring our match on what looked to be very short notice.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on August 29, 2019, 12:23:18 pm
Thanks to Krytenn and Presidente for referring our match on what looked to be very short notice.
Thanks indeed; with all the other commitments the team leaders have pile up on the day they could save themselves some trouble by squaring away some refs in advance!

GG to the French Coalition, advancing to the final of the lower bracket... lets start seeing these other matches materialize guys :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Mitchell on August 29, 2019, 02:13:25 pm
Match week: Semi-Final
Participants: The Good, The Bad & The Timed-Out vs GardeKorps
Involved classes: Line, Lights / Skirms, Cav
Date/Time: Sunday 1st September - 7pm BST
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Skittykiller on August 29, 2019, 05:31:05 pm
Against who?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Auror Davee on August 29, 2019, 05:42:32 pm
Against who?
Gardekorps
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Mitchell on August 30, 2019, 02:33:00 pm
Oops, sorry about that, changed it now
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on September 04, 2019, 04:37:08 pm
Match week: Final
Participants: Cool Casuals VS French Coalition
Involved classes: Inf, Cav, Skirms/Lights
Date/Time: 10/09/2019 19:00 UK Time
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on September 04, 2019, 04:51:20 pm
Match week: Final
Participants: Cool Casuals VS French Coalition
Involved classes: Inf, Cav, Skirms/Lights
Date/Time: 10/09/2019 19:00 UK Time
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
I'm free to ref.

Just to clarify the Central Powers gave the semi-final match to the Cool Casuals thus we have here the final of the lower bracket participants, the winner of which will claim 3rd Place in the tournament :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Ipoa on September 08, 2019, 07:49:37 pm
Match week: Semi-Final
Participants: The Good, The Bad & The Timed-Out vs GardeKorps
Involved classes: Line, Lights / Skirms, Cav
Date/Time: Sunday 1st September - 7pm BST
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
New Date: 9th September - 7pm BST
Ref Stil needed as far as i know.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Tardet on September 09, 2019, 05:15:29 pm
Match week: Semi-Final - Upper Bracket
Participants: The Good, The Bad & The Timed-Out vs GardeKorps
Involved classes: Line, Lights / Skirms, Cav
Date/Time: Monday 9th September - 7pm BST
Referee #1: Jakob
Referee #2: Anna
Referee #3: Tardet

Match week: Final - Lower Bracket
Participants: Cool Casuals VS French Coalition
Involved classes: Inf, Cav, Skirms/Lights
Date/Time: 10/09/2019 19:00 UK Time
Referee #1: Kincaid
Referee #2: Tardet

Posting again with referees updated in case anyone was wondering. Will update again if anything changes, let's have some banging matches.



Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Jakob van Bicke on September 09, 2019, 09:49:58 pm
The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out 3 - 2 Gardekorps

I could write a lot about this match, but I'm in a hurry so I won't.
After a 2-2 a decisive round had to be played. That one was won by GBT.
All in all it was a fair match. FiC, a bit of rambo and lots of OA but nothing that would change the outcome of each round.
GG WP to both coalitions.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Mitchell on September 09, 2019, 09:59:55 pm
The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out 3 - 2 Gardekorps

I could write a lot about this match, but I'm in a hurry so I won't.
After a 2-2 a decisive round had to be played. That one was won by GBT.
All in all it was a fair match. FiC, a bit of rambo and lots of OA but nothing that would change the outcome of each round.
GG WP to both coalitions.

Thankyou to everybody involved in this match. The refs were great, maybe a little slow on some decisions (sorry for raging in internal a little)   ???. The 2Lr and Nr13 played very well, and it was an extremely close competition.  :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Wolffe on September 09, 2019, 10:05:42 pm
The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out 3 - 2 Gardekorps

I could write a lot about this match, but I'm in a hurry so I won't.
After a 2-2 a decisive round had to be played. That one was won by GBT.
All in all it was a fair match. FiC, a bit of rambo and lots of OA but nothing that would change the outcome of each round.
GG WP to both coalitions.
Great match indeed really enjoyed playing our part.
Thanks and GG’s towards the GardeKorps, they played really well and outsmarted us on multiple occasions.
Most enjoyable match we’ve  played so far!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on September 10, 2019, 08:45:24 am
What I caught of the last couple of rounds from the match yesterday looked excellent! Rare to see such a coordinated fight at 80v80 - Well played to both!

Match week: Semi-Final
Participants: 1ste3rdN VS The Old Guard
Involved classes: Inf, Cav, Skirms/Lights
Date/Time: 15/09/2019 19:00 UK Time
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Tardet on September 10, 2019, 11:30:36 am
Just another reminder after last night that referees take from their own free time to ensure that official matches can happen in a structured, fair and somewhat enjoyable atmosphere. They gain little to nothing doing that, the referee job doesn't grant any particular privileges nor does it give them some sort of influential power. Most people do that out of good will, they are not power-hungry, but simply care to help.

I'm not saying that to address the few cretins constantly having a go at admins because this is what you do when you are 17 and want to be a bit edgy but just aiming at clarifying people who keep complaining about rule breaking during the event and get annoyed if the admins/referees don't answer them. Most of these people have probably never refereed a single NW match in their lives and certainly not one which involves around 80 people on each side, with 5 different units, each having their own specific rules, the whole thing happening in a somewhat competitive events with high-stakes for certain people. If they do, they will probably understand that it's a honest struggle to keep an eye on everything, even if you have an set-up of three experienced referees to take care of that match. It's nearly impossible to answer everyone and when/if we do, we are very likely to miss a crucial moment of a round, which will inevitably lead into more complaints.

Referees are also humans and can make mistake. Yes, when the stakes are high, it's frustrating to have a decision possibly impacting the outcome of a whole round, if not of a whole match. But you can always record your perspective and show your side of the story later on. In some situations (not often) it may very well end-up in a specific round having to be replayed. Sure, in this particular competition, having to gather the two coalitions once more to replay a round is unlikely but whining, insulting and spamming the global chat will never do you or your team any good.

Last but not least, I know it's not easy as a leader to keep an eye on your line while commanding and watching out for what's happening on the battlefield. Most leaders will just let their soldiers talk as much shit as they want, not because they like it, but because they can't be arsed to take care of the discipline while leading, which is understandable. That's usually why you have your NCO/CO to do it for you. Every regiments have their own way of doing things but it's always appreciated as a referee when older and more grown up people tell their youngsters to keep it quiet when they get ahead of themselves. We are not here to police every single person during the event, that's your job to make sure they behave according to decent standards.

Tl;dr: In general, just try to show a bit more respect and be a bit more understanding towards the referees who dedicate their own free time to improve your gaming experience.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: 33rdKincaid on September 10, 2019, 09:10:28 pm
The Cool Casuals 3 - 1 The French Coalition

Well played to both team is this final match of the lower bracket. Not going to lie there were quite a few rule-breaks in this match, especially in the last round but for the 4 refs in attendance (myself, Jakob, Darkling & Kaiser) all agree when these occurred they were perpetrated by both teams, so I guess in some weird and irritating way they balanced each other out. On a more positive note it was great to see the French Coalition field some greater numbers with the addition of the 45e. Thankyou also the Cool Casuals for balancing to the extreme for the final round. Not the most exciting match but there were some moments of tense combat, with one huge melee only round aswell.

Congratulations to The Cool Casuals for claiming 3rd Place in this Season NWBC!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on September 10, 2019, 09:29:41 pm
The match was alright but it didn't feel as intense as our last one sadly. I agree with the rule breaking comment. Both us and the FC were guilty of FiC, though from when I was spectating I think we were the ones doing it 'more often'. When us and the FC were FiCingit, it was because our opposing heavy cavalry had smacked into eachothers infantry which just caused confusion. Multiple people in our teamspeak were legitimately asking 'are we in melee?!' when there was cavalry riding around, it's really really confusing.

I think both of our cavalry units were devastating when used against opposing infantry which made both sides scared of doing something risky. I knew to expect strong FC cavalry, but I wasn't expecting it to be seemingly much better than our own! Our cavalry disadvantage forced us to fight in unfamiliar territory.

So, my compliments to the French heavy cavalry. I've seen you annihilate regiments in the matches I've refereed and you were indeed the most difficult thing for us to contend with by far.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Octanidas on September 10, 2019, 09:59:39 pm
What I caught of the last couple of rounds from the match yesterday looked excellent! Rare to see such a coordinated fight at 80v80 - Well played to both!

Match week: Semi-Final
Participants: 1ste3rdN VS The Old Guard
Involved classes: Inf, Cav, Skirms/Lights
Date/Time: 15/09/2019 19:00 UK Time
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed

Nr4 was not involved in this agreement; we won't make it on sunday. Maybe i missed the rule but what happens when one coalition cannot bring Cavalry?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: [2ndHess] lukasoh on September 10, 2019, 10:24:38 pm
What I caught of the last couple of rounds from the match yesterday looked excellent! Rare to see such a coordinated fight at 80v80 - Well played to both!

Match week: Semi-Final
Participants: 1ste3rdN VS The Old Guard
Involved classes: Inf, Cav, Skirms/Lights
Date/Time: 15/09/2019 19:00 UK Time
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed

Nr4 was not involved in this agreement; we won't make it on sunday. Maybe i missed the rule but what happens when one coalition cannot bring Cavalry?
In one of our matches we just waited for like 20 minutes for the enemy cav to call like 5 members and cav 5 invites. So maybe you can do the same?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Octanidas on September 10, 2019, 10:41:35 pm
We have a CCL Match on this day so we won't be able to attend two Events.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on September 10, 2019, 10:43:43 pm
We have a CCL Match on this day so we won't be able to attend two Events.
Apologies I may have posted this pre-emptively - I had thought the Nr4 and 59th were free so that held good odds the date would be fine but if the date is not good for the team then apologies for jumping the gun! Will speak to 59th x
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on September 10, 2019, 10:53:01 pm
What I caught of the last couple of rounds from the match yesterday looked excellent! Rare to see such a coordinated fight at 80v80 - Well played to both!

Match week: Semi-Final
Participants: 1ste3rdN VS The Old Guard
Involved classes: Inf, Cav, Skirms/Lights
Date/Time: 15/09/2019 19:00 UK Time
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed

Nr4 was not involved in this agreement; we won't make it on sunday. Maybe i missed the rule but what happens when one coalition cannot bring Cavalry?
In one of our matches we just waited for like 20 minutes for the enemy cav to call like 5 members and cav 5 invites. So maybe you can do the same?

We won’t do the same, but thanks for your innovative comment!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: DragonKing on September 11, 2019, 12:21:02 am
The match was alright but it didn't feel as intense as our last one sadly. I agree with the rule breaking comment. Both us and the FC were guilty of FiC, though from when I was spectating I think we were the ones doing it 'more often'. When us and the FC were FiCingit, it was because our opposing heavy cavalry had smacked into eachothers infantry which just caused confusion. Multiple people in our teamspeak were legitimately asking 'are we in melee?!' when there was cavalry riding around, it's really really confusing.

I think both of our cavalry units were devastating when used against opposing infantry which made both sides scared of doing something risky. I knew to expect strong FC cavalry, but I wasn't expecting it to be seemingly much better than our own! Our cavalry disadvantage forced us to fight in unfamiliar territory.

So, my compliments to the French heavy cavalry. I've seen you annihilate regiments in the matches I've refereed and you were indeed the most difficult thing for us to contend with by far.

We was really glad to play with a great 45e that brought 16 guys for the Final. But these reinforcements were not enough against our opponents. We played against a strong team that played in a coordinated manner with its members. The tactic of our opponents was simple and effective : Putting our cavalry out. My riders were constantly harassed by the enemy's infantry. While I was hiding my horsemen a little too far from our infantry, the enemy took the opportunity to carry out deadly charges against our troops. Our biggest weapon, our cavalry, had become impossible to use properly. Obviously, the enemy cavalry was always close to its line infantry, thus preventing a face-to-face between the two cavalry. Or a deadly charge against an infantry a little too far from the rest of the group.
In pure Skill, the The Cool Casuals is probably weaker than us. But the Coordination, the tactic , the preparation of the match and the lead of El presidente was overwhelmingly superior. I admit it without shame. We discussed the game after the match. This energy put into preparing and setting up the match really surprised me! I am happy to have lost against a team that really took this match and this competition seriously and, despite some discrepancies in the rules, they totally deserve victory and therefore 3rd place in the tournament!

Well played guys and Good luck for the future!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Kieran on September 11, 2019, 04:35:07 pm
The match was alright but it didn't feel as intense as our last one sadly. I agree with the rule breaking comment. Both us and the FC were guilty of FiC, though from when I was spectating I think we were the ones doing it 'more often'. When us and the FC were FiCingit, it was because our opposing heavy cavalry had smacked into eachothers infantry which just caused confusion. Multiple people in our teamspeak were legitimately asking 'are we in melee?!' when there was cavalry riding around, it's really really confusing.

I think both of our cavalry units were devastating when used against opposing infantry which made both sides scared of doing something risky. I knew to expect strong FC cavalry, but I wasn't expecting it to be seemingly much better than our own! Our cavalry disadvantage forced us to fight in unfamiliar territory.

So, my compliments to the French heavy cavalry. I've seen you annihilate regiments in the matches I've refereed and you were indeed the most difficult thing for us to contend with by far.

We was really glad to play with a great 45e that brought 16 guys for the Final. But these reinforcements were not enough against our opponents. We played against a strong team that played in a coordinated manner with its members. The tactic of our opponents was simple and effective : Putting our cavalry out. My riders were constantly harassed by the enemy's infantry. While I was hiding my horsemen a little too far from our infantry, the enemy took the opportunity to carry out deadly charges against our troops. Our biggest weapon, our cavalry, had become impossible to use properly. Obviously, the enemy cavalry was always close to its line infantry, thus preventing a face-to-face between the two cavalry. Or a deadly charge against an infantry a little too far from the rest of the group.
In pure Skill, the The Cool Casuals is probably weaker than us. But the Coordination, the tactic , the preparation of the match and the lead of El presidente was overwhelmingly superior. I admit it without shame. We discussed the game after the match. This energy put into preparing and setting up the match really surprised me! I am happy to have lost against a team that really took this match and this competition seriously and, despite some discrepancies in the rules, they totally deserve victory and therefore 3rd place in the tournament!

Well played guys and Good luck for the future!

Your Cav was definitely a problem for us and we knew if you used it effectively it was destroy us so taking your cavalry out of the game was our best bet of victory. As i was leading the 19th line i had to tell the lads to focus and you as i knew your cavalry was superior to ours and make victory more possible. Putting the odd FIC issues out of the way, Id say it was overall a very good and intense game and well done to our opponents and especially there Cavalry. Probably the most effective cavalry Ive seen for line battles (as alll cav sweats go hussars for 1v1's).
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Tardet on September 11, 2019, 04:45:55 pm
Hussars has been the main class for probably more than 90% of the cavalry regiments over the years yet there is nothing like heavy cavalry to cut down a line of infantry like a knife through butter. On top of that, when that regiment is made of some of the most experienced and skilled heavy cavalry players left in the community, it's no big surprise to see them performing that well and be such a burden for the enemy team.

Congratz on the Cool Casuals for finding an effective counter to it and claiming the third place, was definitely easier said than done.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Voluble123 on September 11, 2019, 08:42:13 pm
Hussars has been the main class for probably more than 90% of the cavalry regiments over the years yet there is nothing like heavy cavalry to cut down a line of infantry like a knife through butter. On top of that, when that regiment is made of some of the most experienced and skilled heavy cavalry players left in the community, it's no big surprise to see them performing that well and be such a burden for the enemy team.

Congratz on the Cool Casuals for finding an effective counter to it and claiming the third place, was definitely easier said than done.
Heavy cav op!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Kieran on September 12, 2019, 03:55:34 pm
Hussars has been the main class for probably more than 90% of the cavalry regiments over the years yet there is nothing like heavy cavalry to cut down a line of infantry like a knife through butter. On top of that, when that regiment is made of some of the most experienced and skilled heavy cavalry players left in the community, it's no big surprise to see them performing that well and be such a burden for the enemy team.

Congratz on the Cool Casuals for finding an effective counter to it and claiming the third place, was definitely easier said than done.
Heavy cav op!

When used properly like how the 10pk and how we use it in linebattles, i would defo agree with you.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Vegi. on September 13, 2019, 12:54:01 pm
There's nothing more hateful for me than heavy cav, if people use it properly. 19th and 10pk are here good examples of having good heavy cav.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Voluble123 on September 13, 2019, 01:13:19 pm
Hussars has been the main class for probably more than 90% of the cavalry regiments over the years yet there is nothing like heavy cavalry to cut down a line of infantry like a knife through butter. On top of that, when that regiment is made of some of the most experienced and skilled heavy cavalry players left in the community, it's no big surprise to see them performing that well and be such a burden for the enemy team.

Congratz on the Cool Casuals for finding an effective counter to it and claiming the third place, was definitely easier said than done.
Heavy cav op!

When used properly like how the 10pk and how we use it in linebattles, i would defo agree with you.
I would only say defo need to dismount in all charge IMO
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Romulus76 on September 13, 2019, 01:43:19 pm
This was the first tournament / competitve type thing the 1stEB have done in a long time, and I can say a thoroughly enjoyed it. Hats off to the 19th for bringing the majority of our coalition, but this event certainly helped our own attendance and we even reached 20 people again at one point, we usually sit around 10-15. Certainly not our past attendances of 50+, but it's something haha. Cheers for the great time and for the challenging linebattles against the regiments we fought with, especially the 33rd in the first match we did - we got decimated due to not knowing what we were getting ourselves into!

Thanks so much to the 33rd for hosting this and allowing us in, as I am well aware what the majority of people think of my regiment  ::) I hope this might have changed some peoples opinions on us, that we aren't always trolls.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on September 13, 2019, 01:49:18 pm
Hussars has been the main class for probably more than 90% of the cavalry regiments over the years yet there is nothing like heavy cavalry to cut down a line of infantry like a knife through butter. On top of that, when that regiment is made of some of the most experienced and skilled heavy cavalry players left in the community, it's no big surprise to see them performing that well and be such a burden for the enemy team.

Congratz on the Cool Casuals for finding an effective counter to it and claiming the third place, was definitely easier said than done.
Heavy cav op!

When used properly like how the 10pk and how we use it in linebattles, i would defo agree with you.
I would only say defo need to dismount in all charge IMO
The rule for staying mounted was left in with the idea that it would motivate lines/lights (90% of a teams units) to push and engage enemy cavalry prior to any all-charge, which are usually called because of camping. This of course falls down when one teams cavalry is superior to the other where one team will be more motivated to camp and keep their cavalry safe. The alternative however of forcing the Cavalry to dismount in the all-charge encourages the cavalry to commit themselves, but they of course only make up 10-15% of a team so figured the former option would be a better deterrent to camping.

Thanks for the kind words Gretel and for participating from start to finish :D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on September 16, 2019, 11:22:12 pm
Match week: Semi-Final
Participants: 1ste3rdN VS The Old Guard
Involved classes: Inf, Cav, Skirms/Lights
Date/Time: 22/09/2019 19:00 UK Time
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed

Apologies for the delay on this, just unfortunate set of circumstances - just this match and a final to go :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on September 22, 2019, 09:07:21 pm
gg wp but nice FiC's in the third round  ::)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: sirkaide on September 22, 2019, 09:19:33 pm
Great game and well done for putting up such a good fight 33rd and co.


The Old Guard will march into the final and present cock to arse.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 22nd July : Match-week 1
Post by: Tardet on September 22, 2019, 09:26:19 pm
The Old Guard 3 - 1 1ste3rdN

It was a really good match, probably one of the best I have got the chance to watch in this NWBC. There were a few instances of FiC and a couple of OAs yet none which impacted the outcome of the round. There also was a gentleman agreement on the last round to go for an early all-charge, which resulted in an amazing round, where the Nr4 played a huge part in denying the overtime to the 33rd coalition. Generally speaking, it was a team effort which granted the Old Guard that win but needless to say the 33rd brought their A-game, making the whole encounter really exciting.

Big thanks to Anna for being available on such a short notice and kRIEGER for joining us and making our task as referees easier. Good luck to the Old Guard in the grand-final and to the 33rd & 1ste for the bronze match.

Screenshots
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/763846954794933535/505CFD9FB60D1B5C189D57A595F56ADD6CD285BF/)
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/763846954794933788/D21FDD0E24C8D851CC2176FEB2E4E9A4CB17522A/)
[close]

Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Anna on September 23, 2019, 12:27:15 am
I certainly had a lot of fun spectating this match, the last round was especially exciting to watch!

Many thanks to Tardet and Krieger again for their company!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Vegi. on September 23, 2019, 09:29:30 am
Let's play the fucking finals, so we can  finally finish this league!  ;D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on September 23, 2019, 10:57:01 am
Very well played in the match yesterday all, was a tense game! Brilliant coordination from the OG in the first two rounds to soundly put us down, I felt like we may turn the tide in the last half but alas it was not meant to be - though the margin was close ;D ;D

We do now only have the final match for the upper bracket left to play, with both 'The Good the Bad & the Timed-out' and 'The Old Guard' competing for 1st & 2nd place, the 'Cool Casuals' already having claimed 3rd place in the lower bracket final. Looking forward to seeing these magnificent teams taking each other on in an exciting final!

PS - apologies for this last part of the tournie dragging on abit, super glad we were on schedule for the group-stages though or who knows when we would have finished in the end.

Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Kulouš on September 23, 2019, 12:43:26 pm
In finals, will there be arti allowed or we changing the rules once again cuz someone is getting outplayed by arti?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on September 23, 2019, 12:56:55 pm
In finals, will there be arti allowed or we changing the rules once again cuz someone is getting outplayed by arti?
You should read the rules more closely sweetheart; no team is forced to play with arty as it must be agreed upon by both participants of a match. This has been the case from the off. Many teams who initially signed up with arty have opted out of playing with it, after playing their first, long, drawn-out match ;)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Cameron. on September 24, 2019, 11:56:18 pm
Kincaid once called me his sweetheart.
Cockney amorist
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on September 25, 2019, 09:45:56 am
Kincaid once called me his sweetheart.
Cockney amorist
The difference is when I called you that it was sincere x
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 02, 2019, 03:33:50 pm
On what are we waiting for...
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Auror Davee on October 02, 2019, 04:15:52 pm
Wtf, just forgot that this still exist
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 02, 2019, 04:20:43 pm
Wtf, just forgot that this still exist
yes i think so  :( :( :(
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on October 02, 2019, 04:36:45 pm
Wtf, just forgot that this still exist
yes i think so  :( :( :(
Your team and the Old Guard are in discussion as to the date of the upper bracket final.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Krytenn on October 02, 2019, 05:16:07 pm
Shit. Completely forgot about organising this, sorry Vegi. We should hopefully get this match played this week or next week at the latest.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 02, 2019, 10:16:35 pm
Shit. Completely forgot about organising this, sorry Vegi. We should hopefully get this match played this week or next week at the latest.
Well i'm complaining for you guys, so you guys can start NWCL :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Jakob van Bicke on October 07, 2019, 06:06:08 pm
Shit. Completely forgot about organising this, sorry Vegi. We should hopefully get this match played this week or next week at the latest.
Well i'm complaining for you guys, so you guys can start NWCL :)

Seems they had different plans. Kaide cancelled NWCL.

Anyways. Finals gonna happen anytime soon?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Krytenn on October 09, 2019, 07:23:40 pm
Praise be the final is organised:

Participants: Old Guard vs The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out
Involved classes: Line, Lights, Cav
Date/Time: 19th October 19:00 (UK time)
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Wolffe on October 10, 2019, 10:04:42 pm
Praise be the final is organised:

Participants: Old Guard vs The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out
Involved classes: Line, Lights, Cav
Date/Time: 19th October 19:00 (UK time)
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed

Don’t get excited everyone Mitchel and I had a miscommunication and won’t be able to play on this day. Back to the drawing board :D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Auror Davee on October 10, 2019, 10:06:33 pm
Rip
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on October 11, 2019, 09:24:04 am
Will have a chat with both teams together on ts to get this finally organised; it's been over a month now since the final 'match-week'.

I'm still pleased generally with the tournament as 95% of it was on time but this is getting a little ridiculous!! ;)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 11, 2019, 09:34:30 am
This still exists?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on October 11, 2019, 09:54:52 am
This still exists?
Yes and from what I have been advised the Nr4 has been the main factor behind match dates not being suitable for over a month. Since you're apparently completely oblivious, complete ignorance might be a fairer statement.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 11, 2019, 12:53:34 pm
This still exists?
Yes and from what I have been advised the Nr4 has been the main factor behind match dates not being suitable for over a month. Since you're apparently completely oblivious, complete ignorance might be a fairer statement.

Tbf we just play rather our CCL matches that are a bigger and tbh have more value than an Linebattle tourney. We‘re an competitive cavalry regiment not an linebattle regiment. This has nothing to do with ignorance we even told the OG that they can play without us but we completely priotize our CCL matches as they‘re more important for an competitive Regiment. And most of the matches are taking place on sundays because there every regiment has got enough members :) But tbf Idc if you just play without cav if that’s the way to finish ur tournament quicker.
Btw was a really good match against your regiment the 33rd :o
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on October 11, 2019, 01:59:09 pm
This still exists?
Yes and from what I have been advised the Nr4 has been the main factor behind match dates not being suitable for over a month. Since you're apparently completely oblivious, complete ignorance might be a fairer statement.

Tbf we just play rather our CCL matches that are a bigger and tbh have more value than an Linebattle tourney. We‘re an competitive cavalry regiment not an linebattle regiment. This has nothing to do with ignorance we even told the OG that they can play without us but we completely priotize our CCL matches as they‘re more important for an competitive Regiment. And most of the matches are taking place on sundays because there every regiment has got enough members :) But tbf Idc if you just play without cav if that’s the way to finish ur tournament quicker.
Btw was a really good match against your regiment the 33rd :o
I can see you initial comment of 'this still exists?' was just pointless banter then, best say nothing if you've got nothing useful to say mate.

You're right it was a good close match and very enjoyable, no salt at all which is a rarity at this stage :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 11, 2019, 02:05:57 pm
This still exists?
Yes and from what I have been advised the Nr4 has been the main factor behind match dates not being suitable for over a month. Since you're apparently completely oblivious, complete ignorance might be a fairer statement.

Tbf we just play rather our CCL matches that are a bigger and tbh have more value than an Linebattle tourney. We‘re an competitive cavalry regiment not an linebattle regiment. This has nothing to do with ignorance we even told the OG that they can play without us but we completely priotize our CCL matches as they‘re more important for an competitive Regiment. And most of the matches are taking place on sundays because there every regiment has got enough members :) But tbf Idc if you just play without cav if that’s the way to finish ur tournament quicker.
Btw was a really good match against your regiment the 33rd :o
I can see you initial comment of 'this still exists?' was just pointless banter then, best say nothing if you've got nothing useful to say mate.

You're right it was a good close match and very enjoyable, no salt at all which is a rarity at this stage :)

So next time just don’t write sth about ignorance if u have no background informations about our current situation in CCL and why we can’t play on these days and next time don’t rely on every comment from OG about specific regiments, cheers.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on October 11, 2019, 02:15:36 pm
This still exists?
Yes and from what I have been advised the Nr4 has been the main factor behind match dates not being suitable for over a month. Since you're apparently completely oblivious, complete ignorance might be a fairer statement.

Tbf we just play rather our CCL matches that are a bigger and tbh have more value than an Linebattle tourney. We‘re an competitive cavalry regiment not an linebattle regiment. This has nothing to do with ignorance we even told the OG that they can play without us but we completely priotize our CCL matches as they‘re more important for an competitive Regiment. And most of the matches are taking place on sundays because there every regiment has got enough members :) But tbf Idc if you just play without cav if that’s the way to finish ur tournament quicker.
Btw was a really good match against your regiment the 33rd :o
I can see you initial comment of 'this still exists?' was just pointless banter then, best say nothing if you've got nothing useful to say mate.

You're right it was a good close match and very enjoyable, no salt at all which is a rarity at this stage :)

So next time just don’t write sth about ignorance if u have no background informations about our current situation in CCL and why we can’t play on these days and next time don’t rely on every comment from OG about specific regiments, cheers.
I was well aware why you were unable to attend, just don't appreciate pointless posts in the first place. Potentially a bit immature of me to rise to the bait but hey, I know your type mate so don't worry we can leave it there - pointless discussing further.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on October 16, 2019, 02:20:30 pm

Conclusion...


Just wanted to round this tournament off with a statement, since I have reached the date by which I needed to let this go as I'll be absent from NW for at least one or two months.

Firstly I'm pretty chuffed at how this has run (final aside!!) as up to this point it has kept on track. The main people behind the smooth running of the schedule have been some fantastic Coalition leaders, which I would like to thank here; organising any competitive match as we know is stressful at the best of times but these guys had to organise groups of regiments... very tricky!! El Presidente, Mitchell, Jakob, Spoons, Ulfur, Krytten, Ipoa & Dragonking - they all got their teams through the group-stage and we only ended up with one full team capitulation which is in of itself is a great success and in the end is all thanks to you guys and your dedication.

Secondly massive thankyou to all the refs, as we quickly discovered that one or even two refs were sometimes not enough. A relatively small team of refs got the matches played so a special thanks to those names whom I believe took the lions share of matches: Tardet, Kaiser, Anna, Grekos, Cameron, Jakob, El Presidente, Krytten and last but not least Samu!

I hope that the final two teams can organise their match but as I will be unable to follow this through, I leave organisation of this final exciting match in their capable hands. Best of luck to them both and again congratulations to the Cool Casuals for securing 3rd place already in the lower bracket.

Finally thank you to the community as a whole for having a little faith, applying and seeing the tournament through, before what I hope will not be my complete departure from the community :D

PS: Shameless plug for the 33rd; thankyou for hosting all matches using their servers, as these are paid for by voluntary donations by its fabulous members <3
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Anna on October 16, 2019, 03:59:45 pm
Best of luck, Kincaid! I'm in awe of your devotion to the community.
It has been a great experience for me as a ref and participant. Thank you.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 16, 2019, 04:18:24 pm
Best of luck, Kincaid! I'm in awe of your devotion to the community.
It has been a great experience for me as a ref and participant. Thank you.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: DragonKing on October 16, 2019, 06:06:12 pm
Big thank to you Kincaid! You organized a very good competition! I really enjoyed to play in this format. I hope that we will play a third edition on NW ;)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Wolffe on October 17, 2019, 10:21:09 pm
Can’t wait to play the finale finally (no pun intended), but in advance whether I’m in the winning or losing coalition a massive thanks from the entirety of the 33rd Regiment of Foot and Kincaid for being the main organiser and pin point of this tournament.
I think I’m speaking for everyone when I say that without you Kincaid this tournament would’ve either not existed or would’ve been a massive disaster.
With that being said I personally wish you the best of luck and hope to see you around some day!


Colonel J. Gordon - 92nd Regiment of Foot (Gordon Highlanders)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Wolffe on October 18, 2019, 10:36:06 pm
Can’t wait to play the finale finally (no pun intended), but in advance whether I’m in the winning or losing coalition a massive thanks from the entirety of the 33rd Regiment of Foot and Kincaid for being the main organiser and pin point of this tournament.
I think I’m speaking for everyone when I say that without you Kincaid this tournament would’ve either not existed or would’ve been a massive disaster.
With that being said I personally wish you the best of luck and hope to see you around some day!


Colonel J. Gordon - 92nd Regiment of Foot (Gordon Highlanders)

I meant the 33rd ofcourse haha it’s corrected now. ^^
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Matues on October 18, 2019, 11:39:51 pm
Cheers Kincaid, looking forward to the final  :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Barro112 on October 19, 2019, 12:41:30 am
Great event, great referees and ofcourse a great host. Thanks to all of you for delivering this high quality tournament!  ;)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Krytenn on October 21, 2019, 12:20:33 am
Praise be the final is organised:

Participants: Old Guard vs The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out
Involved classes: Line, Lights, Cav
Date/Time: 19th October 19:00 (UK time)
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed

This has been moved to 26th October 19:00 UK time. Still need two referees.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | 26th August : Semi-Finals
Post by: Wolffe on October 25, 2019, 09:04:54 pm
Praise be the final is organised:

Participants: Old Guard vs The Good, the Bad & the Timed-out
Involved classes: Line, Lights, Cav
Date/Time: 19th October 19:00 (UK time)
Referee #1: Needed
Referee #2: Needed


Still looking for 2 referees if anyone’s available:)

This has been moved to 26th October 19:00 UK time. Still need two referees.

Well...
fuck
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: The_HighLord on October 26, 2019, 08:54:47 pm
Can we have an admin that enforces the rules? or has the comp part of this tournament and the rules gone out the window?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: The_HighLord on October 26, 2019, 08:57:53 pm
We ended up having to leave because of how much of a shit show it was, Literaly a monkey could have done a better job at being a ref by just smashing the keyboard.
Admin ignored us, gave them a huge advantage, which caused our members that had come not want to play, so all of us decided to leave than let that shit show of an even happen. They had 17 lights in the 1st round and 18 in the rest, I counted in spec before anyone wants to argue that.

so gg admin, 2 months of organisation down the drain because you didnt follow the rules


https://gyazo.com/d0735615135ace3c9a2099ce6d0c73e4
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 26, 2019, 08:58:25 pm
+20 balance new meta??
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: CharlieTheTurtle on October 26, 2019, 09:00:41 pm
3.1  Minimum attendance to matches is 50 players, consisting of at least 50% Line infantry regardless of the special limits specified below. Should one team bring less, the opposition may still field at least 50. If teams bring greater than 50 players, the maximum one team can outnumber the other is dependant on the number of players the smaller team has:
-  50-59 (+3)

[/td][/tr][/table]

Soooo.... how about these rules?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on October 26, 2019, 09:18:40 pm
You lost to the 92nd team?

We beat them 4-0, therefore we claim prima nocta of this tournament.

Get good 77y honestly...  ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Romulus76 on October 26, 2019, 09:19:56 pm
You lost to the 92nd team?

We beat them 4-0, therefore we claim prima nocta of this tournament.

Get good 77y honestly...  ::) ::) ::)
lmao look at these fools, can't even win a tournament after 9~ years of existing hahahahahahahaha!!
should just merge into the cool casuals tbh
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Auror Davee on October 26, 2019, 09:22:30 pm
You lost to the 92nd team?

We beat them 4-0, therefore we claim prima nocta of this tournament.

Get good 77y honestly...  ::) ::) ::)
Wtf 92nd ist best Regiment, seriously, best Leader and best Gamers. Shame on you its a honor to play against the 92nd even if everybody knows that the 92nd superior is!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 26, 2019, 10:13:45 pm
You lost to the 92nd team?

We beat them 4-0, therefore we claim prima nocta of this tournament.

Get good 77y honestly...  ::) ::) ::)

who gives a fuck, you are just fking garbage
Spoiler
sorry for the not needed toxicity
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on October 26, 2019, 10:29:02 pm
Actually I won the only 2v20 in melee ever recorded in NW history.

All with no groupfight practise.

 8)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Auror Davee on October 26, 2019, 11:12:05 pm
try this in 2019 where only +3k retards play this shit anymore
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Syncmaster667 on October 26, 2019, 11:34:08 pm
Just to point out first, any individual quoted here doesn't represent his regiment as a whole nor do I represent my regiment, Im here to simply point out my view regarding the comment below, to avoid specific people thinking we didn't meet the requirement for attendance.

So I just want to show you two quotes from different regiment members
Spoiler
(https://i.gyazo.com/369175517e2b653c78eb0ea89bbc6cf9.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/9e7dba4043c0eba0996a71e33993267a.png)
[close]

The event rules that we all agreed to follow upon signing up
Spoiler
(https://i.gyazo.com/0add7e002d640919667adb471de6b10c.png)
[close]

A little screenshot showing the balance at a start of a round, just to point out. The austrian team meets the min requirement for attending the event Min we had 52, max we had 55.
Spoiler
(https://i.gyazo.com/f9d6951c9985012938f43eafa963355a.jpg)
[close]
Spoiler
52 is not meeting the minimum of 50?
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f3/b1/cc/f3b1cc7ff51c842b3366b816ec3d8ebe.gif)
[close]

As you can see, UK has ~20 more bois than us, yes the admin attempted to balance the event but no enough people were put into spec. But this was his response for people not going into spec
Spoiler
(https://i.gyazo.com/3a77ae430a79001cc5ef4c6a4fa80b19.png)
[close]
Now sure, sitting in spec is boring, Im sure all of us can agree, we don't want to slap people into spec, but having them play as "non combatants" doesn't exactly solve the solution for balance, as no doubt anyone would just pick up a weapon and defend themselves or could stand infront of a friendly line and act as a shield, at that point you might as well shoot a damn musket too. Along with that I heard comments of people saying they seen various "non combatants" attacking.

A shame we only had 1 ref as the rules state we need 2 minimum.
Sure we left early but I don't plan on wasting peoples time on an event where a core rule isn't enforced and folllowed

Quote of the year from some lad hiding behind a realistic name
Spoiler
(https://i.gyazo.com/1913927a1d2254e139e9792bc2dadf68.png)

The shock when i seen the comment

(https://media.giphy.com/media/8IZwudp5wrYw8/giphy.gif)
[close]

Heres alittle something to cheer you up if your feeling down after todays event
Spoiler
Love you all uwu
(https://media.giphy.com/media/LWsFE7nSNK4s8/giphy.gif)
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Mitchell on October 27, 2019, 12:00:11 am
I'm glad to have this tournament finally concluded it has been brilliant to participate in and there have been many enjoyable moments. So thankyou to Kincaid for organising it and to everybody else for making it possible - other teams, refs etc.

In saying this, it is a shame the final went down the way in which it did. Despite having the match organised for over a week the opposing team could only bring around 50 for the entire game, at the start it was less than this. The match didn't then start until 7.20ish because we were forced to balance down to numbers that were barely realistic when you have 90 people turning up for what they're hoping will be a great final. I understand that numbers aren't always easy to get, however, our usual rifles CO has a broken computer currently so the QR had to replace them on short notice and still managed to bring enough people. Our cav struggled for numbers tonight due to it being a Saturday but even then the coalition could pool enough people together to get them to 15 and they performed decently. Furthermore, due to the balancing issues, the entire KGL line was forced to leave (a few played with the cav) which was entirely unfair on them as they deserved to play just as much as anybody else there and as the CO it feels quite shit to have to tell your guys to not bother coming or leave an event they want to attend. Many of the 92nd and 98e guys also had to sit out even then. The only way in which this issue was slightly solved was by having several non-combatants from each line and a couple in the rifles playing as musician. They didn't participate in any fighting so their presence shouldn't have been an issue, and this was the only reason the balance seemed so one-sided. I also didn't suggest the non-combatant until after we had already dropped 40 odd guys.

Spoiler
Can we have an admin that enforces the rules? or has the comp part of this tournament and the rules gone out the window?

We ended up having to leave because of how much of a shit show it was, Literaly a monkey could have done a better job at being a ref by just smashing the keyboard.
Admin ignored us, gave them a huge advantage, which caused our members that had come not want to play, so all of us decided to leave than let that shit show of an even happen. They had 17 lights in the 1st round and 18 in the rest, I counted in spec before anyone wants to argue that.

so gg admin, 2 months of organisation down the drain because you didnt follow the rules


https://gyazo.com/d0735615135ace3c9a2099ce6d0c73e4
[close]

The OG's attitude towards the match and the referee is pretty much summed up here which I think is completely unjust and unfair on George as he was admining on his own as nobody else was available. The insults in the chat towards him should be enough alone to disqualify them. This insulting even continued after the ref had called a ban to the all-chat.

Thankyou to George though for attempting to admin the event despite the troubles and gg to the other team.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on October 27, 2019, 12:11:43 am
A small neutral observation here.

You could have rotated your infantry each round (sad there's only 4) in some attempt to ensure everybody could play while still working within the parameters of the rules.

Secondly I guess it depends how many the 59th/77y/Nr4 said they would bring. If you bring 90 having not asked before how many they would bring I feel you can have no expectations in that area, even if it is the final. Though I would assume you did! So I can sympathise there.

Yes though, poor George. I bet this was a  nightmare to admin. Regardless he should have enforced the balancing rules to the letter.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 27, 2019, 12:44:50 am
Keep talking ...
Always some retard who is complaining who didn't get the final
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on October 27, 2019, 12:56:36 am
Keep talking ...
Always some retard who is complaining who didn't get the final

4-0
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Auror Davee on October 27, 2019, 01:01:16 am
Keep talking ...
Always some retard who is complaining who didn't get the final

4-0
At least they won the Final ^^
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Skittykiller on October 27, 2019, 02:08:47 am
To be honest, if the event rules say minimum is 50 and you bring 90. Its your fault for bringing to much if the opposite party bringes the right amount to even participate.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: sirkaide on October 27, 2019, 02:16:51 am
I couldn't make it tonight because it took so long to organise (two months) and previous dates were cancelled (British military officer training calls) Yet we played in good faith.

Myself having been involved in all three NWBCs and winner of the second NWBC am disgusted by the news coming out of this final game.

Three competition's and years of good admining washed down the drain.

Thanks to the 77y, NR4 and the 59th under Krytenn and Wookie. I am sorry I couldn't participate in this last game. You boys were clearly robbed. There should be a rematch at the very least.

Of course Kincaid is busy with his latest and new baby. How ever we can all agree this match was admined poorly by all reports.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Krytenn on October 27, 2019, 02:38:11 am
I think the whole situation was rather unfortunate. Our attendance didn't help though I was told, and as the screenshots show, once we started (I had to go 20 minutes in and we hadn't started yet) we had over 50 hence then the balance rules should have applied. I don't think the other brigade expected to get 85 people so fair play to them. However as shit as the situation is, they probably should have balanced fully, though I understand that it sucks to have 40 people in spec. The thing with the non-combatants does seem a bit silly though, and I'm told that some of those people began picking up weapons and attacking during the rounds. Also the other brigade have to remember that they had a larger team roster anyway with their 2 brigades and 2 regiments compared to our 2 regiments and a brigade  (59th now only have one full company), so I don't think it would have been realistic to expect us to bring 85-90 people.

Also, these matches are notoriously difficult to admin on your own (from experience) so thank you to KingGeorge for even trying, for giving up your free time to come and referee and apologies if the salt got too much. (Had I been there I would have told any 59th engaging in such behaviour to stop.)

As you can imagine I'm as disappointed as anyone about these events given how long it took for me to get the match organised xD

* Also it sucks because up until this point I think this tournament had been excellent, (well until the 2 month gap before the final anyway) so many thanks to Kincaid in particular, but also my fellow referees and the other brigades for what has been a lot of fun.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Wolffe on October 27, 2019, 11:04:10 am
Well that was a shit show...
However I do want to clear some things up and say a few words.
First of all my apologies to sync, I try to keep my lads from making negative comments in white chat but I see that I missed a few.
My apologies for that.

Now regarding the "Musicians and Non combatants".
I tried to rotate my line members as much as i could but this turned out to be almost impossible since i had over 15 members in spec,
was only allowed up to 10 in the match (including staff) and the amount of 92nd members playing for our cav and rifles made it almost
impossible to keep track of who needs to play when and what.
So when I was told I could use non combatants I swapped them in and made sure they were no harm to the match.
For one thing I made them drop their swords, sabres or whatever they were carrying, for a second I personally made sure they didnt pick up weapons or even acted as a meatshield.
Does this fully justify it? I dont think so but I hope you can also understand that when people make some free time in real life to attend the finals that I cant dissapoint them
and I try to give everyone a shot at playing.
Still doesnt fully justify it tho.

Now regarding the negative comments towards King George.
To my knowledge I was the only one from both coalitions that was trying to find a referee (atleast on the long term correct me if im wrong ^^).
Turned out that King George was the only one who was semi Willing to cancel his own plans and ref our match.
Therefor I dont see it fit to compare him to a monkey or insult him the way people did both in game and on fse.
After all its a bloody game and he was the only one that was willing to get this match actually done, the rest couldnt be asked (and I dont blame them they have done well enough so please dont see this as a negative comment towards all the other referees).
Misstakes were made but doesnt mean you can treat the man as a piece of garbage.

Now to close things off I still would like to thank the 59th, 77y and the nr4 for fighting us and sitting through it all.
I hope to see all of them in future (and better organised) matches and linebattles.
Many thanks from all Gordon Highlanders also go out to everyone involved with the organisation of this tournament especially the referees and the 33rd Regiment of Foot.

I hope we can close things off leave this match in the past and still look eachother in the eye.
After all, we're just a bunch of guys trying to have fun :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Mitchell on October 27, 2019, 03:36:16 pm
I couldn't make it tonight because it took so long to organise (two months) and previous dates were cancelled (British military officer training calls) Yet we played in good faith.

Myself having been involved in all three NWBCs and winner of the second NWBC am disgusted by the news coming out of this final game.

Three competition's and years of good admining washed down the drain.

Thanks to the 77y, NR4 and the 59th under Krytenn and Wookie. I am sorry I couldn't participate in this last game. You boys were clearly robbed. There should be a rematch at the very least.

Of course Kincaid is busy with his latest and new baby. How ever we can all agree this match was admined poorly by all reports.

I think you've been misinformed by a large amount of biased information which (may) have included a lot of salt. To say your team was robbed is an absolute overstatement, we played with the balanced amount of fighting men and even then you were utterly outplayed with all 3 rounds barely lasting 10minutes. The call for a rematch is pointless as I'm almost certain the result would be the same judging purely off of what was seen last night and we're not really willing to have to make 40 odd guys have to sit out again because it's an awful position to be put in. With your final point, these 'reports' are again all one sided, it's fortunate that the majority of your team wasn't banned for insulting George who did the best possible job he could in the difficult situation he was put in.

Quote
The thing with the non-combatants does seem a bit silly though, and I'm told that some of those people began picking up weapons and attacking during the rounds

This simply isn't true as I watched as the blob of musicians on our team was targeted by your cav (for whatever reason) and were just cut down on I believe all three rounds. I saw one incident of a fighting musician on our side but he was with the 98e who I'm fairly certain weren't participating in the non-combatant side of things and I think this was just their regimental musician.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Octanidas on October 27, 2019, 04:02:39 pm
Spoiler
I couldn't make it tonight because it took so long to organise (two months) and previous dates were cancelled (British military officer training calls) Yet we played in good faith.

Myself having been involved in all three NWBCs and winner of the second NWBC am disgusted by the news coming out of this final game.

Three competition's and years of good admining washed down the drain.

Thanks to the 77y, NR4 and the 59th under Krytenn and Wookie. I am sorry I couldn't participate in this last game. You boys were clearly robbed. There should be a rematch at the very least.

Of course Kincaid is busy with his latest and new baby. How ever we can all agree this match was admined poorly by all reports.

I think you've been misinformed by a large amount of biased information which (may) have included a lot of salt. To say your team was robbed is an absolute overstatement, we played with the balanced amount of fighting men and even then you were utterly outplayed with all 3 rounds barely lasting 10minutes. The call for a rematch is pointless as I'm almost certain the result would be the same judging purely off of what was seen last night and we're not really willing to have to make 40 odd guys have to sit out again because it's an awful position to be put in. With your final point, these 'reports' are again all one sided, it's fortunate that the majority of your team wasn't banned for insulting George who did the best possible job he could in the difficult situation he was put in.

Quote
The thing with the non-combatants does seem a bit silly though, and I'm told that some of those people began picking up weapons and attacking during the rounds

This simply isn't true as I watched as the blob of musicians on our team was targeted by your cav (for whatever reason) and were just cut down on I believe all three rounds. I saw one incident of a fighting musician on our side but he was with the 98e who I'm fairly certain weren't participating in the non-combatant side of things and I think this was just their regimental musician.
[close]

Do you really think we played seriously? The first round was +20 balance (we still complained about this during the round); the second had mentioned issues with the balance and the live-status (first the admin wrote "wait", then for a long time nothing, then "OA" and we all had no idea if it was live or not; the third round was just a YOLO Charge.

As far as i can speak for my regiment, we did not take this event serious because it was just clusterfuck (maybe you saw all of us on the big rock dancing; i don't know if you call this a tryhard move). And from the messages i received from 59th and 77y i could read out the same opinion.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Syncmaster667 on October 27, 2019, 06:46:00 pm
Well that was a shit show...
However I do want to clear some things up and say a few words.
First of all my apologies to sync, I try to keep my lads from making negative comments in white chat but I see that I missed a few.
My apologies for that.
No worries from my half mate, can't expect everyone to play nice.



As for Mitchell, 70 vs 50 is far from a balaced game. 20+ men no matter what class they chose is still an advantage in this game, yes you seen some not fight back but others did and thats the issue. You can't expect people to not defend themselves, they might as well left and played something else than be slaughter. Saying the 98e regimental musician wasn't taking part in the whole non combatant stuff. Convenient. Also the cav charging the musicians all 3 rounds, yet they weren't introducted till the 2nd round so maybe your trying to misinform people with your own bias opinion?

I don't have a problem with anyone in relation to what happened yesterday. But lying, thats as bad as taking your cookie... and dropping it in your brew. Disgusting.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Kieran on October 27, 2019, 06:49:38 pm
It didnt help that the final took the piss to happen. that didnt solve any problems. However i do think the admin should of respected the rules and both teams communicated on how many people you would bring so you didn't have a balance issue. I agree that the musician thing didn't solve the problem as Sync was right, they could pick up a weapon or use there sabres when it comes the the all charge or whenever. If both team are willing to agree that this may have been unfair, you could re arrange the final again and communicate abit more on how many you will be bringing. Make sure there are 2 admins minimum and arrange a set date both can do and if one doesn't make it then its an automatic forfeit.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Rikkert on October 27, 2019, 08:05:31 pm
Lmao imagine if the actually competitive tournaments just allowed the bigger regiment to win. Imagine an EIC, NWL or RGL where the other team just has 10+. What a joke this "tournament" is.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 27, 2019, 08:06:27 pm
Lmao imagine if the actually competitive tournaments just allowed the bigger regiment to win. Imagine an EIC, NWL or RGL where the other team just has 10+. What a joke this "tournament" is.
Brother... You don't know what happend so don't speak out mister ;)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Rikkert on October 27, 2019, 08:07:57 pm
Lmao imagine if the actually competitive tournaments just allowed the bigger regiment to win. Imagine an EIC, NWL or RGL where the other team just has 10+. What a joke this "tournament" is.
Brother... You don't know what happend so don't speak out mister ;)
Why not? I play for 77y all the time. I even played in a couple of these. Just wasn't here yesterday because of work.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 27, 2019, 08:10:28 pm
Lmao imagine if the actually competitive tournaments just allowed the bigger regiment to win. Imagine an EIC, NWL or RGL where the other team just has 10+. What a joke this "tournament" is.
Brother... You don't know what happend so don't speak out mister ;)
Why not? I play for 77y all the time. I even played in a couple of these. Just wasn't here yesterday because of work.
see! you didn't play yesterday!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Rikkert on October 27, 2019, 08:11:35 pm
Lmao imagine if the actually competitive tournaments just allowed the bigger regiment to win. Imagine an EIC, NWL or RGL where the other team just has 10+. What a joke this "tournament" is.
Brother... You don't know what happend so don't speak out mister ;)
Why not? I play for 77y all the time. I even played in a couple of these. Just wasn't here yesterday because of work.
see! you didn't play yesterday!
Screenshots zeggen genoeg schattebout.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 27, 2019, 08:12:40 pm
Lmao imagine if the actually competitive tournaments just allowed the bigger regiment to win. Imagine an EIC, NWL or RGL where the other team just has 10+. What a joke this "tournament" is.
Brother... You don't know what happend so don't speak out mister ;)
Why not? I play for 77y all the time. I even played in a couple of these. Just wasn't here yesterday because of work.
see! you didn't play yesterday!
Screenshots zeggen genoeg schattebout.
leugens, die zijn manifest onjuist!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: King_George on October 27, 2019, 11:37:57 pm
Hello everyone,

here I am after a whole day of this commenting on the thread and I'm here to give my own opinion (whether or not you want to hear it).

First of all, at least in my opinion, there shouldn't be a second match or a rematch but I just heard that it's up to the coalition leaders to decide upon that. But by my opinion, it already took two months to organize and if you'd wanted to have a proper match, you (both teams, not only one) would have put in all of your will and energy into it to organize in 2 weeks time max., not wait a whole month for it. If you do plan to organize it again, try to get an actual referee and not bother a person that's trying to do everyone a favour but in the end, half of the regiments attending the match decides to shit on them.

To the point of me being "shit" admin or that "a monkey could have done a better job at being a ref by just smashing the keyboard", thanks for that, I would've loved to see you in my situation. Turned out I had no possibility to talk to other people (other than steam messages) as I couldn't have been added to the steam group chat. From what I understood, both of the teams decided that going on 33rd TeamSpeak wasn't an option so basically me enforcing the rules was only possible to do in internal admin chat and/or Global admin chat. I think if I would've had more direct contact with both teams through e.g. Teamspeak, the match could've gone much better.

The reason why we started with 8+ balance on the first round was that there were already 20+ people in spec and that already 20 minutes have passed since when the actual match should've started. If I were to wait for more, perhaps you would have your +3 balance but the match could've been delayed even more to then start at half-past or even later... I've never admined a competitive event before thus I thought that playing for at least 40 minutes would be best for everyone rather than waiting for everyone to figure out who to drop out to fix balance. At that, I am wrong but it's not something I could've known as I was the only referee and as said before, haven't admined a comp. match before.

Now you might be wondering "Jeeze George, why did you allow 20 people to go in as non-combat units in the game?" Well glad you asked; because when the first match 33rd was playing on, we had to do exactly the same; we had almost the same advantage but we managed to figure it out by having non-combat units who WILL NOT pick up weapons/can't use muskets during the whole round and guess what, it worked for us and I specifically said that the non-combat units can't pick up weapons. Now there might be a problem if there are 20 people and one of them picks up a musket and I don't notice it and that's most likely because I'm one person trying to watch the other 100+ people are obeying the rules.

All in all, thanks for all the comments, whether they were the positive ones that have kept me sane that night or the negative ones that barely made it possible to sleep. I have to admit that it was a lot of pressure from both sides and considering I only have two hands and had to admit whilst also talk to individual people through steam contact made it the worst experience NW can offer.

Lmao imagine if the actually competitive tournaments just allowed the bigger regiment to win. Imagine an EIC, NWL or RGL where the other team just has 10+. What a joke this "tournament" is.
Brother... You don't know what happend so don't speak out mister ;)
Why not? I play for 77y all the time. I even played in a couple of these. Just wasn't here yesterday because of work.
see! you didn't play yesterday!
Screenshots zeggen genoeg schattebout.

-Also, basing what happened on an event according to a few screenshots is like basing what happened in a crime by only hearing the "victim"...

Spoiler
I couldn't make it tonight because it took so long to organise (two months) and previous dates were cancelled (British military officer training calls) Yet we played in good faith.

Myself having been involved in all three NWBCs and winner of the second NWBC am disgusted by the news coming out of this final game.

Three competition's and years of good admining washed down the drain.

Thanks to the 77y, NR4 and the 59th under Krytenn and Wookie. I am sorry I couldn't participate in this last game. You boys were clearly robbed. There should be a rematch at the very least.

Of course Kincaid is busy with his latest and new baby. How ever we can all agree this match was admined poorly by all reports.

I think you've been misinformed by a large amount of biased information which (may) have included a lot of salt. To say your team was robbed is an absolute overstatement, we played with the balanced amount of fighting men and even then you were utterly outplayed with all 3 rounds barely lasting 10minutes. The call for a rematch is pointless as I'm almost certain the result would be the same judging purely off of what was seen last night and we're not really willing to have to make 40 odd guys have to sit out again because it's an awful position to be put in. With your final point, these 'reports' are again all one sided, it's fortunate that the majority of your team wasn't banned for insulting George who did the best possible job he could in the difficult situation he was put in.

Quote
The thing with the non-combatants does seem a bit silly though, and I'm told that some of those people began picking up weapons and attacking during the rounds

This simply isn't true as I watched as the blob of musicians on our team was targeted by your cav (for whatever reason) and were just cut down on I believe all three rounds. I saw one incident of a fighting musician on our side but he was with the 98e who I'm fairly certain weren't participating in the non-combatant side of things and I think this was just their regimental musician.
[close]

Do you really think we played seriously? The first round was +20 balance (we still complained about this during the round); the second had mentioned issues with the balance and the live-status (first the admin wrote "wait", then for a long time nothing, then "OA" and we all had no idea if it was live or not; the third round was just a YOLO Charge.

As far as i can speak for my regiment, we did not take this event serious because it was just clusterfuck (maybe you saw all of us on the big rock dancing; i don't know if you call this a tryhard move). And from the messages i received from 59th and 77y i could read out the same opinion.

-When it comes to the 3rd round where I said "Wait" in admin chat, I thought everyone would stick to their spawn but in the end, they didn't so at the time though that everyone understood that the match is going on.

- first round wasn't 20+ but 8+, still a difference and not by the rules but it's better than 20+

-To HighLord's comment on how I "ignored" his chat on the fact that 92nd lights had 2 extra men in their light coy, I'll just put this in.

Quote
[Yesterday, 20:30]
[77y] The HighLord:
   also they have 17 skirms

[Yesterday, 20:31]
[33rd]King_George 👑:
   Thank you

Quote
" 20:31:18 - *Admin*[33rd_Ens_King_George]: 92nd lights, you have two drop 2 people. Max is 15 "

All in all, I'm leaving this thread behind me with a few comments from the logs from the event... Enjoy reading ;)

Quote
20:11:07 - [2nd_CR_Cpl_Kremer] Admin just had a stroke
Quote
20:11:23 - [59th_Jew_Shekel] admin you high?
Quote
20:43:25 - [77y_GrenFC_Raii] holy shit this monkey admin
Quote
20:45:13 - *DEAD* [Nr4_GHus_TeraKnecht_Iniskill] that moment when a monkey admin
Quote
20:45:21 - *DEAD* [59th_RoyalGren_Rexcentx] stinky poo admin
Quote
20:45:38 - *DEAD* [59th_Marcsman_Marc] So where was this admin found? The local zoo?
Quote
20:53:28 - *DEAD* [Nr4_Qtm_~Foxii~] you get anything admin or do you have a brain handycap_?
Quote
20:52:23 - [77y_Grdfc_FortuneZero] George you retard they could not pick up muskets if they are spec as are the actual rules

Probably best for last  8)

Quote
20:32:24 - [77y_Cpt_Gaz] George im aware you a massive fucking nigger but you have outdone your self this time

I think all admins would agree that admining events/matches is always fun with comments from the community like that ;)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 27, 2019, 11:43:04 pm
You're a fucking legend George
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Rikkert on October 27, 2019, 11:46:12 pm
Let me break this one down for the people:
"It was my first comp event"
"It was only +8 in the FIRST round"
"It took too long to move people spec"
"There were already 20+ in spec!"
"They were non-combatants"

Alternatively it would've been okay to admit that you just completely fucked up :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Gi on October 27, 2019, 11:51:30 pm
Why are people complaining lol, +20 isn't hard to deal with.

Gaz clearly has a problem due to the fact he's a BTEC commander with little man syndrome, accounting to the fact that he's 4 foot 4 and unironically believes he is the reincarnation of Napoleon Bonaparte himself.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Kaiserinio on October 28, 2019, 12:19:57 am
This last match is a joke. It took you 2 month to arrange it, and the first message that ask for anyone who can ref it was send at sat 11:08 am. The only person that came was George, and he recieved the message 1,5 hour before the match.  As you can check, George isn't official ref for this tournament, and he doesn't have exprience with comp matches. He also was reffing alone, and i think all of the refs will agree with me, that 2 ref are barely minimum to keep everything in order. It is the participating regiments fault that they didn't paid attention to organising the refs for the match that was massively delayed. Even with that, you have the audacity to offend persont that decided to ref for you instead of admining his own event.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Tardet on October 28, 2019, 12:36:02 am
Your daily remember that a lot of people in this community are complete cretins with their NW experience consisting of sitting their fat arses behind a computer and insulting people when things don't go their way. Most of them have never even considered doing something which doesn't serve their friend's interest or their own and would be still crying themselves to sleep if they were put in the situation George experienced.

You were incapable of scheduling your match withing a reasonable timing, most of the people who were active and dedicated to making this event successful either lost interest or couldn't find the availabilities anymore and even the main host had some real IRL priorities which kept him away from this final. At the end of the day, you are the only responsible of what happened that match, period.

Keep your head high George and don't bother answering the morons. They ain't worth your time, trust me.

Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: 77y_Lt_Gaz on October 28, 2019, 12:44:40 am
Why are people complaining lol, +20 isn't hard to deal with.

Gaz clearly has a problem due to the fact he's a BTEC commander with little man syndrome, accounting to the fact that he's 4 foot 4 and unironically believes he is the reincarnation of Napoleon Bonaparte himself.

True, True

But they had 17 skirms even Napoleon himself couldn't have delt with that cancer.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Barro112 on October 28, 2019, 12:58:56 am
Your daily remember that a lot of people in this community are complete cretins with their NW experience consisting of sitting their fat arses behind a computer and insulting people when things don't go their way. Most of them have never even considered doing something which doesn't serve their friend's interest or their own and would be still crying themselves to sleep if they were put in the situation George experienced.

You were incapable of scheduling your match withing a reasonable timing, most of the people who were active and dedicated to making this event successful either lost interest or couldn't find the availabilities anymore and even the main host had some real IRL priorities which kept him away from this final. At the end of the day, you are the only responsible of what happened that match, period.

Keep your head high George and don't bother answering the morons. They ain't worth your time, trust me.
+1
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Syncmaster667 on October 28, 2019, 09:24:03 am
Its been 3 days now and I'm sure most of yous have either vented your anger or simply aint bothered anymore, so how about we discuss ideas for the next one if the game isn't dead by then.

I aint no expert in organising events and shit but heres an idea for the next time we do something like this.
Making steam group chats for specific brackets (A, B ect) and have all the admins and the specific coalition and regimental leaders within that so its easier to chat about dates and who will ref. As i seen the main problem with how it was done with that specific problem was the coalition would chat between themselves in one chat, then go backwards and forwards with the other side about the date, once the date was decided then the coalition leaders would have to find the refs. Doing it all in one chat would streamline the process and allow the refs to see the date decided at the earliest time along with them being able to directly say of they can make it or not, now sure it might be mess so could use the channels fuction to split the chat up, aka one for match day, 2 for each of the coalitions, and finally one for saying what days you can do it on and who could ref depending on those days.

Hope the idea possibly helps, love you all xx
Heres a little something to make everyone feel better (mostly me tho)
Spoiler
UWU
(https://i.redd.it/sijntwil8jr31.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Rikkert on October 28, 2019, 11:43:55 am
Your daily remember that a lot of people in this community are complete cretins with their NW experience consisting of sitting their fat arses behind a computer and insulting people when things don't go their way. Most of them have never even considered doing something which doesn't serve their friend's interest or their own and would be still crying themselves to sleep if they were put in the situation George experienced.

You were incapable of scheduling your match withing a reasonable timing, most of the people who were active and dedicated to making this event successful either lost interest or couldn't find the availabilities anymore and even the main host had some real IRL priorities which kept him away from this final. At the end of the day, you are the only responsible of what happened that match, period.

Keep your head high George and don't bother answering the morons. They ain't worth your time, trust me.
I didnt know he wasnt an official ref. I understand it was his first time. And I agree that the reactions that me and others have given are sometimes unnecessary. I didnt know the reg leaders were lazy and that george was asked to show up last minute. This was very noble of him and I respect him for trying his best. I apologise to George if I sounded rude.

That being said even those 'cretins with a keyboard' know that 20+ and even 8+ balance is ludicrous in a linebattle. You don't need years of reffing experience or a 1 week notice to understand that. You don't need to be an official ref to type 'you guys need to move 15 people spec, or I will randomly start swapping people spec' to the regimental leaders.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Krytenn on October 28, 2019, 02:16:48 pm
Your daily remember that a lot of people in this community are complete cretins with their NW experience consisting of sitting their fat arses behind a computer and insulting people when things don't go their way. Most of them have never even considered doing something which doesn't serve their friend's interest or their own and would be still crying themselves to sleep if they were put in the situation George experienced.

You were incapable of scheduling your match withing a reasonable timing, most of the people who were active and dedicated to making this event successful either lost interest or couldn't find the availabilities anymore and even the main host had some real IRL priorities which kept him away from this final. At the end of the day, you are the only responsible of what happened that match, period.

Keep your head high George and don't bother answering the morons. They ain't worth your time, trust me.

In fairness as somebody who has refereed quite a bit in the last few years, people do seem to forget that the referees give up their own time to do this, usually with very little reward and a lot of abuse and then people act surprised as to why tournaments often struggle to get  referees. That being said the idea that the match wasn’t organised because nobody could be arsed is untrue. I spent a lot of time and effort trying to get this match organised and we had to change the dates several times because of regiments not being able to make dates at short notice/ regimental leaders having irl priorities and going away.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 28, 2019, 02:22:59 pm
everything was perfect besides the final. Okey for the ones who lost, it sucks... but i mean I don't actually remember, that tournaments used to be perfectly organized or have the perfect referees. It's sad it has to end like this, even for the one who won, because a lot of my member told me this wasn't a final that we expected or it wasn't a final after all (what has no offense to the opponents).
In my opinion this tournament turned out really well than i actually expected, what is a positive i guess....
GG to all the coalitions and the organisers, this is something not usual, that we actually get big numbers that fight each other on the battlefield.
Spoiler
sorry for broken england
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Krytenn on October 28, 2019, 02:38:32 pm
Also difficulty in finding referees in this tournament was not just limited to the final, I refereed 3-4 matches at very short notice because seemingly the regiments couldn’t be bothered to look but also because the referees couldn’t seemingly be bothered. I know that a number of signed up referees didn’t officiate a single game.

I suppose people need to remember it is just a game and not put too much expectation into efficiency/ time dedication
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on October 29, 2019, 02:21:42 pm
Since the last match result is in disrepute if you'd like to join the official NWBC champions 2019 regiment, probaby the last ever on NW then apply at:

www.19thyorkshire.com (http://www.19thyorkshire.com)

Thanks
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 29, 2019, 03:06:54 pm
Since the last match result is in disrepute if you'd like to join the official NWBC champions 2019 regiment, probaby the last ever on NW then apply at:

www.19thyorkshire.com (http://www.19thyorkshire.com)

Thanks
*cough* 3rd place *cough*
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on October 29, 2019, 05:04:38 pm
Since the last match result is in disrepute if you'd like to join the official NWBC champions 2019 regiment, probaby the last ever on NW then apply at:

www.19thyorkshire.com (http://www.19thyorkshire.com)

Thanks
*cough* 3rd place *cough*

4-0
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Wolffe on October 29, 2019, 06:46:59 pm
Since the last match result is in disrepute if you'd like to join the official NWBC champions 2019 regiment, probaby the last ever on NW then apply at:

www.19thyorkshire.com (http://www.19thyorkshire.com)

Thanks
*cough* 3rd place *cough*

4-0
Only one we lost, maybe you can tell us how many you lost?
You seem to like showing off victories but something tells me there are more defeats?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: ~NickCole~ on October 29, 2019, 07:02:57 pm
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Wolffe on October 29, 2019, 07:07:12 pm
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 29, 2019, 07:42:45 pm
Bro wtf +20 balance rematch pls plox :x
I need to win at least one tournament
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on October 29, 2019, 08:23:00 pm
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Scottish Unicorn on October 29, 2019, 10:08:38 pm
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on October 29, 2019, 10:25:25 pm
I mean, I do have 10 GCSEs
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Scottish Unicorn on October 29, 2019, 10:31:24 pm
I mean, I do have 10 GCSEs

A canny even spell GCSE but here we are.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Giles on October 30, 2019, 08:50:28 am
GG ladies. This tournament has gone too long. No further discussion needed.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 30, 2019, 10:25:03 am
GG ladies. This tournament has gone too long. No further discussion needed.
;D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: sirkaide on October 30, 2019, 11:13:29 am
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Auror Davee on October 30, 2019, 11:32:26 am
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 30, 2019, 01:49:32 pm
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 30, 2019, 02:21:28 pm
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
I don't think it doesn't matter who he's. He has a good point with his "opinion"
I can ask you the same "who you are", but it's irrelevant to ask...
Spoiler
Just lock this fricking thread, because this shit is over
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on October 30, 2019, 02:33:41 pm
Wow someone pulled out the 'who are you card'.

I sure hope everyone knows who I am! I won a 2v20 in melee afterall and got it on video:

https://youtu.be/21BGTqxGgD8?t=52
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 30, 2019, 02:49:53 pm
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
I don't think it doesn't matter who he's. He has a good point with his "opinion"
I can ask you the same "who you are", but it's irrelevant to ask...
Spoiler
Just lock this fricking thread, because this shit is over
[close]

I am one of the leaders of Nr4 as u can see if u watch my sig for sure! Nevertheless I was one of the involved leaders in that finale mess and your crying about that we should not do an rematch makes me think about one thing. You just wanna avoid it all ur opinions and even though that opinions of people that were not involved in both coalitions are literally useless. Only people which were involved in that match and overall in the teams are allowed to share their opinion if we should do an rematch or not. For me it’s simple the most important balance rules was not obeyed which makes it to find an conclusion why we shall do an rematch to find out who may is the better regiment under fair conditions.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 30, 2019, 02:51:52 pm
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
I don't think it doesn't matter who he's. He has a good point with his "opinion"
I can ask you the same "who you are", but it's irrelevant to ask...
Spoiler
Just lock this fricking thread, because this shit is over
[close]

I am one of the leaders of Nr4 as u can see if u watch my sig for sure! Nevertheless I was one of the involved leaders in that finale mess and your crying about that we should not do an rematch makes me think about one thing. You just wanna avoid it all ur opinions and even though that opinions of people that were not involved in both coalitions are literally useless. Only people which were involved in that match and overall in the teams are allowed to share their opinion if we should do an rematch or not. For me it’s simple the most important balance rules was not obeyed which makes it to find an conclusion why we shall do an rematch to find out who may is the better regiment under fair conditions.
I'm sorry I still don't know who you are
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Rikkert on October 30, 2019, 03:04:40 pm
Wow someone pulled out the 'who are you card'.

I sure hope everyone knows who I am! I won a 2v20 in melee afterall and got it on video:

https://youtu.be/21BGTqxGgD8?t=52
I heard this guy has at least 10 GCSEs
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Gi on October 30, 2019, 03:07:44 pm
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
I don't think it doesn't matter who he's. He has a good point with his "opinion"
I can ask you the same "who you are", but it's irrelevant to ask...
Spoiler
Just lock this fricking thread, because this shit is over
[close]

I am one of the leaders of Nr4 as u can see if u watch my sig for sure! Nevertheless I was one of the involved leaders in that finale mess and your crying about that we should not do an rematch makes me think about one thing. You just wanna avoid it all ur opinions and even though that opinions of people that were not involved in both coalitions are literally useless. Only people which were involved in that match and overall in the teams are allowed to share their opinion if we should do an rematch or not. For me it’s simple the most important balance rules was not obeyed which makes it to find an conclusion why we shall do an rematch to find out who may is the better regiment under fair conditions.
I'm sorry I still don't know who you are
LMFAO billy big bollocks over here acting as though he's known for anything other than being a massive sperg
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Nero_ on October 30, 2019, 03:18:02 pm
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
I don't think it doesn't matter who he's. He has a good point with his "opinion"
I can ask you the same "who you are", but it's irrelevant to ask...
Spoiler
Just lock this fricking thread, because this shit is over
[close]

I am one of the leaders of Nr4 as u can see if u watch my sig for sure! Nevertheless I was one of the involved leaders in that finale mess and your crying about that we should not do an rematch makes me think about one thing. You just wanna avoid it all ur opinions and even though that opinions of people that were not involved in both coalitions are literally useless. Only people which were involved in that match and overall in the teams are allowed to share their opinion if we should do an rematch or not. For me it’s simple the most important balance rules was not obeyed which makes it to find an conclusion why we shall do an rematch to find out who may is the better regiment under fair conditions.
I'm sorry I still don't know who you are
LMFAO billy big bollocks over here acting as though he's known for anything other than being a massive sperg
LMFAO billy big bollocks over here acting as though he's known for anything other than being a massive sperg
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 30, 2019, 03:18:44 pm
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
I don't think it doesn't matter who he's. He has a good point with his "opinion"
I can ask you the same "who you are", but it's irrelevant to ask...
Spoiler
Just lock this fricking thread, because this shit is over
[close]

I am one of the leaders of Nr4 as u can see if u watch my sig for sure! Nevertheless I was one of the involved leaders in that finale mess and your crying about that we should not do an rematch makes me think about one thing. You just wanna avoid it all ur opinions and even though that opinions of people that were not involved in both coalitions are literally useless. Only people which were involved in that match and overall in the teams are allowed to share their opinion if we should do an rematch or not. For me it’s simple the most important balance rules was not obeyed which makes it to find an conclusion why we shall do an rematch to find out who may is the better regiment under fair conditions.
I'm sorry I still don't know who you are

Then I would advise you to improve your reading skills !
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Gi on October 30, 2019, 03:20:10 pm
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
I don't think it doesn't matter who he's. He has a good point with his "opinion"
I can ask you the same "who you are", but it's irrelevant to ask...
Spoiler
Just lock this fricking thread, because this shit is over
[close]

I am one of the leaders of Nr4 as u can see if u watch my sig for sure! Nevertheless I was one of the involved leaders in that finale mess and your crying about that we should not do an rematch makes me think about one thing. You just wanna avoid it all ur opinions and even though that opinions of people that were not involved in both coalitions are literally useless. Only people which were involved in that match and overall in the teams are allowed to share their opinion if we should do an rematch or not. For me it’s simple the most important balance rules was not obeyed which makes it to find an conclusion why we shall do an rematch to find out who may is the better regiment under fair conditions.
I'm sorry I still don't know who you are
LMFAO billy big bollocks over here acting as though he's known for anything other than being a massive sperg
LMFAO billy big bollocks over here acting as though he's known for anything other than being a massive sperg
alright kevin you got me  >:(
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: DragonKing on October 30, 2019, 03:31:17 pm
The question is: why did you play if the balance was broken?

Now, do your rematch if someone is still interested in the tournament. Whoever wins, I don't care.

Good luck finding a date and hopefully the next game will make everyone happy.

Spoiler
(https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2019/44/3/1572445607-salt.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 30, 2019, 03:51:29 pm
Spoiler
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]

What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
I don't think it doesn't matter who he's. He has a good point with his "opinion"
I can ask you the same "who you are", but it's irrelevant to ask...
Spoiler
Just lock this fricking thread, because this shit is over
[close]

I am one of the leaders of Nr4 as u can see if u watch my sig for sure! Nevertheless I was one of the involved leaders in that finale mess and your crying about that we should not do an rematch makes me think about one thing. You just wanna avoid it all ur opinions and even though that opinions of people that were not involved in both coalitions are literally useless. Only people which were involved in that match and overall in the teams are allowed to share their opinion if we should do an rematch or not. For me it’s simple the most important balance rules was not obeyed which makes it to find an conclusion why we shall do an rematch to find out who may is the better regiment under fair conditions.
I'm sorry I still don't know who you are
LMFAO billy big bollocks over here acting as though he's known for anything other than being a massive sperg
[close]
Oh no...
Now he can have a taste of own "who are you" bullshit
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Ry@n on October 30, 2019, 04:40:03 pm
quiet vegitable stop farming posts on a finished tourny thread xDDDDD
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 30, 2019, 04:41:58 pm
quiet vegitable stop farming posts on a finished tourny thread xDDDDD
8)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: sirkaide on October 30, 2019, 04:58:36 pm
The question is: why did you play if the balance was broken?

Now, do your rematch if someone is still interested in the tournament. Whoever wins, I don't care.

Good luck finding a date and hopefully the next game will make everyone happy.

Spoiler
(https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2019/44/3/1572445607-salt.jpg)
[close]

They didn't play properly that was the point. Kincaid has a new baby and thus couldn't attend. Krytenn was busy too which meant the two most senior admins couldn't attend. Furthermore, George (first time admining) tried last minute to admin, he tried his best but ultimately didnt know the rules. There was no seasoned admins available.

The whole final was a mess from what I've heard. Kincaid has apologised and acknowledged the failures...

Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Auror Davee on October 30, 2019, 06:02:13 pm
Spoiler
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]


What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
[close]
Who r u exactly? xddd You was the one who beg me to join your dead Nr4 Regiment lmao. You write me everyday a Steam Message with words like "Hey we have a Event, pls come". Du bist einfach nur Schmutz. I can say my opinion. You are just sad because your Troll Reg is dead now.
PS: The 2Lr still exist :)
PS2: The Nr4 is not dead of course, they have just a break :D
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Voluble123 on October 30, 2019, 06:55:23 pm
Jeeez missed the “final”, what a shit show! Was a great tournament and by far is the most fun I’ve ever had in any competitive NW tournament due to the shear scale and the idea behind it. If a admin did fuck up with the rule of minimum numbers and if non-combatant players did pick weapons up or bait, then it should be classed as a draw/ both win. Can’t do the other team dirty like that... If the roles was reversed u can be damn sure I’m shouting at Mitchell and Wolfe to leave cus it’s BS. Yes it’s fucked up if we have 30 spec or something but rules are rules and adding in non-combatants is stupid and there is no way before or after you can justify it or control it so I’d say overrule it to a draw/both win. Both teams had hard and intense routes and for it to end like that without a intense final is anti climatic and BS. Do the right thing Kincaid  ~Dead computer 2nd CR Cpt Volubad xx
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: ~Felix~ on October 30, 2019, 06:59:53 pm
Spoiler
Spoiler
I mean this is the only time 19th will become relevant in any type of comp event. Also he is just b8ing you Wolffe!
I know (which makes it worse)
I just wish we could let things in the past between the 92nd and the 19th.

We only dislike Vegi and one of your NCOs who was rude to us and the 1stEB, Polar or something his name was. Kieran told Archibald this when they spoke a week ago or so.

That comment was setup to bait Vegi actually, not you or the other members of your team. Then again nobody really likes Vegi that's why he gets warned constantly :dab:.

(Side note we only lost 1 match as well)

Literally just made a FSE forumn account for this.

Presidente, leave my vegi alone. Don't be a nonce. Literally no need to post this on a forumn that looks like something I made in 08-no offence-for a 10 year old game, got nothing better to do in your time? Coming on here dissing my reg and frens and then acting all high and mighty giving it "I'm smart everyone else dumb" etc etc. Doesn't really work pal.

Reminder for everyone complaining it's only a game, a 10 year old one at that. Maybe go for a walk or a cold shower, how about going to your room and visiting a site that ends in hub and having 10-15 minutes of you time and come back to us. If you lost, its not fun is it? But, its not something to get worked up about. The games a decade old, and is winding down, maybe spend the time enjoying playing with friends not complaining about one final that didn't go to plan.

^-^


[Cool signature showing I'm in the 92nd]


What a boring bastard. You just made an account to tell people to be "more productive" by doing the least productive thing possible.

Again, there should be a rematch or both sides given the win. -20 balance and a complete breakdown of admining being the main problems. Both sides agreed it was a mess. The admin agreed and so did the head admin? So the solution is a rematch.

The 59th and 77y gave so much to this community. The 59th approaching its 7th year and the 77y 9th year in NW. We deserved something better then this shit fess.

The NR4, 59th, 77y formed a coalition named 'The old Guards' because we wanted to end the game on a high. This has been the exact opposite. I have been involved with all three NWBCs and winner of the second season and this final has ruined the competition and its memory.
[close]
Lmao imagine crying about a game.

And to your point with the "oh look the 59th and 77y gave so much to this community". Who was the one who left NW for fuckin Holdfast. And see I didn't even notice that you left. I am sorry but we don't need ya regiments in the NW Community. I mean it's good and nice too see such old regiments in our community but don't think you are something better than other regiments. Btw I was also in the 59th my first regiment in my NW History but then you just give a fuck about your members and went to Holdfast and now you come back and cry.

Who r u exactly?
Pls u weren’t involved at all maybe for 2Lr even though nobody cares about opinion
[close]
Who r u exactly? xddd You was the one who beg me to join your dead Nr4 Regiment lmao. You write me everyday a Steam Message with words like "Hey we have a Event, pls come". Du bist einfach nur Schmutz. I can say my opinion. You are just sad because your Troll Reg is dead now.
PS: The 2Lr still exist :)
PS2: The Nr4 is not dead of course, they have just a break :D

So I am dirt oei ...
I am not the one who left 2Lr and regiment hopping around in the first place
Secondly ofc leaders write to their members if they show up that’s needed to get a properly amount of men’s. That’s the procedure every proper leader is doing to gather players if you never made this experience. Thirdly Idk but we have beaten the 2Lr in two big tournament one 9-1 and the other tournament 10-0 so both regiment has an different value in my opinion. You are that person which is trashtalking everyday to compensate some problems I would day. Ah and I forgot about sth we have beaten the 2Lr even in this tournament with our mates from the 59th and 77y. I don’t get the point why you are making an simile out of that.

To conclude you are an fucking troll being sad because you lost in two tournaments against us and Nr4 is not dead at all we are still able to bring our minimum of around ten players each event. And as far as I remember 2Lr is bringing the same.
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: sirkaide on October 30, 2019, 08:49:02 pm
Jeeez missed the “final”, what a shit show! Was a great tournament and by far is the most fun I’ve ever had in any competitive NW tournament due to the shear scale and the idea behind it. If a admin did fuck up with the rule of minimum numbers and if non-combatant players did pick weapons up or bait, then it should be classed as a draw/ both win. Can’t do the other team dirty like that... If the roles was reversed u can be damn sure I’m shouting at Mitchell and Wolfe to leave cus it’s BS. Yes it’s fucked up if we have 30 spec or something but rules are rules and adding in non-combatants is stupid and there is no way before or after you can justify it or control it so I’d say overrule it to a draw/both win. Both teams had hard and intense routes and for it to end like that without a intense final is anti climatic and BS. Do the right thing Kincaid  ~Dead computer 2nd CR Cpt Volubad xx
The voice of reason
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Ry@n on October 30, 2019, 10:05:11 pm
Jeeez missed the “final”, what a shit show! Was a great tournament and by far is the most fun I’ve ever had in any competitive NW tournament due to the shear scale and the idea behind it. If a admin did fuck up with the rule of minimum numbers and if non-combatant players did pick weapons up or bait, then it should be classed as a draw/ both win. Can’t do the other team dirty like that... If the roles was reversed u can be damn sure I’m shouting at Mitchell and Wolfe to leave cus it’s BS. Yes it’s fucked up if we have 30 spec or something but rules are rules and adding in non-combatants is stupid and there is no way before or after you can justify it or control it so I’d say overrule it to a draw/both win. Both teams had hard and intense routes and for it to end like that without a intense final is anti climatic and BS. Do the right thing Kincaid  ~Dead computer 2nd CR Cpt Volubad xx
The voice of reason
ye cuz that's what he's known for :/
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Voluble123 on October 30, 2019, 10:47:52 pm
Jeeez missed the “final”, what a shit show! Was a great tournament and by far is the most fun I’ve ever had in any competitive NW tournament due to the shear scale and the idea behind it. If a admin did fuck up with the rule of minimum numbers and if non-combatant players did pick weapons up or bait, then it should be classed as a draw/ both win. Can’t do the other team dirty like that... If the roles was reversed u can be damn sure I’m shouting at Mitchell and Wolfe to leave cus it’s BS. Yes it’s fucked up if we have 30 spec or something but rules are rules and adding in non-combatants is stupid and there is no way before or after you can justify it or control it so I’d say overrule it to a draw/both win. Both teams had hard and intense routes and for it to end like that without a intense final is anti climatic and BS. Do the right thing Kincaid  ~Dead computer 2nd CR Cpt Volubad xx
The voice of reason
ye cuz that's what he's known for :/
known for beating shit kids like you and winning tournaments :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Rikkert on October 30, 2019, 10:53:40 pm
Jeeez missed the “final”, what a shit show! Was a great tournament and by far is the most fun I’ve ever had in any competitive NW tournament due to the shear scale and the idea behind it. If a admin did fuck up with the rule of minimum numbers and if non-combatant players did pick weapons up or bait, then it should be classed as a draw/ both win. Can’t do the other team dirty like that... If the roles was reversed u can be damn sure I’m shouting at Mitchell and Wolfe to leave cus it’s BS. Yes it’s fucked up if we have 30 spec or something but rules are rules and adding in non-combatants is stupid and there is no way before or after you can justify it or control it so I’d say overrule it to a draw/both win. Both teams had hard and intense routes and for it to end like that without a intense final is anti climatic and BS. Do the right thing Kincaid  ~Dead computer 2nd CR Cpt Volubad xx
The voice of reason
ye cuz that's what he's known for :/
known for beating shit kids like you and losing to snappers in tournaments 8)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Ry@n on October 30, 2019, 10:58:31 pm
Jeeez missed the “final”, what a shit show! Was a great tournament and by far is the most fun I’ve ever had in any competitive NW tournament due to the shear scale and the idea behind it. If a admin did fuck up with the rule of minimum numbers and if non-combatant players did pick weapons up or bait, then it should be classed as a draw/ both win. Can’t do the other team dirty like that... If the roles was reversed u can be damn sure I’m shouting at Mitchell and Wolfe to leave cus it’s BS. Yes it’s fucked up if we have 30 spec or something but rules are rules and adding in non-combatants is stupid and there is no way before or after you can justify it or control it so I’d say overrule it to a draw/both win. Both teams had hard and intense routes and for it to end like that without a intense final is anti climatic and BS. Do the right thing Kincaid  ~Dead computer 2nd CR Cpt Volubad xx
The voice of reason
ye cuz that's what he's known for :/
known for beating shit kids like you and winning tournaments :)
he nibbled, also u try winning tournies in fucking kamikaze
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Ricky. on October 30, 2019, 11:03:29 pm
Jeeez missed the “final”, what a shit show! Was a great tournament and by far is the most fun I’ve ever had in any competitive NW tournament due to the shear scale and the idea behind it. If a admin did fuck up with the rule of minimum numbers and if non-combatant players did pick weapons up or bait, then it should be classed as a draw/ both win. Can’t do the other team dirty like that... If the roles was reversed u can be damn sure I’m shouting at Mitchell and Wolfe to leave cus it’s BS. Yes it’s fucked up if we have 30 spec or something but rules are rules and adding in non-combatants is stupid and there is no way before or after you can justify it or control it so I’d say overrule it to a draw/both win. Both teams had hard and intense routes and for it to end like that without a intense final is anti climatic and BS. Do the right thing Kincaid  ~Dead computer 2nd CR Cpt Volubad xx
The voice of reason
ye cuz that's what he's known for :/
known for beating shit kids like you and winning tournaments :)
he nibbled, also u try winning tournies in fucking kamikaze
join one of the many other gf teams that want you then
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: El_Presidente on October 30, 2019, 11:07:11 pm
admin i'm here for the linebattle ?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Ry@n on October 30, 2019, 11:13:18 pm
Jeeez missed the “final”, what a shit show! Was a great tournament and by far is the most fun I’ve ever had in any competitive NW tournament due to the shear scale and the idea behind it. If a admin did fuck up with the rule of minimum numbers and if non-combatant players did pick weapons up or bait, then it should be classed as a draw/ both win. Can’t do the other team dirty like that... If the roles was reversed u can be damn sure I’m shouting at Mitchell and Wolfe to leave cus it’s BS. Yes it’s fucked up if we have 30 spec or something but rules are rules and adding in non-combatants is stupid and there is no way before or after you can justify it or control it so I’d say overrule it to a draw/both win. Both teams had hard and intense routes and for it to end like that without a intense final is anti climatic and BS. Do the right thing Kincaid  ~Dead computer 2nd CR Cpt Volubad xx
The voice of reason
ye cuz that's what he's known for :/
known for beating shit kids like you and winning tournaments :)
he nibbled, also u try winning tournies in fucking kamikaze
join one of the many other gf teams that want you then
they cant afford me... i'm classy, not a basic whore
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Skittykiller on October 30, 2019, 11:40:13 pm
So bunch of argue i see. But what will it be? Rematch or let the score stay as it is?
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: Vegi. on October 30, 2019, 11:57:55 pm
So bunch of argue i see. But what will it be? Rematch or let the score stay as it is?
Imma say score has to stay as it is  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D :D :D ;) ;) ;) :) :) :) :)
Title: Re: | NWBC | Season 3 | Finals
Post by: 33rdKincaid on October 31, 2019, 10:36:52 am
Locking the topic for now as in my absence seems to have become a bit of a slogging match.

So people are aware where things stand; I am happy for a re-match to take place (with effort invested into making sure at least 2-3 refs are available) since the balancing rules were not adhered to. I cannot however thank George enough for attempting to see this match through so we might finish this off! I am also aware that this last part of the tournie has dragged on ridiculously long, to the point where either team may have just lost interest in seeing it to completion. When I last spoke to Mitchel and Highlord as to what they wished to do there was still some indecision, so will update when they know more since whether or not we re-play this final is largely in their hands.

Thankfully I have more time now to offer this my support if a final match is arranged :)