I think the round Stockholm refers to that (he says) I saved them from a round void, the 71st/96y line were extremely close and as such I think charging both of them was inevitable (Especially given the angle of the charge).
There was certainly some amount of RoL (people pushing reloads after being told to move out) from the 45thN side. There were also cases of 45thN players FiCing, throwing a bottle at Desant, using other partisani weapons BUT the 45thN themselves tried to slay their own players doing it.
The worst round was one of the close ones where I believe the 45thN Grens effectively formed 2 lines and fired into the side of the 96y(?). If Stockholm had got a better view of that, I probably would have agreed that was worth voiding, but he didn't get that good of a view of it.
Apparently that's not the first time it's happened so that's probably something that needs working on if that's true.
If anyone cares for a second opinion on what Stockholm is saying, the above is it.
Spoiler
Personal Opinion Summary: Given the melee skill of the 71st/96y I don't think they played too well. Equally the 45thN bent the rules a bit today. There you go!