Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Regiments (Game Clans) / Re: 44th Regiment of Foot
« Last post by Lord Telering on Today at 09:56:15 pm »
Okay, will be changed.
2
Regiments (Game Clans) / Re: 44th Regiment of Foot
« Last post by LithuanianEuro on Today at 09:54:44 pm »
The second one,also the one you have as a profile picture,you can see it here:
http://www.fsegames.eu/forum/index.php?topic=37116.30

I meant no offense guys just warnin ya before something happens.
4
Ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.
5
Regiments (Game Clans) / Re: 44th Regiment of Foot
« Last post by Lord Telering on Today at 09:51:18 pm »
Lithuanian, you mean the whole image or the pictures in it? Because these can be found on Google.
6
Regiments (Game Clans) / Re: 44th Regiment of Foot
« Last post by PotatoKuzzle on Today at 09:46:09 pm »
Nice stolen artwork.That belongs to Marks I believe,ask him for permission.
Artwork will be changed.
7
Regiments (Game Clans) / Re: 44th Regiment of Foot
« Last post by Lord Telering on Today at 09:45:29 pm »
I made this with a template which a friend of me created: https://ibb.co/ctDcik. I have no idea who Marks is, but if he considers this as stolen, I will of course remove it.
8
Other Games / Re: Holdfast: Nations at War
« Last post by Windflower on Today at 09:44:44 pm »
Ideally you would be trained, but sometimes it's better to have someone who knows little about how the guns work ramming charges than to not have the guns firing at all.

I can see where you're coming from with the 'splitting a line to man guns' argument though, which was one I had not considered. I envisioned the feature as enabling an infantry regiment to send a man or two to a suddenly understaffed gun, rather than entire units disregarding the artillery class completely. Hyper-competitive people ruin everything for us. :D (Perhaps that is something that could become a server toggle-able option, up to the admins of a particular event or server to choose to make use of?)
Or just put artillery class in the game..
9
Off Topic / Re: The General Political Thread
« Last post by Olafson on Today at 09:42:36 pm »
Like maybe making sure all of your citizens are given proper healthcare. Not fucking the environment could be a priority too.
So you want to take away thousands of jobs and GDP  to instead use that money to increase spending on already trillion dollar programs? Nice
Did I say that? Just it's clear that America chooses to increase its budget in a department that doesn't need extra funding and cut funding for areas that do need it.

Exactly.
10
Other Games / Re: Holdfast: Nations at War
« Last post by TheBoberton on Today at 09:37:00 pm »
Still, but what's the point? Like surely none of you enjoy having long arguments about a sub-par game lmao.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10