Yeah, they are... We are making huge progress in the coding part of the game, but there is not much we can show you... I guess showing you C# code is not that interesting :P We will get back to longer Devblogs soon!I don't mind it at all, this early in the stage of making a game should be making the frame. I like checking up on the game but if you don't have anything then I'm fine. Safe in the thought you guys are working hard on it.
I have to say although personally i have no interest in the civil war, i think this is a really high quality model and it make me consider wanting to play this game :)
Looking good guys! I could not tell but do you have Arsenal Markings on yhe Lock plate..... Just curious 8)
My money is in some damn good hands!
My money is in some damn good hands!
Safer than banks these days :p
I wonder how i will look in-game. Will the fps be omptimized to shoot from the ironsight?I hope so.
That's very interesting that the game is developed under C#, I thought it's written in Python or something like that.
That's very interesting that the game is developed under C#, I thought it's written in Python or something like that.
Warband was...totally new engine.
That's very interesting that the game is developed under C#, I thought it's written in Python or something like that.
Warband was...totally new engine.
The Unity engine will be a lot nicer and hopefully it will be a lot better in terms of graphics, smoothness of play and hopefully a lot less buggy
I guess showing you C# code is not that interesting
Nevermind, the question above me answered my question.
Second question, if you do add the 1861 Springfield, how about the 1852 Mississippi?
shouldn't the barell be blued for an Enfield?
I'll give you the bottom line right up front: there is no period evidence to support an all-or-none stand on either side. That is, there is no clear-cut period evidence to support an opinion that either a blued or bright finish is more authentic. Of course, this could be modified for specific units at specific times and locations, but as a general rule, both Federals and Confederates used Enfields that were both blued and bright, and in-depth research does not indicate that either finish was in enough of a majority to be the clear-cut more authentic choice for the finish on a repro Enfield today. So to those who put out the all-or-none rule … that all (or the vast majority) Enfields were exported to America with bright finishes or were struck bright once they got here, thus, all repro Enfields must be bright in order to be authentic … sorry, folks, it just isn't true, and you can’t back it up with period evidence.