PSG started with the 31e and scraps of Andee's regiment, what that regiment managed to accomplish with its members in its time is something you gotta put respek on.
Multiple regiments have taken scraps from bad regiments and made something good. In fact, most regiments are formed that way.
Not just the PSG either. Ever since the 30th came back we've stayed as a highly competitive regiment and always been considered the top competition in NA.
There's no competition to begin with. Claiming to be competitive when a huge majority of veteran leaders like Millander and co are all gone is both redundant and irrelevant. Competitive in NW's wasteland period? I never knew that's something to be proud of, who would have known. PSG never advanced to league 1 and stayed in the sissy league their entire time and winning it once despite League 2 being trash because it's league 2. Congrats to the King of Baddies
Neither the 30th or PSG regiments have had to crutch on melee and we lasted a damn long time in the community, I attribute that to strong leadership.
In a game where melee is 90% and regiments who can't compete are forced to shoot more is some sort of sign of being better is both the dumbest and stupidest thing I've ever heard. Your regiment start date is nothing. Regiments have formed out of nothing and become something in 1/10th of the time you did with any of your affiliated regiments. The 3e, 12th, 9y and many others have reformed multiple times and each time they've been better you in less then a week. If you're so 'strong' then how can a newly formed regiment suddenly eclipse you? Really seems like that shooting practice sure is helping you out! It's almost like melee is what it takes to be good!
Waste I'm sorry but look at the regiments you've created and compare them to what the accomplishments of the 30th/PSG. You aren't really a good leader and you're not really capable of leading a regiment without other officers there all the time. On top of that you've struggled to lead regiments for a sustained period of time.
This is potentially the worst attempt at b8 I've seen in a long ass time. Waste may not be the greatest leader in NW, but he's more then you. The LG has won leagues and tournaments, he's been a great caller during our melee's alongside Russian, he can hold his own and melee excellently, is capable of doing all of this with massive ping spikes, and made the LG out of the scraps of the 71st with only Russian and a few other NCO's/Co's. In fact, comparing your regiments to Waste, Waste accomplished far more then you ever did. He won multiple intense linebattles with the 3eVolt, you know, a regiment that you have probably never beaten, and other top regiments with a combination of melee and shooting, not sitting in the back like a bunch of losers who can't seem to grasp that they're inferior and will never be relevant so long as the LG or 3e are around. Not to mention he beat you in the Nr37 which was leagues worse then the LG (sorry Waste)
As a matter of fact, you lost to Waste in NWL well before the LG. Hell, you even lost to fucking Deadeye. D E A D E Y E
William don't be ignant, and don't even talk.
inb4 'huhuehueuheuhue wowowow will u f3ll for mei b888888 huheuhueueh'.
Pathetic.
Except those two scrap regs were really bad. No, most regiments are not formed by fucked merges. Do you know what competition means brutha? Don't act like there's no competition between regiments nowadays or in the past 3 years. Be an oldfag all you want but your viewpoints are very outdated. PSG was actually top level for a bit considering they tied the 3eVolt (then lost the tiebreaker). Considering the amount of unknowns we had in our regiment, how well we did was pretty good, and if you don't agree with me, then you're fucked Will. Must be nice always being in the best regiments. 63e, 71st, LG, right
So you're saying leading is the dumbest and stupidest thing, riight. Melee isn't 90% what the fuck is that statistic, leading + shooting get you far if you use them right. The regiment start date is important, it shows that the leader can actually keep a regiment together and not just be a failure of a person. The reason these regiments are so strong right away is because they are veteran players man. They have obsessive melee disorder in their communities from playing the game for so long. William your logic is really black/white, I didn't expect you to know much about leading but wew.
I really can't see the LG's winning of leagues and tournaments being legit after that merge with the 45e. Now that is pathetic, they could not compete with the 3eVolt and that's what they had to do. Import members into their regiment to become a steroid wagon. That match in NWL vs Nr37 was actually a tie, but both regiments had double reggers and they gave the Nr37 the 6-4. Also the PSG later 9-1'd Deadeye in TNWL for our revenge.
All I'm hearing from Waste about you is "hes not the best leader but hes good at melee." And w0w it must be so hard to make a good regiment out of the former best regiment at the time (71st). It's real easy for you to call the 30th hill campers, that's really funny. The LG were doing an equal amount of it in our NAPL match, sure we were defensive obviously because we knew we could get the upper hand in shooting and outleading Russian before getting into melee.
William as for yourself, I don't know if you've ever tried leading a regiment, you probably have, and if I had to guess how it turned out, I'd say it was probably a failure. It's really shows how good the leadership is in a regiment if they can manage to stay competitive constantly with changing rosters/members over the years and develop a solid community.
man I miss cringey 63e Will..
