This is good and should be kept
I would agree, But there are some regiments who shouldnt be so high up or there at all 
I can name a few. I think the 3rd should be higher considering they drew with the 44th, 44th beat 59th, 44th drew with the 78th (beat them but a round was taken 
) and lost a close 7-3 to the 91st so with that in mind give old Super/merfie their correct position. I can see this dieing anyways so ya GL!
Hi Marks,
As I said in the introduction, the system is far from perfect and I agree that the current position of the 3rd Regiment of Foot is questionable. As more games are played then the 'T' aspect of the formula will become more accurate; this in turn will make the table far more reflective of reality. I finished calculating the new 'T' multipliers last night and as long the 3rd keep their form . . . It is likely that they will shoot up in the rankings next time around.
This a GREAT Idea ! 
Just one question, are you only taking the NWL matches in this score ?
Hi Cazazar,
The current system only takes Premier and 2nd League NWL matches into account. In the future I would like this to expanded to as many games as possible. The reason that NWL was picked was because of its wealth of regiments, it is fully open with its results and all regiment us the same rules. That is something that can not necessarily be carried out across the whole community.
You put an army on a list of regiments? This is a horrible idea and you're an idiot.
Hello Skils4Evil,
Firstly I appreciate the kind sentiment
Why don't you like the idea? I want to make a system everyone likes
Extra detail would really help.
Quick note to John Price.
The 18e are a really good regiment and its unfortunate that you guys fall in the 3rd League. You should rightfully have a place in the rankings but it would mean that I have to calculate all the 3rd Leagues scores which would dramatically improve my work load.
Sorry m9ey
